Abstract
Background:
Stress during pregnancy can lead to significant adverse outcomes for maternal mental health. Early evaluation of prenatal stress can help identify treatment needs and appropriate interventions. Disparities in the social determinants of health can contribute to stress, but what constitutes stress during pregnancy within the social determinants of health framework is poorly understood.
Objective:
To scope how prenatal stress is defined and measured among pregnant people exposed to three prominent social stressors in the United States: insecurity pertaining to food, housing, and immigration.
Eligibility Criteria:
We included all studies that focused on stress during pregnancy in the context of food insecurity, housing instability, and immigration, given their recent policy focus due to the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing political discourse, in addition to their importance in American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG’s) social determinants of health screening tool.
Sources of Evidence:
We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published between January 2012 and January 2022.
Charting Methods:
Using a piloted charting tool, we extracted relevant study information from the selected articles and analyzed the content pertaining to stress.
Results:
An initial search identified 1,023 articles, of which 24 met our inclusion criteria. None of the studies defined prenatal stress, and only one used the Prenatal Distress Questionnaire, a prenatal stress-specific tool to measure it. The Perceived Stress Scale was the most common instrument used in seven studies. Fifteen studies measured over 25 alternative exposures that researchers theorized were associated with stress, and 4 of the 15 studies did not explain the association between the measure and stress.
Conclusions:
Our findings demonstrate a fundamental inconsistency in how prenatal stress is defined and measured in the context of social determinants of health, limiting the comparison of results across studies and the potential development of effective interventions to promote better maternal mental health.
Keywords
Introduction
Two in five people in the US experience a stressful life event the year before pregnancy, and 10%–20% suffer from mental health problems during the perinatal period.1,2 People who experience stress during pregnancy are at a greater risk for maternal mental health disorders and adverse maternal and birth outcomes, including preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, maternal mood disorders, and infant developmental delays.2 –16 Maternal mental health conditions, including depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar illness, and substance use disorders, are the most common complications of pregnancy and childbirth in the United States, affecting 1 in 5 or 800,000 people each year.17 –19 Screening for stress during pregnancy may help identify people who can benefit from stress-reduction interventions to mitigate prenatal stress and associated maternal and fetal outcomes.
Nearly 30 years ago, Lobel 3 called attention to the importance of “a robust, conceptually and methodologically powerful operational definition of prenatal stress,”20,21 and developed the Prenatal Distress Questionnaire (PDQ) and its successor, the Revised Prenatal Distress Questionnaire (NuPDQ). However, what constitutes prenatal stress remains broadly described in the social sciences literature, potentially impeding interventions to prevent adverse outcomes. Some researchers have operationally defined prenatal stress as the number of major life events or daily hassles during pregnancy.21 –23 In contrast, others have defined it as emotional states, particularly anxiety, without attention to what elicits these emotions.21,24 Most maternal health research assesses general stress that is nonspecific to pregnancy.3,10,15,25,26 Some commonly used measures of stress during pregnancy have included perceived stress to capture life event changes, daily hassles, and chronic stress; emotional stress to capture anxiety, sadness, and general tension; and psychosocial stress to capture caregiver burden, job strain, and discrimination.2 –9,11 –16,27 –31 The variation in stress constructs and the multitude of tools used to measure it impedes the comparability of research results to the detriment of maternal mental health promotion.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) emphasizes the importance of addressing social and structural determinants, including food insecurity, housing, and immigration, as part of patient-centered care to decrease inequities in reproductive healthcare. 32 Unmet social needs, often called the social determinants of health (SDOH), can contribute to adverse perinatal outcomes for low-income mothers and their newborns. 33 The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) asserts that social determinants have a much greater influence on health than genetic or healthcare access factors, which have traditionally been the focus of health research and interventions. 34 However, there is a significant gap in maternal health literature regarding the role of social determinants in impacting maternal morbidity and mortality, including mental health conditions – and especially the underlying mechanisms for these associations. 35
