High BIRC7 Expression Might Be an Independent Prognostic Indicator of Poor Recurrence-Free Survival in Patients With Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Background:

BIRC7, which encodes Baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) repeat-containing protein 7, is an oncogene in multiple types of cancer. In this study, we examined the association between BIRC7 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of prostate cancer, the independent prognostic value of BIRC7 in terms of recurrence-free survival, and the molecular mechanisms of its dysregulation.

Methods:

Data mining was performed using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The patients were divided into high and low BIRC7 expression groups according to the Youden index determined by receiver operating characteristic curves for recurrence. Subgroup analysis was performed according to T stages and Gleason score.

Results:

BIRC7 was significantly upregulated in prostate cancer tissues (N = 497) than in normal prostate tissues (N = 52). High BIRC7 expression group had lower ratios of overall response rate and medium-grade (Gleason score 6-7) tumors and higher proportions of nodal invasion and recurrence after surgery. Although Kaplan-Meier curves showed that high BIRC7 expression was generally associated with poor recurrence-free survival, the following subgroup analysis only confirmed the association in T3/T4 and medium-grade tumors. Multivariate analysis showed that BIRC7 expression was not an independent indicator of recurrence-free survival in T2 or high-grade tumors, but was independently associated with poor recurrence-free survival in T3/T4 tumors (hazard ratio: 4.249, 95% confidence interval: 1.563-11.546, P = .005) and in medium-grade tumors (hazard ratio: 6.041, 95% confidence interval: 1.763-20.703, P = .004). DNA amplification was associated with significantly upregulated BIRC7 expression. There was also a weak negative correlation between BIRC7 expression and its DNA methylation (Pearson r = −0.23).

Conclusion:

Based on these findings, we infer that BIRC7 upregulation might serve as a valuable biomarker of increased recurrence risk in advanced T stages and medium-grade prostate cancer. Its expression is at least regulated by both copy number alteration and DNA methylation.

Keywords

prognosis recurrence-free survival prostate cancer

Introduction

Baculoviral inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) repeat (BIR)-containing protein 7, which is also called Livin, is a protein encoded by the BIRC7 gene in human.¹ BIRC7 encodes 2 splicing variants of Livin, termed Livin-α and Livin-β. Both proteins have a single copy of BIR and a Really Interesting New Gene (RING) -type zinc finger domain.² The BIR domain has a well-characterized role in interacting with caspases and inhibiting apoptosis, while the RING-type zinc finger domain has a putative E3 ubiquitin ligase activity and may enhance its antiapoptotic activity.^1,3

A series of previous studies showed that aberrant BIRC7 expression is associated with tumorigenesis, development, and progression in a variety of human malignancies, such as melanoma,⁴ non-small cell lung cancer,⁵ malignant pleural mesothelioma,⁶ gallbladder cancer,⁷ breast cancer,⁸ and prostate cancer.⁹ In prostate cancer, upregulated Livin-α can promote cell proliferation by enhancing G1-S cell cycle transition⁹ and enhance prostate cancer cell invasion via nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) signaling, and the downstream Fibronectin (FN) and C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) pathway.^10,11 Knockdown of endogenous Livin could significantly inhibit prostate cancer cell proliferation and enhance apoptosis.¹² Another recent study based on 43 paraffin-embedded prostate cancer tissues found that Livin expression was positively correlated to the pathological grading of prostate cancer.¹³ These findings suggest that BIRC7 also acts as an oncogene that modulates cancer cell proliferation and invasion and might be related to differentiation of prostate cancer.

Currently, radical prostatectomy remains a first-line therapeutic option for most patients with localized prostate cancer.¹⁴ Biochemical recurrence (BCR), which is defined as detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after radical prostatectomy, or an increasing PSA level following radiation therapy, may signify local or metastatic recurrence.¹⁵ Around 20% to 40% of the patients suffer BCR by 10 years after surgery.¹⁶ In fact, the median overall survival (OS) of the patients after radical prostatectomy is usually over 15 years.¹⁷ In comparison, the median OS was 14.7 years for men who had 1 BCR after surgery and further dropped to 13.6 years in patients who had 2 BCRs.¹⁴ However, patients with BCR may have different clinical courses: some may suffer rapid disease progression and increased risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality, but some may have indolent course, which had little adverse influence on their survival.¹⁸ Therefore, besides the use of PSA as an indicator, it is meaningful to explore other biomarkers for early prediction of recurrence.

In this study, we examined the association between BIRC7 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics and the independent prognostic value of BIRC7 in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Materials and Methods

Data Mining in The Cancer Genome Atlas

Data mining was performed in The Cancer Genome Atlas-prostate cancer (TCGA-PRAD), in which biopsy specimen of 497 prostate cancer tissues and 52 normal prostate tissues have BIRC7 expression measured by RNAseq (IlluminaHiSeq). BIRC7 expression data (log2 [normalized count+1]), gene-level thresholded GISTIC2-processed copy-number alteration (−2: homozygous deletion; −1: heterozygous loss, 0: copy-neutral; +1: low-level copy gain; +2: high-level amplification), DNA methylation (measured by Infinium Human Methylation 450K BeadChip) and relevant clinical data were downloaded by using the UCSC Xena browser (https://xenabrowser.net/).

Kaplan-Meier Curves of RFS

Kaplan-Meier curves of RFS after primary therapy were generated by GraphPad Prism v6.0. Receiver operating characteristic curves for recurrence was constructed and the optimal cutoff values of BIRC7 expression were determined based on Youden index. Subgroup analysis was performed according to T stages and tumor grade.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0 and GraphPad Prism v6.0. Continuous variables were reported as means ± standard error of the mean. The group difference was compared by 2-tailed Student t test or analysis of vairance with Student-Newman-Keuls test as a post hoc test. The association between BIRC7 expression and the clinicopathological parameters was assessed by using χ² tests. The difference between the RFS curves was compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate the independent prognostic values of BIRC7 expression in terms of RFS. Pearson goodness of fit test was performed to assess the correlation between BIRC7 expression and its DNA methylation. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

BIRC7 Expression Is Upregulated in Prostate Cancer and Is Associated With Malignant Tumor Behaviors

By using RNA-seq data in TCGA-PRAD, we found 497 prostate cancer tissues had BIRC7 RNA expression measured. BIRC7 expression was significantly higher in prostate cancer tissues than in normal prostate tissues (N = 52; Figure 1A) and showed a trend of increase in advanced T stages (Figure 1B). In addition, we also observed substantially higher BIRC7 expression in nodal positive (N1) cases than in nodal negative (N0) cases (Figure 1C) and in high-grade tumors (Gleason score 8-10) than in medium-grade tumors (Gleason score 6-7; Figure 1D). Then, we compared the clinicopathological parameters in the patients with RFS data recorded (N = 436). The patients were divided into high and low BIRC7 expression groups according to the optimal cutoff value (Table 1). Results showed that the high BIRC7 expression group had older ages (61.58 ± 0.42 vs 59.96 ± 0.54, P = .018), a higher proportion of nodal positive cases (47/235, 20.0% vs 15/135, 11.1%, P = .028), lower proportions of overall response rate (215/249, 86.3% vs 140/150, 93.3%, P = .031), R0 cases (163/254, 64.2% vs 118/155, 76.1%, P = .011) and medium-grade (Gleason score 6-7) tumors (144/273, 52.7% vs 118/163, 72.4%, P < .0001), and a higher risk of recurrence (44/273, 16.1% vs 8/163, 4.9%, P = .0005; Table 1). PTEN deletion has been considered as an important marker of RFS in prostate cancer.^19,20 In TCGA-PRAD, we also observed a high frequency of PTEN deletion (heterozygous loss and homozygous deletion/all tumor cases with copy number alteration data: 159/491) and associated decreased PTEN expression (Supplemental Figure 1A and B). However, no difference in BIRC7 expression was observed in these groups (Supplemental Figure 1C). In addition, between the high and low BIRC7 expression groups, we did not find any significant difference in PTEN copy number alterations (Table 1). These results suggest that BIRC7 expression is irrelevant to PTEN in prostate cancer.

Figure 1.

BIRC7 expression is upregulated in prostate cancer and is associated with malignant tumor behaviors. Comparison of BIRC7 expression between prostate cancer tissues (N = 497) and normal prostate tissues (N = 52) (A), among T2/T3/T4 stage tumors (B), between nodal positive (N = 79) and negative (N = 345) tumors (C), and between high-grade (Gleason score 8-10; (N = 205) and medium-grade tumors (Gleason score 6-7; (N = 292).

Table 1.

The Association Between BIRC7 Expression and the Clinical Parameters in Patients With Prostate Cancer.

Parameters		BIRC7 Expression		χ²	P Value
Parameters		High (N = 273)	Low (N = 163)	χ²	P Value
Age (Mean ± SEM)		61.58 ± 0.42	59.96 ± 0.54		.018
PSA value (Mean ± SEM)		1.945 ± 1.354	0.685 ± 0.319		.37
T stages	T2	102	73	2.21	.14
	T3/T4	166	88
	Null	5	2
N stages	N0	188	120	4.86	.028
	N1	47	15
	Null	38	28
Primary therapy outcome	CR+PR	215	140	4.66	.031
	SD+PD	34	10
	Discrepancy + null	24	13
Radiation therapy	No	222	141	3.36	.067
	Yes	40	14
	Discrepancy + null	11	8
Residual tumor	R0	163	118	6.40	.011
	R1+R2	91	37
	RX + null	19	8
Gleason score	6/7	144	118	16.43	<.001
Gleason score	8/9/10	129	45	16.43	<.001
PTEN CNAs	Amplification	4	0	2.42	.30
	Copy neutral	179	109
	Deletion	87	53
	Null	3	1
Recurrence	No	229	155	12.21	<.001
Recurrence	Yes	44	8	12.21	<.001

Abbreviations: CNAs, copy number alterations; CR, complete remission; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial remission; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; R0, No residual tumor; R1, Microscopic residual tumor; R2, Macroscopic residual tumor; RX, the presence of residual tumor cannot be assessed; SD, stable disease; SEM, standard error of the mean; null, no data.

BIRC7 Upregulation Is Associated With Poor RFS in Prostate Cancer

By generating Kaplan-Meier curves of RFS, we found that high BIRC7 expression was associated with unfavorable RFS in prostate cancer (P = .0003; Figure 2). To verify the robustness of the association, we performed subgroup analysis according to T stages and tumor grades. By using the Youden Index as the cutoff (>1.285 vs ≤ 1.285), we found that BIRC7 expression was not related to RFS in patients with T2 tumors (P = .080; Figure 3A). However, high BIRC7 expression (> 0.92, N = 166) was significantly associated with poor RFS in T3/T4 tumors (P = .0007; Figure 3B). To explore the independent prognostic value of BIRC7 in these subgroups, we then conducted univariate and multivariate analysis with Cox regression model. Results showed that BIRC7 expression was not an independent indicator of RFS in T2 tumors, but was independently associated with poor RFS in T3/T4 tumors (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.249, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.563-11.546, P = .005; Table 2).

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier curves of RFS in prostate cancer. RFS indicates recurrence-free survival.

Figure 3.

Kaplan-Meier curves of RFS in T2 (A) and T3/T4 (B) tumors. RFS indicates recurrence-free survival.

Table 2.

Univariate and Multivariate Analysis of RFS in T2 and in T3/T4 Tumors.

Parameters	Univariate Model				Multivariate Model
	P	HR	95% CI		P	HR	95% CI
	P	HR	(Lower/Upper)		P	HR	(Lower/Upper)
T2
Age (continuous)	.386	1.041	0.951	1.140
N status: N0 vs N1	.109	0.170	0.020	1.482
Primary therapy outcome: SD/PD vs CR/PR	.006	10.114	1.949	52.486
PSA value (continuous)	.134	1.230	0.938	1.613
Radiation therapy: No vs Yes
Residual tumor: R1+R2 vs R0	.410	1.938	0.401	9.370
Gleason score:8/9/10 vs 6/7	.039	4.002	1.070	14.975
BIRC7 expression: High vs low	.102	3.716	0.770	17.935
T3/T4
Age (continuous)	.568	0.986	0.940	1.034
N status: N0 vs N1	.820	0.923	0.461	1.845
Primary therapy outcome: SD/PD vs CR/PR	.011	2.276	1.203	4.308	.358	1.394	0.686	2.832
PSA value (continuous)	.027	1.043	1.005	1.082	.014	1.057	1.011	1.105
Radiation therapy: No vs Yes	.339	0.695	0.330	1.464
Residual tumor: R1+R2 vs R0	.012	2.214	1.187	4.129	.136	1.692	0.848	3.376
Gleason score: 8/9/10 vs 6/7	<.001	4.505	2.004	10.128	.027	2.634	1.118	6.205
BIRC7 expression: High vs Low	.002	3.999	1.685	9.490	.005	4.249	1.563	11.546

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CR, complete remission; HR, hazard ratio; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial remission; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; RFS, recurrence-free survival.

In subgroup analysis according to the Gleason score, we found that high BIRC7 expression (>2.00, N = 67) was significantly associated with poor RFS in medium-grade tumors (Gleason score 6-7; P = .0003; Figure 4A), but not in high-grade tumors (> 0.90, N = 129; Gleason score 8-10; P = .10; Figure 4B). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that BIRC7 expression was independently associated with unfavorable RFS in medium-grade tumors (HR: 6.041, 95% CI: 1.763-20.703, P = .004), but not in high-grade tumors (Table 3).

Figure 4.

Kaplan-Meier curves of RFS in medium-grade (A) and high-grade (B) tumors. RFS indicates recurrence-free survival.

Table 3.

Univariate and Multivariate Analysis of RFS in Medium-Grade and High-Grade Tumors.

Parameters	Univariate Model				Multivariate Model
	P	HR	95% CI		P	HR	95% CI (Lower/Upper)
	P	HR	(Lower/Upper)		P	HR	95% CI (Lower/Upper)
Gleason score 6/7
Age (continuous)	.277	1.048	0.963	1.140
T stages: T3/T4 vs T2	.366	1.701	0.538	5.380
N status: N0 vs N1	.388	0.403	0.051	3.180
Primary therapy outcome: D/PD vs CR/PR	.015	6.682	1.447	30.863	.110	3.595	0.749	17.264
PSA value (continuous)	.983	1.006	0.582	1.740
Radiation therapy: No vs Yes	.390	0.404	0.051	3.181
Residual tumor: R1+R2 vs R0	.273	1.959	0.589	6.522
BIRC7 expression: High vs Low	.002	6.716	2.015	22.381	.004	6.041	1.763	20.703
Gleason score 8/9/10
Age (continuous)	.399	0.980	0.936	1.027
T stages: T3/T4 vs T2	.184	2.020	0.715	5.707
N status: N0 vs N1	.508	1.271	0.626	2.581
Primary therapy outcome: SD/PD vs CR/PR	.211	1.518	0.789	2.920
PSA value (continuous)	.085	1.034	0.995	1.073
Radiation therapy: No vs Yes	.855	0.934	0.452	1.932
Residual tumor: R1+R2 vs R0	.025	2.123	1.099	4.099
BIRC7 expression: High vs Low	.111	2.154	0.838	5.538

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CR, complete remission; HR, hazard ratio; PD, progressive disease; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; RFS, recurrence-free survival; SD, stable disease.

BIRC7 Dysregulation Is Related to Both Copy Number Alteration and Methylation

To explore the mechanisms of BIRC7 dysregulation in prostate cancer, we examined the correlation between its RNA expression and DNA copy number alteration/methylation by using deep-sequencing data in TCGA-PRAD (Figure 5A). BIRC7 copy number alteration was quantified in 492 out of 498 patients with primary prostate cancer. Forty patients (8.13%) had DNA amplification (+1/+2; Figure 5A), which was associated with significantly upregulated BIRC7 expression (P = .0033; Figure 5B). The results of regression analysis showed a weak negative correlation between BIRC7 expression and its DNA methylation (Pearson r = −0.23; Figure 5C). These findings suggest that the expression of BIRC7 in prostate cancer is at least regulated by both copy number alteration and DNA methylation.

Figure 5.

The association between BIRC7 expression and its DNA copy number alteration/methylation. A, Heat map showing the correlation between BIRC7 expression and its DNA copy number alteration/methylation; −2: homozygous deletion; −1: heterozygous Loss, 0: copy-neutral; +1: low-level copy gain; +2: high-level amplification. B, Comparison of BIRC7 expression in groups with different BIRC7 copy number alteration. C, Regression analysis of the correlation between BIRC7 expression and its DNA methylation.

