Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study investigates the interplay of socially responsible human resource management (SRHRM) and employee green behaviour (EGB) in the public healthcare sector. It examines how personal moral norms (PMN) and public service motivation (PSM) mediate this relationship, as well as how environmental transformational leadership (ETL) moderates it. The study applies Social Information Processing Theory (SIPT) to analyse these dynamics. We conducted a quantitative study using a questionnaire-based survey and a quota sampling technique. Our sample consisted of 334 nurses in Vietnamese public hospitals. We performed data analysis using structural equation modelling (SEM). The findings reveal a strong relationship between SRHRM and employee green behaviour. SRHRM influences employee green behaviour indirectly through the mediating roles of PMN and PSM. In addition, ETL plays a significant role in moderating the link between SRHRM and EGB. However, the moderating of ETL in this relationship through PMN and PSM was not statistically significant. This study is among the first to explore the interplay of SRHRM and EGB using SIPT in a healthcare context, offering theoretical insights and practical guidance for sustainable HRM practices in developing economies.

Plain Language Summary

Impact of Socially Responsible HRM on Vietnamese Nurse Green Behaviour: Does Environmental Transformational Leadership Matter?

This study explores how socially responsible human resource management (SRHRM) practices influence employee green behaviour (EGB) in the public healthcare sector. Drawing on Social Information Processing Theory, we investigate the mediating roles of personal moral norms and public service motivation, as well as the moderating role of environmental transformational leadership (ETL). A survey of 334 nurses in Vietnamese public hospitals was conducted using a structured questionnaire. The findings suggest that SRHRM positively influences EGB both directly and indirectly through the two mediators. Moreover, ETL enhances the positive effect of SRHRM on EGB. These results highlight the importance of responsible human resource management practices and environmentally focused leadership in promoting sustainable behaviours among healthcare employees.

Keywords

employee green behaviour leadership nurse personal moral norms public service motivation socially responsible HRM Vietnam

Introduction

Healthcare is not only one of the most trustworthy industries, but also one of the largest, employing hundreds of thousands to provide healthcare to millions of people. Healthcare administrators have a social responsibility and opportunity (Ozkan et al., 2024). Concerns about long-term sustainability rank high among healthcare stakeholders (Berniak-Woźny & Rataj, 2023). Given the gravity and consequences of environmental issues, environmentally conscious individuals are more likely to embrace ecological behaviours (Ha, 2023; Ozkan et al., 2024). Green behaviours are quantifiable personal actions that support environmentally sustainable work–life balance objectives (Norton, Parker, et al., 2015). Aslan and Yildiz (2019) recommended healthcare managers to adopt eco-friendly practices for social responsibility. Since healthcare spending is high, efforts should be made to find healthy, environmentally friendly strategies. Vietnam’s healthcare industry has grown to meet its population’s needs, but inefficient production and consumption, as well as inadequately treated medical waste, are causing environmental pollution. The Vietnamese healthcare industry has made significant contributions to the promotion of healthcare. However, the presence of more hospitals impacts human health, the environment, and medical waste. Present medical facilities are not at their full potential. Concerns are also mounting over industry pressure to acquire resources (Tseng et al., 2022). Nurses can help organisations implement green policies and initiatives. Indeed, the existing literature has documented several environmentally conscious nursing practices, including turning off computers when not in use, putting used items in their proper bins, sharing transportation, teleconferencing in place of staff meetings, editing files electronically rather than printing them, and printing drafts using waste paper. Sustainable practices also include asking leaders to strengthen the creation of a less polluted workplace and reducing waste during care (Akore Yeboah et al., 2024). Consequently, it is essential to understand how nurses are contributing to green initiatives at work (Zhou & Zheng, 2024). Employee green behaviour (EGB) has been defined as ‘scalable actions and behaviours that employees engage in that are linked with and contribute to environmental sustainability’ (Ones & Dilchert, 2012, p. 87). Incorporating corporate social responsibility (CSR) into human resource management (HRM) practices by fostering a positive work environment and offering various HRM modules for professional development can help socially responsible HRM (SRHRM) achieve its goals (Ha & Doan, 2024; Shen & Benson, 2016). This, in turn, can motivate employees to participate in EGB that aligns with the organisation’s CSR objectives. More research into the effects of SRHRM on environmentally conscious management is needed, as Zhao and Zhou (2021) have recently acknowledged. Through an analysis of SRHRM’s impact on EGB from a responsibility-oriented HRM standpoint, Zhou and Zheng (2024) clarified the conditions in which SRHRM promotes such actions. The extent to which SRHRM affects EGB in the workplace is largely unclear, despite the expanding corpus of scholarly work conceptualising SRHRM and EGB. Therefore, we investigate the societal effect of SRHRM practices on EGB among nurses to address this knowledge gap.

Using the SIPT (Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978), we elucidate the potential impact of SRHRM practices on EGB. SIPT proposes: ‘individuals, as adaptive organisms, adapt attitudes, behaviour and beliefs to their social context’ (Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978, p. 226), and cognitive processes mediate the nexus of social information and employee attitudes (Zhang et al., 2022). A personal moral norm (PMN) is the ‘moral obligation to perform or refrain from a specific action’ (Schwartz, 1977), with examples including recycling and energy conservation. Several studies have found a direct correlation between PMN and EGB, making it a crucial variable within organisations (Fawehinmi et al., 2020). PMN offers a conceptual bridge between broad principles and concrete deeds (Schwartz & Howard, 1984). Nurses are motivated to conduct their work in an environmentally conscious manner by PMN, an obligation-based intrinsic motivation (Fawehinmi et al., 2020; van der Werff et al., 2013). According to Fawehinmi et al. (2020), organisations’ responsible practices can improve EGB by affecting nurses’ moral norms. However, PMN may well be the understudied variable in the relationship between SRHRM and EGB. Nurses become intrinsically aroused and broaden their remit by participating in EGB, which enables them to positively impact the environment as a result of being inspired by the social values and goals behind CSR (Tang et al., 2024). According to Rainey and Steinbauer (1999, p. 23), public service motivation (PSM) is ‘a general altruistic motivation to serve the interests of a community of people, a state, a nation or humankind’. Academics have previously explored how PSM affects prosocial behaviour because many of its definitions emphasise altruism (Piatak & Holt, 2020). Ha and Doan (2024) demonstrated recently that PSM functions as a positive mediator in the nexus of SRHRM and civil servants’ moral behaviour. However, there is currently a shortage of research regarding the mediating appearance of individual-level factors (PMN and PSM) in the relationship between SRHRM and EGB. It is essential to comprehend the individual and organisational factors that are frequently interconnected with ethical behaviour. Studies have also examined macro-level factors, including the socio-political environment, culture and external stakeholders, in ethical decision-making (Chan & Ananthram, 2020). In this investigation, we primarily conceive of nurses as agents whose EGB is influenced by their PMN and PSM. Their capacity for EGB is activated and reinforced by such organisational practices as SRHRM and environmental transformational leadership (ETL). In the context of a developing nation’s healthcare sector, the integration of specific variables (SRHRM, PMN, PSM, ETL) into a single empirical model is crucial for the purpose of closing these gaps and offering a unique contribution to the literature. Environmental concerns in Vietnam have attracted growing attention from both domestic and international firms, driven by governmental efforts towards sustainable development. However, the implementation of effective environmental management systems has been hindered by weak infrastructure, ineffective legislation and inconsistent policies (Pham et al., 2020). As resource-intensive institutions, hospitals consume large amounts of energy, water and materials. Nevertheless, adopting simple and sustainable practices can significantly reduce their environmental impact (Nguyen et al., 2024). These context-specific challenges and opportunities make Vietnam a relevant setting for studying EGB in healthcare.

An organisational setting can influence an employee’s thoughts, feelings, and actions, as stated in the SIPT (Liu et al., 2023; Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978). As a crucial component of any organisation, leadership plays a role in communicating organisational expectations to employees, creating an atmosphere of shared perceptions, and aligning employees’ needs with said expectations through relationship-focused leadership behaviours. This, in turn, significantly impacts organisational outcomes (Liu et al., 2023; Piccolo et al., 2010). According to Robertson and Carleton (2017, p. 962), environmental transformational leadership (ETL) is ‘a type of transformational leadership that is focused on influencing corporate environmental responsibility’. Leaders who adopt a transformational approach that is tailored to environmental issues are likely to inspire their teams with a unified environmental vision (Crucke et al., 2022). Therefore, we emphasise the importance of ETL’s moderating role in enhancing the beneficial impact of SRHRM practices. Simply put, the present paper aims to clarify the interplay of SRHRM and EGB among nurses in public hospitals in Vietnam, using PMN and PSM as mediators and ETL as a moderator in light of the aforementioned gaps.

