Given that political interest is one of the best predictors of political participation, it remains curious that the causes of interest are undertheorized and understudied. Notably absent from much of the research on political interest is an exploration of how variations in the nature of politics itself might have an impact on individual-level political interest. We develop a theory and a set of testable predictions about how partisanship interacts with the presence of a presidential (vs. midterm) election, the party of the sitting president, and elite polarization, to affect political interest. We report multilevel models that use ANES measures of political interest and partisanship and the DW-NOMINATE Senate polarization measure (from 1960 to 2008) and discuss the implications of our findings for the long-term prospects of an interested electorate.
AbramowitzA. I.AlexanderB.MatthewG. (2006). Incumbency, redistricting, and the decline of competition in U.S. House elections. Journal of Politics, 68(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00371.x
2.
AbramowitzA. I.WebsterS. (2016). The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, 41(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.001
3.
AlbertsonB.GadarianS. K. (2015). Anxious politics: Democratic citizenship in a threatening world. Cambridge University Press.
4.
ArnoldF. (1910). Attention and interest: A study in psychology and education. MacMillan Company.
5.
BennettS. E. (1986). Apathy in America, 1960-1984. In Causes and consequences of citizen political indifference. Transnational Publishers.
6.
BurnsN. (2002). Gender: Public opinion and political action. In KatznelsonI.MilnerH. V. (Eds.), Political science: State of the discipline. W.W. Norton.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.
11.
DeweyJ. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Houghton Mifflin Company.
12.
DruckmanJ. N.KlarS.KrupnikovY.LevenduskyM.RyanJ. B. (2020). Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America. Nature Human Behavior, 5(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01012-5
13.
EliasophN. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge University Press.
14.
EnnsP. K.KellstedtP. M.McAvoyG. E. (2012). The consequences of partisanship in economic perceptions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(2), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs016
15.
EvelandW. P. (2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 21(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600490443877
16.
FedericoC. M.MalkaA. (2018). The contingent, contextual nature of the relationship between needs for security and certainty and political preferences: Evidence and implications. Political Psychology, 39(51), 3–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12477
GerberA. S.HuberG. A. (2010). Partisanship, political control, and economic assessments. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00424.x
HareC.PooleK. T.HowardR. (2015). Polarization in congress has risen sharply. Where is it going next? In HopkinsD. J.SidesJ. (Eds.), Political polarization in American politics (pp. 144–151). Bloomsburry.
24.
HartR. P. (2000). Campaign talk: Why elections are good for us. Princeton University Press.
25.
HerrnsonP. S. (2016). Congressional elections. Sage.
26.
HetheringtonM. J. (2008). Turned off or turned on? How polarization affects political engagement. In NivolaP.BradyD. (Eds), Red and blue nation (Vol. 2). Brookings Institution Press and the Hoover Institution.
HonakerJ.KingG.BlackwellM. (2011). Amelia II: A program for missing data. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(7), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i07
30.
HuddyL.MasonL.AarøeL. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000604
31.
IyengarS.SoodG.LelkesY. (2012). Affect, not ideology A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038
32.
JacobsonG. C.CarsonJ. L. (2015). The politics of congressional elections. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
33.
KeithB. E.MaglebyD. B.NelsonC. J.ElizabethO.WestlyeM. C.WolfingerR. E. (1992). The myth of the independent voter. University of California Press.
LaneR. E. (1959). Political life: Why people get involved in politics. Free Press.
36.
LaymanG. C.CarseyT. M. (2002). “Party polarization and conflict extension” in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 786–802. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088434
37.
LazarsfeldP. F.BerelsonB. R.GaudetH. (1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his Mind in a presidential campaign (2nd ed.). Columbia University Press.
38.
LevenduskyM. S. (2010). Clearer cues, more consistent voters: A benefit of elite polarization. Political Behavior, 32(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-009-9094-0
39.
LichterS. R.BaumgartnerJ. C.MorrisJ. S. (2018). Politics is a joke!: How TV Comedians are remaking political life. Routledge.
40.
LipsitzK. (2011). Competitive elections and the American voter. University of Pennsylvania Press.
41.
MacedoS.Alex-AssensohY.BerryJ. M.BrintnallM.CampbellD. E.Ricardo FragaL.FungA.GalstonW. A.KarpowitzC. F.LeviM.LevinsonM.LipsitzK.NiemiR. G.PutnamR. D.RahnW. M.ReichR.RodgersR. R.ToddS.WalshK. C. (2005). Democracy at risk: How political choices undermine citizen participation and what we can do about it. Brookings Institute Press.
42.
MasonL. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. University of Chicago Press.
43.
McCartyN. (2015). What we know and what do not know about our polarized politics. In HopkinsD. J.SidesJ. (Eds.), Political polarization in American politics (pp. 1–10). Bloomsbury.
44.
McCartyN.PooleK. T.HowardR. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press.
45.
MilbrathL. W.GoelM. L. (1977). Political participation: How and why do people get involved in politics?University Press of America.
46.
MillerJ. M. (2020). Psychological and situational factors combine to boost COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000842392000058x
47.
OndercinH. L.GarandJ. C.CrapanzanoL. E. (2011). Political learning during the 2000 US presidential election: The impact of the campaign on the gender gap in political knowledge. Electoral Studies, 30(4), 727–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2011.06.016
48.
PetersonD. A. M.MillerJ. M.SaundersK. L.McClurgS. D. (2022). Macrointerest. British Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 200–220.
49.
PhoenixD. L. (2019). The anger gap: How race shapes emotion in politics. Cambridge University Press.
50.
PriorM. (2010). You’ve either got it or you don’t? The stability of political interest over the life cycle. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381610000149
51.
PriorM. (2018). Hooked: How politics captures people’s interest. Cambridge University Press.
RamirezM. D.EricksonN. (2014). Partisan bias and information discounting in economic judgments. Political Psychology, 35(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12064
RosenbergM. (1954). Some determinants of political apathy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 18(4), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1086/266528
56.
SaundersK. L.AbramowitzA. I. (2004). Ideological realignment and active partisans in the American electorate. American Politics Research, 32(3), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x03259195
57.
SilvaP. J. (2006). Exploring the psychology of interest. Oxford University Press.
58.
SinclairB. (2006). Party wars: Polarization and the politics of national policy making. University of Oklahoma Press.
59.
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
60.
StrömbäckJ.JohanssonB. (2007). Electoral cycles and the mobilizing effects of elections: A longitudinal study of the Swedish case. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties, 17(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13689880601132570
61.
TheriaultS. M. (2008). Party polarization in congress. Cambridge University Press.
62.
van DethJ. W. (2000). Interesting but irrelevant: Social capital and the saliency of politics in western europe. European Journal of Political Research, 37(2), 115–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00507
63.
VerbaS.Lehman SchlozmanK.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
64.
WebsterS. W. (2020). American rage: How anger shapes our politics. Cambridge University Press.
65.
WeinschenkA. C.DawesC. T. (2017). The relationship between genes, personality traits, and political interest. Political Research Quarterly, 70(3), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917698045
66.
WolakJ. (2020). Self-confidence and gender gaps in political interest, attention, and efficacy. Journal of Politics, 82(4), 1490–1501. https://doi.org/10.1086/708644
67.
WolfingerR. E.RosenstoneS. J. (1980). Who votes?Yale University Press.
68.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
