Abstract
The purpose of nutrition information on a nutrition label is to communicate to consumers the nutritional content of prepackaged foods so that they would be able to identify healthy foods before purchase. Many systematic reviews in the area of consumer awareness, knowledge, understanding, and use of nutrition labels have focused on the United States, Canada, Asia, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, and little attention has been given to African countries. To review the state of consumer awareness, knowledge, understanding, and use of nutrition labels within the African region, identify barriers to the use of nutrition labels, identify consumers who are more likely to use labels, and assess the factors that affect purchasing decisions. Searches were done in electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Web of Science) and the reference lists of relevant research articles (back referencing). The review was limited to cross-sectional peer-reviewed research articles which were published in the English Language between January 2000 and June 2022. Twenty-six peer-reviewed papers from 10 African countries that met our inclusion criteria are included in this systematic review. The overall crude means of levels of awareness, knowledge, understanding, and use of nutrition labels were found to be 74.2%, 56.4%, 45.3%, and 69.1%, respectively. Consumer levels of knowledge and understanding of nutrition labels across the 10 African countries were low compared to the awareness and use of nutrition labels.
Plain Language Summary
The purpose of nutrition information on a nutrition label is to communicate to consumers the nutritional content of prepackaged foods so that they can identify healthy foods before making purchases. In this study, we aimed to review the state of consumer awareness, knowledge, understanding, and use of nutrition labels within the African region. Searches were done in electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Web of Science) and the reference lists of relevant research articles (back referencing). Twenty-six peer-reviewed papers from 10 African countries that met our inclusion criteria are included in this systematic narrative review. Our finding that consumer levels of knowledge and understanding of nutrition labels were low suggests the need for specific policies and public health interventions that would improve consumer understanding of nutrition information on labels will be more effective in the African region for better health outcomes. We identified gaps in the literature regarding the lack of studies in some African countries on consumer awareness, knowledge, and use of nutrition labels in making purchasing decisions of food. The review suggests the need for food industries and government institutions to review how nutrition information are currently presented on nutrition labels for better consumer understanding. However, the findings are subject to the limitations of the individual studies that met eligibility criteria and included in our review.
Introduction
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), globally non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are responsible for about 71% of all deaths every year, and approximately 77% of these deaths from NCDs occur in low-income and middle-income countries (World Health Organization [WHO], 2018b). Many studies have shown that obesity is a major risk factor for several NCDs, and the prevalence rates of obesity are rising speedily in both developed and developing countries (Gona et al., 2021; Keramat et al., 2021; Okati-Aliabad et al., 2022; Paul et al., 2023). However, the factors that predispose people to obesity are sundry and complex, with food intake being the most usual (Cory et al., 2021). Therefore, consumers must be educated about healthy foods and appropriate dietary practices so that they can make informed decisions about their food choices (Mayne & Spungen, 2017).
A healthy diet aids in the protection of populations against malnutrition in all its forms (Bain et al., 2013). The dietary patterns of many populations have changed over the last two decades (Bosu, 2015). Studies have shown that factors such as food globalization, urbanization, and convenience, among others have led to the majority of people consuming more prepackaged processed foods that are usually high in calories (Shamim et al., 2022). A global report by the WHO (2018a) revealed that many populations consume more foods that contain excessive amounts of energy, fats, sugars, and salt. Hence, the need for nutrition information on a nutrition label is to communicate to consumers the nutritional content of prepackaged foods, so that they would be able to identify healthy foods before purchase (Shamim et al., 2022).
Systematic reviews in some European and Arab countries, as well as countries in North America, have indicated that segments of populations are either unaware of nutrition labels or do not understand the nutrition information that is usually provided on nutrition labels (Benajiba et al., 2020; Campos et al., 2011; Talati et al., 2019). Many systematic reviews in the area of consumer awareness, knowledge, understanding, and use of nutrition labels have focused on the United States, Canada, Asia, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand (Benajiba et al., 2020; Grunert & Wills, 2007; Kasapila & Shaarani, 2016; Mhurchu & Gorton, 2007; Persoskie et al., 2017). Little attention has been given to African countries, therefore this systematic review sought to review the state of consumer awareness, knowledge, understanding, and use of nutrition labels within the African region. In addition, the review sought to also identify barriers to the use of nutrition labels, identify consumers who were more likely to use labels, and assess the factors that affect purchasing decisions.
Theoretical Framework
This systematic review is based on consumer behavior models, which explain the factors associated with consumers’ buying decision processes and how they influence consumer behavior (Jisana, 2014). Our proposition was that when consumers are aware, and have much knowledge and understanding of nutrition labels, they are more likely to use nutrition information on labels when making food purchases to informed healthier food choices. In addition, we hypothesized that socioeconomic factors, level of education, cultural influences, and other external factors have the potential to influence the relationships between consumer awareness, knowledge, understanding, and use of nutrition labels (Wills et al., 2012).
