Kentucky’s Targeted Interventions (TI) program is a statewide intervention intended to prepare non-college-ready high school students for college-level coursework. Using a difference-in-regression discontinuity design, we find that TI reduces the likelihood that students enroll in remedial courses by 8 to 10 percentage points in math. These effects are similar or stronger among students who are eligible for free/reduced-price lunch, students with remediation needs in multiple subjects, and students in lower performing schools. TI also increases the likelihood that students enroll in and pass college math before the end of the first year in 4-year universities by 4 percentage points and by 9 percentage points among free/reduced-price lunch eligible students. However, we do not find evidence of TI affecting credit accumulation or persistence.
AttewellP.DominaT. (2008). Raising the bar: Curricular intensity and academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(1), 51–71.
3.
AucejoE.RomanoT.TaylorE. S. (2019). Does evaluation distort teacher effort and decisions? Quasi-experimental evidence from a policy of retesting students (CEP Discussion Paper No. 1612). Centre for Economic Performance.
4.
BaileyT.JaggarsS. (2016). When college students start behind. The Century Foundation.
5.
BarnettE. A.ChavarínO.GriffinS. (2018). Math transition courses in context: Preparing students for college success [CCRC Research Brief]. Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
6.
BarnettE. A.FayM. P.TrimbleM. J.PheattL. (2013). Reshaping the college transition: Early college readiness assessments and transition curricula in four states [A State Policy Report]. Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
7.
BarryM. N.DannenbergM. (2016). Out of pocket: The high cost of inadequate high schools and high school student achievement on college affordability. Education Reform Now.
8.
BelfieldC.JenkinsP. D.LahrH. E. (2016). Is corequisite remediation cost-effective? Early findings from Tennessee (CCRC Research Brief 62). Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.
9.
BettendorfL. J.FolmerK.JongenE. L. (2014). The dog that did not bark: The EITC for single mothers in the Netherlands. Journal of Public Economics, 119, 49–60.
10.
BettingerE. P.BoatmanA.LongB. T. (2013). Student supports: Developmental education and other academic programs. The Future of Children, 23(1), 93–115.
11.
BettsJ. R.ZauA. C.ZieleniakY.BachoferK. V. (2012). Passing the California high school exit exam: Have recent policies improved student performance?Public Policy Institute of California.
12.
BoatmanA. (2012). Evaluating institutional efforts to streamline postsecondary remediation: The causal effects of the Tennessee developmental course redesign initiative on early student academic success [An NCPR Working Paper]. National Center for Postsecondary Research, Columbia University.
13.
BoatmanA.LongB. T. (2018). Does remediation work for all students? How the effects of postsecondary remedial and developmental courses vary by level of academic preparation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1), 29–58.
14.
BoylanH. R.TrawickA. R. (2015). Contemporary developmental education: Maybe it’s not as bad as it looks. Research & Teaching in Developmental Education, 31(2), 26–37.
15.
CalonicoS.CattaneoM. D.FarrellM. H. (2020). Optimal bandwidth choice for robust bias-corrected inference in regression discontinuity designs. The Econometrics Journal, 23(2), 192–210.
16.
ChenX. (2016). Remedial coursetaking at U.S. Public 2- and 4-year institutions: Scope, experiences, and outcomes (NCES 2016-405). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
17.
ChingosM. M.GriffithsR. J.MulhernC. (2017). Can low-cost online summer math programs improve student preparation for college-level math? Evidence from randomized experiments at three universities. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(4), 794–816.
DantasR. N.DuarteG.NetoR. D. M. S.SampaioB. (2018). Height restrictions and housing prices: A difference-in-discontinuity approach. Economics Letters, 164, 58–61.
20.
EggersA. C.FreierR.GrembiV.NanniciniT. (2018). Regression discontinuity designs based on population thresholds: Pitfalls and solutions. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 210–229.
21.
FayM. P.BarnettE.ChavarínO. (2017). How states are implementing transition curricula: Results from a national scan [CCRC Research Brief]. Teachers College, Community College Research Center, Columbia University
22.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99.
23.
GoudasA. M.BoylanH. R. (2012). Addressing flawed research in developmental education. Journal of Developmental Education, 36(1), 2–13.
ImbensG. W.LemieuxT. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615–635.
28.
JacksonC. K. (2017). The effect of single-sex education on test scores, school completion, arrests, and teen motherhood: Evidence from school transitions (NBER Working Paper No. 22222). National Bureau of Economic Research.
29.