Recent Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data show that lack of money for adequate food and a balanced meal was the most common unmet need affecting two-thirds of low-income adults in 12 states. 36 One in five individuals reported being unable to pay for housing and experiencing constant stress, and those with multiple needs were more likely to miss medical appointments. In interviews conducted with prenatal care providers and patients, we documented similar experiences where pregnant and postpartum people faced multiple needs, any of which could be exacerbated on any given day. These challenges compromised their ability to work, buy food, take care of their children, go to medical appointments, continue with substance use disorder treatment, or feel safe in their relationship. 37 Furthermore, current immigration policies limit access to obstetric and gynecologic care while in custody, target pregnant people at points of entry for immigrant-enforcement actions, separate parents and children, and restrict access to asylum for victims of gender-based violence. 38 Highly racialized rhetoric and promises of punitive, anti-immigrant policies made during the 2016 election were associated with a significant increase in preterm births; low birth weight newborns; self-reported sadness, anxiety, and nervousness; and decreased healthcare utilization by US immigrants.38,39
Given the persistence of maternal health disparities and in light of the stress imposed by social and material adversity on pregnant people and associated maternal and infant health outcomes, we examined how researchers and interventionists conceptualize and measure prenatal stress in groups experiencing these social disadvantages in the United States. 40 To investigate this question, we conducted a scoping review to assess how researchers are defining and measuring prenatal stress in the context of food insecurity, housing instability, and immigration in the United States. Our rationale for excluding non-U.S. studies was to optimize comparability of the overall sociopolitical context in which these stressors were experienced. Our primary aim was to assess the definition and measurement of prenatal stress in research focusing on pregnant people exposed to food insecurity, housing, and immigration to identify research gaps and opportunities to develop effective mental health interventions.
Methods
Conceptual framework
We adapted two frameworks to develop our conceptual model of stress during pregnancy as a possible result of three social stressors with consequences for maternal, fetal, and infant health. The SDOH framework illustrates how structural or “upstream” social, economic, and political factors, such as income, education, occupation, gender, race, and ethnicity, contribute to a person’s intermediate or “midstream” living and working conditions, which ultimately impacts their health status. 41 These midstream factors include a person’s housing quality, employment opportunities, access to healthy food, and overall ability to lead a healthy life. In the second framework by Kramer et al., 42 a pregnant person is situated at the intersection of her social and health life course trajectory and the multilevel causes of morbidity and mortality, ranging from biomedical conditions to the health service, transportation, social support, and community environments. We adapted these frameworks to highlight the demands of pregnancy (illustrated by a “top-down” arrow of biomedical needs) and the underlying social conditions that produce stress (illustrated by a “bottom up” arrow of the conditions of life in general that induce stress); the two arrows capture the coexistence of two sets of demands on a single pregnant body. Figure 1 below illustrates our conceptual model for this approach. We posit that while social determinants produce stressors in any stage of life, the demands of pregnancy exacerbate the immediacy of their effect, resulting in a combined form of stress that is best captured as prenatal stress due to its timing and overlap with pregnancy-related needs.

Conceptual model for prenatal stress and the social determinants of health.
Approach
Scoping reviews aim to map key concepts supporting a research area rapidly and are recommended when the field of interest is complex or has not been comprehensively reviewed. 43 We conducted a scoping review to identify gaps in the existing literature concerning the current definitions and measurements of prenatal stress and to highlight opportunities for integrating validated measures of prenatal stress in research on social determinants of maternal health. 43 We used Arksey and O’Malley’s 43 framework for conducting scoping reviews and reported our results using the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. 44
Study eligibility criteria
We created study eligibility criteria to ensure that a broad range of articles could be included in this review. We identified all articles within our search timeline that included stress as a variable of interest during pregnancy among individuals subjected to food insecurity, housing instability, or immigration. We chose these stressors to focus on the key elements of the ACOG social determinants of health screening tool and the recent policy focus on these issues given the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing political discourse on immigration.32,37,45 –49 The definition of food insecurity, housing instability, or immigration was unrestricted, i.e. we relied on the study authors’ operationalization of these factors and did not specify a particular aspect of any of these three stressors. Therefore, as long as the study population was described as experiencing one of these conditions, we considered the article for inclusion. Next, we reviewed these studies for their focus on stress during pregnancy and excluded those that did not include stress as a variable in maternal health assessments. In addition, we omitted studies conducted outside of the United States and those that examined the impact of stress during the postpartum phase. Studies not written in English were excluded because of the cost and time involved in translation. Articles focusing on biological and oxidative stress were also excluded as this was outside the scope of this review. A detailed inclusion criteria table with justifications and explanations can be found in Supplemental Appendix 1.