Discussion

In this study, we observed that BIRC7 expression was significantly upregulated in prostate cancer tissues than in normal prostate tissues. In addition, by comparing the clinical parameters between high and low BIRC7 expression groups, we observed that the high BIRC7 expression group had lower ratios of overall response rate and medium-grade (Gleason score 6-7) tumors and higher proportions of nodal invasion and recurrence after surgery. Previous studies showed that Livin acts as a caspase inhibitor, which blocks caspase activation and further inhibits apoptosis.²¹ In prostate cancer, upregulated Livin-α can facilitate S phase entry in prostate cancer cells and subsequently enhance their proliferation and survival.⁹ It can also enhance prostate cancer cell invasion via NF-κB signaling, and the downstream FN and CXCR4 pathway.^10,11 These mechanisms help to explain the oncogenic properties of BIRC7 in prostate cancer.

As an oncogene, the independent prognostic value of BIRC7 was also observed in several cancers. In patients with rectal cancer, Livin expression was associated with unfavorable OS independent of TNM stage, local and distant recurrence, grade of differentiation, gender, and age.²² In squamous cell/adenosquamous carcinomas and adenocarcinoma of gallbladder, BIRC7 expression was an independent poor prognostic factor in terms of postoperative survival.⁷ Although the oncogenic effects of BIRC7 have been reported in prostate cancer, its prognostic value has not been explored. In fact, current prognostic tools such as clinicopathological parameters lack sufficient accuracy to effectively predict recurrence in prostate cancer.²³ For example, PSA is one of the most important screening tools for prostate cancer. But its prognostic value is debated controversially due to limited specificity and imprecise prediction of tumor aggressiveness.²⁴ Therefore, it is necessary to explore other potential prognostic biomarkers for both early predictions and proactive use of adjuvant therapeutic options before frank recurrence. In this study, we further assessed the independent prognostic value of BIRC7 in terms of RFS. Although Kaplan-Meier curves of RFS showed that high BIRC7 expression was generally associated with poor RFS, the following subgroup analysis only confirmed the association in T3/T4 and in medium-grade tumors. Multivariate analysis showed that BIRC7 expression was not an independent indicator of RFS in T2 or in high-grade tumors, even under the best cutoff model. In comparison, high BIRC7 expression was independently associated with poor RFS in T3/T4 tumors (HR: 4.249, 95% CI: 1.563-11.546, P = .005) and in medium-grade tumors (HR: 6.041, 95% CI: 1.763-20.703, P = .004). These findings suggest that BIRC7 expression might serve as a valuable biomarker of recurrence risk in advanced T stages and medium-grade prostate cancer. However, due to insufficiency data of OS in TCGA-PRAD, we failed to evaluate the prognostic value of BIRC7 in terms of OS.

Previous studies suggest that Livin is a potential therapeutic target in some cancers.² Some therapeutic strategies for its inhibition, such as antisense oligonucleotides, small-molecule inhibitors, and immune-mediated approaches have been tested in in vitro cell models and in vivo animal models and showed certain therapeutic values.^2,25 In this study, we found that high BIRC7 expression was associated with poor therapeutic responses in prostate cancer. In addition, some previous studies found that Livin inhibition could also significantly inhibit prostate cancer cell proliferation and enhance apoptosis.^9,12 Therefore, it is meaningful to further explore the potential of Livin inhibition as a therapeutic option in prostate cancer in the future. Although we found that the expression of BIRC7 in prostate cancer is at least regulated by both copy number alteration and DNA methylation, we could not exclude other genetic or epigenetic mechanisms influencing its transcription and translations. Thus, it is also necessary to investigate other potential mechanisms underlying its dysregulation in prostate cancer.

Conclusion

BIRC7 upregulation might serve as a valuable biomarker of increased recurrence risk in advanced T stages and medium-grade prostate cancer, which is at least regulated by both copy number alteration and DNA methylation.

Supplemental Material

Supplementary_figure_2 - High BIRC7 Expression Might Be an Independent Prognostic Indicator of Poor Recurrence-Free Survival in Patients With Prostate Cancer

Supplementary_figure_2 for High BIRC7 Expression Might Be an Independent Prognostic Indicator of Poor Recurrence-Free Survival in Patients With Prostate Cancer by Yi Yang, Peng Sun, Wei Xu, and Wei Xia in Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Wei Xu

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

Abbreviations

References

Kasof

Gomes

. Livin, a novel inhibitor of apoptosis protein family member. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(5):3238–3246.

