Lumbar Lordosis Distribution in Asymptomatic Adult Volunteers: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background:

Restoring lumbar lordosis is important for adult spinal deformity surgery. Several reports have suggested that lumbar lordosis distribution has a significant impact on the outcome of surgery, including lumbar distribution index (LDI), proximal lumbar lordosis (PLL), and distal lumbar lordosis (DLL). The features of lumbar lordosis distribution are inconclusive in asymptomatic adults.

Questions/Purposes:

We sought to evaluate the variation of lumbar lordosis distribution (LDI, PLL, and DLL) and to identify associated factors in asymptomatic adult volunteers.

Methods:

We performed a systematic review of the Embase and Medline databases to identify studies in asymptomatic adult volunteers to evaluate lumbar lordosis distribution including LDI, PLL, and DLL.

Results:

Twelve articles met eligibility criteria and were included in our review. The respective pooled estimates of mean and variance, respectively, were 65.10% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.61–67.58) and 13.70% in LDI, 16.51° (95% CI: 5.54–27.49) and 11.46° in PLL, and 35.47° (95% CI: 32.79–38.18) and 9.10° in DLL. Lumbar lordosis distribution was associated with race, age, sex, body mass index, pelvic incidence, and Roussouly classification.

Conclusions:

This systematic review found that despite a wide variation in LDI and PLL, DLL is maintained in a narrower range in asymptomatic adult volunteers, especially in white populations. Distal lumbar lordosis may be a more reliable radiographic parameter to restore the lumbar lordosis distribution in preoperative planning.

Keywords

lumbar lordosis distribution asymptomatic lumbar distribution index proximal lumbar lordosis distal lumbar lordosis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ando

Kobayashi

Nakashima

, et al. Poor spinal alignment in females with obesity: the Yakumo study. J Orthop. 2020;21:512–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.09.006.

Anwar

Butler

Yarashi

Rajakulendran

Molloy

. Segmental Pelvic Correlation (SPeC): a novel approach to understanding sagittal plane spinal alignment. Spine J. 2015;15(12):2518–2523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.09.021.

Arima

Dimar

2nd Glassman

, et al. Differences in lumbar and pelvic parameters among African American, Caucasian and Asian populations. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(12):2990–2998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5743-5.

Chung

Lee

Jeon

. Differences in lumbar segment angle among Roussouly types of global sagittal alignment in asymptomatic adult subjects. Spine Deform. 2020;8(2):227–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-019-00010-6.

Diebo

Gammal

, et al. Role of ethnicity in alignment compensation: propensity matched analysis of differential compensatory mechanism recruitment patterns for sagittal malalignment in 288 ASD patients from Japan, Korea, and United States. Spine. 2017;42(4):E234–E240. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001744.

Hyun

Han

Kim

, et al. Predictive formula of ideal lumbar lordosis and lower lumbar lordosis determined by individual pelvic incidence in asymptomatic elderly population. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(9):1906–1913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05955-w.

Jacobs

van Royen

van Kuijk

SMJ

, et al. Prediction of mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity surgery-the GAP score versus the Schwab classification. Spine J. 2019;19(5):781–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.11.013.

Kim

Ahn

, et al. A comparative analysis of sagittal spinopelvic alignment between young and old men without localized disc degeneration. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(7):1400–1406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3236-8.

Korovessis

Dimas

Iliopoulos

Lambiris

. Correlative analysis of lateral vertebral radiographic variables and medical outcomes study short-form health survey: a comparative study in asymptomatic volunteers versus patients with low back pain. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;15(5):384–390. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200210000-00007.

10.

Lafage

Schwab

Challier

, et al. Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds: should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age? Spine. 2016;41(1):62–68. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001171.

11.

Lee

Chung

Kang

Park

Shin

. Normal patterns of sagittal alignment of the spine in young adults radiological analysis in a Korean population. Spine. 2011;36(25):E1648–E1654. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318216b0fd.

12.

Lee

Chung

Park

Kim

Shin

. Simple prediction method of lumbar lordosis for planning of lumbar corrective surgery: radiological analysis in a Korean population. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(1):192–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2895-1.

13.

Sun

Wang

. Lumbar lordosis morphology correlates to pelvic incidence and erector spinae muscularity. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):802. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80852-7.

14.

Shi

, et al. Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score in asymptomatic individuals: is it universal? Spine J. 2022;22:1566–1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2022.04.003.

15.

McCarthy

Lafage

Smith

, et al. How much lumbar lordosis does a patient need to reach their age-adjusted alignment target? A formulated approach predicting successful surgical outcomes. [published online ahead of print, 2022 Apr 20] Global Spine J. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221092003.

16.

Pesenti

Lafage

Stein

, et al. The amount of proximal lumbar lordosis is related to pelvic incidence. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(8):1603–1611. https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000000380.

17.

Pesenti

Prost

McCausland

, et al. Optimal correction of adult spinal deformities requires restoration of distal lumbar lordosis. Adv Orthop. 2021;2021:5572181. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5572181.

18.

Riouallon

Bouyer

Wolff

. Risk of revision surgery for adult idiopathic scoliosis: a survival analysis of 517 cases over 25 years. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(8):2527–2534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4505-5.

19.

Roussouly

Gollogly

Berthonnaud

Dimnet

. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine. 2005;30(3):346–353. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65.

20.

Scemama

Laouissat

Abelin-Genevois

Roussouly

. Surgical treatment of thoraco-lumbar kyphosis (TLK) associated with low pelvic incidence. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(8):2146–2152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-4984-z.

21.

Schwab

Blondel

Bess

, et al. Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine. 2013;38(13):E803–E812. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318292b7b9.

22.

Schwab

Diebo

Smith

, et al. Fine-tuned surgical planning in adult spinal deformity: determining the lumbar lordosis necessary by accounting for both thoracic kyphosis and pelvic incidence. Spine J. 2014;14(11):S73.

23.

Schwab

Ungar

Blondel

, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine. 2012;37(12):1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823e15e2.

24.

Sebaaly

Gehrchen

Silvestre

, et al. Mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity and the effect of restoring the spinal shapes according to the Roussouly classification: a multicentric study. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(4):904–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06253-1.

25.

Sebaaly

Grobost

Mallam

Roussouly

. Description of the sagittal alignment of the degenerative human spine. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(2):489–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5404-0.

26.

Sohn

Chung

Kim

, et al. Sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic patients over 30 years old in the Korean population. Acta Neurochir. 2017;159(6):1119–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3100-9.

27.

Tobert

Davis

Annis

, et al. The impact of the lordosis distribution index on failure after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine J. 2020;20(8):1261–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.03.010.

28.

Wegner

Iyer

Lenke

Kim

Kelly

. Global alignment and proportion (GAP) scores in an asymptomatic, nonoperative cohort: a divergence of age-adjusted and pelvic incidence-based alignment targets. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(9):2362–2367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06474-9.

29.

Sun

, et al. Correlation between lordosis distribution index, lordosis tilt, and occurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis following surgery for adult degenerative scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2022;31(2):267–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07090-x.

30.

Yilgor

Sogunmez

Boissiere

, et al. Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(19):1661–1672. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.16.01594.

31.

Yilgor

Sogunmez

Yavuz

, et al. Relative lumbar lordosis and lordosis distribution index: individualized pelvic incidence-based proportional parameters that quantify lumbar lordosis more precisely than the concept of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;43(6):E5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.8.Focus17498.

32.

Zhou

Sun

Chen

, et al. How does sagittal spinopelvic alignment of lumbar multisegmental spondylolysis differ from monosegmental spondylolysis? [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 17]. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.2.Spine191415.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB