Due to the realistic, complex natures of authentic cases involved in case-based learning, the use of group work has been encouraged and expected to enhance the quality of interaction among participants and to improve students’ learning experiences. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the case-based online group work increased students’ satisfaction with interaction among students in an online course. Findings of this study revealed that the group assignment did not have an effect on students’ satisfaction with online interactions. Instead, students’ perceptions of the importance of group work were associated with their satisfaction with interaction in the online course.
Bahar-ÖzvarişŞÇetinFÇTuranS. (2006) Cooperative learning: A new application of problem-based learning in mental health training. Medical Teacher28(6): 553–7.
2.
BaskinCBarkerMWoodsP (2005) When group work leaves the classroom does group skills development also go out the window?British Journal of Educational Technology36(1): 19–31.
3.
BransfordJDGoinLIHasselbringTS. (1986) Learning with technology: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Peabody Journal of Education64(1): 5–26.
4.
BrownCAMcIlroyK (2011) Group work in healthcare students’ education: What do we think we are doing?Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education36(6): 687–99.
5.
CarterKUnklesbayR (1989) Cases in teaching and law. Journal of Curriculum Studies21(6): 527–36.
6.
EllisonCMBoykinAW (1994) Comparing outcomes from differential cooperative and individualistic learning methods. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal22(1): 91–104.
7.
ErtmerPARussellJD (1995) Using case studies to enhance instructional design education. Educational Technology35(4): 23–31.
8.
FinlaySFaulknerG (2005) Tête à tête: Reading groups and peer learning. Active Learning in Higher Education6(1): 32–45.
9.
FisherMThompsonGSSilverbergDA (2004 [2005]) Effective group dynamics in e-learning: Case study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems33(3): 205–22.
10.
FitzgeraldGEWilsonBSemrauLP (1997) An interactive multimedia program to enhance teacher problem-solving skills based on cognitive flexibility theory: Design and outcomes. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia6(1): 47–76.
11.
FlynnAEKleinJD (2001) The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development49(3): 71–86.
12.
FongPSW (2010) Building teams that learn: Study of learning effects in engineering student teams. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice136(3): 121–7.
13.
HallDBuzwellS (2013) The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education14(1): 37–49.
14.
Hammar ChiriacE (2014) Group work as an incentive for learning: Students’ experiences of group work. Frontiers in Psychology5: 1–10.
15.
HassanienA (2007) A qualitative student evaluation of group learning in higher education. Higher Education in Europe32(2–3): 135–50.
16.
HerrmannKJ (2013) The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention. Active Learning in Higher Education14(3): 175–87.
17.
HillyardCGillespieDLittigP (2010) University students’ attitudes about learning in small groups after frequent participation. Active Learning in Higher Education11(1): 9–20.
18.
JohnsonDWJohnsonRT (2009) An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher38(5): 365–79.
19.
KolodnerJL (1997) Educational implications of analogy: A view from case-based reasoning. American Psychologist52(1): 57–66.
20.
LandSMHannafinMJ (2000) Student-centered learning environments. In: JonassenDHLandSM (eds) Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 1–23.
21.
LevinBB (1995) Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers’ thinking about cases. Teaching and Teacher Education11(1): 63–79.
22.
MersethKK (1991) The early history of case-based instruction: Insights for teacher education today. Journal of Teacher Education42(4): 243–9.
23.
MersethKKLaceyCA (1993) Weaving stronger fabric: The pedagogical promise of hypermedia and case methods in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education9(3): 283–99.
24.
MuilenburgLYBergeZL (2005) Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education26(1): 29–48.
25.
PhippsMPhippsCKaskS. (2001) University students’ perceptions of cooperative learning: Implications for administrators and instructors. Journal of Experiential Education24(1): 14–21.
26.
RileyWAndersonP (2006) Randomized study of the impact of cooperative learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education7(2): 129–44.
27.
SanderPStevensonKKingM. (2000) University students’ expectations of teaching. Studies in Higher Education25(3): 309–23.
28.
SlavinRE (1991) Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership48(5): 71–81.
29.
StepichDAErtmerPALaneMM (2001) Problem-solving in a case-based course: Strategies for facilitating coached expertise. Educational Technology Research and Development49(3): 53–69.
30.
SykesGBirdT (1992) Teacher education and the case idea. Review of Research in Education18(1): 457–521.
31.
VrevenDMcFaddenS (2007) An empirical assessment of cooperative groups in large, time-compressed, introductory courses. Innovative Higher Education32(2): 85–92.
32.
WhiteheadAN (1929) The Aims of Education and Other Essays. New York: MacMillan Publishers.
33.
WilliamsKCMorganKCameronBA (2011) How do students define their roles and responsibilities in online learning group projects?Distance Education32(1): 49–62.