Methods
This is a systematic narrative review of studies that examined nutrition label use in African countries, and it followed the PRISMA guidelines for reporting a systematic review (Yepes-Nunez et al., 2021). The protocol for the study was registered with the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (Registration number: INPLASY202270001). The review was limited to cross-sectional peer-reviewed research articles, which were conducted in the English Language, assessing the level of consumer awareness, knowledge, understanding, and the use of nutrition labels, as well as the factors that influence food purchasing choices and the barriers to the use of nutrition labels in African countries. This study was not restricted to consumers of a particular age group, gender, or educational background. However, the review was limited to studies that utilized “normal” healthy populations who were without any diagnosed existing medical conditions.
Eligibility Criteria of Papers for Inclusion in the Review
The following inclusion criteria were used in the selection of research articles:
Peer-reviewed research articles published in the English Language.
Articles published between January 2000 and June 2022.
Studies conducted in African countries.
Studies that used healthy populations.
Search Strategy
Searches were done in electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Web of Science) and the reference lists of relevant research articles (back referencing). The time interval for the articles search was chosen to give the researchers the space to evaluate the trends in consumer awareness, knowledge, understanding, and use of nutrition labels over the period. The search terms used included: “awareness of nutrition labels” OR “awareness of food labels”, “use of nutrition labels “OR” use of food labels,”“understanding of nutrition labels” OR “ understanding of food labels,”“knowledge of nutrition labels” OR “knowledge of food labels,”“nutrition labels in Africa” OR “food labels in Africa.” A successful search result included an article that contained either awareness, knowledge, understanding, or use of nutrition labels and the country where the study was conducted. The research articles were independently reviewed and screened by PKO and CAD for quality regarding relevance to the study objectives, methodology, and main findings, and assessed either consumer awareness, knowledge, understanding, and use of nutrition labels or combinations of these terms. Where discrepancies occurred for inclusion or exclusion, a third investigator (AKA.) was involved to conduct additional evaluation of the study, and such discrepancies were resolved accordingly. Studies that did not address the main research questions were excluded. We also included studies that examined factors that influence purchasing decisions, barriers to the use of nutrition labels, and consumers who were likely to use nutrition labels. Details of the electronic database searching protocol are shown in Figure 1.

PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the study selection process for the systematic review.
Results
The articles and their main findings are presented in Table 1. Twenty-six peer-reviewed papers from 10 African countries that met our inclusion criteria are included in this systematic review. Table 1 presents the articles in terms of authors, country, sampling and sample size, population characteristics, objectives, main findings, and conclusions. Seven of the articles assessed consumer awareness and use of nutrition labels: Botswana (n = 1), Ethiopia (n = 1), Ghana (n = 3), Libya (n = 1), and Tanzania (n = 1); six articles assessed consumer use and understanding of nutrition labels: Ghana (n = 2), Nigeria (n = 1), Malawi (n = 1), South Africa (n = 1) and Zimbabwe (n = 1); four articles assessed consumer use of nutrition labels: Ghana (n = 2), Nigeria (n = 1), and Zimbabwe (n = 1); three articles assessed consumer awareness, knowledge and use of nutrition labels: Ethiopia (n = 1) and South Africa (n = 2); two articles assessed awareness, use, and understanding: Ghana (n = 1) and Nigeria (n = 1); one article assessed awareness of nutrition labels: Ghana (n = 1); one article assessed knowledge of nutrition labels: Nigeria (n = 1); one article assessed knowledge and use of nutrition labels: Lesotho (n = 1) and finally, one article assessed knowledge, use, and understanding of nutrition labels: South Africa (n = 1). In addition, 10 of the 26 articles reported on factors that influence purchasing decisions; five articles reported on barriers to the use of nutrition labels; another five articles reported on consumers who were likely to use nutrition labels; four articles reported on both barriers to the use of nutrition labels and factors that influence purchasing decisions; one article reported on both the barriers to the use of nutrition labels and consumers who were likely to use nutrition labels. Different sampling methods were employed by the authors to select participants which are summarized in Table 1.
Study Objectives, Population Characteristics, Findings, and Conclusions Per Research Article.
Literature Review
Consumer Awareness, Knowledge, Understanding, and Use of Nutrition Labels
Our search identified 13 articles that reported on the levels of consumer awareness of nutrition labels in seven different countries. The awareness levels reported ranged between 25% in Tanzania (Samson, 2012) and 100% in Ghana (Sarkodie & Boakye-Kessie, 2017), with the crude average level of awareness being 74.2%. We identified six articles that reported on the levels of consumer knowledge of nutrition labels. Studies that reported the lowest and highest levels of consumer knowledge of nutrition labels were all from South Africa, ranging from 39.8% (Xazela et al., 2019) to 86.0% (van der Merwe et al., 2013). The crude mean level of knowledge was found to be 56.4%. Nine studies reported on the levels of understanding of nutrition labels. The levels of understanding ranged from 26.2% (Kasapila & Shawa, 2011) in Malawi to 69.7% (P. Aryee et al., 2019) in Ghana. The crude mean level of understanding was 45.3%. Finally, 21 studies reported on the levels of consumer use of nutrition labels. The range of levels of understanding was between 29.2% (Kasapila & Shawa, 2011) in Malawi and 95.8% (P. Aryee et al., 2019) in Ghana. The crude mean level of consumer use of nutrition labels was found to be 69.1%.
Barriers to Consumer Use of Nutrition Labels
Overall, most of the articles consistently reported that time constraints, small font size, and unfamiliar language were the main barriers to consumer use of nutrition labels. Some other articles reported that difficulty in understanding was a substantial barrier to consumer use of nutrition labels. In Zimbabwe, one article reported that mistrust of nutrition labels (44.0%) was the principal barrier to the use of nutrition labels (Ncube et al., 2017). All the research articles from Lesotho and Malawi did not report on barriers to consumer use of nutrition labels (Kasapila & Shawa, 2011; Mahgoub et al., 2007).
Factors That Influence Purchasing Decisions
The leading factors which were reported to influence purchasing decisions were expiry date, brand, and price. In Tanzania, religious belief (2.4%) was also reported as one of the factors that influence purchasing decisions (Samson, 2012). Nonetheless, articles from Malawi, Libya, and Botswana did not report on factors that influence purchasing decisions when buying prepackaged foods (Alshukri et al., 2020; Kasapila & Shawa, 2011; Themba & Tanjo, 2013).
Consumers Likely to Use Nutrition Labels
Articles from five countries reported on consumers who were likely to use nutrition labels when buying prepackaged foods. In South Africa, those who speak English, the educated, and the young were the categories of consumers identified as likely to use nutrition labels (van der Merwe et al., 2013). Furthermore, a study in Zimbabwe identified only females as consumers likely to use nutrition labels (Ncube et al., 2017). Finally, in Nigeria, Malawi, and Ethiopia, the educated, female, and high-income earners were the categories of consumers reported as likely to use nutrition labels (Falola, 2014; Feyisa et al., 2021; Kasapila & Shawa, 2011).
Discussion
This systematic review assessed the scientific evidence from studies on awareness, knowledge, understanding, and use of nutrition labels in African countries. Twenty-six studies met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in this systematic review. Some studies reported on the factors that influence consumer purchasing decisions, the barriers to the use of nutrition labels, and consumers who were likely to use nutrition labels when buying prepackaged foods. All studies were conducted using both males and females, and the education levels of study participants varied from below high school to postsecondary tertiary education. The age structures of participants were diverse in different countries, ranging from 15 to 69 years, and different sampling methods such as random sampling, purposive sampling, stratified sampling, convenience sampling, and other multistage sampling techniques were used by the authors in their studies.
The overall crude means of levels of awareness, knowledge, understanding, and use of nutrition labels were found to be 74.2%, 56.4%, 45.3%, and 69.1%, respectively. These results show that the extent of consumer awareness and use of nutrition labels were relatively higher compared to the levels of knowledge and understanding of nutrition labels across the African countries where the studies were conducted. This observation is similar to findings from a study conducted in India where the levels of awareness and use of nutrition labels were found to be 74.0% and 80.8%, but only 7.2% of the study participants could understand the information on nutrition labels (Kamboj et al., 2022). More so, other studies in Thailand and across Europe found similar observations where consumer awareness and use of nutrition labels when buying prepackaged foods were high but the nutrition knowledge and understanding of nutrition labels were comparatively low (Grunert et al., 2012; Rimpeekool et al., 2015). A global review has documented that generally, consumers find nutrition labels to be a useful source of nutrition information (Campos et al., 2011). Therefore, as noted in the systematic review by Dumoitier et al. (2019), there is a need to improve nutrition knowledge and understanding of nutrition labels in the African countries where the studies were conducted, through effective nutrition education and other public health strategies.
The factors consistently reported in almost all countries as the main barriers to consumer use of nutrition labels comprised time constraints, small font size, difficulty in understanding, and unfamiliar language. These factors are in line with the findings of other studies where these same factors were reported as the barriers to consumer use of nutrition labels (Besler et al., 2012; Donga & Patel, 2018; Perumal et al., 2022; Rimpeekool et al., 2015; Shamim et al., 2022). However, in Zimbabwe, mistrust was the principal barrier reported by the study participants.