Databases, search terms, and limits
We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to assess how prenatal stress was defined and measured in literature from January 2012 to January 2022 to capture contemporary contexts for social adversity in the United States. Studies were limited to those published in these 10 years to focus our search and highlight the possible inconsistencies in the way prenatal stress is defined and measured in recent literature to limit the influence of large variations in U.S. social and immigration policy over time. We completed this preliminary search in three parts, exploring keywords such as “food insecurity,” “housing instability,” “immigration,” “pregnancy,” “prenatal,” and “stress.” We utilized the Boolean operator “AND” to combine themes and “OR” within themes for all three searches, optimizing the search process and ensuring comprehensive results. No other limitations were applied. Supplemental Appendix 2 includes a detailed breakdown of our search strategies for each database searched.
Study selection
I.P. and A.D. screened all the articles identified via electronic searches for eligibility using Rayyan. 50 We were blinded during the screening process and applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria to all abstracts. If the relevance of a study or its relation to the concept of stress was unclear from the abstract, we scanned the full article. Once both researchers had made their selections, we unblinded the first review and included all studies for which both I.P. and A.D. agreed on the assessment. In the case of disagreement, both reviewers discussed the article and made a final decision. We read each of the included studies and discussed them to determine whether they should be included in the review.
Charting the data
Using a standardized data collection form, IP extracted data from all included studies, including the definition of prenatal stress (if any), how it was measured, and when it was measured during the pregnancy. The data collection form is included in Supplemental Appendix 3.
Collating, summarizing, and reporting the results
IP and AD tabulated and summarized the extracted data. Both reviewers created independent descriptive narratives to illustrate findings concerning the definitions of and measurement approaches for prenatal stress in the included studies and then compared the narratives. Through conversation and consensus, we developed a combined narrative. Both reviewers re-reviewed the tabulated and summarized data to ensure we had not missed any important points.
Results
Included studies
The study selection process is presented in Figure 2 below. Our initial search identified 1,023 articles. After removing 70 duplicates, IP and AD independently screened the remaining 953 articles and excluded another 909 based on the title and abstract. Of the 44 articles that underwent a full-text review, 20 were excluded because they either had incorrect or missing stress indicators (n = 16) or studied the wrong population (n = 4). Twenty-four articles met all inclusion criteria.

Study selection flow diagram.
Study characteristics
Of the 24 articles that assessed stress during pregnancy in the context of food insecurity, housing instability, and immigration, six studied the relationship between stress and food insecurity, three studied the relationship between stress and housing instability, and 15 examined the relationship between stress and immigration.51 –74 Study designs included prospective birth cohort studies (n = 10), retrospective studies (n = 4), case-control studies (n = 3), mixed methods research studies (n = 2), retrospective cross-sectional studies (n = 2), a qualitative study (n = 1), and quasi-experimental studies (pre-post) (n = 2).51 –74 A summary of the characteristics of the included studies is presented in Table 1 below.
Included study characteristics.
PTSD: post-traumatic stress disorder; SSS: subjective social status; GPC: group prenatal care; LBW: low birth weight; PTB: preterm birth.
Thirteen studies measured stress during the second or third trimester of pregnancy (14–40 weeks gestation).51,52,54,55,59 –63,69,70,72,74 Three studies measured stress during the first trimester of pregnancy (1–12 weeks gestation).56 –58 Eight studies did not mention when they measured stress during pregnancy.53,64 –68,71,73 Of the 24 studies included in this scoping review, one studied Japanese American women, one studied Hawaiian/Pacific Islander women, one studied Somali women, one studied Black women, nine studied Latinx women, and 11 studied a racially diverse cohort of women.51 –74 All women who participated in the selected studies were 18 years or older, and most were low-income with singleton pregnancies.51 –74
Defining prenatal stress
Although each included study focused on stress during pregnancy, only five studies named prenatal stress specifically, and none of them defined it.51,69 –71,73 None of these studies described whether prenatal stress was unique or how it might differ from general stress in the context of adverse social determinants of health. Seven other studies identified a particular form of stress that had an associated definition, including post-traumatic stress (n = 1), 68 acculturative stress (n = 3),56 –58 and self-reported stress (n = 2).55,72 See Table 2 below.
Types of stress and their definitions in selected studies.
PTSD: post-traumatic stress disorder.
Measuring prenatal stress
While we screened for studies that measured some form of stress, only 13 used a validated instrument.51,52,56 –59,62 –65,68,72,74 Seven studies used the Perceived Social Stress Scale (PSS),51,56,57,59,62,64,65 two studies used Cohen’s 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10),52,63 one study used Cohen’s 4-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4), 74 and one study used Cohen’s 14-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14) to measure psychosocial and perceived stress. 72 Bandoli et al. 62 measured chronic stress using a validated tool and acute stress using a non-validated questionnaire. In addition to the PSS-4, Izano et al. 74 also measured psychosocial stress using questions from the literature on factors related to psychosocial stress, work, social and physical environments that had been previously validated in other study populations and were pilot tested on a subset of women in the Chemicals in Our Body (CIOB) study. Eight studies used non-validated surveys and questionnaires constructed by the research team to measure stress.53,60,66,67,69 –71,73 Three studies mentioned that they used a validated tool to measure paradigms of stress but did not specify which tool they used.54,55,61
Five studies specifically measured life events commonly understood to cause stress among individuals54,55,67,68,74; however, of these five studies, only one specified which validated tool they used to measure it: the Life Events Checklist (LEC). 68 Three studies measured acculturative stress using a combination of the Social Attitudinal Familial and Environmental Stress Scale (SAFE) and the Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican-Americans-Revised (ARMSA-II).56 –58 Of the five studies that mentioned prenatal stress, only one used a validated tool, the PDQ, to measure it.51,74 Tsai et al. 60 measured stress during pregnancy using a non-validated, standardized questionnaire. Brief descriptions of the validated instruments are included in Table 3 below.
Stress measurement instruments.
Fifteen studies measured over 25 common stressors that were included as stress indicators.51 –58,60 –62,67 –71,74 These included caregiver burden (n = 3),54,55,74 unplanned pregnancy (n = 3),54,70,74 change in marital status (n = 2),70,71 incarceration (n = 2),53,71 violence and abuse (n = 1), 68 discrimination (n = 2),56,57 and poor neighborhood environment (n = 2).54,74 Four studies measured financial strain, and three studies measured job strain.54,55,71,74 Two studies measured depression, and another two measured pregnancy-related anxiety.51,58,62 While some studies measured food insecurity as a construct that is separate from stress (n = 5),51,52,54,55,74 Laraia et al. 52 write that “the household food insecurity scale can be viewed as a crude measure that captures psychosocial stress, poor diet quality, and economic hardship.” Of the 15 studies that measured a stress paradigm, four studies did not explain the association between the stress paradigm and stress during pregnancy.51,60,67,69 In addition, 10 studies measured a series of measures and compiled the data without clarifying which measures were used to measure stress specifically.51 –54,56 –58,67,68,70 See Table 4 for a breakdown of how prenatal stress and general stress were measured in the included studies.
Measurement of prenatal stress and general stress.
PSS: perceived social stress scale; PDQ: prenatal distress questionnaire; ARMSA-II: acculturation rating scale for Mexican Americans-revised II; SAFE: social attitudinal familial and environmental stress scale; DSS: discrimination stress scale; LEC: life events checklist.
Four of the five studies using more than one tool or scale to measure stress presented a correlation matrix of these measures. Izano et al. 74 found a strong association between food insecurity and financial strain, as well as between food insecurity and poor neighborhood quality. In addition, high job strain was highly correlated with financial strain. Among women of Mexican descent in southern California, acculturative stress was highly correlated with anxiety symptoms during all stages of pregnancy and postpartum. 58 Similarly, in another sample of Mexican-American women in southern California, acculturative stress was associated with prenatal anxiety symptoms in every trimester, although the anxiety declined by the last three months of pregnancy. Perceived discrimination was not found to be associated with anxiety. 56 D’Anna-Hernandez et al., 57 however, found that acculturative stress measures were highly correlated with perceived discrimination but not cultural stressors of acculturation and that acculturative stress and perceived stress were highly correlated with maternal depressive symptoms, which was an outcome in their study but also used as a measure of stress in others.
Discussion
Of the 24 articles we reviewed, none defined prenatal stress, and only one used a prenatal stress-specific tool to measure it.51 –74 While we screened for US studies that measured some form of stress during pregnancy, we found a large variation in the tools used to measure prenatal stress and the related constructs that are measured as stress indicators. Furthermore, we question whether an association between two concepts, e.g. food insecurity and stress, is sufficient to use the one to approximate the other. Therefore, our study found that within the past 10 years in the United States, there has been little consistency in the definition and measurement of prenatal stress in the context of three common social determinants of health.
Three decades ago, Lobel 15 raised concerns about the conceptual equivalence of three measures of prenatal stress, including stressful life events, women’s emotional responses (state anxiety), and their predisposition toward anxiety (trait anxiety) in pregnancy literature. We investigated whether prenatal stress is defined and measured as a validated measure in contemporary research on psychosocial risk factors associated with pregnancy and birth outcomes and found that this lack of conceptual equivalence persists. 32 In their review of literature from 1999 to 2009 on ways prenatal stress was being measured, Nast et al. 25 identified 43 different psychometric instruments used to measure maternal psychosocial stress across seven constructs, with anxiety being most frequent and stress related to pregnancy and parenting being least. While we focused our study on the measurement of prenatal stress in relation to adverse social conditions, we still identified 10 different instruments that measured over 25 different constructs; of the tools that directly measured stress, perceived stress was measured most frequently, and prenatal stress was measured the least.51,52,56 –59,62 –65,68,72,74 While using multiple measures (proxies) for prenatal stress should have helped to reduce problems of measurement error, we observed a lack of evidence showing the conceptual equivalence of these proxies and prenatal stress.
Within food insecurity, housing instability, and immigration, we found no uniform definition or measure of prenatal stress. Although several studies used validated instruments, most of them did not consider the specific demands resulting from social adversity and pregnancy, as we had conceptualized in our model. Among the measures related to particular social determinants, acculturative stress related to immigration status was the most frequently used measure, capturing a particular aspect of immigration. However, other than the PDQ, all other instruments were designed for use at any stage in one’s life, disregarding the physical, psychosocial, and financial demands of pregnancy. When measuring stress, it is important to differentiate between measuring stressful events, such as being food insecure, which can be measured discretely, and the cognitive, emotional, and biological response to these stressors. 82 Social scientists, such as those working within the SDOH framework, may use the term “stress” loosely, 83 either failing to define it or using it to refer to a multitude of experiences, and this lack of specificity can impede any clear assessment or comparisons of stress during pregnancy, especially when harmful exposures can have detrimental consequences for mothers and their infants. 84
Certain studies centered on the three SDOHs mentioned in this paper drew attention to the heightened vulnerability of pregnant individuals impacted by our selected determinants. However, despite this focus, these studies failed to meet our selection criteria and were not included in our analysis. An example includes a study of linked administrative data for women who received shelter through an Emergency Assistance program in Massachusetts. 85 While this study measured the effect of unstable housing during pregnancy on pregnancy complications, it excluded data on mental health disorders among the study population. Similarly, another study measured household food insecurity and elevated antenatal depression symptoms (EADS) but did not equate EADS with stress, and therefore, it did not meet our study inclusion criteria. 86 An immigration and stress study investigated the health profiles and use of healthcare services among newly arrived migrant women in Canada. 87 Although the study indicated potential stress during pregnancy and focused on depression, anxiety, somatization, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in an immigrant population, it did not meet our country selection criteria.