Literature Review and Formulation of Hypotheses

Social Information Processing Theory (SIPT)

Salancik and Pfeffer’s (1978) SIPT proposes that the workplace social environment affects behaviour and performance. Social interactions help employees understand their workplace. The workplace influences employee attitudes, perceptions and motivation. According to Salancik and Pfeffer (1978), the social environment – in this case, the organisation – provides cues for constructing and interpreting events related to positive organisational attitudes and behaviours. Managers’ HRM use helps employees understand their workplace (Aryee et al., 2012; Cooper et al., 2019) in terms of important information, desired behaviour and results (Cooper et al., 2019). HRM policies should be firmly established within the organisation with effective communication and unwavering organisational backing to maximise the societal advantages of environmentally conscious employee actions (Dumont et al., 2017). According to SIPT, adaptive people change their mindsets in response to their social surroundings. Cognitive processes link social information to individual attitudes (Zhang et al., 2022).

Social cues and personal needs influence workplace behaviour (Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978). When making behavioural decisions, employees often consult their superiors (Boekhorst, 2015), who, in turn, shape culture and inform employees (Huhtala et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2021). SIPT posits that a nurse’s understanding of their work environments and interactions with co-workers influences their work attitudes and behaviours (Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978). Scholars have consistently shown the relevance of SIPT to organisational leadership studies (Wadei et al., 2021). According to the theory, employees’ impressions of the organisation are heavily influenced by its leaders. Leaders represent their organisations because of the authority and prestige they possess (Mohammed Sayed Mostafa & Shen, 2020). This leads employees to believe that the organisation is responsible for their actions (Gilbert et al., 2011). Leaders are responsible for understanding and implementing the organisation’s policies and practices. To make sense of these policies and procedures, followers consult the data supplied by their leaders (Mohammed Sayed Mostafa & Shen, 2020). Employees can learn the organisation’s rules, regulations and expectations through their leaders’ everyday interactions with them. Employees’ attitudes and behaviours on the job will be impacted by this (Jiang et al., 2015).

Socially Responsible Human Resource Management and Employee Green Behaviour

Green behaviour refers to personal actions and choices that positively influence the environment (Fawehinmi et al., 2020). These actions lessen the human impact on the environment (Stern, 2000) and promote long-term environmental sustainability (Ones & Dilchert, 2012). Organisations should establish formal procedures for promoting environmentally friendly behaviour (Fawehinmi et al., 2020). EGB highlights the actions and behaviours of employees in managing the environment, as aligned with the organisation’s expectations (Paillé & Boiral, 2013; Zhou & Zheng, 2024). By aligning employees with organisational CSR goals, SRHRM provides a new perspective on responsible management and provides additional micro-theory to explain the link between SRHRM and individual outcomes (Zhou & Zheng, 2024). Implementing a human resources practice that fosters CSR enhances employees’ sense of affiliation with the organisation (Lee et al., 2023; Shen & Benson, 2016). SIPT states that nurses’ work environment perceptions, attitudes and behaviours are socially constructed. Nurses proactively acquire information and comprehend their environment (Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978). Nurses may interpret SRHRM using social information processing, which includes both internal and external stakeholders, ultimately impacting their EGB.

SRHRM is ‘CSR policies and practices directed at employees. As such, SRHRM is not only an integral part of CSR initiatives but also an important tool for its successful implementation as it is through employees that the objectives of CSR are achieved’ (Shen & Benson, 2016, p. 1724). SRHRM can help nurses process social information and assess the organisation’s external image (Lee et al., 2023). Norton, Zacher, et al. (2017) found that EGB generates value and is prosocial, thereby helping an organisation achieve its CSR goals. When hospitals implement SRHRM strategies, nurses often believe that external stakeholders are being prioritised. These SRHRM practices help nurses recognise how their work benefits others and boost prosocial motivation (Wang et al., 2023). Hu and Liden (2014) defined prosocial employees as givers who place others before themselves and strive to improve their communities. Thus, prosocial employees are more inclined to engage in EGB (Wang et al., 2023). SIPT suggests prioritising sustainable values during recruitment, improving employees’ communication and engagement skills with external stakeholders related to promotion, rewards, and compensation to encourage EGB (Zhou & Zheng, 2024). These fundamentals influence nurses’ decisions as organisational cues. After reviewing the literature, we formulated the following hypothesis (H1):

H1: SRHRM has a positive correlation with EGB.

The Mediating Role of Personal Moral Norms

Nurses are more inclined to view their employer as moral when they feel that they are internally accountable (Abdelmotaleb & Saha, 2020). Ellemers et al. (2011) found that socially responsible organisational practices and actions strongly influence employee morality. According to Abdelmotaleb and Saha (2020), nurses view SRHRM practices as a reflection of the moral and ethical character of their hospital. These practices include hiring and retaining socially responsible individuals, offering CSR training, and incorporating nurses’ social contributions into promotions, performance reviews and rewards. The SIPT states that observations, job behaviour, and others’ opinions are the main sources of information (Zhang et al., 2022). Managers portray the organisation as a social actor who upholds norms (Yam et al., 2018). Therefore, SRHRM practices communicate the organisation’s values and norms to nurses, which helps them understand how their organisations interact with stakeholders (Cooper et al., 2019; De Roeck & Farooq, 2018). Workplace practices and standards can strengthen or weaken morality (Elango et al., 2010). Victor and Cullen (1988) argued that individual traits cannot predict mortality. Organisational predictors significantly affect individual decisions. Organisational culture, rewards and beliefs strongly influence employee ethics (Elango et al., 2010). PMN are significant moral imperatives that compel employees to participate in pro-social behaviour (Schwartz, 1977), such as helping to protect the environment (Fawehinmi et al., 2020). Thøgersen (2006) defined PMN as an individual’s values-based inclination towards right and wrong. In this context, these feelings relate to environmental concerns (Fawehinmi et al., 2020). Accordingly, we argue that nurses’ SRHRM views can predict PMN.

Staddon et al. (2016) found that EGB has long-term economic and social benefits for the organisation; thus, EGB must be voluntarily adopted. Simply reminding workers of their environmental responsibilities can induce EGB (Fawehinmi et al., 2020). Bamberg and Möser (2007) stressed that EGB is ethically driven. Social discourse influences PMN, making it an individual duty. Schwartz and Howard (1981) defined taking responsibility as setting self-expectations for beneficial deeds and then feeling obligated to perform them. PMN is obligation-based intrinsic motivation. Energy conservation and recycling are part of this duty – employees may not enjoy it, but can derive satisfaction from it. While PMNs appear crucial to organisations, little research has linked them to EGB (Fawehinmi et al., 2020). Hence, we propose the following hypothesis:

H2: PMN mediates the nexus between SRHRM and EGB.

The Mediating Role of Public Service Motivation

Some scholars have perceived PSM as a collection of beliefs and values (Ha & Doan, 2024). Vandenabeele (2007) characterised PSM as beliefs and attitudes transcending self and organisational interests, driving individuals towards actions benefiting broader entities. Given the SIPT framework, we can deduce that SRHRM initiatives stimulate PSM. The notion of working for a socially impactful organisation (SRHRM) can enhance nurses’ sense of purpose (Ha & Doan, 2024). For example, when nurses sense their organisation’s larger societal contribution, they experience enhanced job meaningfulness. By focusing on nurses’ well-being through SRHRM strategies, hospitals signal a loftier mission to their staff (Glavas & Kelley, 2014). SRHRM undertakings also convey pivotal messages about organisational morals and trustworthiness (Hansen et al., 2011). Building on this notion and the SIPT, this study posits a link between nurse perceptions of SRHRM and PSM.

The function of PSM as a mediator between HRM practices and employee outcomes has been the subject of several recent empirical investigations (Abdelmotaleb & Saha, 2019). The PSM studies discussed here have improved our comprehension of the idea. However, several academics have called for additional research to fully understand how organisational practices and policies affect the growth of PSM (Gould-Williams et al., 2014). PSM ‘may be formed by socio-historical factors before employees enter the organisation, but it will also be influenced by the work environment in which employees find themselves’ (Moynihan & Pandey, 2007, p. 42). This forms the basis of our hypothesis that nurses’ positive views of SRHRM are associated with PSM. Intrinsically motivated nurses have a higher chance of taking actions that benefit the workplace environment. EGBs taken by intrinsically motivated workers are likely to align with their values and priorities (Sabbir & Taufique, 2022). Put differently, green practices are more commonly employed by nurses when they have ‘a general altruistic motivation to serve the interests of a community of people’ (Piatak & Holt, 2020). Building upon the foundation provided by SIPT, we anticipate that the improved PSM, resulting from perceived SRHRM, will enhance nurses’ EGB.

H3: PSM mediates the association between SRHRM and EGB.

