This article reports adult students’ (N = 632) perceptions of long-functioning academic learning teams in accelerated online and on-campus business cohort groups in six constructs: attraction to team, performance expectation alignment, workload distribution, intra-team conflict, preference for teamwork, and impact on learning. Comparisons between students in online and on-campus programs revealed, regardless of degree or delivery model, a majority of adult students preferred individual work and did not believe teams positively affected their learning. These perspectives were more distinct among students in online programs.
AdamR. D.FinegoldL. C. (2006). Exploring the attitudes, experiences and dynamics of interaction in online groups. The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 201-215.
2.
AyokoO. B.KonradA. M.BoyleM. V. (2012). Online work: Managing conflict and emotions for performance in virtual teams. European Management Journal, 30, 156-174.
3.
CampionM. A.MedskerG. J.HiggsA. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850.
4.
CarronA. V.WidmeyerW. N.BrawleyL. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244-266.
5.
DaviesW. M. (2009). Group work as a form of assessment: Common problems and recommended solutions. Higher Education, 58, 563-584.
6.
De DreuC. K. W.WeingartL. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-749.
7.
EvansN. J.DawsonC.JarvisP. A. (1986). The Group Attitude Scale: A measure of attraction to group. Small Group Behavior, 17, 203-216.
8.
FavorJ. (2012). Students’ perceptions of long-functioning cooperative teams in accelerated adult degree programs. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 60, 157-164.
9.
FletcherJ. D.TobiasS.WisherR. A. (2007). Learning anytime, anywhere: Advanced distributed learning and the changing face of education. Educational Researcher, 36, 96-102.
10.
GottschallH.Garcia-BayonasM. (2008). Student attitudes toward group work among undergraduates in business administration, education, and mathematics. Educational Research Quarterly, 32, 3-28.
11.
GreenS. B.SalkindN. J. (2008). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
12.
GriffithT. L.MannixE. A.NealeM. A. (2003). Conflict in virtual teams. In GibsonC. B.CohenS. G. (Eds.), Virtual teams that work (pp. 335-352). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
KeppelG.WickensT. D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
14.
LiraE. M.RipollP.PeiroJ. M.OrengoV. (2008). How do different types of intragroup conflict affect group potency in virtual compared with face-to-face teams? A longitudinal study. Behavior & Information Technology, 27, 107-114.
15.
MorganB. (2003). Cooperative learning in higher education: Undergraduate student reflections on group examinations for group grades. College Student Journal, 37, 40-49.
16.
NavarroP.ShoemakerJ. (2000). Performance and perceptions of distance learners in cyberspace. American Journal of Distance Education, 14, 15-35.
17.
OreyM.McClendonV. J.BranchR. M. (2006). Educational media and technology yearbook (Vol. 31). Englewood, CA: Greenwood.
18.
PayneB. K.Monk-TurnerE. (2006). Students’ perceptions of group projects: The role of race, age, and slacking. College Student Journal, 40, 132-139.
19.
PfaffE.HuddlestonP. (2003). Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 37-45.
20.
PhippsM.PhippsC.KaskS.HigginsS. (2001). University students’ perceptions of cooperative learning: Implications for administrators and instructors. The Journal of Experiential Education, 24, 14-21.
21.
RahimM. A. (1983). Measurement of organizational conflict. The Journal of General Psychology, 109, 189-199.
22.
RobertsT. S.McInnerneyJ. M. (2007). Seven problems of online group learning (and their solutions). Educational Technology & Society, 10, 257-268.
23.
SmithG. C.SorensonC.GumpA.HeindelA. J.CarisM.MartinezC. D. (2011). Overcoming student resistance to group work: Online versus face-to-face. The Internet and Higher Education, 14, 121-128.
24.
SteinerI. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
25.
SweeneyA.WeavenS.HeringtonC. (2008). Multicultural influences on group learning: A qualitative higher education study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 119-132.
26.
ThompsonL. (2006). A case study of online collaborative learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7, 361-375.
27.
VrevenD.McFaddenS. (2007). An empirical assessment of cooperative groups in large, time-compressed, introductory courses. Innovative Higher Education, 32, 85-92.
28.
WilliamsE. A.DurayR.ReddyV. (2006). Teamwork orientation, group cohesiveness, and student learning: A study of the use of teams in online distance education. Journal of Management Education, 30, 592-616.