Strengths and limitations
A strength of our review was our particular focus on three salient aspects of the SDOH framework, given its relevance to contemporary research on maternal health inequities. By focusing on three different social determinants, we were able to question and answer how their psychological impact is being conceptualized in current literature. Another strength was having two researchers independently screen, select, and extract data. This minimized bias and increased the validity of the data reported. A limitation of our study was that we limited the scope of research to the United States to focus on how food insecurity, housing instability, and immigration impact stress among pregnant people in the sociopolitical context of one country. While this allowed us to compare findings without needing to account for country-specific factors, such as housing policy, we also had to exclude international studies that specifically attempted to define and measure prenatal stress. As this was a scoping review, we did not formally evaluate study quality and the risk of bias.
Future implications
Having a consistent definition and set of measures for prenatal stress is important for research and policy development. Currently, the differences in the conceptualization of prenatal stress impede comparisons across populations, settings, and stressors and, thus, fail to build compelling evidence for the importance of prenatal stress for maternal and child health outcomes. The inability to effectively conceptualize prenatal stress in the context of social determinants of health hinders our ability to understand the degree to which addressing the source of stress, such as food insecurity, housing instability, or immigration, reduces prenatal stress across different populations and geographies. Choosing and documenting appropriate measures of stress should be based on theoretical and empirical examinations of the uniqueness of the population, windows of sensitivity, types of stress responses, characteristics of the stressor, and the best scales available to accommodate the intended measure. 82 We encourage social scientists working within the SDOH framework to consider greater specificity in their definition of stress and in the tools they choose to measure it, including a clear presentation of their conceptual approach to do so.
As healthcare stakeholders seek to assess and address social determinants of health-related needs, it is imperative that they can turn to credible data in the literature that accurately defines and measures prenatal stress. In addition, increasing the reliability and validity of pregnancy-specific stress measures over time could benefit clinical care, aiding healthcare workers in identifying pregnant people at greatest risk of delivering early or engaging in behaviors, such as smoking, and subsequently offering additional support that aims to reduce prenatal stress and adverse maternal and infant health outcomes.3,26,88 –90
Conclusions
Research with concise and consistent definitions of prenatal stress during adverse social conditions is sparse in the United States. We encourage the accurate definition and measurement of prenatal stress so that conclusions made in the literature are applicable across studies and to other policy and community-based maternal health initiatives. We recommend identifying a consistent, well-supported multidimensional approach to defining and measuring prenatal stress in the context of adverse social conditions to provide consistent evidence on how the relationship between prenatal stress and social determinants of health can influence adverse maternal and child health outcomes. Improving the definition of prenatal stress and standardizing the tools used to measure it will allow us to build effective interventions and policies that can aid those facing stress-related pregnancy complications.
Supplemental Material
sj-docx-1-whe-10.1177_17455057231191091 – Supplemental material for What is prenatal stress? A scoping review of how prenatal stress is defined and measured within the context of food insecurity, housing instability, and immigration in the United States
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-whe-10.1177_17455057231191091 for What is prenatal stress? A scoping review of how prenatal stress is defined and measured within the context of food insecurity, housing instability, and immigration in the United States by Ishani Patel and Alka Dev in Women’s Health
Supplemental Material
sj-docx-2-whe-10.1177_17455057231191091 – Supplemental material for What is prenatal stress? A scoping review of how prenatal stress is defined and measured within the context of food insecurity, housing instability, and immigration in the United States
Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-whe-10.1177_17455057231191091 for What is prenatal stress? A scoping review of how prenatal stress is defined and measured within the context of food insecurity, housing instability, and immigration in the United States by Ishani Patel and Alka Dev in Women’s Health
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the professors at The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice that provided their guidance and expertise during this study: Dr. Catherine Saunders and Dr. Rebecca Emeny. Three high school students assisted with the initial search as a summer project: Richa Vaid, Liana Lansigan, and Diya Kochhar.
Declarations
Supplemental material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
