Party Line or Bottom Line? Decision-Making in Local Contexts

Abstract

Does partisanship reduce the importance of self-interest in local political decision-making? I examined the case of homeowners and their preferences for lower property taxes, as well as their evaluations of zoning and development policy, to answer this question. Relying on data from a conjoint survey experiment (n = 2036), I found that homeowners were more likely to select a candidate who supported lower property taxes than non-homeowners, on average. However, homeowners did not express stronger preferences for lower property taxes when evaluating candidates from the opposing party, or making decisions in elections that featured two-party competition. I supplemented my experimental data with survey data from the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES), which asked respondents to evaluate zoning and development in their area, as well as their mayor. I found that homeowners were more likely than non-homeowners to credit their mayor for favorable evaluations of zoning and development regardless of their mayor’s partisanship.

Keywords

local politics public opinion partisanship self-interest

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramowitz

A. I.

Webster

(2016). The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of us elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, 41(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.001

Abramowitz

A. I.

Webster

S. W.

(2018). Negative partisanship: Why Americans dislike parties but behave like rabid partisans. Political Psychology, 39(S1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12479

Ansolabehere

Schaffner

B. F.

(2017). CCES common content, 2016. Harvard Dataverse.

Anzia

S. F.

(2021). Party and ideology in American local government: An appraisal. Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102131

Bisgaard

(2015). Bias will find a way: Economic perceptions, attributions of blame, and partisan-motivated reasoning during crisis. The Journal of Politics, 77(3), 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1086/681591

Bisgaard

(2019). How getting the facts right can fuel partisan-motivated reasoning. American Journal of Political Science, 63(4), 824–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12432

Bolsen

Druckman

J. N.

Cook

F. L.

(2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0

Boudreau

Elmendorf

C. S.

MacKenzie

S. A.

(2015). Lost in space? In-formation shortcuts, spatial voting, and local government representation. Political Research Quarterly, 68(4), 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915609437

Bowler

Donovan

(1995). Popular responsiveness to taxation. Political Research Quarterly, 48(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/449121

10.

Buchanan

Tullock

(1965). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor Paperbacks. University of Michigan Press.

11.

Campbell

Converse

P. E.

Miller

W. E.

Stokes

D. E.

(1980). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.

12.

Campbell

A. L.

(2002). Self-interest, social security, and the distinctive participation patterns of senior citizens. American Political Science Review, 96(3), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055402000333

13.

Cann

D. M.

(2018). The structure of municipal political ideology. State and Local Government Review, 50(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x18781456

14.

Chong

Citrin

Conley

(2001). When self-interest matters. Political Psychology, 22(3), 541–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00253

15.

Coppock

McClellan

O. A.

(2019). Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. Research & Politics, 6(1), 205316801882217. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018822174

16.

Cutler

D. M.

Elmendorf

D. W.

Zeckhauser

(1997). Restraining the leviathan: Property tax limitation in Massachusetts. Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 1997(47), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.17016/feds.1997.47

17.

Darr

J. P.

Hitt

M. P.

Dunaway

J. L.

(2018). Newspaper closures polarize voting behavior. Journal of Communication, 68(6), 1007–1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy051

18.

Das

Sinclair

Webster

S. W.

Yan

(2022). All (mayoral) politics is local? The Journal of Politics, 84(2), 1021–1034. https://doi.org/10.1086/716945

19.

de Benedictis-Kessner

Hankinson

(2019). Concentrated burdens: How self-interest and partisanship shape opinion on opioid treatment policy. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 1078–1084. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055419000443

20.

Einstein

K. L.

Palmer

Glick

D. M.

(2019). Who participates in local government? Evidence from meeting minutes. Perspectives on Politics, 17(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s153759271800213x

21.

Ferreira

Gyourko

(2009). Do political parties matter? Evidence from us cities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.399

22.

Fischel

W. A.

(2009). The homevoter hypothesis. Harvard University Press.

23.

Gerber

E. R.

Hopkins

D. J.

(2011). When mayors matter: Estimating the im- pact of mayoral partisanship on city policy. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00499.x

24.

Green

D. P.

Palmquist

Schickler

(2004). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. Yale University Press.