Successive Mediation of PMN and PSM

As a set of principles for how one ought to act in one’s social environment, moral values encourage individuals to put their interests aside and work towards the greater good. Similarly, PSM encourages public servants to behave compassionately, put public values ahead of their interests, and act for the common good (Wang et al., 2020). The moral stance is intrinsic to and related to PSM-relevant beliefs and norms (Stazyk & Davis, 2015). Through socialisation, environmental reinforcement and value congruence, nurses with high levels of PSM can link institutional values to their morals (Stazyk & Davis, 2015; Wang et al., 2020). According to Piatak and Holt (2020), an example of a higher norm is the ‘commitment to the public interest or civic duty’. As a result, PSM’s results ought to align with the accepted social norms and values. Accordingly, it would make sense to assume that PMN can improve nurses’ workplace PSM.

Research has demonstrated that PSM extends beyond public institutions and encompasses a universal, selfless desire to serve the public (Wang et al., 2020). Regardless of whether one works in a public organisation, PSM is a combination of factors that motivate them to uphold social responsibility, stifle selfishness, and advance society – indeed, a range of prosocial behaviours have been linked to PSM (Piatak & Holt, 2020). We suggest a serial mediation model that connects SRHRM and EGB by taking into account the aforementioned arguments. Specifically, SRHRM, via cue signalling, will enhance nurses’ PMN, which, in turn, will benefit nurses’ PSM and promote EGB.

H4: PMN and PSM mediate the positive link between SRHRM and EGB.

The Moderating Role of Environmental Transformational Leadership

According to SIPT, leaders influence their employees’ thoughts and actions (Boekhorst, 2015). Leaders’ positive information exchanges change employees’ attitudes, behaviours and perceptions, thus improving the relationship between SRHRM and EGB. Leaders send these signals to ensure employees understand the organisation’s environment and then use that knowledge to shape their thoughts (Gu et al., 2018). ETL, according to Chen and Chang (2013, p. 109), is ‘leaders’ behaviours that inspire followers to perform beyond expected levels of environmental performance and motivate followers to achieve environmental goals’. ETL can inspire followers and set a positive example for environmental values and behaviour (Asghar et al., 2022). ETL can also consider environmental remedies (Robertson & Barling, 2017) and inspire their subordinates to improve sustainability and engage in more long-term thinking (Asghar et al., 2022). SIPT states that employees’ perceived social information affects their behaviour. SRHRM and ELT practices affect employees’ attitudes and behaviours, and the expectations placed on them, thus making them important pieces of social information (Liu et al., 2023; Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978). As stated in the SIPT, nurses are better able to comprehend the hospital’s expectations, goals, and direction when they receive highly consistent cues from leadership and the organisational level. When nurses’ values match ETL and SRHRM practices, EGB rates rise (Liu et al., 2023). Leadership that prioritises environmental sustainability has the potential to increase intrinsic motivation among nurses (Graves & Sarkis, 2018). Nurses who are morally committed to sustainability and higher ideals are more likely to accept organisational goals (Graves & Sarkis, 2018). Moreover, ETLs have the potential to boost morale from within by giving nurses greater confidence in their ability to solve environmental problems (Asghar et al., 2022; Graves & Sarkis, 2018).

Employees perceive both formal HR practices and leadership behaviours as signals of their psychological contract with the organisation. These two elements of the employee management system may interact in ways that are either mutually reinforcing, conflicting, or functionally substitutive, depending on their alignment. When contract makers’ signals are inconsistent, there is a greater chance of unfavourable synergistic effects throughout the broader set of employee management systems (McClean & Collins, 2019). These effects can occur when ETL and SRHRM practices convey conflicting messages, creating a weak environment where employees are unclear about the firm’s values (Bowen & Ostroff, 2004). Additionally, an ETL can take the place of SRHRM procedures by giving more casual feedback, being considerate of members’ needs and skills, or rewarding staff in other, less conventional ways. By appreciating EGB in the lack of official SRHRM procedures, they might also inherently encourage independence and discretion (McClean & Collins, 2019). Consequently, the consistent informational cues shared by SRHRM and ETL can be seen as trustworthy ethical signals (Lv et al., 2024). When combined, they can impact nurses’ thinking and decision-making in a way that promotes ethics, helps them better understand moral issues, and ultimately improves their PMN and EGB. These earlier hypotheses point to a paradigm of moderated mediation. In particular, the various levels of ETL determine the indirect impact of SRHRM on EGB through PMN and PSM. Based on the above, we propose the following hypotheses:

H5: ETL moderates the direct effect of SRHRM on EGB, such that the direct impact is stronger when ETL is higher rather than lower.

H6: ETL moderates the indirect effect of SRHRM on EGB through PMN and PSM, such that the indirect effect is stronger when ETL is higher rather than lower.

The current research model is presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Conceptual framework of the relationships among SRHRM, PMN, PSM, ETL, and EGB.

Methodology

Data Collection and Sample

Data for the study were gathered from nurses working in Vietnamese public hospitals between October and December, 2023. Before the data collection, a pre-test was conducted in person with a small but representative sample of respondents (n = 20). The objective was to verify the questionnaire’s construct validity by determining whether any of the statements were difficult to understand (Colton & Covert, 2007; Ha et al., 2022; Shadish et al., 2002). Pre-testing serves as an initial step to gather empirical feedback on the appropriateness of the draft instrument. Participants are first asked to complete the questionnaire, after which they evaluate its format, content, clarity, terminology, usability and completion time. They are also invited to suggest specific additions or removals. Based on their feedback, the instrument should be reviewed and revised accordingly to improve its validity and usability. The questionnaire was pretested for participant comprehension (Lewis et al., 2005). Responses to the pre-test revealed that some SRHRM items were unclear. In every question, ‘company’ was changed to ‘hospital’. Moreover, the terms ‘social performance’ and ‘social responsibility’ were also ambiguous, so we provided examples to elucidate. For instance, a hospital’s social responsibility goes beyond providing quality medical examination and treatment services to protect and improve public health, ensure fair and humane working conditions for medical staff, and protect the environment through safe medical waste management. Besides, ‘social performance’ measures how well an organisation manages its social responsibilities and helps stakeholders and society flourish sustainably. Subsequently, we incorporated these clarifications into the questionnaire.

The survey sought to gather information from public nurses employed in 10 public hospitals in Vietnam. To sufficiently reflect the population, the sampling reflected the demographic features of nurses. Specifically, we employed the quota sampling technique, which aims to include a specific number of respondents from subgroups within the population. We then used a non-random selection mechanism to continue until each subgroup had the required number or quota of completed interviews (Acharyya & Bhattacharya, 2020). Quotas were established based on hospital affiliation, departmental designation (e.g., internal medicine, surgery, emergency, obstetrics and gynaecology), and gender distribution, mirroring essential demographic and structural characteristics of the nursing workforce. The distribution of quotas was informed by workforce data supplied by the hospitals’ administrative divisions and publicly accessible health sector reports. Samples can then be conveniently drawn during this second stage. Nevertheless, quota sampling is not a suitable substitute for probability sampling. Quota sampling is prone to favour those who are eager, readily available, and interested in the research issue. Therefore, representative samples that are comparable to those obtained using probability sampling cannot be obtained through quota sampling (Yang & Banamah, 2014). Ultimately, 334 nurses representing 10 public hospitals in Vietnam answered the questionnaires (66.8% of the 500 that were distributed). Demographic information of the survey participants is summarised in Table 1. According to Garver and Mentzer (1999), a ‘critical sample size’ of 200 yields reliable parameter estimations and has enough power to test a model. Although the response rate was 66.8%, we did not perform a formal non-response bias test, such as comparing early versus late respondents (Armstrong & Overton, 1977), due to limitations in time-stamped data collection or lack of access to full demographic information for all participants. We acknowledge this as a limitation of the study and recommend future research to include such an assessment in order to enhance the robustness of survey findings.

Table 1.

The Respondents’ Demographics.

Characteristics	Frequency	Percent (%)
Gender
Female	250	74.9
Male	84	25.1
Age (years)
Below 30	28	8.4
31–40	134	40.1
41–50	111	33.2
Above 50	61	18.3
Educational level
College	12	3.6
University	210	62.9
Others	112	33.5
Working experience (years)
Less than 3	43	12.9
3–5	68	20.3
6–10	113	33.8
11–15	65	19.5
Over 15	45	13.5
N	334	100%

We thoroughly briefed the participants on the study’s objectives, methodologies, potential hazards and advantages. All participants submitted written consent before engaging in the study. The privacy and confidentiality of participant data were fully ensured following applicable regulations.

Measurement of Constructs

An evaluation was conducted for each question using a five-point Likert scale, where strong disagreement (1) represented the lowest score and strong agreement (5) the highest. We used a distinct scale to evaluate each construct. Orlitzky and Swanson (2006) developed the six-item unidimensional scale, which Shen and Benson (2016) further enhanced, to assess SRHRM. PMN was assessed using four items adapted from Fawehinmi et al. (2020) and Steg and de Groot (2010). ETL was assessed using five items derived from Graves et al. (2013) and Asghar et al. (2022). The five-item PSM scale was measured according to that used by Wright et al. (2013). Wesselink et al. (2017) developed the five-item scale for EGB assessment, which they adapted from Fawehinmi et al. (2020).

Data Analysis

Using structural equation modelling (SEM), this study analyses survey data from 334 nurses. While multiple regression and SEM are fairly similar, the latter is far more robust and offers more analytical flexibility. Error terms, correlations, interactions, and other independent and dependent variables can all be modelled using SEM (Collier, 2020). Through model validation and visualisation, SEM is typically used to explain multiple statistical correlations at once. This method makes it easy to explain complex models. It is an expansion of conventional linear modelling methods, such as multiple regression analysis, which are necessary to master SEM. Simply put, it is the simultaneous combination of multiple regression analysis and factor analysis (Dash & Paul, 2021).

One of the most significant limitations of SEM is the required sample size, which is widely considered extensive (Collier, 2020). Indeed, even the most basic models require extensive samples, let alone intricate structures (Hair et al., 2019). Study reliability, power and generalisability are compromised by inadequate sample sizes (Martínez-López et al., 2013). The sample quantity is a critical factor in the use of SEM. Despite the widespread consensus regarding the necessity of a large sample size for SEM, there is no definitive guideline for the selection of an appropriate sample size. Additionally, normality is a concern in SEM analysis. General least squares and maximum likelihood estimation are the most widely used methods for SEM estimation, which presume that the data follow a normal distribution. Goodness-of-fit measures may be impacted and standard error terms may be undervalued if this restriction is violated (MacCallum et al., 1992). Thus, researchers must confirm multivariate normality and rectify non-normality, and calculate the skewness and kurtosis of the data to evaluate their normality (Kline, 2016).

Empirical Findings

The Sample’s Demographics

Evaluation of Measurement Model

We eliminated Items 5 and 6 from the SRHRM scale, Item 5 from the ETL scale, and Item 4 from the PSM scale due to cross-loading issues, as well as Items 4 and 5 from the EGB scale due to factor loading under .5 before evaluating the measurement model (Hair et al., 2019). That the data follow a normal distribution is a crucial assumption to make at the outset (Collier, 2020; Ha et al., 2022). Skewness and kurtosis tests are used to determine the normality of the data. A kurtosis of less than 7.0 and a skewness of less than 3.0 are indicators of data normality (Collier, 2020). The normality test confirmed that the data follow a normal distribution, which showed that kurtosis ranged from −.101 (EGB3) to 3.805 (ETL2) and skewness between −1.559 (EGB1) and −.578 (PSM2). Following this, we examined common method variance (CMV) through Harman’s single-factor test because the same instrument was used to collect all indicators (Jordan & Troth, 2019; Podsakoff & Organ, 1986). The results showed that one factor explained 46.753% of the variation in the 19 variables, well below the 50% threshold. Consequently, the dataset seemed unaffected by CMV (Podsakoff & Organ, 1986). It is important to note that although Harman’s single-factor test was conducted to evaluate common technique bias, relying entirely on this approach has several drawbacks. CMV is not adequately evaluated by this analysis, and it frequently allows researchers to assert support for data that is, in fact, unduly skewed by CMV (Fuller et al., 2016). Thus, more robust approaches, such as the marker variable test (Lindell & Whitney, 2001) or a full collinearity test (Kock, 2015), should be used in future research, as they may boost the reliability of the results.

To ensure the validity and accuracy of the measurement tools, Hair et al. (2019) suggested examining composite reliability (CR), average variance extracted (AVE), and standardised regression weights, among other factors. According to Table 2, every AVE value exceeded the recommended threshold of .50, with ETL having the lowest value at .560 and PMN having the highest at .809. Furthermore, the CR values for all measures were higher than the recommended threshold of .70, with ETL having the lowest value at .835 and PMN having the highest at .944. All items also had standardised regression weights that were higher than the .5 threshold (Hair et al., 2019).

Table 2.

The Constructs and their Corresponding Measures.

Construct	Code	Item	Loading	AVE	CR
Socially responsible HRM (SRHRM)	SRHRM1	‘My hospital considers individual identity-social responsibility identity fit in recruitment and selection’	.814***	.745	.921
	SRHRM2	‘My hospital provides adequate training to promote social responsibility as a core hospital value’	.867***
	SRHRM3	‘My hospital provides social responsibility training to develop employees’ skills in receptive stakeholder engagement and communication’	.878***
	SRHRM4	‘My hospital considers employee social performance in promotions’	.890***
	SRHRM5	‘My hospital considers employee social performance in performance appraisals’ (d)	–
	SRHRM6	‘My hospital relates employee social performance to rewards and compensation’ (d)	–
Personal moral norms (PMN)	PMN1	‘I feel guilty if I do not act pro-environmentally at work’	.834***	.809	.944
	PMN2	‘I feel morally obliged to act pro-environmentally at work’	.912***
	PMN3	‘I feel proud when I act pro-environmentally at work’	.948***
	PMN4	‘I would violate my principles if I did not act pro-environmentally at work’	.902***
Public service motivation (PSM)	PSM1	‘Meaningful public service is very important to me’	.824***	.604	.858
	PSM2	‘I am often reminded by daily events about how dependent we are on one another’	.875***
	PSM3	‘Making a difference in society means more to me than personal achievements’	.761***
	PSM4	‘I am prepared to make enormous sacrifices for the good of society’	–
	PSM5	‘I am not afraid to go to bat for the rights of others even if it means I will be ridiculed’	.627***
Environmental transformational leadership (ETL)	ETL1	‘My manager displays confidence about environmental issues’	.753***	.560	.835
	ETL2	‘My manager talks about the importance of protecting nature’	.812***
	ETL3	‘My manager talks enthusiastically about what we need to do to protect nature’	.787***
	ETL4	‘My manager gets me to look at environmental problems in new ways’	.630***
	ETL5	‘My manager provides teaching and coaching on environmental issues’ (d)	–
Employee green behaviour (EGB)	EGB1	‘I make sure that air-conditioning is switched off when not in the office’	.879***	.783	.915
	EGB2	‘I print and photocopy double-sided’	.940***
	EGB3	‘I switch off my computer/notebook when I leave my office for a considerable period’	.833***
	EGB4	‘I switch off the lights when I leave my office for a considerable period of time, and there is no one else’ (d)	–
	EGB5	‘I recycle plastics’ (d)	–

Note. d = indicator failed. EGB = employee green behaviour; ETL = environmental transformational leadership; PMN = personal moral norms; PSM = public service motivation; SRHRM = socially responsible human resource management.

***

Significant at p < .001.

Henseler et al. (2015) suggested a method for evaluating a scale’s discriminant validity that involves assessing the Heterotrait–Monotrait (HTMT) ratio of correlations, which measures the degree of association between related concepts. If the ratio exceeds .85, the discriminant validity is compromised (Kline, 2016). The constructs’ satisfactory discriminant validity was confirmed by our study’s results (HTMT values < .85). The particular HTMT values derived from our study are displayed in Table 3.

Table 3.

Heterotrait–Monotrait Ratio Results.

Construct	PMN	SRHRM	PSM	ETL
PMN
SRHRM	.647
PSM	.579	.514
ETL	.554	.594	.468
EGB	.604	.549	.608	.468

Note. HTMT discriminate at HTMT < .85. EGB = employee green behaviour; ETL = environmental transformational leadership; PMN = personal moral norms; PSM = public service motivation; SRHRM = socially responsible human resource management.

With χ² = 367.351 (df = 142, p = .000), χ²/df = 2.587, standardised root mean squared residual (SRMR) = .0565, comparative fit index (CFI) = .953, Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI) = .944, and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = .069, the model fit statistics showed an excellent fit. This allowed us to confirm that the constructs were valid and reliable.

Evaluation of the Structural Model

A maximum likelihood estimation was then performed on the structural model to validate the hypotheses (Collier, 2020). The metrics used to evaluate the model’s fit are as follows: SRMR = .0701; CFI = .950; TLI = .940; RMSEA = .069; χ² = 408.069 (df = 158; p = .000). The fact that the χ²/df value of 2.583 fell between the 2 and 5 thresholds further demonstrates the model’s acceptability (Hu & Bentler, 1999). Therefore, the model’s goodness of fit was in the range of acceptable to excellent, as indicated by all of the fit indices (Ha et al., 2022). Different levels of statistical significance were demonstrated for each of the hypotheses. Table 4 shows the outcomes of the structural mode hypothesis testing.

