Abstract
Numerous studies show that negative and uncivil political content on social media – where politicians criticize and insult each other – boosts voters’ engagement. While research suggests this engagement may fuel further negativity and incivility, this cyclical feedback loop remains theoretically unexplored and empirically untested. In this study, we propose a pre-registered hypothesis based on reinforcement learning theory: politicians may become trapped in a vicious cycle where the voters’ engagement generated by their negative and uncivil posts increases the likelihood of future negativity and incivility, especially in proximity to elections. To test this, we analyzed the daily short-term and monthly long-term effects of voter engagement with negative social media posts by low- and high-profile politicians across full electoral cycles in Belgium and the United States. Our findings reveal a vicious cycle of negativity and incivility based on engagement in the period leading up to elections. This suggests that voters’ inherent negativity bias on social media may contribute to escalating conflict between politicians – but primarily during election campaigns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