Chang

Schimmer

. Livin/melanoma inhibitor of apoptosis protein as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of malignancy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6(1):24–30.

Gazzaniga

Gradilone

Giuliani

. Expression and prognostic significance of LIVIN, SURVIVIN and other apoptosis-related genes in the progression of superficial bladder cancer. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(1):85–90.

Takeuchi

Morton

Elashoff

Hoon

. Survivin expression by metastatic melanoma predicts poor disease outcome in patients receiving adjuvant polyvalent vaccine. Int J Cancer. 2005;117(6):1032–1038.

Crnkovic-Mertens

Muley

Meister

. The anti-apoptotic livin gene is an important determinant for the apoptotic resistance of non-small cell lung cancer cells. Lung Cancer. 2006;54(2):135–142.

Gordon

Mani

Mukhopadhyay

. Expression patterns of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins in malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Pathol. 2007;211(4):447–454.

Yuan

Yang

Zou

. Comparative study of clinicopathological significance, BIRC7, and STC2 expression between squamous cell/adenosquamous carcinomas and adenocarcinoma of gallbladder. Neoplasma. 2013;60(6):698–705.

Yin

Luo

. Livin promotes progression of breast cancer through induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and activation of AKT signaling. Cell Signal. 2013;25(6):1413–1422.

Song

. Livin-α promotes cell proliferation by regulating G1-S cell cycle transition in prostate cancer. Prostate. 2011;71(1):42–51.

10.

Chen

Yang

Che

. Livin mediates tumor cell invasion in the DU-145 cell line via NF-κB. Oncol Rep. 2012;27(6):2010–2016.

11.

Chen

Yang

Wang

. Livin regulates prostate cancer cell invasion by impacting the NF-κB signaling pathway and the expression of FN and CXCR4. IUBMB Life. 2012;64(3):274–283.

12.

Yang

Wang

Huang

Zhou

Landman

. Effects of monomethoxypolyethylene glycol-chitosan nanoparticle-mediated dual silencing of livin and survivin genes in prostate cancer PC-3M cells. Genet Mol Res. 2016;15(2):gmr.15027430.

13.

Ren

Wang

Zhang

. Expression of livin, survivin and caspase-3 in prostatic cancer and their clinical significance. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(11):14034–14039.

14.

Ying

Wang

Yan

. Long-term outcome of prostate cancer patients who exhibit biochemical failure despite salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2017;40(6);612–620.

15.

Uchio

Aslan

Wells

Calderone

Concato

. Impact of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer among US veterans. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(15):1390–1395.

16.

Roehl

Han

Ramos

Antenor

Catalona

. Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J Urol. 2004;172(3):910–914.

17.

Schulz

Kagan

. Long-term outcomes after radical prostatectomy performed in a community-based health maintenance organization. Cancer. 2004;101(1):208–209; Author reply 209-210.

18.

Darwish

Raj

. Management of biochemical recurrence after primary localized therapy for prostate cancer. Front Oncol. 2012;2:48.

19.

Wise

Hermida

Leslie

. Prostate cancer, PI3K, PTEN and prognosis. Clin Sci (Lond). 2017;131(3):197–210.

20.

Kim

Joung

. Overexpression of ERG and Wild-Type PTEN are associated with favorable clinical prognosis and low biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0122498.

21.

Saleem

Qadir

Perveen

. Inhibitors of apoptotic proteins: new targets for anticancer therapy. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2013;82(3):243–251.

22.

Ding

Zhang

Adell

Olsson

Sun

. Livin expression is an independent factor in rectal cancer patients with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:281.

23.

Ilic

Neuberger

Djulbegovic

Dahm

. Screening for prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013(1):CD004720.

24.

Prensner

Rubin

Wei

Chinnaiyan

. Beyond PSA: the next generation of prostate cancer biomarkers. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(127):127rv123.

25.

Zhou

Yuen

Zhan

. Immunity to the melanoma inhibitor of apoptosis protein (ML-IAP; livin) in patients with malignant melanoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012;61(5):655–665.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.63 MB