Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article presents new quasi-experimental evidence regarding the effectiveness of teaching-oriented faculty with tenure-track appointment, a model pioneered at the University of California (UC) system. Using data from six cohorts of students at a UC campus, we examine the impact of initial course-taking with three distinct types of instructors—tenure-track research faculty, tenure-track teaching faculty, and contingent lecturers—on students’ current and subsequent academic outcomes. Descriptive analyses indicate that tenure-track teaching faculty assume a substantially larger teaching load than either research faculty or lecturers. Using a three-way fixed effects model, we find limited evidence supporting differences by faculty type on either current or downstream student outcomes.

Keywords

achievement economics of education educational policy higher education teacher research econometric analysis quasi-experimental analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arum

Roksa

(2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Astin

(1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Benjamin

(2002). How over-reliance on contingent appointments diminishes faculty involvement in student learning. Peer Review, 5(1). Retrieved from aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/how-over-reliance-contingent-appointments-diminishes-faculty

Benjamin

(2003). Reappraisal and implications for policy and research. New Directions for Higher Education, 2003(123), 79–113.

Berube

Ruth

(2015). The humanities, higher education, and academic freedom: Three necessary arguments. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bettinger

E. P.

Long

B. T.

(2010). Does cheaper mean better? The impact of using adjunct instructors on student outcomes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 598–613.

Bok

(2006). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Braxton

J. M.

Bray

N. J.

Berger

J. B.

(2000). Faculty teaching skills and their influence on the college student departure process. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 215–227.

Brew

(2013). Understanding the scope of undergraduate research: A framework for curricular and pedagogical decision-making. Higher Education, 66, 603–618.

10.

Brew

Jewell

(2012). Enhancing quality learning through experiences of research-based learning: Implications for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 17, 47–58.

11.

Bush

S. D.

Pelaez

N. J.

Rudd

J. A.

Stevens

M. T.

Tanner

K. D.

Williams

K. S.

(2015). Misalignments: Challenges in cultivating science faculty with education specialties in your department. BioScience, 65, 81–89.

12.

Bush

S. D.

Stevens

M. T.

Tanner

K. D.

Williams

K. S.

(2017). Origins of science faculty with education specialties: Hiring motivations and prior connections explain institutional differences in the SFES phenomenon. BioScience, 67, 452–463.

13.

Carrell

S. E.

West

J. E.

(2010). Does professor quality matter? Evidence from random assignment of students to professors. Journal of Political Economy, 118, 409–432.

14.

Coate

Barnett

Williams

(2001). Relationships between teaching and research in higher education in England. Higher Education Quarterly, 55, 158–174.

15.

Condon

Iverson

E. R.

Manduca

C. A.

Rutz

Willett

(2016). Faculty development and student learning: Assessing the connections. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

16.

Crockett

D. S.

(2015). The ten most effective retention strategies for community/technical colleges (PowerPoint slides). Retrieved from http://docplayer.net/3064806-The-ten-most-effective-retention-strategies-for-community-technical-colleges-david-s-crockett.html

17.

Easton

J. Q.

Guskey

T. R.

(1983). Estimating the effects of college, department, course, and teacher on earned credit rates. Research in Higher Education, 19, 153–158.

18.

Fabert

(2014). Growth mindset training to increase women’s self-efficacy in science and engineering: A randomized-controlled trial (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://repository.asu.edu/items/25875

19.

Figlio

D. N.

Schapiro

M. O.

(2017, January 26). Are great teachers poor scholars? Evidence Speaks Reports. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/are-great-teachers-poor-scholars/

20.

Figlio

D. N.

Schapiro

M. O.

Soter

K. B.

(2015). Are tenure track professors better teachers? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 97, 715–724.

21.

Finkelstein

(1984). Education and the retreat from democracy in the United States. Teachers College Record, 20, 275–282.

22.

Gaff

J. G.

Pruitt-Logan

A. S.

Sims

L. B.

Denecke

D. D.

(2003). Preparing future faculty in the humanities and social sciences: A guide for change. Retrieved from the http://www.preparing-faculty.org/PFFWeb.FrontMatter.PFF4Manual.pdf

23.

Gordon

L. M.

(2012). Good teaching matters, teachers matter, and teacher education matters (Lecture). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED538614.pdf

24.

Gyurko

MacCormack

Bless

M. M.

Jodl

(2016). Why colleges and universities need to invest in quality teaching more than ever: Faculty development, evidence-based teaching practices, and student success. Retrieved from http://acue.org/quality-teaching/

25.

Hajdarpasic

Brew

Popenici

(2015). The contribution of academics’ engagement in research to undergraduate education. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 644–657.

26.

Hall

Sandler

(1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? (Project on the status and education of women). Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.

27.

Halliwell

(2008). The Nexus of teaching and research: Evidence and insights from the literature. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.

28.

Harlow

Buswell

Sato

(2019, March). Higher education administrators on the role of teaching (faculty) at R1 institutions. Paper presented at the NARST, Baltimore, MD.

29.

Harlow

Sato

(2017, March). Gaining insight into the UC system’s tenure track lecturer position. Poster session presented at the SABER, Baltimore, MD.

30.

Hattie

Marsh

H. W.

(1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 507–542.

31.

Hoffman

Oreopoulos

(2009). Professor qualities and student achievement. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, 83–92.

32.

Jaeger

A. J.

Hinz

(2008). The effects of part-time faculty on first semester freshmen retention: A predictive model using logistic regression. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 10, 265–286.

33.

Kezar

Maxey

(2013). The changing academic workforce. Trusteeship Magazine, 21, 15–21.

34.

Kezar

Maxey

(2014). Faculty matter: So why doesn’t everyone think so? Thought & Action, 30, 29–44.

35.

Kuh

G. D.

S. P.

(2001). The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s. The Review of Higher Education, 24, 309–332.

36.

Loes

C. N.

Pascarella

E. T.

(2015). The benefits of good teaching extend beyond course achievement. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(2), 1–13.

37.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Characteristics of postsecondary faculty. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_csc.asp

38.

National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. In S. R. Singer, N. R. Nielsen, & H. A. Schweingruber (Eds.), Committee on the status, contributions, and future directions of discipline-based education research, board on science education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education (pp. 119–139). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13362

39.

National Science Foundation. (2018). Overview of the state of the U.S. S&E Enterprise in a global context. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/assets/1387/overview.pdf

40.

National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. (2017). Current term enrollment: Fall 2017. Retrieved from https://nscresearchcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/CurrentTermEnrollment-Fall2017a.pdf

41.

Oolbekkink-Marchand

H. W.

Van Driel

J. H.

Verloop

(2014). Perspectives on teaching and regulation of learning: A comparison of secondary and university teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 799–811.

42.

Pascarella

E. T.

Terenzini

(2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

43.

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.

44.

Raisman

(2013). The cost of college attrition at four-year colleges and universities. Virginia Beach: The Educational Policy Institute.

45.

Ran

(2018). Does contractual form matter? The impact of different types of non-tenure track faculty on college students’ academic outcomes. The Journal of Human Resources. Advance online publication. doi:10.3368/jhr.54.4.0117.8505R

46.

Rawn

C. D.

Fox

J. A.

(2018). Understanding the work and perceptions of teaching focused faculty in a changing academic landscape. Research in Higher Education, 59, 591–622.

47.

Rivkin

S. G.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

(2005). Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417–458.

48.

Robertson

Bond

(2001). Experiences of the relation between teaching and research: What do academics value? Higher Education Research & Development, 20, 5–19.

49.

Romano

J. P.

Wolf

(2016, February). Efficient computation of adjusted P-values for resampling-based stepdown multiple testing (Working Paper No. 219). Department of Economics, University of Zurich. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2737429

50.

Schuetz

(2002). Instructional practices of part-time and full-time faculty. In Outcalt

C. L.

(Ed.), Community college faculty: Characteristics, practices, and challenges: New directions for community colleges (Vol. 118, pp. 39–46). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

51.

Schuster

J. H.

(2003). The faculty makeover: What does it mean for students? In Benjamin

(Ed.), Exploring the role of contingent instructional staff in undergraduate learning (pp. 15–22). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

52.

Seymour

Hewitt

N. M.

(1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

53.

Teichler

Arimoto

Cummings

W. K.

(2013). The changing academic profession: Major findings of a comparative survey. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

54.

Tinto

(2004). Student retention and graduation: Facing the truth, living with the consequences (Occasional Paper No. 1). Washington, DC: Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education.

55.

Umbach

P. D.

(2007). How effective are they? Exploring the impact of contingent faculty on undergraduate education. The Review of Higher Education, 30, 91–124.

56.

Umbach

P. D.

Wawrzynski

M. R.

(2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46, 153–184.

57.

University of California, Office of the President. (2002). Academic personnel manual. Retrieved from https://www.ucop.edu/academic-personnel-programs/academic-personnel-policy/

58.

uz Zaman

M. Q

. (2004). Review of the academic evidence on the relationship between teaching and research in higher education. London, England: Department for Education and Skills.

59.

V. Q.

(2017). Documenting instructional practices in large introductory STEM lecture courses (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1b15t5q8

60.

Wang

J. S.

Pascarella

E. T.

Nelson Laird

T. F.

Ribera

A. K.

(2015). How clear and organized classroom instruction and deep approaches to learning affect growth in critical thinking and need for cognition. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 1786–1807.

61.

Wooldridge

(2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

62.

(2019). Academic performance in community colleges: The influences of part-time and full-time instructors. American Educational Research Journal, 56, 368–406.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

Tenure-Track Appointment for Teaching-Oriented Faculty? The Impact of Teaching and Research Faculty on Student Outcomes

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material