25.

Groenendyk

(2018). Competing motives in a polarized electorate: Political re- sponsiveness, identity defensiveness, and the rise of partisan antipathy. Political Psychology, 39(S1), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12481

26.

Hainmueller

Hopkins

D. J.

Yamamoto

(2014). Causal inference in conjoint analysis: Understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt024

27.

Hayes

Lawless

J. L.

(2021). News hole: The demise of local journalism and political engagement. Cambridge University Press.

28.

Hobbes

(2017). Leviathan. Penguin Classics. Penguin Books.

29.

Hopkins

D. J.

(2018). The increasingly United States: How and why American political behavior nationalized. University of Chicago Press.

30.

Jensen

Marble

Scheve

Slaughter

M. J.

(2021). City limits to partisan polarization in the American public. Political Science Research and Methods, 9(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.56

31.

Kirkland

P. A.

Coppock

(2018). Candidate choice without party labels. Political Behavior, 40(3), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9414-8

32.

Lau

R. R.

Brown

T. A.

Sears

D. O.

(1978). Self-interest and civilians’ attitudes toward the Vietnam war. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42(4), 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/268474

33.

Lavine

H. G.

Johnston

C. D.

Steenbergen

M. R.

(2012). The ambivalent partisan: How critical loyalty promotes democracy. Oxford University Press.

34.

Leeper

T. J.

Slothuus

(2014). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation. Political Psychology, 35(S1), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12164

35.

Levendusky

(2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became democrats and con-servatives became republicans. University of Chicago Press.

36.

Lodge

Taber

C. S.

(2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00426.x

37.

Ludecke

(2022). sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science. R package version 2.8.11.

38.

Marble

Nall

(2021). Where self-interest trumps ideology: Liberal home- owners and local opposition to housing development. The Journal of Politics, 83(4), 1747–1763. https://doi.org/10.1086/711717

39.

Moskowitz

D. J.

(2021). Local news, information, and the nationalization of us elec-tions. American Political Science Review, 115(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055420000829

40.

Reny

T. T.

Sears

D. O.

(2020). Symbolic politics and self-interest in post-affordable care act health insurance coverage. Research & Politics, 7(3), 205316802095510. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168020955108

41.

Sances

M. W.

(2017). Attribution errors in federalist systems: When voters punish the president for local tax increases. The Journal of Politics, 79(4), 1286–1301. https://doi.org/10.1086/692588

42.

Sances

M. W.

(2018). Ideology and vote choice in us mayoral elections: Evidence from Facebook surveys. Political Behavior, 40(3), 737–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9420-x

43.

Sears

(1993). Symbolic politics: A socio-psychological theory. Duke University Press.

44.

Sears

Citrin

(1982). Tax revolt: Something for nothing in California. Harvard University Press.

45.

Sears

D. O.

Funk

C. L.

(1991). The role of self-interest in social and political attitudes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 1–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60327-5

46.

Sears

D. O.

Hensler

C. P.

Speer

L. K.

(1979). Whites’ opposition to “busing”: Self-interest or symbolic politics? American Political Science Review, 73(2), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954885

47.

Sears

D. O.

Lau

R. R.

Tyler

T. R.

Allen

H. M.

(1980). Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting. American Political Science Review, 74(3), 670–684. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958149

48.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin

W. G.

Worchel

(Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks Cole.

49.

Tausanovitch

Warshaw

(2013). Measuring constituent policy preferences in congress, state legislatures, and cities. The Journal of Politics, 75(2), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381613000042

50.

Tausanovitch

Warshaw

(2014). Representation in municipal government. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 605–641. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000318

51.

Tedin

K. L.

(1994). Self-interest, symbolic values, and the financial equalization of the public schools. The Journal of Politics, 56(3), 628–649. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132185

52.

Trounstine

(2018). Segregation by design: Local politics and inequality in American cities. Cambridge University Press.

53.

Warshaw

(2019). Local elections and representation in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-071108

54.

Yoder

(2020). Does property ownership lead to participation in local politics? Evidence from property records and meeting minutes. American Political Science Review, 114(4), 1213–1229. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055420000556

55.

Zaller

J. R.

(1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB