Despite rapid growth in adult free-college (“reconnect”) programs, little is known about their impact on the enrollment of adults. We leverage the 2020 rollout of Michigan Reconnect to estimate causal impacts of a statewide adult free community college program on adult enrollment overall and enrollment of adults by gender, enrollment intensity, and age. We show that Michigan Reconnect significantly increased adult enrollment in community colleges by 38% (roughly 620 students), with larger gains among women and younger adults (ages 25–34). However, we show these increases were entirely driven by growth in part-time students. We expand the empirical understanding reconnect programs, discuss actionable recommendations for policy and practice, and lay a foundation for future research in this area.
AndrewsR. J.DesJardinsS.RanchhodV. (2010). The effects of the Kalamazoo Promise on college choice. Economics of Education Review, 29, 722–737.
2.
BellE. (2021). Estimating the spillover effects of the Tennessee Promise: Exploring changes in tuition, fees, and enrollment. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 50(1), 1–28.
BuchmannC.DwyerR. E.YaoM. (2025). The deepening gender divide in credentials, 2000-2020: Continuity, change, and implications. The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 11(1), 154–177.
5.
BurlandE.DynarskiS.MichelmoreK.OwenS.RaghuramanS. (2023). The power of certainty: Experimental evidence on the effective design of free tuition programs. American Economic Review: Insights, 5(3), 293–310.
6.
CollomG. D. (2023). A quasi-experimental investigation of adult student enrollment responses to the Tennessee Reconnect Grant. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 47(7), 478–493.
7.
DynarskiS.LibassiC.MichelmoreK.OwenS. (2021). Closing the gap: The effect of reducing complexity and uncertainty in college pricing on the choices of low-income students. American Economic Review, 111(6), 1721–1756.
8.
DynarskiS.PageL. C.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2022). College costs, financial aid, and student decisions (Working Paper No. 30275). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w30275
GoodchildA. (2017). Part-time students in transition: Supporting a successful start to higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(6), 774–787.
12.
GurantzO. (2022). Impacts of state aid for nontraditional students on educational and labor market outcomes. Journal of Human Resources, 57(1), 241–271.
13.
HillmanN.OriansE. L. (2013). Community colleges and labor market conditions: How does enrollment demand change relative to local unemployment rates?Research in Higher Education, 54, 765–780.
14.
Huntington-KleinN. (2023). Linear rescaling to accurately interpret logarithms. Journal of Econometric Methods, 12(1), 139–147.
15.
HutchensM. K. (2016). Nontraditional students and nontraditional enrollment patterns: College choice, multiple life roles, and developmental education [Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University]. Vanderbilt University Institutional Repository. https://ir.vanderbilt.edu/items/e1ee4fed-aa0e-4551-935e-6f43bab85df8
16.
JaquetteO.ParraE. (2016). The problem with the Delta Cost Project database. Research in Higher Education, 57, 630–651.
LowryD.PageL.NurshatayevaA.IritiJ. (2024). Subtraction by addition: Do private scholarship awards lead to financial aid displacement?Economics of Education Review, 99, Article 102517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102517
19.
MacCannC.FogartyG.RobertsR. D. (2012). Strategies for success in education: Time management is more important for part-time than full-time community college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(5), 618–623.
20.
MayerA. K.PatelR.GutierrezM. (2016). Four-year degree and employment findings from a randomized controlled trial of a one-year performance-based scholarship program in Ohio. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(3), 283–306.
Miller-AdamsM.IritiJ. (Eds.). (2022). The free college handbook: A practitioner’s guide to promise research. W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
26.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Table 331.35: Percentage of full-time, full-year undergraduates receiving financial aid, and average annual amount received, by type and source of aid and selected student characteristics: Selected academic years, 1999-2000 through 2019-20. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d22/tables/dt22_331.35.asp
27.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2023a). Student enrollment: How many students ages 25 and over enroll in postsecondary institutions in the fall?U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/trendgenerator/app/answer/2/8
28.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2023b). Table 219.10: High school graduates, by sex and control of school; selected school years, 1869-70 through 2031-32. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d23/tables/dt23_219.10.asp
29.
NguyenH. (2019). Free tuition and college enrollment: Evidence from New York’s Excelsior program. Education Economics, 27(6), 573–587.
30.
OdleT. K. (2022). The power of “free” college: Reducing racial and socioeconomic inequalities in college expectations (EdWorkingPaper: 22–565). Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://edworkingpapers.com/ai22-565
OdleT. K.LeeJ. C.GentileS. P. (2021). Do promise programs reduce student loans? Evidence from Tennessee Promise. The Journal of Higher Education, 92(6), 847–876.
33.
OdleT. K.Wright-KimJ.CastrejónA. (2025). Whose last dollar? Estimating the effects of promise programs on financial aid awards. The Journal of Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2025.2455332
34.
OrtagusJ.AllchinH.SkinnerB.TannerM.McFarlinI. (2025). Experimental evidence of the impact of re-enrollment campaigns on long-term academic outcomes. Education Finance and Policy, 20(3), 494–515. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00434
35.
PernaL. W.LeighE. W. (2017). Understanding the promise: A typology of state and local college promise programs. Educational Researcher, 47(3), 155–180.
36.
PernaL.LeighE. W.CarrollS. (2017). “Free college”: A new and improved state approach to increasing educational attainment?American Behavioral Scientist, 61(14), 1740–1756.
37.
PernaL. W.OdleT. K. (2020). Recognizing the reality of working college students. Academe, 106(1), 18–22.
38.
PernaL. W.Wright-KimJ.LeighE. W. (2020). Is a promise program an effective use of resources? Understanding the implications of program design and resource investments for equity and efficiency. AERA Open, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420967633
SwansonE.WatsonA. R.RitterG. W. (2020) Promises fulfilled? A systematic review of the impacts of college promise programs. In PernaL. W.SmithE. J. (Eds.), Improving research-based knowledge on college promise programs (pp. 33–68). American Educational Research Association.
41.
TurnerL. J.GurantzO. (2025). Experimental evidence of college coaching on postsecondary reenrollment. Education Finance and Policy, 20(2), 214–235.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
