Abstract
The possibility to induce real out-of-body experiences (OBEs) using hypnotic inductions, with the opportunity to interview participants during their experience, permits to investigate in depth the characteristics of different aspects of this particular state of consciousness from a first-person point of view. In this article, six selected participants report the description of another “body” we named “subtle body,” identified as an intermediate entity between the physical body (Pb) and their “Self” or “I-identity” that was named “psychic body,” and their relationships and characteristics. The “subtle body” was described as a sort of white silvered cloud surrounding the Pb, with a particular enlargement of its hands and feet that could move quickly like flying from one place to another even if less easily than the “psychic body,” and a vague sense of attrition was perceived when passing through walls. Similar to the “psychic body,” the “subtle” one too could move forward and backward in time even if they did not seem perceiving the sense of time. The “subtle body” was referred to be connected with the physical one by a sort of white brilliant link sometimes described like a silvered string more or less visible, whereas no visible links were identified between the “subtle body” and the “psychic” one. These reports were compared with similar descriptions deriving from the Vedanta philosophy and Theosophical tradition.
Introduction
The out-of-body experience (OBE) is a multifaceted experience whose core characteristic is a first personal perspective in which the “self,” “himself,” or “center of consciousness” is experienced as spatially separated from the body (Carruthers, 2015; Metzinger, 2005; Terhune, 2009). This particular state of consciousness attracts much interest spanning from the philosophy of mind, to neurophysiology, and to the study of consciousness in general (see Alvarado, 2009; Cardeña & Alvarado, 2014, for a review).
Usually, such an experience occurs either as an uncontrolled, spontaneous event (Blanke & Castillo, 2007; Braithwaite, Samson, Apperly, Broglia, & Hulleman, 2011; Cardeña, 2005) and are all based on the participants’ verbal reporting obtained by questionnaires or interviews carried out after and not during this experience.
The possibility to induce real OBE using hypnotic inductions, with the possibility to interview participants during their experience, offers a unique opportunity to investigate in detail this state of consciousness for a prolonged time in a controlled way.
Hypnotic induced OBE (Cardeña, 2005; Nash, Lynn, & Stanley, 1984; Tart, 1998; Tressoldi & Del Prete, 2007) are rare, given the necessity to recruit expert hypnotists and in particular participants willing and ready to face such a special experience.
In a related article, Tressoldi et al. (2014) investigated the accuracy of perceiving distant and the first-person phenomenological experience of five selected participants with respect to the minimal phenomenal selfhood (MPS) as defined by Blanke and Metzinger (2009) and the similarities with the characteristics of spatial and temporal perception reported in near-death experiences (NDEs).
The first-person reports of all five participants suggested the existence of a disembodied personal selfhood (DPS) characterized by the experience of being a distinct, holistic entity with self-control and learning capabilities implying the concept of ability to experience and participate in events, without a body or location in space–time. This entity is able to perceive simply by an act of will without the physical limitations of eyesight, is able to move about in the environment instantly, and exists in a sort of three-dimensional world with no perception of time.
During the participants’ training, the hypnotist noticed that some of them perceived a type of secondary body, an intermediate between the physical body (Pb) and the DPS. It was therefore decided to investigate this presumed new non-Pb using a semistructured interview.
In this article, we report the first-person verbal reports of how those participants plus a new one, described this body, which was simply named “subtle body” (Sb) to differ it from the Pb and from the center of consciousness or first-person perspective we named “psychic body” (Ψb) plus the interaction among them.
The literature about the identification of different bodies in OBE is mainly based on some autobiographical reports (see Alvarado’s (2012) analysis of Robert Crookall work), survey literature, and other questionnaire studies that give some information about the bodies perceived by people during OBEs (e.g., Alvarado & Zingrone, 2015). Consequently, the models to explain these bodies have not been developed in terms of testable hypotheses up today. Given this situation, our study has to be considered as an exploratory investigation aimed at bringing a further contribution to the knowledge of this fascinating phenomenon.
Method
Participants
Six people took part in this study, five of whom were also included in a related article by Tressoldi et al. (2014).
They were chosen because they were accustomed to hypnosis, their experience ranging from 2 to 10 years. Their individual levels of hypnotic susceptibilities were estimated using the Italian version of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (Pascalis, Russo, & Marucci, 2000).
The participants’ previous knowledge of the OBE subject was determined by asking them how many books, videos, reports, or articles they have read regarding this state of consciousness. Those with no previous interest in, or reading of, the subject were classified as “low,” and those with a keen interest who had read extensively on the subject were classified as “high.”
Their demographical and general characteristics are reported in Table 1. Coauthor L.P., with more than 20 years’ experience in hypnosis, had the role of hypnotist.
Participants’ Chronological and Experience With OBE and Hypnosis Characteristics.
Note. OBE = out-of-body experience.
Procedure
For a more detailed description of the general hypnotic procedure and the specific OBE induction process, see the above-mentioned previous study by Tressoldi et al. (2014).
Before beginning the official experiment, all the participants underwent one or two sessions per week to become accustomed to the procedure and OBE suggestions, until the hypnotist deemed them ready for the official study.
To prepare the participants, an average of four sittings specifically dedicated to the OBE were necessary. Each participant did a minimum of two official sittings, up to a maximum of six.
OBE hypnotic induction procedure
All the sessions were completed either in a lightproof and partially soundproof laboratory or in the participants’ homes. When the participants were at home, the session was conducted over the telephone. They lay on a recliner with a digital recorder beside them or the telephone to record their words.
Once the hypnotist was satisfied that the participant had reached an appropriate hypnotic state, the OBE induction would commence, and when attainment of that state was also confirmed, questions would be posed to the participant (see Table 2).
Participants’ Replies to Questions Regarding the Pb, the Sb, and the Ψb, and Their Mutual Relationships.
Note. Pb = physical body; Sb = subtle body; Ψb = psychic body. Answers in bold type were determined to be the participants’ general consensus.
All the participants were asked the same questions in the same order, in the form of a semistructured interview. Sometimes the hypnotist found it necessary to repeat a question to ensure it was understood or to rephrase it for ease of comprehension.
Original audio recordings (in Italian) can be found in Tressoldi (2013). Transcripts in English are currently underway.
All participants agreed on not sharing their experiences with the others until the end of the study to prevent possible contamination of their responses.
Analysis of participants’ answers
All the questions and answers were transcribed by L.P. and qualitatively analyzed independently by P.E.T. and L.P. by relistening to the original recordings and examining the contents according to Krippendorff’s (2013) guidelines. Overall agreement was 90%. Interpretative inconsistencies were resolved by once again listening to the recordings.
Results
Table 2 is a summary of each participant’s exact words in reply to each question. More than one answer to a question indicates the same question was asked in different sessions. Answers in bold type were determined to be the participants’ general consensus. We considered overall agreement to have been reached when the same answer was given by at least five out of six participants, or four out of five if one of them failed to answer. The last two participants, E and D, had the least previous knowledge of OBEs.
Comments
More detailed comments about each question are presented in the appendix. The overall agreement between the two judges was 81%, and the main discrepancies between them were due to variations in interpretation of the answers regarding perception and the roles of the Sb and psychic body (Ψb).
It is important to remember that where there was agreement, the differences in previous OBE knowledge among participants had no effect on the answers.
Descriptions and Characteristics of the Sb Compared With the Pb and Ψb
Descriptions of the Sb’s characteristics are uniform among the participants: This body was described as a type of silvery-white cloud surrounding the Pb and is wider around the hands and feet.
Agreement to a lesser degree was obtained regarding its perceptive characteristics: around half the replies stated that colors and shapes were more easily perceived and were more vivid and intense than in the Pb, whereas the other half described them as being less bright or in black and white.
However, shapes and colors were described as being brighter, clearer, and more intense when perceived through the Ψb.
With respect to how the Sb feels emotions or senses others’ emotions, virtually all participants agreed that, like the Ψb, the Sb either does not feel them at all or feels them less intensely than the Pb, but it seems that only the Ψb is able to perceive others’ thoughts.
With respect to the motion properties of the Sb, there was general agreement that it can move quickly from one place to another, like flying, albeit less easily than the Ψb, and that mild friction is felt when passing through walls.
Like the Ψb, the Sb can also move back and forth in time, but does not appear to have an actual sense of real time.
It is unclear whether or not the Sb is able to interact with the physical (material) environment: when attempted, it is described as very difficult, although easier than with the Ψb.
Role of the Sb and Its Differences to the Ψb
The main purpose of the Sb seems to be the regulation of the Pb’s biological functions and aiding the Ψb’s interaction with the Pb, even though it appears that the Ψb is capable of directly interacting with it.
The descriptions confirm that the Sb is connected to the Pb by something bright that is sometimes defined as a barely visible silvery string. No perceivable connections were described between the Sb and Ψb.
The Sb’s existence has been described as finite in time, but of longer duration than the Pb, whereas the Ψb’s existence was said to be infinite in time. Less agreement emerged from the questions related to in which body the memory for present and past lives is stored and where reasoning and creativity come from. There was an agreement on the fact that the Pb was the less endowed with respect to the Sb and the Ψb.
Less agreement emerged from answers to questions concerning which body stores memories of the current and past lives, as well as the origin of creativity and reasoning capacities. There was agreement on the fact that the Pb has fewer capabilities than the Sb and Ψb.
Are There Other Bodies?
When asked if the Ψb is aware of other bodies apart from the Pb and Sb, the answers concur about the existence of “superior Bodies,” or rather, “superior entities”—given their lack of boundaries, like the Ψb—but their exact number and functions remain unknown.
Discussion
Only a few questions elicited overall agreement in the answers, regardless of participants’ previous knowledge of this subject, but there was agreement regarding the existence of at least two “bodies” other than the Pb, which we have called the Sb and Ψb.
If necessary, the DPS can inhabit either of the two bodies, even though it prefers the Ψb, which is described as the overseer of the Sb and Pb, and probably exists eternally.
Although the perceptive and cognitive differences between the Sb and the Ψb have not been clearly defined, the differences in how they “move through space” were described the same way by all participants: The Ψb seems to travel at the speed of thought, or will, with no “friction” from solid materials. Similar, but less ideal, characteristics are described for the Sb, due to it having boundaries. Furthermore, all descriptions about the link between the Pb and the Sb were in agreement.
The descriptions cited here about both the Sb and the Ψb bring to mind those mentioned in several philosophical/spiritual traditions. For example, the Vedanta philosophy identifies three different bodies that have much in common with the Pb (Sthula Sarira), the Sb (Sukshma Sarira), and the Ψb (Karana Sarira) as described by our participants (Three Bodies Doctrine (Vedanta), 2015).
Similar, but not identical, descriptions are defined in the Theosophical tradition, which combines Western Occultism and Oriental Philosophy (Ellwood, 1986). In this spiritual tradition, the three bodies are described as the Linga Sarira (or astral body), the Mayavi-rupa (the illusory body), and the causal body (vehicle for the Superior Mind). Of these, the astral body somewhat resembles the Sb and the causal body resembles the Ψb (see a more detailed description in Besant, 1912).
Bearing in mind the known uncertainties inherent in first-person phenomenological descriptions, the information given by our participants about their OBE experiences induced by an hypnotic induction can be used for the time being as a new source of description of this particular state of consciousness as a converging evidence to other sources obtained with different methods (see, for example, Alvarado, 2012).
This may be useful to future investigators who are interested in traveling to these new “territories” of human existence.
Footnotes
Appendix
Comments for Each Question.
| Questions | Comments |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Can you move freely with the Sb? | There is agreement on the Sb’s ability to move rapidly, but some say it slows down when passing through solid matter. |
| What level of awareness does the Sb have? | Although there is no real agreement, it seems the Sb has a superior knowledge to the Pb. |
| What role does the Sb have? | The Sb’s role with respect to the Pb is variously described, even though it represents a type of intermediary between the Pb and the Ψb. Once the Pb is dead, the Sb seems to slowly dissolve, as opposed to the Ψb, which continues to exist. |
| How do you see colors with the Sb? | There is no agreement on this. It seems that the intensity of the colors depends on the degree of one’s attention to them. |
| How do you see objects (such as plants, houses, etc.) with the Sb? | As for previous question. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What type of emotions does the Sb feel? | Answers vary, although there is some agreement on the fact that the Sb feels no emotions like those felt by the Pb. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Which non-Pb allows you to see colors better? | It seems to be the Sb. |
| Which non-Pb allows you to see objects better (i.e., plants, houses, etc.)? | The answers vary, but what is interesting is that “details are sharper with the Sb. With the Ψb their history is more defined.” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Which non-Pb allows you to better perceive people? | There is no consensus on this point. |
| How many other bodies are there apart from the Pb and the Sb? | The answers vary, but this one is interesting: “There are others, but when I try to see them I come up against a barrier.” |
| When you are in the Sb, are you aware of the Pb? | There is no agreement on this point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Can the Sb interact with matter? | It is very doubtful. If it can interact, it seems to require much effort. |
| Can the Ψb interact with matter? | There is no general consensus. |
| While you are living in the Pb, what roles do the other two bodies have? | The descriptions vary, but it appears that both the Ψb and Sb represent a type of container for the Pb that allow it to function. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Can the Sb perceive what people think? | There is no agreement on this point. |
|
|
|
| Within which body are the events of the present life stored? | There is no agreement on this point. |
| Which body carries the memories of past lives? | There is no agreement on this, even if the Ψb seems to be the best candidate. |
| Which body is responsible for our reasoning ability? | There is no agreement on this point, even though the Ψb seems to be the best endowed. |
| Which body holds the capacity to invent new things? | Answers vary, although it seems that the creative process requires the coordination of all three bodies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note. Questions and answers in bold type are those that satisfied the general agreement criterium (5/6 or 4/5 similar answers); Pb = physical body, Sb = subtle body, Ψb = psychic body.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the useful suggestions and comments of Carlos Alvarado to the previous version of the article. English translation by C. Evangelista (Melbourne, Australia).
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.
Author Biographies
![]()
![]()