Moreover, price, brand name, expiry date, and convenience were consistently reported as the leading factors that influence purchasing decisions. Similar observations were reported in studies in India and New Zealand where price, expiry date, brand name, and convenience were also the main factors that influence consumer buying decisions (Kamboj et al., 2022; Ni Mhurchu et al., 2018). Nonetheless, in Ghana, Nigeria, and Ethiopia, the country of origin of a prepackaged food product was found to be another essential factor that influenced consumer purchasing decisions. Lastly, in the UK, a systematic review by Ogundijo et al. (2022) identified price as one of the main factors that influence consumer purchasing decisions.
In South Africa, Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Malawi, those who are educated were reported as consumers likely to use nutrition labels. Also, females were reported as likely to use nutrition labels in Zimbabwe, Nigeria, and Malawi. Furthermore, high-income earners were found to be the consumers likely to use nutrition labels in Nigeria and Ethiopia. In other studies, similar findings were reported by Azman and Sahak (2014), and Perumal et al. (2022), where the former found the educated to be the consumers who were likely to use nutrition labels, and the latter also identified those with high incomes, as consumers likely to use nutrition labels. In addition, across the US, UK, New Zealand, Australia, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, other similar studies have reported females as consumers who are more likely to use nutrition labels, and this is in agreement with our findings from this review (Azman & Sahak, 2014; Donga & Patel, 2018; Shamim et al., 2022).
In South Africa, those who were younger were reported as likely to use nutrition labels than older consumers (van der Merwe et al., 2013). This observation is inconsistent with many other studies where both young and older consumers have been reported as likely to use nutrition labels, indicating that it is highly likely that age has no independent relationship with nutrition label use (Natour et al., 2021). For instance, in the research by Azman and Sahak (2014), study participants aged 55 years and beyond were found to be the consumers who were likely users of nutrition labels compared to consumers with ages between 22 and 54 years old. Contrarily, in the research by Liu et al. (2015), younger consumers were reported as those who were likely to use nutrition labels. This review contributes to existing literature by providing an overview of the state of consumer awareness, nutrition knowledge, understanding, and use of nutrition labels in the African region. We identified gaps in the literature regarding the lack of studies in some African countries on consumer awareness, knowledge, and use of nutrition labels in making purchasing decisions of food. The finding that consumer levels of knowledge and understanding of nutrition labels were low suggests the need for specific policies and public health interventions that would improve consumer understanding of nutrition information on labels will be more effective in the African region for better health outcomes. The review suggests the need for food industries and government institutions to review how nutrition information are currently presented on nutrition labels for better consumer understanding. Overall, our review provides valuable information that could inform evidence-based decision making in nutrition education, food safety and food policy for consumer protection.
Strengths and Limitations
Our review approach followed the PRISMA guidelines for conducting a systematic review and specific eligibility criteria. The strength of this approach includes providing a comprehensive and unbiased synthesis of existing evidence on consumer awareness, knowledge, understanding, and use of nutrition labels in the African region. We followed strict eligibility criteria and specific steps in selecting the included studies in this review. Synthesizing all available evidence from different studies and countries that focused and addressed similar research question to a single place provides a better picture of the state of the situation. However, we acknowledge that our findings may not be directly applicable to all populations because our study approach could not identify similar studies in some African countries. Finally, the findings of this systematic review are subject to the limitations of the individual studies that met eligibility criteria and included in our review. Since studies from only 10 African countries were included in this review, we cannot generalize our findings to the whole of Africa.
Conclusions
Consumer levels of knowledge and understanding of nutrition labels across the 10 African countries were low compared to the awareness and use of nutrition labels. The main barriers to consumer use of nutrition labels that were reported across the African regions were time constraints, small font size, difficulty in understanding, and unfamiliar language. Price, brand name, expiry date, and convenience were consistently reported in many African countries as the leading factors that influence purchasing decisions of consumers. The educated, female, and high-income earners were identified as the categories of consumers who are likely to use nutrition labels.
Recommendations
Nutrition education is needed to improve consumer knowledge and understanding of nutrition labels. Interventions to make the information on nutrition labels more simplistic and comprehensive are needed to help consumer understanding. Studies on awareness, knowledge, understanding, and use of nutrition labels in other African countries that were not part of this study are highly recommended. Further studies must investigate the reasons why some consumers do not use nutrition labels when making food purchases.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge those who provided any form of support toward this research.
Author Contributions
The research articles were independently reviewed and screened by PKO and CAD. PKO and CAD were also involved in the literature search, and data extraction, and AKA supervised the overall process of the systematic review. PKO, CAD, and AKA participated in the manuscript writing.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical Approval
Not Applicable
Consent for Publication
The authors of this manuscript have agreed to authorship, read and approved the manuscript, and have given consent for submission and subsequent publication of the manuscript in the Nutrition and Health Journal. The authors declare the manuscript in part or in full has not been submitted or published anywhere, and that the manuscript will not be submitted elsewhere until the editorial process is completed.
Availability of Data
Data described in the manuscript will be made available upon request pending approval of the manuscript.