JaggarsS. S.HodaraM. (2011). The opposing forces that shape developmental education: Assessment, placement, and progression at CUNY community colleges (CCRC Working Paper No. 36). Community College Research Center, Columbia University.
30.
JaggarsS. S.HodaraM.ChoS. W.XuD. (2015). Three accelerated developmental education programs: Features, student outcomes, and implications. Community College Review, 43(1), 3–26.
31.
JenkinsD.JaggarsS. S.RoksaJ. (2009). Promoting gatekeeper course success among community college students needing remediation: Findings and recommendations from a Virginia study (summary report). Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
32.
KaneT. J.BoatmanA.KozakowskiW.BennettC.HitchR.WeisenfeldD. (2019). College remediation goes back to high school: Evidence from a statewide program in Tennessee (No. w26133). National Bureau of Economic Research.
KolesárM.RotheC. (2018). Inference in regression discontinuity designs with a discrete running variable. American Economic Review, 108(8), 2277–2304.
35.
LeC.PisacretaE.WardJ.MargolisJ. (2019). Setting a North star: Motivations, implications, and approaches to state postsecondary attainment goals. Ithaka S+R.
36.
LeeD. S.CardD. (2008). Regression discontinuity inference with specification error. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 655–674.
37.
LevinJ.CarbucciaM.Adelman-SilE.DanksA. (2020). Kentucky targeted intervention program cost study. American Institutes for Research.
38.
LogueA. W.Watanabe-RoseM.DouglasD. (2016). Should students assessed as needing remedial mathematics take college-level quantitative courses instead? A randomized controlled trial. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(3), 578–598.
39.
MasterB.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2017). More than content: The persistent cross-subject effects of English language arts teachers’ instruction. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(3), 429–447.
40.
McCaffreyD. F.BellR. M. (2002). Bias reduction in standard Errors for linear and generalized linear models with multi-stage samples. Survey Methodology, 28(2), 169–181.
41.
McCraryJ. (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 698–714.
42.
MelguizoT.BosJ. M.NgoF.MillsN.PratherG. (2016). Using a regression discontinuity design to estimate the impact of placement decisions in developmental math. Research in Higher Education, 57(2), 123–151.
MokherC. G.LeedsD. M.HarrisJ. C. (2018). Adding it up: How the Florida College and Career Readiness Initiative impacted developmental education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(2), 219–242.
45.
OuD. (2010). To leave or not to leave? A regression discontinuity analysis of the impact of failing the high school exit exam. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 171–186.
46.
PapayJ. P.MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B. (2011). How performance information affects human-capital investment decisions: The impact of test-score labels on educational outcomes (NBER Working Paper No. 17120). National Bureau of Economic Research.
47.
PheattL. E.TrimbleM. J.BarnettE. (2016). Improving the transition to college: Estimating the impact of high school transition courses on short-term college outcomes. Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
48.
RanF. X.LinY. (2019). The effects of corequisite remediation: Evidence from a statewide reform in Tennessee [Community College Research Center Working Paper 115]. Teachers College, Columbia University.
49.
RoderickM.NagaokaJ.AllensworthE. (2006). From high school to the future: A first look at Chicago public school graduates’ college enrollment, college preparation, and graduation from four year college. The University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
50.
Sanchez-MecaJ.Marin-MartinezF.Chacon-MoscosoS. (2003). Effect-size indices for dichotomous outcomes in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 448–467.
51.
Scott-ClaytonJ. (2011). The shapeless river: Does a lack of structure inhibit students’ progress at community colleges? (CCRC Working Paper No. 25). Assessment of Evidence Series, Community College Research Center, Columbia University.
52.
SwailW. S.PernaL. W. (2002). Pre-college outreach programs. In TierneyW. G.HagedornL. S. (Eds.), Increasing access to college: Extending possibilities for all students (pp. 15–34). State University of New York Press.
53.
ValentineJ. C.KonstantopoulosS.Goldrick-RabS. (2017). What happens to students placed into developmental education? A meta-analysis of regression discontinuity studies. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 806–833.
54.
WimberlyG. L.NoethR. J. (2005). College readiness begins in middle school [ACT Policy Report]. American College Testing
55.
XieE. (2015). The influences of new rural pension scheme on elderly labor supply and well-being in rural areas. Journal of Finance and Economics, 8, 39–49.
56.
XuZ.CepaK. (2018). Getting college-ready during state transition toward the Common Core State Standards. Teachers College Record, 120(6). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1162833
