Abstract
The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia (OL) infected with
Introduction
World Health Organization (WHO) states that the term ‘oral leukoplakia’ (OL) should be used to recognize white plaques of questionable risk having excluded (other) known diseases or disorders that carry no increased risk for cancer. 1 The estimated prevalence of OL is 2.6% (95% CI 1.72–2.74%), with an incidence rate of malignancy attributed to OL between 6.2 and 29.1 per 100,000. 2 Some risk factors that increase likelihood of malignant transformation of OL include grade of dysplasia, advancing age, female gender, leukoplakia size exceeding 200 mm2, non-homogenous leukoplakia (erythroleukoplakia, speckled leukoplakia), tobacco use, betel nut chewing, alcohol consumption, nutritional deficiency and immunosuppression. 3 –7
Studies also have identified the presence of
In the published scientific literature, candidal infection in OL lesions was considered synonymous with chronic hyperplastic candidiasis (CHC), however these are now considered histologically distinct.
15
CHC was previously termed as candidal leukoplakia, however OL may not always be present in this condition.
16
CHC is therefore regarded as a separate clinical entity that is caused primarily by candidal infection.
16
In
To the best of authors’ knowledge, no systematic reviews of observational studies on
Materials and methods
This systematic review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
18
The following electronic databases: Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE-Elsevier and CINAHL were searched. Additional searches were conducted using grey literature databases: WorldCat, Trove, OpenGrey, AHRQ, HISA and TRIP. Our database search strategy was created using the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms ‘
Electronic search strategy and articles retrieved.

PRISMA guideline flowchart detailing article selection process. PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta Analyses.
Our review was limited to observational studies, including prospective and retrospective cohort and case-control studies. Experimental studies, reviews,
Risk of bias assessment
Newcastle–Ottawa risk of bias assessment tool 19 for case-control and cohort studies was used. Although, the tool applies to case-control and cohort studies, the papers included in the study have retrospective studies as well. Hence, we have slightly modified the scale to fit into the objectives of our review. The scoring system consists of three categories that determine the bias: selection, comparability and outcome factors. A star is allocated when the study fulfil the criteria of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale.
Results
Study selection
The initial electronic search yielded 502 articles. A further 40 articles were identified through manual search and after removal of duplicates, 372 were available for initial screening. One hundred articles remained after the screening based on the title and abstracts. These articles were screened against the inclusion/exclusion criteria and 16 papers were selected for full review. The papers excluded during the screening process were case reports/case series (
Risk of bias and quality assessment
Tables 2 and 3 summarize the risk of bias assessment based on Newcastle–Ottawa risk of bias tool. Scores for case-control studies and cohort studies are given in these tables. Our assessment indicates only two of cohort studies 26,33 and one case-control study 20 acquire 5 points.
Risk of bias assessment for case-control studies: modified Newcastle–Ottawa scale.
*One point as per the scoring method of Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Blank cell indicate that the study did not earn a point according to the scale.
Risk of bias assessment for cohort studies: Newcastle–Ottawa scale cohort studies.
aRetrospective study.
*One point as per the scoring method of Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Blank cell indicate that the study did not earn a point according to the scale.
Summary of results
A summary of the 16 studies included in the final systematic review is provided in Table 4.
Summary of data on epithelial changes and malignant transformation OL infected with
N/A: Not available; OL: Oral leukoplakia.
aThe studies reporting malignant transformation of leukoplakia infected with
The incidence of candidal infection in OL ranged between 6.8% and 100.0%. Only 3 of 16 studies reported malignant transformation rates of OL lesions associated with
Individual study characteristics
Individual study characteristics and the outcome extracted from each included study are given below:
Leukoplakia was defined as a predominantly white lesion of the oral mucosa that cannot be characterized as any other definable lesion. OL lesions were categorized into four stages: stage 1–4 (rationale for this staging was not provided). Eleven cases (37.0%) of OL were positive for
Hebbar et al.
29
conducted a study in India with 50 participants (30 male, 20 female) ranging from 18 to 75 years of age. Twenty-three OLs were present (15 homogenous, 8 non-homogenous). The authors did not provide a definition for OL. Seven (87.5%) non-homogenous OLs were positive for fungal growth after culturing and PAS staining. No data were available for fungal infection in homogenous OL. The authors noted that a small sample size was a limitation of their study but concluded that
Discussion
The studies included in this review assessed
Epithelial changes that were observed in the studies reviewed include varying grades of dysplasia and cellular atypia. Grades of dysplasia ranged from mild to carcinoma-in-situ, and ranged from 20.0% to 100.0%.
22,24,25
One study
29
noted dysplasia was higher in OL lesions infected with
There are several proposed cellular mechanisms whereby
The over-expression of p53, Ki-67 and COX-2 are some of the additional mechanisms by which
A number of methodological disparities among the studies included in this review were identified. Several studies failed to define terms and classification criteria, affecting the consistency of analysis between studies included in this review. As mentioned in the methodology, studies relating to CHC were excluded from our review. Three articles were removed purely on the basis of analysing CHC rather than
The authors acknowledge that excluding CHC from this review may have caused under-reporting of candidal infection in OL as the lesions are often clinically indistinguishable and are erroneously reported interchangeably. 47 We plan to undertake a separate review analysing the malignant potential of CHC lesions to account for this discrepancy in the literature. A study by Gracia et al. notes that CHC lesions should completely resolve with antifungal treatment, whereas OL lesions will usually persist afterwards, thus verifying the conditions as separate. 17 In terms of clinical practice, treatment with topical or systemic antifungal agents (e.g. nystatin, miconazole) may be of use in separating CHC from OL lesions, allowing for the OL to be managed as appropriate.
Additional terms that were used inconsistently between studies included: epithelial atypia, cellular changes and dysplasia.
23,24,32,33
One study defined epithelial atypia as lesions with varying degrees of hyperparakeratosis, inflammation, oedema, hyperplasia, acanthosis, dyskeratosis and atrophy.
32
However, this is not consistent with other studies that used the term epithelial atypia.
23,28,31
Similarly, there were inconsistencies between the histological classification of OL lesions. As the publication dates of the included articles spanned numerous decades, the terminology used to describe OL varied, which reduced uniformity in their evaluation. Classification of OL included simplex, speckled, erythroleukoplakia, erosive, verrucous and homogenous or non-homogenous.
26,29,31
As these terms were not used consistently, it made comparison difficult and limited the ability to assess extent of cellular and malignant changes in OL as a result of
Limitations
Limitations of this review include lack of follow-up data detailing malignant transformation, weak methodology of included studies, inconsistences in the terminology and heterogeneity in analysis. We also limited the studies to papers published in English language only and this limits interpretation and representation of global literature on the topic. Only three of the 16 studies included in this systematic review identified OL lesions progressing to malignant transformation. Most studies did not provide follow-up data of patients. Therefore, definite association between
Conclusions
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review conducted on the influence of leukoplakia
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank James Cook University and to JCU College of Medicine and Dentistry staff for assisting with the sourcing of articles.
Author contributions
All authors contributed to the development of the study protocol, literature search, review and writing the manuscript. The senior author (AA) supervised the study and edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed the final version of the manuscript.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
