Recent studies indicate that politicians’ negativity usage fails to enhance their approval ratings among the general public, yet politicians regularly use it. This begs the following question: why are politicians so negative if this strategy does not bolster their prospects for re-election? In this paper, I argue that the media, driven by audience engagement, plays a pivotal role in shaping politicians’ propensity for negativity. Specifically, politicians resort to negativity because it aligns with the media’s negativity bias, thereby increasing their chances of securing media access and public attention. I test this expectation on the less-likely case of Belgium, using data on politicians’ negativity usage in parliament and their presence in prime-time TV news (2010–2020). The results show that using negativity significantly increases politicians’ chances of gaining media access, particularly when using uncivil negativity. The more media access politicians start to attract due to negativity, the more they resort to negativity.
AlbaughQ.SevenansJ.SorokaS.LoewenP. J.2013. “The Automated Coding of Policy Agendas: A Dictionary-Based Approach.” Paper presented at the 6th Annual Comparative Agendas Conference. Antwerp, Belgium.
2.
ArbaouiB.De SwertK.Van der BrugW.2020. “Sensationalism in News Coverage: A Comparative Study in 14 Television Systems.” Communication Research47(2): 299–320.
3.
BartholoméG.LechelerS.de VreeseC.2015. “Manufacturing Conflict? How Journalists Intervene in the Conflict Frame Building Process.” The International Journal of Press/Politics20(4):438–57.
4.
BenoitW. L.1999. Seeing Spots: A Functional Analysis of Presidential Television Advertisements, 1952–1996. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
5.
BenoitW. L.SteinK. A.HansenG. J.2004. “Newspaper Coverage of Presidential Debates.” Argumentation and Advocacy41(1):17–27.
6.
BorghettoE.Chaqués-BonafontL.2019. “Parliamentary Questions.” In Comparative Policy Agendas, eds. BaumgartnerF.BreunigC.GrossmanE., 282–405. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
ChungH.BeretvasS. N.2012. “The Impact Of Ignoring Multiple Membership Data Structures In Multilevel Models.” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology65(2):185–200.
8.
ConwayB. A.KenskiK.WangD.2015. “The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication20(4):363–80.
9.
DamoreD. F.2002. “Candidate Strategy and the Decision To Go Negative.” Political Research Quarterly55(3):669–685.
10.
DassonnevilleR.2023. Voters Under Pressure: Group-Based Cross-Pressure and Electoral Volatility. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
De SwertK.HoogheM.2010. “When Do Women Get A Voice? Explaining The Presence Of Female News Sources in Belgian News Broadcasts (2003–5).” European Journal of Communication25(1):69–84.
12.
Djerf-PierreM.ShehataA.2017. “Still an Agenda Setter.” Journal of Communication67(5):733–757.
13.
DruckmanJ. N.GubitzS. R.LloydA. M.LevenduskyM. S.2019. “How Incivility on Partisan Media (De) Polarizes the Electorate.” The Journal of Politics81(1):291–295.
14.
DuboisE.BlankG.2018. “The Echo Chamber is Overstated.” Information, Communication & Society21(5):729–45.
15.
Elmelund-PræstekærC.2010. “Beyond American Negativity: Toward a General Understanding of the Determinants of Negative Campaigning.” European Political Science Review2(1):137–56.
16.
Elmelund-PræstekærC.HopmannD. N.NørgaardA. S.2011. “Does Mediatization Change MP-Media Interaction and MP Attitudes Toward the Media? Evidence From a Longitudinal Study of Danish MPs.” The International Journal of Press/Politics16(3): 382–403.
17.
FournierP.SorokaS.NirL.2020. “Negativity Biases and Political Ideology: A Comparative Test Across 17 Countries.” American Political Science Review114(3): 775–91.
18.
FridkinK. L.KenneyP.2004. “Do Negative Messages Work? The Impact of Negativity on Citizens’ Evaluations of Candidates.” American Politics Research32(5):570–605.
19.
FridkinK. L.KenneyP.2011. “Variability in Citizens’ Reactions to Different Types of Negative Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science55(2):307–25.
20.
FrimerJ. A.AujlaH.FeinbergM.SkitkaL. J.AquinoK.EichstaedtJ. C.WillerR.2023. “Incivility is Rising Among American Politicians on Twitter.” Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(2), 259–69.
21.
GarziaD.da SilvaF. F.De AngelisA.2022. “Partisan Dealignment and the Personalisation of Politics in West European Parliamentary Democracies, 1961–2018.” West European Politics45(2):311–34.
22.
GeerJ. G.2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
23.
GeerJ. G.2012. “The News Media and the Rise of Negativity in Presidential Campaigns.” PS: Political Science & Politics45(3):422–27.
24.
GervaisB. T.2017. “More Than Mimicry? The Role of Anger in Uncivil Reactions to Elite Political Incivility.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research29(3):384–405.
25.
GoovaertsI.MarienS.2020. “Uncivil Communication and Simplistic Argumentation: Decreasing Political Trust, Increasing Persuasive Power?.” Political Communication37(6):768–788.
26.
GoovaertsI.TurkenburgE.2022. “How Contextual Features Shape Incivility Over Time: An Analysis of the Evolution and Determinants of Political Incivility in Televised Election Debates (1985–2019).” Communication Research50(4): 480–507.
27.
HallinD. C.ManciniP.2004. “Comparing Media Systems: Three Models Of Media And Politics.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
HarcupT.O’NeillD.2017. “What Is News? News Values Revisited (Again).” Journalism Studies18(12):1470–88.
29.
HarringtonJ. E.JrHessG. D.1996. “A Spatial Theory of Positive and Negative Campaigning.” Games and Economic Behavior17(2):209–29.
30.
HaselmayerM.MeyerT. M.WagnerM.2019. “Fighting For Attention: Media Coverage of Negative Campaign Messages.” Party Politics25(3):412–23.
31.
HaynesA. A.RhineS. L.1998. “Attack Politics In Presidential Nomination Campaigns: An Examination of the Frequency and Determinants of Intermediated Negative Messages Against Opponents.” Political Research Quarterly51(3):691–721.
32.
HumprechtE.HerreroL. C.BlassnigS.BrüggemannM.EngesserS.2022. “Media Systems in the Digital Age: An Empirical Comparison of 30 Countries.” Journal of Communication72(2):145–164.
33.
HopmannD. N.VliegenthartR.MaierJ.2018. “The Effects of Tone, Focus, and Incivility in Election Debates.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties28(3):283–306.
34.
IyengarS.SoodG.LelkesY.2012. “Affect, Not Ideology Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly76(3):405–31.
35.
JenningsW.WlezienC.2018. “Election Polling Errors Across Time and Space.” Nature Human Behaviour2(4):276–83.
JürgensP.JungherrA.SchoenH.2011. “Small Worlds With A Difference: New Gatekeepers and the Filtering Of Political Information On Twitter.” In Proceedings of the 3rd International Web Science Conference, Koblenz, Germany (pp. 1–5).
38.
KetelaarsP.2019. “Position, Preference and Personality: A Microlevel Explanation of Negativity In Day-To-Day Politics.” Political Psychology40(5):1019–38.
39.
Knobloch-WesterwickS.MothesC.PolavinN.2020. “Confirmation Bias, Ingroup Bias, and Negativity Bias in Selective Exposure to Political Information.” Communication Research47(1):104–24.
40.
LamotK.Van AelstP.2020. “Beaten By Chartbeat? An Experimental Study On the Effect of Real-Time Audience Analytics On Journalists’ News Judgment.” Journalism Studies21(4):477–93.
41.
LauR. R.SigelmanL.RovnerI. B.2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment.” The Journal of Politics69(4):1176–209.
42.
LengauerG.EsserF.BerganzaR.2012. “Negativity In Political News: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations and Key Findings.” Journalism13(2):179–202.
43.
LijphartA.2012. Patterns of Democracy. 2nd Edition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
44.
LipsitzK.GeerJ. G.2017. “Rethinking The Concept of Negativity: An Empirical Approach.” Political Research Quarterly70(3):577–89.
45.
LouwerseT.OtjesS.2016. “Personalised Parliamentary Behaviour Without Electoral Incentives: The Case of the Netherlands.” West European Politics39(4):778–99.
46.
LouwerseT.SiebererU.TuttnauerO.AndewegR. B.2021. “Opposition in Times of Crisis: COVID-19 in Parliamentary Debates.” West European Politics, 44(5–6), 1025–1051.
47.
MaierJ.JansenC.2017. “When Do Candidates Attack In Election Campaigns? Exploring The Determinants of Negative Candidate Messages in German Televised Debates.” Party Politics23(5):549–59.
48.
MaierJ.NaiA.2020. “Roaring Candidates in the Spotlight: Campaign Negativity, Emotions, and Media Coverage in 107 National Elections.” The International Journal of Press/Politics25(4):576–606.
49.
MaierJ.NaiA.2021. “Mapping The Drivers Of Negative Campaigning: Insights From A Candidate Survey.” International Political Science Review44(2):195–211.
50.
MaierJ.StierS.OschatzC.2022. “Are Candidates Rational When It Comes To Negative Campaigning? Empirical Evidence From Three German Candidate Surveys.” Party Politics29(4):766–79.
51.
MaiselL. S.2012. “The Negative Consequences Of Uncivil Political Discourse.” PS: Political Science & Politics45(3):405–11.
52.
MarienS.GoovaertsI.ElstubS.2020. “Deliberative Qualities In Televised Election Debates: The Influence Of The Electoral System And Populism.” West European Politics43(6):1262–84.
53.
MuddimanA.2018. “Attributions of Incivility in Presidential Campaign News.” In An Unprecedented Election, eds. WarnerB.BystromD. G.McKinneyM. S.BanwartM. C., 115–133. Santa Barbara: Praeger.
54.
MuddimanA.Pond-CobbJ.MatsonJ. E.2020. “Negativity Bias Or Backlash: Interaction With Civil And Uncivil Online Political News Content.” Communication Research47(6):815–837.
55.
MuellerS. D.SaeltzerM.2022. “Twitter Made Me Do It! Twitter’s Tonal Platform Incentive and its Effect on Online Campaigning.” Information, Communication & Society25(9):1247–72.
56.
MutzD. C.2015. In Your Face Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
57.
NaiA.2013. “What Really Matters is Which Camp Goes Dirty: Differential Effects of Negative Campaigning On Turnout During Swiss Federal Ballots.” European Journal of Political Research52(1):44–70.
58.
NaiA.WalterA.2015. “New Perspectives On Negative Campaigning.”Colchester: ECPR Press.
59.
NaiA.SciariniP.2018. “Why “Going Negative?” Strategic and Situational Determinants of Personal Attacks in Swiss Direct Democratic Votes.” Journal of Political Marketing17(4):382–417.
60.
NaiA.MaierJ.2021. “Is Negative Campaigning A Matter of Taste? Political Attacks, Incivility, and the Moderating Role of Individual Differences.” American Politics Research49(3):269–81.
61.
NaiA.TreschA.MaierJ.2022. “Hardwired To Attack. Candidates’ Personality Traits and Negative Campaigning in Three European Countries. Acta Politica57(4):772–797.
62.
NivenD.2001. “Bias in the News: Partisanship and Negativity in Media Coverage of Presidents George Bush and Bill Clinton.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics6(3): 31–46.
63.
Oleskog TryggvasonP. 2020. “How Mediated Opinion Polls Influence Political Parties: Revisiting the Arena Framework.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research32:243–65.
64.
OsnabrüggeM.HoboltS. B.RodonT.2021. “Playing to the Gallery: Emotive Rhetoric in Parliaments.” American Political Science Review115(3):885–99.
65.
PeetersJ.2022. What’s The Issue? Studying Supply and Demand Side of Online Issue Strategies of Politicians. Antwerp: Universiteit Antwerpen.
66.
PoljakŽ.2023a. “Parties’ attack behaviour in parliaments: Who attacks whom and when.” European Journal of Political Research, 62(3):903–923.
67.
PoljakŽ. 2023b. “The Impact of Public Approval on the Use of Negativity Throughout the Electoral Cycle.” West European Politics46(5):947–70.
ReiterF.MatthesJ.2022. “‘The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly’: A Panel Study on the Reciprocal Effects of Negative, Dirty, and Positive Campaigning on Political Distrust.” Mass Communication and Society, 25(5): 649–672.
RidgeH. M.2022. “Just Like The Others: Party Differences, Perception, and Satisfaction With Democracy.” Party Politics, 28(3), 419–30.
73.
RidoutT. N.WalterA. S.2015. “How The News Media Amplify Negative Messages.” In New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning, eds. NaiA.WalterA., 267–86. Colchester: ECPR Press.
74.
RossiniP.2022. “Beyond Incivility: Understanding Patterns of Uncivil and Intolerant Discourse in Online Political Talk.” Communication Research49(3):399–425.
75.
SacerdoteB.SehgalR.CookM.2020. “Why Is All COVID-19 News Bad News?.” National Bureau of Economic Research.
76.
SchuckA. R. T.VliegenthartR.De VreeseC. H.2016. “Who’s Afraid Of Conflict? The Mobilizing Effect of Conflict Framing in Campaign News.” British Journal of Political Science46(1):177–94.
77.
SevenansJ.WalgraveS.VosD.2015. “Political Elites’ Media Responsiveness and Their Individual Political Goals: A Study of National Politicians in Belgium.” Research & Politics2(3):1–7.
78.
ShoemakerP. J.1996. “Hardwired For News: Using Biological and Cultural Evolution to Explain the Surveillance Function.” Journal of Communication46(3):32–47.
79.
ShoemakerP. J.VosT. P.ReeseS. D.2009. “Journalists As Gatekeepers.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies, 93–107. New York and London: Routledge.
80.
SkaperdasS.GrofmanB.1995. “Modeling Negative Campaigning.” American Political Science Review89(1):49–61.
81.
SkytteR.2019. “Why Politicians Seem So Rude And How It Affects Citizens.” Doctoral thesis. Aarhus University.
82.
SkytteR.2022. “Degrees of Disrespect: How Only Extreme and Rare Incivility Alienates the Base.” The Journal of Politics84(3):1746–59.
83.
SobierajS.BerryJ. M.2011. “From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News.” Political Communication28(1):19–41.
84.
Somer-TopcuZ.WeitzelD.2022. “Negative Campaigning and Vote Choice In Europe: How Do Different Partisan Groups React To Campaign Attacks?.” Comparative Political Studies55(13):2283–310.
85.
SoontjensK.2021. “The Awareness Paradox:(Why) Politicians Overestimate Citizens’ Awareness of Parliamentary Questions and Party Initiatives.” Representation57(1):75–94.
86.
SorokaS.2012. “The Gatekeeping Function: Distributions of Information in Media and the Real World.” The Journal of Politics74(2):514–28.
87.
SorokaS.2014. “Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences.” New York: Cambridge University Press.
88.
SorokaS.McAdamsS.2015. “News, Politics, and Negativity.” Political Communication32(1):1–22.
89.
SorokaS.FournierP.NirL.2019. “Cross-National Evidence of a Negativity Bias in Psychophysiological Reactions To News.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(38):18888–92.
90.
StrömbäckJ.2008. “Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics.” The International Journal of Press/Politics13(3):228–46.
91.
ThesenG.YildirimT. M.2023. “Electoral Systems and Gender Inequality In Political News.” American Political Science Review117(2):575–90.
92.
ThorsonE.OgnianovaE.CoyleJ. R.DentonF.2000. “Negative Political Ads and Negative Citizen Orientations Toward Politics.” Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising22(1):13–40.
93.
TuttnauerO.2022. “Satisfaction With Democracy And Government-Opposition Relations.” Working paper. https://osf.io/942ab/download (1.7.2023)
94.
Van AelstP.MaddensB.NoppeJ.FiersS.2008. “Politicians in the News: Media or Party Logic? Media Attention and Electoral Success in the Belgian Election Campaign of 2003.” European Journal of Communication23(2):193–210.
95.
van ElsasE.FiselierT.2023. “Conflict Or Choice? The Differential Effects of Elite Incivility and Ideological Polarization on Political Support.” Acta Politica, 1–30.
96.
Van ErkelP. F. A.ThijssenP.2016. “The First One Wins: Distilling The Primacy Effect.” Electoral Studies44:245–54.
97.
Van RemoortereA.WalgraveS.VliegenthartR.2023. “Mass Media Occurrence As A Political Career Maker.” The International Journal of Press/Politics28(1):201–18.
98.
Van’t RietJ.Van StekelenburgA.2022. “The Effects of Political Incivility on Political Trust and Political Participation: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research.” Human Communication Research48(2):203–29.
99.
VerhulsdonkI.NaiA.KarpJ. A.2022. “Are Political Attacks a Laughing Matter? Three Experiments on Political Humor and the Effectiveness of Negative Campaigning.” Political Research Quarterly75(3):720–37.
100.
VliegenthartR.BoomgaardenH. G.BoumansJ. W.2011. “Changes in Political News Coverage: Personalization, Conflict and Negativity in British and Dutch Newspapers.” In Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy, eds. BrantsK.VoltmerK., 92–110. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
101.
VliegenthartR.WalgraveS.BaumgartnerF. R.BevanS.BreunigC.BrouardS.BonafontL. C.GrossmanE.JenningsW.MortensenP. B.PalauA. M.SciariniP.TreschA.2016. “Do The Media Set The Parliamentary Agenda? A Comparative Study In Seven Countries.” European Journal of Political Research55(2):283–301.
102.
VosD.2014. “Which Politicians Pass The News Gates And Why? Explaining Inconsistencies in Research on News Coverage of Individual Politicians.” International Journal of Communication8:2438–61.
103.
VosD.Van AelstP.2018. “Does The Political System Determine Media Visibility of Politicians? A Comparative Analysis of Political Functions In The News In Sixteen Countries.” Political Communication35(3):371–92.
104.
WalgraveS.2008. “Again, The Almighty Mass Media?Political Communication25(4):445–59.
105.
WalgraveS.SoontjensK.2023. “How Politicians Learn About Public Opinion.” Research & Politics10(3). Published online September 13. doi:10.1177/20531680231200692.
106.
WalterA. S.2014. “Choosing the Enemy: Attack Behaviour in a Multiparty System.” Party Politics20(3):311–23.
107.
WalterA. S.2021. “The Study of Political Incivility and its Challenges.” In Political Incivility in the Parliamentary, Electoral and Media Arena, ed. WalterA., 1–16. New York: Routledge.
108.
WalterA. S.Van der BrugW.2013. “When the Gloves Come Off: Inter-Party Variation in Negative Campaigning in Dutch Elections, 1981–2010.” Acta Politica48(4):367–88.
109.
WalterA. S.van der BrugW.van PraagP.2014. “Party Competition and Negative Campaigning.” Comparative Political Studies47(4):550–73.
110.
WalterA. S.van der EijkC.2019. “Unintended Consequences of Negative Campaigning: Backlash and Second-Preference Boost Effects in a Multi-Party Context.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations21(3):612–29.
111.
WalterA. S.RidoutT.2021. “Voters’ Emotional Response to Negative Campaign Messages.” In Political Incivility in the Parliamentary, Electoral and Media Arena, ed. WalterA., 124–142. New York: Routledge.
112.
WlezienC.1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 39(4):981–1000.
113.
YildirimT. M.ThesenG.JenningsW.de VriesE.2023. “The Determinants of the Media Coverage of Politicians: The Role of Parliamentary Activities.” European Journal of Political Research62:1369–88.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
