The growth of the public discourse on college completion and student debt has pushed policymakers and institutional leaders to implement a variety of policies aimed at incentivizing student completion. This article examines state-adopted excess credit hour (ECH) policies on student completion and median debt outcomes. Using a quasi-experimental approach, we find little evidence that ECH policies positively affect student completion. However, we find statistically large estimates that adoption of ECH policies increase median student debt. Students from marginalized backgrounds (i.e., first-generation and low-income) appear to be most adversely affected by ECH policies. As states face constant pressures for resources, the adoption of tuition-based surcharges does not significantly alter student course-taking behaviors, rather shifts the cost burdens from the state to the individual student for perceived inefficiencies in students’ course-taking behaviors.
AdelmanC. (2004). Principal indicators of student academic histories in post-secondary education, 1972-2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences
2.
AdelmanC. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
3.
AinaC.BaiciE.CasaloneG. (2011). Time to degree: Students’ abilities, university characteristics or something else? Evidence from Italy. Education Economics, 19, 311–325.
4.
AinaC.PastoreF. (2012). Delayed graduation and over education: A test of the human capital model versus the screening hypothesis (IZA Discussion Paper No. 6413). Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp6413.html
5.
AngristJ. D.LangD.OreopoulosP. (2009). Incentives and services for college achievement: Evidence from a randomized trial. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1, 136–163.
6.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
AttewellP.HeilS.ReiselL. (2012). What is academic momentum? And does it matter?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34, 27–44.
8.
AveryC.KaneT. J. (2004) Student perceptions of college opportunities: The Boston COACH Program. In HoxbyC. M. (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 355–394). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BahrP. R.TothC.ThirolfK.MasseJ. C. (2013). A review and critique of the literature on community college students’ transition processes and outcomes in four-year institutions. In PaulsenM. B. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 28, pp. 459–511). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
10.
BaileyM. J.DynarskiS. M. (2011). Gains and gaps: Changing inequality in U.S. college entry and completion (Working Paper No. 17633). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
11.
BastedoM. N.JaquetteO. (2011). Running in place: Low-income students and the dynamics of higher education stratification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 318–339.
12.
BehrA.TheuneK. (2016). The causal effect of off-campus work on time to degree. Education Economics, 24, 189–209.
13.
BelascoA. S.RosingerK. O.HearnJ. C. (2014). The test-optional movement at America’s selective liberal arts colleges a boon for equity or something else?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 206–223.
14.
BertrandM.DufloE.MullainathanS. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 249–275.
15.
BettingerE. P. (2004). How financial aid affects persistence. In HoxbyC. M. (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 207–238). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
BettingerE. P.BakerR. B. (2014). The effects of student coaching: An evaluation of a randomized experiment in student advising. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 3–19.
BoundJ.LovenheimM. F.TurnerS. (2012). Increasing time to baccalaureate degree in the United States. Education Finance and Policy, 7, 375–424.
19.
BoundJ.TurnerS. (2007). Cohort crowding: How resources affect collegiate attainment (Working Paper No. 12424). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
20.
BowenW. G.ChingosM. M.McPhersonM. S. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America’s public universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
BruckmeierK.FischerG.WiggerB. U. (2015). Tuition fees and the time to graduation: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37, 459–471.
23.
BrunelloG.Winter-EbmerR. (2003). Why do students expect to stay longer in college? Evidence from Europe. Economics Letters, 80, 247–253.
24.
BryanG. A.WhippleT. W. (1995). Tuition elasticity of the demand for higher education among current students: A pricing model. The Journal of Higher Education, 66, 560–574.
25.
CalcagnoJ. C.CrostaP.BaileyT.JenkinsD. (2007). Stepping stones to a degree: The impact of enrollment pathways and milestones on community college student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 48, 775–801.
26.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
CastlemanB. L.LongB. T. (2016). Looking beyond enrollment: The causal effect of need-based grants on college access, persistence, and graduation. Journal of Labor Economics, 34, 1023–1073.
28.
ChenR.WiederspanM. (2014). Understanding the determinants of debt burden among college graduates. The Journal of Higher Education, 85, 565–598.
29.
CochraneD.ChengD. (2016). Student debt and the class of 2015. Oakland, CA: The Institute for College Access and Success.
CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (1986). The causal assumptions of quasi-experimental practice. Synthese, 68, 141–180.
32.
CornwellC.MustardD. B.SridharD. J. (2006). The enrollment effects of merit-based financial aid: Evidence from Georgia’s HOPE program. Journal of Labor Economics, 24, 761–786.
33.
DavisE.AitchisonT.AllenE.GomezC.LairdS.RaczyńskaK. (2015). An investigation of student response to a potential tuition cap increase at Casper College. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 39, 192–198.
34.
DesJardinsS. L.AhlburgD. A.McCallB. P. (2006). The effects of interrupted enrollment on graduation from college: Racial, income, and ability differences. Economics of Education Review, 25, 575–590.
35.
DesJardinsS. L.KimD.RzoncaC. S. (2003). A nested analysis of factors affecting bachelor’s degree completion. Journal of College Student Retention, 4, 407–435.
36.
DesJardinsS. L.McCallB. P.OttM.KimJ. (2010). A quasi-experimental investigation of how the gates millennium scholars program is related to college students’ time use and activities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 456–475.
37.
DesrochersD. M.HurlburtS. (2016). Trends in college spending: 2003-2013. Where does the money come from? Where does it go? What does it buy?Washington, DC: Delta Cost Project.
38.
DoyleW. R. (2010a). Changes in institutional aid, 1992-2003: The evolving role of merit aid. Research in Higher Education, 51, 789–810.
39.
DoyleW. R. (2010b). Does merit-based aid “crowd out” need-based aid?Research in Higher Education, 51, 397–415.
40.
DoyleW. R. (2012). The politics of public college tuition and state financial aid. The Journal of Higher Education, 83, 617–647.
41.
DynarskiS. (2000). Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance (Working Paper No. 7756). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
42.
DynarskiS. (2002). The consequences of merit aid (Working Paper No. 9400). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
43.
FloresS. (2010). The First State Dream Act: In-state resident tuition and immigration in Texas. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 435–455.
44.
GaribaldiP.GiavazziF.IchinoA.RettoreE. (2012). College cost and time to complete a degree: Evidence from tuition discontinuities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94, 699–671.
45.
GlockerD. (2011). The effect of student aid on the duration of study. Economics of Education Review, 30, 177–190.
46.
Goldrick-RabS.KelchenR.HarrisD. N.BensonJ. (2016). Reducing income inequality in educational attainment: Experimental evidence on the impact of financial aid on college completion. American Journal of Sociology, 121, 1762–1817.
47.
GrodskyE.JonesM. T. (2007). Real and imagined barriers to college entry: Perceptions of cost. Social Science Research, 36, 745–766.
48.
GrossJ. P. K.TorresV.ZerqueraD. (2013). Financial aid and attainment among students in a state with changing demographics. Research in Higher Education, 54, 383–406.
49.
GunnesT.KirkebøenL. J.RønningM. (2013). Financial incentives and study duration in higher education. Labour Economics, 25, 1–11.
50.
HartmanR. W. (1972). Equity implications of state tuition policy and student loans. Journal of Political Economy, 80, 142–171.
51.
HeckmanJ. J.IchimuraH.ToddP. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64, 605–654.
52.
HellerD. E. (2006). State support of higher education: Past, present, and future. In PriestD. M.JohnE. P. St. (Eds.), Privatization and public universities (pp. 11–37). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
53.
HemeltS. W.MarcotteD. E. (2011). The impact of tuition increases on enrollment at public colleges and universities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 435–457.
54.
HemeltS. W.StangeK. (2016). Marginal pricing and student investment in higher education. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35, 441–471.
55.
HillmanN. W. (2013). Economic diversity in elite higher education: Do no-loan programs impact Pell enrollments?The Journal of Higher Education, 84, 806–833.
56.
HillmanN. W. (2015). Borrowing and repaying student loans. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 45, 35–48.
57.
HillmanN. W.TandbergD. A.FryarA. H. (2015). Evaluating the impacts of “new” performance funding in higher education. Educational Eval-uation and Policy Analysis, 37, 501–519.
58.
HillmanN. W.TandbergD. A.GrossJ. P. (2014). Performance funding in higher education: Do financial incentives impact college completions?The Journal of Higher Education, 85, 826–857.
59.
HornL.PaslovJ. (2014). Trends in student financing of undergraduate education: Selected years, 1995-96 to 2011-12. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
60.
HornL. J.XiangleiC.ChapmanC. (2003). Getting ready to pay for college: What students and their parents know about the cost of college tuition and what they are doing to find out. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
61.
HumphreysB. R. (2000). Do business cycles affect state appropriations to higher education?Southern Economic Journal, 67, 398–413.
62.
IshitaniT. T. (2006). Studying attrition and degree completion behavior among first-generation college students in the United States. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 861–885.
63.
JaquetteO.ParraE. E. (2014). Using IPEDS for panel analyses: Core concepts, data challenges, and empirical applications. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 467–533). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
64.
JaquetteO.ParraE. (2016). The problem with the Delta Cost Project Database. Research in Higher Education, 57, 630–651.
65.
