Does partisanship reduce the importance of self-interest in local political decision-making? I examined the case of homeowners and their preferences for lower property taxes, as well as their evaluations of zoning and development policy, to answer this question. Relying on data from a conjoint survey experiment (n = 2036), I found that homeowners were more likely to select a candidate who supported lower property taxes than non-homeowners, on average. However, homeowners did not express stronger preferences for lower property taxes when evaluating candidates from the opposing party, or making decisions in elections that featured two-party competition. I supplemented my experimental data with survey data from the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES), which asked respondents to evaluate zoning and development in their area, as well as their mayor. I found that homeowners were more likely than non-homeowners to credit their mayor for favorable evaluations of zoning and development regardless of their mayor’s partisanship.
AbramowitzA. I.WebsterS. (2016). The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of us elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, 41(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.001
2.
AbramowitzA. I.WebsterS. W. (2018). Negative partisanship: Why Americans dislike parties but behave like rabid partisans. Political Psychology, 39(S1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12479
3.
AnsolabehereS.SchaffnerB. F. (2017). CCES common content, 2016. Harvard Dataverse.
BisgaardM. (2015). Bias will find a way: Economic perceptions, attributions of blame, and partisan-motivated reasoning during crisis. The Journal of Politics, 77(3), 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1086/681591
6.
BisgaardM. (2019). How getting the facts right can fuel partisan-motivated reasoning. American Journal of Political Science, 63(4), 824–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12432
7.
BolsenT.DruckmanJ. N.CookF. L. (2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0
8.
BoudreauC.ElmendorfC. S.MacKenzieS. A. (2015). Lost in space? In-formation shortcuts, spatial voting, and local government representation. Political Research Quarterly, 68(4), 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915609437
9.
BowlerS.DonovanT. (1995). Popular responsiveness to taxation. Political Research Quarterly, 48(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/449121
10.
BuchananJ.TullockG. (1965). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor Paperbacks. University of Michigan Press.
11.
CampbellA.ConverseP. E.MillerW. E.StokesD. E. (1980). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.
12.
CampbellA. L. (2002). Self-interest, social security, and the distinctive participation patterns of senior citizens. American Political Science Review, 96(3), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055402000333
CoppockA.McClellanO. A. (2019). Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. Research & Politics, 6(1), 205316801882217. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018822174
16.
CutlerD. M.ElmendorfD. W.ZeckhauserR. (1997). Restraining the leviathan: Property tax limitation in Massachusetts. Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 1997(47), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.17016/feds.1997.47
17.
DarrJ. P.HittM. P.DunawayJ. L. (2018). Newspaper closures polarize voting behavior. Journal of Communication, 68(6), 1007–1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy051
18.
DasS.SinclairB.WebsterS. W.YanH. (2022). All (mayoral) politics is local?The Journal of Politics, 84(2), 1021–1034. https://doi.org/10.1086/716945
19.
de Benedictis-KessnerJ.HankinsonM. (2019). Concentrated burdens: How self-interest and partisanship shape opinion on opioid treatment policy. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 1078–1084. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055419000443
20.
EinsteinK. L.PalmerM.GlickD. M. (2019). Who participates in local government? Evidence from meeting minutes. Perspectives on Politics, 17(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s153759271800213x
21.
FerreiraF.GyourkoJ. (2009). Do political parties matter? Evidence from us cities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.399
22.
FischelW. A. (2009). The homevoter hypothesis. Harvard University Press.
23.
GerberE. R.HopkinsD. J. (2011). When mayors matter: Estimating the im- pact of mayoral partisanship on city policy. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00499.x
24.
GreenD. P.PalmquistB.SchicklerE. (2004). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. Yale University Press.
25.
GroenendykE. (2018). Competing motives in a polarized electorate: Political re- sponsiveness, identity defensiveness, and the rise of partisan antipathy. Political Psychology, 39(S1), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12481
26.
HainmuellerJ.HopkinsD. J.YamamotoT. (2014). Causal inference in conjoint analysis: Understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt024
27.
HayesD.LawlessJ. L. (2021). News hole: The demise of local journalism and political engagement. Cambridge University Press.
HopkinsD. J. (2018). The increasingly United States: How and why American political behavior nationalized. University of Chicago Press.
30.
JensenA.MarbleW.ScheveK.SlaughterM. J. (2021). City limits to partisan polarization in the American public. Political Science Research and Methods, 9(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.56
LauR. R.BrownT. A.SearsD. O. (1978). Self-interest and civilians’ attitudes toward the Vietnam war. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42(4), 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/268474
33.
LavineH. G.JohnstonC. D.SteenbergenM. R. (2012). The ambivalent partisan: How critical loyalty promotes democracy. Oxford University Press.
34.
LeeperT. J.SlothuusR. (2014). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. Political Psychology, 35(S1), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12164
35.
LevenduskyM. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became democrats and con-servatives became republicans. University of Chicago Press.
36.
LodgeM.TaberC. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00426.x
37.
LudeckeD. (2022). sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science. R package version 2.8.11.
38.
MarbleW.NallC. (2021). Where self-interest trumps ideology: Liberal home- owners and local opposition to housing development. The Journal of Politics, 83(4), 1747–1763. https://doi.org/10.1086/711717
39.
MoskowitzD. J. (2021). Local news, information, and the nationalization of us elec-tions. American Political Science Review, 115(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055420000829
40.
RenyT. T.SearsD. O. (2020). Symbolic politics and self-interest in post-affordable care act health insurance coverage. Research & Politics, 7(3), 205316802095510. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020955108
41.
SancesM. W. (2017). Attribution errors in federalist systems: When voters punish the president for local tax increases. The Journal of Politics, 79(4), 1286–1301. https://doi.org/10.1086/692588
42.
SancesM. W. (2018). Ideology and vote choice in us mayoral elections: Evidence from Facebook surveys. Political Behavior, 40(3), 737–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9420-x
43.
SearsD. (1993). Symbolic politics: A socio-psychological theory. Duke University Press.
44.
SearsD.CitrinJ. (1982). Tax revolt: Something for nothing in California. Harvard University Press.
45.
SearsD. O.FunkC. L. (1991). The role of self-interest in social and political attitudes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 1–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60327-5
46.
SearsD. O.HenslerC. P.SpeerL. K. (1979). Whites’ opposition to “busing”: Self-interest or symbolic politics?American Political Science Review, 73(2), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954885
47.
SearsD. O.LauR. R.TylerT. R.AllenH. M. (1980). Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting. American Political Science Review, 74(3), 670–684. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958149
48.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks Cole.
49.
TausanovitchC.WarshawC. (2013). Measuring constituent policy preferences in congress, state legislatures, and cities. The Journal of Politics, 75(2), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381613000042
50.
TausanovitchC.WarshawC. (2014). Representation in municipal government. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 605–641. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000318
51.
TedinK. L. (1994). Self-interest, symbolic values, and the financial equalization of the public schools. The Journal of Politics, 56(3), 628–649. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132185
52.
TrounstineJ. (2018). Segregation by design: Local politics and inequality in American cities. Cambridge University Press.
YoderJ. (2020). Does property ownership lead to participation in local politics? Evidence from property records and meeting minutes. American Political Science Review, 114(4), 1213–1229. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055420000556
55.
ZallerJ. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