Table 4.

Hypothesis Testing Using the Structural Model.

Relationship hypotheses	Expected effects	Standardised regression weights	Results
H1: SRHRM → EGB	Positive	.210**	Supported
H2: SRHRM → PMN → EGB	Positive	.142***	Supported
H3: SRHRM → PSM → EGB	Positive	.068**	Supported
H4: SRHRM → PMN → PSM → EGB	Positive	.187***	Supported
H5: SRHRM × ETL → EGB	Positive	.186***	Supported

Note. EGB = employee green behaviour; ETL = environmental transformational leadership; PMN = personal moral norms; PSM = public service motivation; SRHRM = socially responsible human resource management.

***

p < .001. **p < .010.

Direct Effect

H1 posits a positive correlation between nurses’ EGB and SRHRM. The path analysis results indicated a positive and significant regression relationship between SRHRM and EGB (β = .210, p < .010). Consequently, H1 was confirmed (see Table 4).

Mediation Analysis

A bootstrapping mediation analysis revealed the relationships between SRHRM, PMN and EGB. The permutation methods used approximately 1,999 permuted samples, while the bootstrap methods used 2,000 bootstrap samples per sample (Taylor & MacKinnon, 2012). The data showed that PMN significantly affects EGB and that SRHRM correlates with it. It appears that PSM mediates the SRHRM–EGB relationship. The bootstrap test also demonstrated that SRHRM indirectly influenced EGB consecutively via PMN and PSM. Table 5 summarises the mediation test results.

Table 5.

Results from a Mediation Evaluation.

Relationship	Estimate	Probability	Conclusion
H3: SRHRM – PMN – EGB	.142	<.001	Partial mediation
H4: SRHRM – PSM – EGB	.068	<.010	Partial mediation
H5: SRHRM – PMN – PSM – EGB	.187	<.001	Partial mediation

***

p < .001. **p < .010.

Moderation Analysis

The models used contained all of the relevant variables, including those acting as moderators, dependents, and independents, as well as an interaction term (Collier, 2020). A strong positive effect of SRHRMxETL on EGB was found through these models (β = .187, p < .001), thus supporting H5. To distinguish between the high and low values of SRHRM and to identify the two degrees of this variable, the moderating effects of ETL were mapped out (Dawson, 2014). As shown in Figure 2, the relationship between SRHRM and EGB was positively moderated by ETL, especially at higher ETL levels. Furthermore, H6 was not supported by the insignificant effect of SRHRM × ETL on PMN.

Figure 2.

The moderating effect of ETL on the link between SRHRM and EGB.

Moderated Mediation Analysis

Using SPSS PROCESS Macro 4.2 Model 86, the moderated mediation model (H6) was analysed and tested with 5,000 bootstrapping re-samples and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Table 6 presents the results of the moderating effect of ETL on the indirect effects of SRHRM on EGB via the sequential path PMN and PSM. For the sequential indirect path (SRHRM → PMN → PSM → EGB), the index of moderated mediation was −.0111, SE = .0072, with a 95% confidence interval (BootLLCI = −.0274, BootULCI = .0006) that narrowly included zero, indicating that the moderated mediation effect was not statistically significant. H6 was therefore not substantiated.

Table 6.

The Moderated Mediation Effect of ETL.

Moderator (ETL)	Effect	BootSE	BootLLCI	BootULCI
Indirect effect: SRHRM → PMN → PSM→ EGB
−1 SD (−.6632)	.0613	.0173	.0287	.0964
M	.0539	.0154	.0250	.0851
+1 SD (.6632)	.0465	.0147	.0195	.0773
Index of moderated mediation
	Index	BootSE	BootLLCI	BootULCI
	−.0111	.0072	−.0274	.0006

Note. LLCI = lower confidence interval; ULCI = upper confidence interval.

Discussion

This study sought to incorporate and expand upon current understandings of the interplay between SRHRM, PMN, PSM, ETL and EGB as related to the healthcare sector. Our findings from the SIPT show that EGB is more likely to emerge when nurses have a positive impression of SRHRM. Furthermore, PMN and PSM mediate the positive SRHRM–EGB link, and our findings lend credence to the idea that ETL moderates this interplay.

We can confirm a significant correlation between SRHRM and EGB (H1) based on our results. Zhou and Zheng (2024) found a positive correlation between SRHRM and EGB taken by employees in the workplace, which aligns with our results. Nurses have a better chance of experiencing belonging to a hospital that values CSR initiatives and prioritises them in HRM policies and procedures (Lee et al., 2023; Shen & Benson, 2016), which in turn boosts EGB. The SIPT posits that nurses’ views, beliefs, and actions stem from their collectively formed interpretations of the work setting (Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978).

Second, the findings confirm the substantial correlation between SRHRM and EGB, with PMN playing a partially mediating role (H2). This discovery is consistent with Fawehinmi et al.’s (2020) finding that PMN serves as an important mediator in the HRM–EGB link. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, no investigation has yet determined whether there is a connection between SRHRM and employees’ ethical attributes, such as PMN. According to prior research, it is crucial to analyse ethical issues as they are linked to the process of making ethical decisions (Fawehinmi et al., 2020; Trevino, 1986). Nurses’ EGBs are influenced by both internal (PMN) and external factors (SRHRM; Zhao & Zhou, 2021). The primary objective of SRHRM is to streamline the implementation of CSR and establish a conducive and safe workplace for nurses. This is achieved through various HRM practices, including offering comprehensive CSR training and taking into account nurses’ CSR contributions (Shen & Benson, 2016; Zhao & Zhou, 2021). These ethical endeavours could certainly help nurses establish ‘moral-cognitive frameworks’ (Zhao & Zhou, 2021).

Third, we also verified that PSM mediates the connection between SRHRM and EGB. Consistent with previous research (Abdelmotaleb & Saha, 2019; Ha & Doan, 2024), the results demonstrate a strong correlation between SRHRM and PSM. When nurses have a positive impression of SRHRM, they are more motivated to help the public. According to SIPT, which is supported by Zhang et al. (2022), SRHRM practices provide nurses with valuable insights into the organisation’s values. This finding expands the role of PSM as a mediator in the connection between SRHRM and EGB among nurses (Abdelmotaleb & Saha, 2019).

Fourth, the results demonstrate that SRHRM influences EGB via a sequential mediation process, bolstering PMN and PSM; this is an original discovery in the existing literature on PSM. A person’s moral code provides a framework for their behaviour in various social contexts, including those involving the public domain and other people (Wang et al., 2020). High PSM individuals are seen as ‘moral exemplars’ who strive to achieve their moral goals by deeply integrating self and public morality (Perry, 2000). The highest level of PMN is associated with public service motives, such as selflessness, helping others and working for the community interest. This is because public service transcends private interest and is grounded in personal principles (Lim Choi, 2006).

Fifth, this study found that ETL positively impacts the relationship between SRHRM and EGB, thus confirming H5. Despite the lack of research suggesting that ETL moderates the SRHRM–EGB link, previous works have shown a positive correlation between ETL and EGB (Asghar et al., 2022; Graves & Sarkis, 2018; Kura, 2016). ETL has a substantial impact on fostering EGB within organisations, both directly and indirectly, due to the inspiring attributes of ETL. Our work demonstrates the moderating effect of ETL on the interaction between SRHRM and EGB.

Last but not least, the moderating effect of ETL on the relationship between SRHRM and EGB via PMN and PSM is insignificant (H6 was not supported). The interaction between HRM systems and leadership behaviours may depend on cultural circumstances; therefore, we cannot conclude that leadership styles can always replace HRM (Zhao & Zhou, 2021). In Vietnam, where collectivism and power distance are prevalent, our findings support the idea that leadership can replace HRM. Because nurses can be attracted and encouraged to engage with the organisation through either one, investing in both SRHRM practices and ETL does not bring any further advantage and may even cost more (McClean & Collins, 2019). Thus, the relationship between leadership and HRM practices in different backgrounds remains unexplored. Additionally, the moderated mediation effect was non-significant (H6 was not supported), which can be explained by the characteristics of the study population. Nursing staff in public hospitals are required to comply with the code of ethics and other pertinent regulations (Bordbar et al., 2025). The present study suggests that nurses in public hospitals act in accordance with their personal moral convictions, guided by a thoughtfully considered set of principles. Having internalised core public service values, nurses in public hospitals are therefore more likely to demonstrate ethical behaviours (Mai et al., 2025). As a result, the moderating effect of ETL on the nexus between SRHRM and EGB via PMN and PSM was non-significant. Our study may have overlooked crucial elements; therefore, further research is necessary.

Conclusion and Implications

Conclusion

This study sought to use the SIPT to investigate the relationship between SRHRM practices and EGB in Vietnam’s public healthcare sector. We found strong evidence for the positive relationship between SRHRM practices and nurses’ EGB. Additionally, our findings add credence to the idea that nurses’ PMN and PSM play mediating roles in the positive correlation between SRHRM and EGB. Finally, ETL was shown to play a moderating role between SRHRM practices and nurses’ EGB. However, the moderating of ETL in this relationship through PMN and PSM was not statistically significant. Our research shows that SRHRM practices and ETL style are useful tools for healthcare organisations to encourage environmentally conscious actions among their staff. This is especially true for organisations with environmental sustainability goals and objectives. Furthermore, the behaviours assessed by EGB are relatively simple and may exert little influence. Subsequent research should replicate the model to explain more complex behaviours.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

Theoretical Implications

Our results carry substantial theoretical contributions. First, our findings strengthen the case for merging HRM with leadership practices (Liu et al., 2023). The literature on SRHRM and transformational leadership has primarily centred on the effects of ETL or SRHRM on organisational performance. Leadership and HRM research must immediately merge because both practices significantly affect organisational outcomes (Liu et al., 2023). Moving forward, strategic HRM should primarily focus on this area (Liu et al., 2023; Steffensen et al., 2019). As a result, the SIPT is enhanced by this study. According to Salancik and Pfeffer (1978), employees can pick up clues about what is expected of them in the workplace from their social surroundings. Organisations promote socially acceptable attitudes and behaviours by using the social context to construct meaning (Graves & Sarkis, 2018; Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978). Aryee et al. (2012) found that when managers use HRM, it gives workers an indication about how to interpret their work environment from a contextual perspective. HRM practices enable supervisors to direct employees’ attention towards key priorities, including relevant data, desired actions, and their outcomes. SIPT elucidates how interactions with important others, like leaders, impact cognitive and behavioural responses (Mohammed Sayed Mostafa & Shen, 2020; Wadei et al., 2021). Leadership signals like these help employees validate their perceptions of the organisation’s environment, which they use to shape their thoughts and actions (Gu et al., 2018). Due to the rarity of using SRHRM and ETL for EGB prediction, this study’s results substantially advance the SIPT.

Second, by delving further into the connection between SRHRM and EGB, our study adds to what is already known about this relationship (Zhou & Zheng, 2024) and its potential implications. PMN, an obligation-based intrinsic motivation, stimulates employees to conduct their work in an environmentally conscious manner (Stern et al., 1999; van der Werff et al., 2013). Our results imply that SRHRM improves PMN, which may influence EGB. According to Zhou and Zheng (2024), our research reaffirms scholars’ demands for a deeper dive into the inner workings of the connection between SRHRM and environmentally conscious actions taken by nurses. Indeed, our study is the first to examine the mediating effect of PMN on this relationship.

Third, this is the first study to explain how PSM mediates the nexus between SRHRM and EGB. Doing so satisfies Ripoll and Ballart’s (2020) request for studies examining the evolution of PSM and workplace ethics. Workers can acquire PSM throughout their careers, in addition to whatever PSM they may have before starting work (Vandenabeele, 2014). Research on PSM has helped us better understand the concept. To fully grasp how organisational policies and practices impact the development of PSM, many scholars have called for more research (e.g., Abdelmotaleb & Saha, 2019). In addition, no prior studies have established a connection between SRHRM, PSM and EGB.

Finally, as far as we are aware, this study is the first to investigate how ETL acts as a moderator between SRHRM and EGB. Additionally, our research agrees with previous calls for further investigations into the limits of the link between SRHRM and environmentally conscious actions taken by employees (Zhou & Zheng, 2024). Based on our findings, a stronger ETL used by the organisation’s leaders amplifies the impact of SRHRM practices on EGB. Leadership and HRM have been the subject of prior research (Liu et al., 2023; Steffensen et al., 2019), which this study builds upon. Employees’ perceptions of the organisation’s expectations for members are shaped by SRHRM practices and ETL behaviours, which are significant social cues within organisations (Liu et al., 2023). Leadership that is environmentally conscious, and especially transformational leadership, is essential for inspiring people to do their part to preserve the planet and bolster existing environmental protection programmes (Asghar et al., 2022). We hope that other scholars will find our work encouraging, and we intend to keep digging into the intersection of leadership styles and HRM. The effect of ETL behaviours on the correlation between SRHRM and EGB has been the subject of surprisingly little research. Hence, additional research on the impact of leadership on the relationship between HRM content and outcomes is needed (Liu et al., 2023; Steffensen et al., 2019). Therefore, this is a pioneering study exploring the moderating role of ETL in the SRHRM–EGB relationship.

Practical Implications

The results of this study have substantial practical implications for healthcare organisations that are interested in enhancing the EGB performance of their employees by implementing SRHRM and using an ETL style. Our study suggests a connection between organisational practices and individual pro-environmental behaviours, and that SRHRM has the potential to encourage nurses to participate in EGB. Healthcare organisations need to make SRHRM a part of their internal CSR strategy in order to motivate nurses to fully involve themselves in green and socially responsible activities. These actions not only support external CSR efforts, but also create a social-interest community that brings together internal and external stakeholders for everyone’s benefit. First, HRM departments should ensure that nursing staff understand SRHRM regulations and what is expected of them. For instance, training sessions and onboarding materials should talk about the hospital’s CSR goals, environmental programmes, and the parts nurses can play in reaching those goals. Clear communication increases awareness of, and motivation for, participating in green and prosocial activities. Second, hiring procedures should put applicants with a strong moral identity and desire to help society at the front of the list. Interview questions or screening methods may look at how motivated applicants are to work in public service and how involved they have been in social or environmental concerns in the past. Third, nurses should be given the knowledge and skills they need to be involved in CSR through regular training programmes. These could focus on how to run a sustainable clinic, seminars on health equity and community impact, or peer-led sessions on how to make ethical decisions in healthcare settings. Fourth, performance rating systems should officially include metrics for social and environmental performance. For example, nurses who help with hospital-led community health programmes or suggest eco-friendly measures should be recognised and rewarded. Hospitals can tie these contributions to yearly reviews, bonuses, or choices about promotions. Lastly, hospital administrators should create a work environment that supports prosocial norms by setting an example of ethical and sustainable behaviour and supporting team-level projects. One method to give nurses more power and responsibility is to create specific CSR task forces or green teams inside departments. This will allow them to take an active role in designing socially responsible practices. Healthcare organisations can guarantee the centrality of their CSR agenda by implementing SRHRM through these specific actions. This will improve both employee motivation and the long-term success of the organisation.

Our findings highlight the crucial role of ETL in enabling SRHRM to foster EGB. ETL should not be confined to upper management or sustainability units, but rather be embedded across all levels, particularly among frontline supervisors. Hospitals should prioritise leadership development programmes that equip nurse managers with the necessary skills to communicate environmental values, align team goals with hospital sustainability objectives, and address day-to-day environmental challenges. Supporting managers to lead by example in green initiatives can significantly enhance the effectiveness of SRHRM and the success of hospital-wide environmental efforts.

Limitations and Implications for Further Research

Naturally, this study carries certain limitations. First, we gathered our datasets from a cross-section of Ho Chi Minh City nurses working in the public healthcare system. Consequently, future research should include samples from different locations to assess the totality of the experimental findings. Second, this study merely examined PMN’s function as a go-between for SRHRM and EGB. No other variables were considered for their possible effects. Subsequent studies can undertake further investigations into the internal workings of the SRHRM–EGB relationship. Third, because intrinsic motivation is considered a strong predictor of job performance, motivational theories, such as self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985), can be applied (Norton, Parker, et al., 2015). Future research could address different levels of employee engagement with EGB by exploring whether different types of formal motivation can do so. Finally, our use of a cross-sectional design may have presented endogeneity as a potential weakness. Consequently, future studies may wish to use longitudinal or experimental methodologies to establish causality more definitively.

Footnotes

ORCID iD

Bao-Son Doan

Ethical Considerations

The Ethics Committee of Ho Chi Minh City Open University waived the need for ethics approval for this non-interventional study.

Consent to Participate

The participants were informed of the research’s purpose, duration and procedures; their right to decline and withdraw from it; the foreseeable consequences of declining or withdrawing; and reasonably foreseeable factors that may influence their willingness to participate, such as potential risks, discomfort or adverse effects.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Abdelmotaleb

Saha

S. K.

(2019). Corporate social responsibility, public service motivation and organizational citizenship behavior in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(11), 929–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1523189

Abdelmotaleb

Saha

S. K.

(2020). Socially responsible human resources management, perceived organizational morality, and employee well-being. Public Organization Review, 20(2), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-019-00447-3

Acharyya

Bhattacharya

(2020). Contemporary issues in social science research: Research methodology for social sciences. Routledge.