KelchenR.Goldrick-RabS.HoschB. (2017). The costs of college attendance: Examining variation and consistency in institutional living cost allowances. The Journal of Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00221546.2016.1272092
66.
KimJ.DesJardinsS. L.McCallB. P. (2009). Exploring the effects of student expectations about financial aid on postsecondary choice: A focus on income and racial/ethnic differences. Research in Higher Education, 50, 741–774.
67.
KurlaenderM.JacksonJ.HowellJ. S.GrodskyE. (2014). College course scarcity and time to degree. Economics of Education Review, 41, 24–39.
68.
LeuvenE.OosterbeekH.van der KlaauwB. (2010). The effect of financial rewards on students’ achievement: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8, 1243–1265.
69.
LinJ. Y.CaiF.LiZ. (1998). Competition, policy burdens, and state-owned enterprise reform. The American Economic Review, 88, 422–427.
70.
LooneyA.YannelisC. (2015). A crisis in student loans? How changes in the characteristics of borrowers and in the institutions they attended contributed to rising loan defaults. Washington, DC: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.
71.
MaJ.BaumS.PenderM.WelchM. (2016). Trends in college pricing. Washington, DC: The College Board.
72.
McCormickA. C. (1999). Credit production and progress toward the bachelor’s degree: An analysis of postsecondary transcripts for beginning students at 4-year institutions. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
73.
McLendonM. K.HearnJ. C.MokherC. G. (2009). Partisans, professionals, and power: The role of political factors in state higher education funding. The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 686–713.
74.
MeyerB. (1995). Natural and quasi-natural experiments in economics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 12, 151–162.
75.
MonksJ. (1997). The impact of college timing on earnings. Economics of Education Review, 16, 419–423.
76.
MonksJ. (2001). Loan burdens and educational outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 20, 545–550.
77.
MonksJ. (2009). The impact of merit-based financial aid on college enrollment: A field experiment. Economics of Education Review, 28, 99–106.
78.
MortensonT. G. (1998). How will we do more with less? The public policy dilemma of financing postsecondary educational opportunity. In FosseyR.BatemanM. (Eds.), Condemning students to debt: College loans and public policy (pp. 19–36). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
79.
NoraA.BarlowL.CrispG. (2006). Examining the tangible and psychosocial benefits of financial aid with student access, engagement, and degree attainment. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1636–1651.
80.
Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. (2006). Excess hours cost State $62 million annually; university actions may help address problems (OPPAGA Rep. No. 06-58). Tallahassee, FL: Office of the Florida Legislature.
81.
PaulsenM. B.St JohnE. P. (1997). The financial nexus between college choice and persistence. New Directions for Institutional Research, 95, 65–82.
82.
PusserB.DoaneD. J. (2001). Public purpose and private enterprise the contemporary organization of postsecondary education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 33(5), 18–22.
83.
RadfordA. W.HornL. (2012). An Overview of classes taken and credits earned by beginning postsecondary students. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
84.
SavocaE. (1990). Another look at the demand for higher education: Measuring the price sensitivity of the decision to apply to college. Economics of Education Review, 9, 123–134.
85.
Scott-ClaytonJ. (2011). On money and motivation a quasi-experimental analysis of financial incentives for college achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 46, 614–646.
86.
St JohnE. P. (1990). Price response in persistence decisions: An analysis of the high school and beyond senior cohort. Research in Higher Education, 31, 387–403.
87.
TaniguchiH. (2005). The influence of age at degree completion on college wage premiums. Research in Higher Education, 46, 861–881.
88.
TintoV. (2010). From theory to action: Exploring the institutional conditions for student retention. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 51–89). New York, NY: Springer.
89.
TitusM. A. (2006). Understanding college degree completion of students with low socioeconomic status: The influence of the institutional financial context. Research in Higher Education, 47, 371–398.
90.
TriventiM. (2014). Does work during higher education affect students’ academic progression?Economics of Education Review, 41, 1–13.
91.
TurnerS. (2004). Going to college and finishing college: Explaining different educational outcomes. In HoxbyC. M. (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 13–62). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
92.
WeertsD. J.RoncaJ. M. (2012). Understanding differences in state support for higher education across states, sectors, and institutions: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Higher Education, 83, 155–185.
93.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2009). On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics Letters, 104, 112–114.
94.
ZeidenbergM. (2015). Valuable learning or “spinning their wheels”? Understanding excess credits earned by community college associate degree completers. Community College Review, 43, 123–141.
95.
ZhangL.NessE. C. (2010). Does state merit-based aid stem brain drain?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 143–165.
96.
ZumetaW. (2004). State higher education financing. In JohnE. P. St.ParsonsM. D. (Eds.), Public funding of higher education: Changing contexts and new rationales (pp. 79–106). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
