The purpose of this paper is to explore how to support active knowledge sharing in online group work which both encourages collaboration and motivates individual effort. In this study, two graduate–level online courses (course 1 and course 2) operated through Blackboard were selected. In both courses, the instructor designed the course activities and online learning environment in a a manner that aimed to promote active group work and knowledge sharing. Sixty students were enrolled in these two courses. Several themes were generalized from the data, which include: (a) community and trust were created for knowledge sharing through multiple course activities; (b) group work shared in blogs stimulated knowledge sharing, interactive learning and learning credibility as well as provided a learning reference for students; (c) transparent group work promoted across–group learning; and (d) progressive and split assignments design with clearly defined components promoted collaboration and satisfied the desire of individual members to work independently.
BoothS. E. (2012). Cultivating knowledge sharing and trust in online communities for educators. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 47(1), 1–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.47.1.a
2.
BrindleyJ. E., WaltiC., & BlaschkeL. M. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10 (3), 1–18.
3.
CameronB., MorganK., & WilliamsK. (2011). How do students define their roles and responsibilities in online learning group projects?Distance Education, 32(1), 49–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.565498
CollinsW. C., SalgadoJ. F., & CabreraÁ. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500404614
6.
CorbinJ., & StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21. doi:/10.1007/BF00988593
FinegoldA. R. D., & CookeL. (2006). Exploring the attitudes, experiences and dynamics of interaction in online groups.The Internet and Higher Education,(3), 201–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.003
9.
HafnerC. A., & MillerL. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment.Learning & Technology: A Refereed Journal for Second and Foreign Language Educators,(3), 68–86.
10.
HooperS. (1992). Cooperative learning and computer–based instruction. Journal of the Educational Technology Research & Development, 40 (3), 21–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296840
11.
KaoG.Y.M., LinS. S. J., & SunC.T. (2008). Beyond sharing: Engaging students in cooperative and competitive active learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11 (3), 82–96.
12.
KesslerG., & BikowskiD. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning,(1), 41–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220903467335
13.
LahtinenJ. (2013). Local social knowledge management: A case study of social learning and knowledge sharing across organizational boundaries. Journal of Information Science, 39(5), 661–675. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551513481431
14.
LeonardiP. M. (2014). Social media, knowledge sharing, and innovation: Toward a theory of communication visibility.Systems Research,(4), 796–816. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0536
15.
LincolnY.S., & GubaE.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
LiuC., LinC., DengK., WuY., & TsaiC. (2014). Online knowledge sharing experience with creative commons. Online Information Review, 38(5), 680–696. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR–12–2013–0280
17.
LoonA. v., RosA., & MartensR. (2012). Motivated learning with digital learning tasks: What about autonomy and structure?Technology Research and Development, (6), 1015–1032. doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9267-0
18.
LynchD. J. (2010). Application of online discussion and cooperative learning strategies to online and blended college courses.College Student Journal,(3), 777–784.
19.
MelothM. S., & DeeringP. D. (1994). Task talk and task awareness under different cooperative learning conditions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 138–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1163270
20.
MorganK., CameronB. A., & WilliamsK. C. (2009). Student perceptions of social task development in online group project work. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(3), 285–294.
21.
OliveiraI., TinocaL., & PereiraA. (2011). Online group work patterns: How to promote a successful collaboration. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1348–1357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.017
22.
Pankoke–BabatzU., & JeffreyP. (2002). Documented norms and conventions on the Internet. International Journal of Human–Computer Interactions, 14(2), 219–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC1402_6
23.
PaulusT. M. (2005). Collaborative and cooperative approaches to online group work: The impact of task type. Education, (1), 111–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081343
24.
PerkinsD. N. (1992). Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage? In DuffyT. M. & JonassenD. H. (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 45–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
PooleD. M. (2000). Student participation in a discussion–oriented online course: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 162–177.
RobertsT. S., & McInnerneyJ. M. (2007). Seven problems of online group learning (and their solutions). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 257–268. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/10_4/22.pdf
28.
RoseM. A. (2002). Cognitive dialogue, interaction patterns, and perceptions of graduate students in an online conferencing environment under collaborative and cooperative structures (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Indiana, Bloomington.
29.
StoofA., MartensR. L., & Van MerriënboerJ. J. G. (2007). Web–based support for constructing competence maps: Design and formative evaluation. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 55(4), 347–368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423–006–9014–5
30.
ThomasL., CliftR. T., & SugimotoT. (1996). Telecommunication, student teaching, and methods instruction: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(3), 165–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487196047003002
YoungM. L., & TsengF. C. (2008). Interplay between physical and online settings for online interpersonal trust formation in knowledge–sharing practice. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 11(1), 55–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0019
33.
Zygouris–CoeV. (2012). Collaborative learning in an online teacher education course: Lessons learned. In MorrisL., & TsolakidisC. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education (ICICTE)(pp.332–342), Rhodes, Greece.