Akore Yeboah

Adegboye

A. R. A.

Kneafsey

(2024). Nurses’ perceptions, attitudes, and perspectives in relation to climate change and sustainable healthcare practices: A systematic review. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 16(2024), Article 100290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2023.100290

Armstrong

J. S.

Overton

T. S.

(1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320

Aryee

Walumbwa

F. O.

Seidu

E. Y. M.

Otaye

L. E.

(2012). Impact of high-performance work systems on individual- and branch-level performance: Test of a multilevel model of intermediate linkages. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025739

Asghar

M. M.

Zaidi

S. A. H.

Ahmed

Khalid

Murshed

Mahmood

Abbas

(2022). The role of environmental transformational leadership in employees’ influencing organizational citizenship behavior for environment well-being: A survey data analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(39), 58773–58790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19886-5

Aslan

Yildiz

(2019). How blameless are hospitals in climate change? An example of a province in Turkey. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 7(4), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2019-0023

Bamberg

Möser

(2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002

10.

Berniak-Woźny

Rataj

(2023). Towards green and sustainable healthcare: A literature review and research agenda for green leadership in the healthcare sector. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), Article 908. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20020908

11.

Boekhorst

J. A.

(2015). The role of authentic leadership in fostering workplace inclusion: A social information processing perspective. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21669

12.

Bordbar

Mehralian

Davarani

F. R.

Yusefi

A. R.

(2025). Exploring the relationship between facilitating factors and adherence to nursing ethical standards. BMC Nursing, 24(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02676-4

13.

Bowen

Ostroff

(2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2004.12736076

14.

Chan

Ananthram

(2020). A neo-institutional perspective on ethical decision-making. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(1), 227–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9576-x

15.

Chen

Y. S.

Chang

C. H.

(2013). The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1452-x

16.

Collier

J. E.

(2020). Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques (1st ed.). Routledge.

17.

Colton

Covert

R. W.

(2007). Designing and constructing instruments for social research and evaluation. John Wiley.

18.

Cooper

Wang

Bartram

Cooke

F. L.

(2019). Well-being-oriented human resource management practices and employee performance in the Chinese banking sector: The role of social climate and resilience. Human Resource Management, 58(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21934

19.

Crucke

Servaes

Kluijtmans

Mertens

Schollaert

(2022). Linking environmentally-specific transformational leadership and employees’ green advocacy: The influence of leadership integrity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(2), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2208

20.

Dash

Paul

(2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173(2021), Article 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092

21.

Dawson

J. F.

(2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7

22.

De Roeck

Farooq

(2018). Corporate social responsibility and ethical leadership: Investigating their interactive effect on employees’ socially responsible behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3656-6

23.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6

24.

Dumont

Shen

Deng

(2017). Effects of green HRM practices on employee workplace green behavior: The role of psychological green climate and employee green values. Human Resource Management, 56(4), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21792

25.

Elango

Paul

Kundu

S. K.

Paudel

S. K.

(2010). Organizational ethics, individual ethics, and ethical intentions in international decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(4), 543–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0524-z

26.

Ellemers

Kingma

van de Burgt

Barreto

(2011). Corporate social responsibility as a source of organizational morality, employee commitment and satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Moral Psychological, 1(2), 97–124.

27.

Fawehinmi

Yusliza

M. Y.

Wan Kasim

W. Z.

Mohamad

Sofian Abdul Halim

M. A.

(2020). Exploring the interplay of green human resource management, employee green behavior, and personal moral norms. SAGE Open, 10(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020982292

28.

Fuller

C. M.

Simmering

M. J.

Atinc

Babin

B. J.

(2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008

29.

Garver

M. S.

Mentzer

J. T.

(1999). Logistics research methods: employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity. Journal of Business Logistics, 20(1), 33–57.

30.

Gilbert

De Winne

Sels

(2011). Antecedents of front-line managers’ perceptions of HR role stressors. Personnel Review, 40(5), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481111154432

31.

Glavas

Kelley

(2014). The effects of perceived corporate social responsibility on employee attitudes. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(2), 165–202. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20143206

32.

Gould-Williams

J. S.

Bottomley

Redman

T. O. M.

Snape

E. D.

Bishop

D. J.

Limpanitgul

Mostafa

A. M. S.

(2014). Civic duty and employee outcomes: Do high commitment human resource practices and work overload matter? Public Administration, 92(4), 937–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12019

33.

Graves

L. M.

Sarkis

(2018). The role of employees’ leadership perceptions, values, and motivation in employees’ provenvironmental behaviors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196(2018), 576–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.013

34.

Graves

L. M.

Sarkis

Zhu

(2013). How transformational leadership and employee motivation combine to predict employee proenvironmental behaviors in China. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.002

35.

Chen

Huang

Liu

Huang

(2018). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between shared leadership and creativity in inter-organizational teams. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 52(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.135

36.

M.-T.

(2023). Green innovation dynamics: The mediating role of green intellectual capital and open innovation of SMEs in Vietnam. Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 15(3), 430–459. https://doi.org/10.1504/JIBED.2023.136753

37.

M.-T.

Doan

B.-S.

(2024). Exploring moral voice in Vietnam’s public sector: A study of socially responsible human resource management, public service motivation, and ethical leadership. Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 16(1), 34–62. https://doi.org/10.1504/JIBED.2024.139131

38.

M.-T.

Ngan

V. T. K.

Nguyen

P. N. D.

(2022). Greenwash and green brand equity: The mediating role of green brand image, green satisfaction and green trust and the moderating role of information and knowledge. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(4), 904–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12462

39.

Hair

J. F.

Black

W. C.

Babin

B. J.

Anderson

R. E.

(2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

40.

Hansen

S. D.

Dunford

B. B.

Boss

A. D.

Boss

R. W.

Angermeier

(2011). Corporate social responsibility and the benefits of employee trust: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0903-0

41.

Henseler

Ringle

C. M.

Sarstedt

(2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

42.

Liden

R. C.

(2014). Making a difference in the teamwork: Linking team prosocial motivation to team processes and effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1102–1127. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.1142

43.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

44.

Huhtala

Kangas

Lämsä

A. M.

Feldt

(2013). Ethical managers in ethical organisations? The leadership-culture connection among Finnish managers. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(3), 250–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731311326684

45.

Jiang

Chuang

C.-H.

Chiao

Y.-C.

(2015). Developing collective customer knowledge and service climate: The interaction between service-oriented high-performance work systems and service leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000005

46.

Jordan

P. J.

Troth

A. C.

(2019). Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations. Australian Journal of Management, 45(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219871976

47.

Kline

R. B.

(2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

48.

Kock

(2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101

49.

Kura

K. M.

(2016). Linking environmentally specific transformational leadership and environmental concern to green behaviour at work. Global Business Review, 17(3_suppl), 1S–14S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916631069

50.

Lee

B. Y.

Kim

T.-Y.

Kim

Liu

Wang

(2023). Socially responsible human resource management and employee performance: The roles of perceived external prestige and employee human resource attributions. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(4), 828–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12481

51.

Lewis

B. R.

Templeton

G. F.

Byrd

T. A.

(2005). A methodology for construct development in MIS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(4), 388–400. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000552

52.

Lim Choi

(2006). Moral reasoning in public service: Individual, organizational, and societal determinants. International Review of Public Administration, 11(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2006.10805076

53.

Lindell

M. K.

Whitney

D. J.

(2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114

54.

Liu

Baranchenko

Lin

(2021). The impact of ethical leadership on employee creative deviance: The mediating role of job autonomy. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2020-0026

55.

Liu

Zhang

(2023). The influence of the fit between strategic human resource management and CEO strategic leadership behaviours on organizational effectiveness in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 29(1), 136–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2022.2130640

56.

Xiao

Zhou

Men

Chen

(2024). Serving as an ethical signal: Understanding how and when socially responsible human resource management inhibits time theft. Journal of Business Ethics, 200, 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05895-6

57.

MacCallum

R. C.

Roznowski

Necowitz

L. B.

(1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111(3), 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490

58.

Mai

D. L.

Doan

B. S.

Tran

T. N.

M. T.

Hoang-Nhat

D. P.

(2025). Responsible leadership and nurses’ moral voice in Vietnamese public hospitals: The mediation and moderation role of public service motivation. In International conference on the development of biomedical engineering in Vietnam (pp. 1157–1176). Springer Nature Switzerland.

59.

Martínez-López

F. J.

Gázquez-Abad

J. C.

Sousa

C. M. P.

(2013). Structural equation modelling in marketing and business research: Critical issues and practical recommendations. European Journal of Marketing, 47(1–2), 115–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561311285484

60.

McClean

Collins

C. J.

(2019). Expanding the concept of fit in strategic human resource management: An examination of the relationship between human resource practices and charismatic leadership on organizational outcomes. Human Resource Management, 58(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21945

61.

Mohammed Sayed Mostafa

Shen

(2020). Ethical leadership, internal CSR, organisational engagement and organisational workplace deviance. Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 8(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-03-2019-0026

62.

Moynihan

D. P.

Pandey

S. K.

(2007). Finding workable levers over work motivation: Comparing job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Administration & Society, 39(7), 803–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707305546

63.

Nguyen

K. T.

Nguyen

P. N. D.

Tran

C. Q.

T. T. T.

(2024). Green human resource management and employee pro-environmental behaviors: The role of individual green value. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science-Economics and Business Administration, 14(2), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.14.2.3129.2024

64.

Norton

T. A.

Parker

S. L.

Zacher

Ashkanasy

N. M.

(2015). Employee green behavior: A theoretical framework, multilevel review, and future research agenda. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575773

65.

Norton

T. A.

Zacher

Parker

S. L.

Ashkanasy

N. M.

(2017). Bridging the gap between green behavioral intentions and employee green behavior: The role of green psychological climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(7), 996–1015. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2178

66.

Ones

D. S.

Dilchert

(2012). Environmental sustainability at work: A call to action. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(4), 444–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01478.x

67.

Orlitzky

Swanson

D. L.

(2006). Socially responsible human resource management. In Deckop

J. R.

(Ed.), Human resource management ethics (pp. 3–25). Information Age.

68.

Ozkan

Tari Selcuk

Kan

Z. E.

(2024). Is green behaviors of health professionals related to green practices in the workplace? Multicenter study in Turkey. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 34(2), 898–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2023.2185209

69.

Paillé

Boiral

(2013). Pro-environmental behavior at work: Construct validity and determinants. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36(2013), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.014

70.

Perry

J. L.

(2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 471–488. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024277

71.

Pham

N. T.

Vo-Thanh

Shahbaz

Duc Huynh

T. L.

Usman

(2020). Managing environmental challenges: Training as a solution to improve employee green performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 269(2020), Article 110781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110781

72.

Piatak

J. S.

Holt

S. B.

(2020). Prosocial behaviors: A matter of altruism or public service motivation? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3), 504–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz041

73.

Piccolo

R. F.

Greenbaum

den Hartog

D. N.

Folger

(2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.627

74.

Podsakoff

P. M.

Organ

D. W.

(1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408

75.

Rainey

H. G.

Steinbauer

(1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024401

76.

Ripoll

Ballart

(2020). Judging unethical behavior: The different effects of external and public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 23(5), 631–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2019.1588811

77.

Robertson

J. L.

Barling

(2017). Contrasting the nature and effects of environmentally specific and general transformational leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2015-0100

78.

Robertson

J. L.

Carleton

(2017). Uncovering how and when environmental leadership affects employees’ voluntary pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817738940

79.

Sabbir

M. M.

Taufique

K. M. R.

(2022). Sustainable employee green behavior in the workplace: Integrating cognitive and non-cognitive factors in corporate environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2877

80.

Salancik

G. R.

Pfeffer

(1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563

81.

Schwartz

S. H.

(1977). Normative influences on altruism. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 221–279). Academic Press.

82.

Schwartz

S. H.

Howard

(1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. In Rushton

J. P.

Sorrentino

R. M.

(Eds.), Altruism and helping behaviour (Vol. Lawrence, pp. 189–211). Erlbaum.

83.

Schwartz

S. H.

Howard

J. A.

(1984). Internalized values as motivators of altruism. In Staub

(Ed.), Development and maintenance of prosocial behavior: International perspectives on positive morality (pp. 229–255). Springer.

84.

Shadish

W. R.

Cook

T. D.

Campbell

D. T.

(2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Mifflin and Company.

85.

Shen

Benson

(2016). When CSR is a social norm: How socially responsible human resource management affects employee work behavior. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1723–1746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314522300

86.

Staddon

S. C.

Cycil

Goulden

Leygue

Spence

(2016). Intervening to change behaviour and save energy in the workplace: A systematic review of available evidence. Energy Research & Social Science, 17(2016), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.027

87.

Stazyk

E. C.

Davis

R. S.

(2015). Taking the ‘high road’: Does public service motivation alter ethical decision making processes? Public Administration, 93(3), 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12158

88.

Steffensen

D. S.

Ellen

B. P.

Wang

Ferris

G. R.

(2019). Putting the “management” back in human resource management: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2387–2418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318816179

89.

Steg

de Groot

(2010). Explaining prosocial intentions: Testing causal relationships in the norm activation model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(4), 725–743. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X477745

90.

Stern

P. C.

(2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175

91.

Stern

P. C.

Dietz

Abel

Guagnano

G. A.

Kalof

(1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97.

92.

Tang

Loi

Lai

S. W.

(2024). Employees go green: The roles of perceived CSR and intrinsic motivation. Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 12(2), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-11-2022-0287

93.

Taylor

A. B.

MacKinnon

D. P.

(2012). Four applications of permutation methods to testing a single-mediator model. Behavior Research Methods, 44(3), 806–844. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0181-x

94.

Thøgersen

(2006). Norms for environmentally responsible behaviour: An extended taxonomy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.004

95.

Trevino

L. K.

(1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306235

96.

Tseng

M.-L.

H. M.

K.-J.

Xue

(2022). Healthcare industry circular supply chain collaboration in Vietnam: Vision and learning influences on connection in a circular supply chain and circularity business model. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 25(4–5), 743–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1923671

97.

van der Werff

Steg

Keizer

(2013). It is a moral issue: The relationship between environmental self-identity, obligation-based intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1258–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.018

98.

Vandenabeele

(2007). Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030701726697

99.

Vandenabeele

(2014). Explaining public service motivation: The role of leadership and basic needs satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X14521458

100.

Victor

Cullen

J. B.

(1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392857

101.

Wadei

K. A.

Chen

Frempong

Appienti

W. A.

(2021). The mediation effect of ethical leadership and creative performance: A social information processing perspective. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.449

102.

Wang

Zhang

Jia

(2023). Doing good or looking good: How socially responsible human resource management practices influence employees’ CSR-specific performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 38(3), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-08-2022-0423

103.

Wang

T. M.

van Witteloostuijn

Heine

(2020). A moral theory of public service motivation. Frontier in Psychology, 11, Article 517763. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.517763

104.

Wesselink

Blok

Ringersma

(2017). Pro-environmental behaviour in the workplace and the role of managers and organisation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168(2017), 1679–1687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.214

105.

Wright

B. E.

Christensen

R. K.

Pandey

S. K.

(2013). Measuring public service motivation: Exploring the equivalence of existing global measures. International Public Management Journal, 16(2), 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2013.817242

106.

Yam

K. C.

Christian

M. S.

Wei

Liao

Nai

(2018). The mixed blessing of leader sense of humor: Examining costs and benefits. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 348–369. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1088

107.

Yang

Banamah

(2014). Quota sampling as an alternative to probability sampling? An experimental study. Sociological Research Online, 19(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3199

108.

Zhang

Wang

Jia

(2022). Multilevel examination of how and when socially responsible human resource management improves the well-being of employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 176(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04700-4

109.

Zhao

Zhou

(2021). Socially responsible human resource management and hotel employee organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: A social cognitive perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 95, Article 102749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102749

110.

Zhou

Zheng

(2024). Socially responsible human resource management and employee green behavior at work: The role of learning goal orientation and moral identity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2023.2192358

Employee Green Behaviour in the Vietnamese Healthcare Sector: Integrating Socially Responsible Human Resource Management and Environmental Transformational Leadership

Abstract

Plain Language Summary

Keywords

Introduction

Literature Review and Formulation of Hypotheses

Social Information Processing Theory (SIPT)

Socially Responsible Human Resource Management and Employee Green Behaviour

The Mediating Role of Personal Moral Norms

The Mediating Role of Public Service Motivation

Successive Mediation of PMN and PSM

The Moderating Role of Environmental Transformational Leadership

Methodology

Data Collection and Sample

Measurement of Constructs

Data Analysis

Empirical Findings

The Sample’s Demographics

Evaluation of Measurement Model

Evaluation of the Structural Model

Direct Effect

Mediation Analysis

Moderation Analysis

Moderated Mediation Analysis

Discussion

Conclusion and Implications

Conclusion

Theoretical and Practical Implications

Theoretical Implications

Practical Implications

Limitations and Implications for Further Research

Footnotes

ORCID iD

Ethical Considerations

Consent to Participate

Funding

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Data Availability Statement

References