Focus groups are routinely used as a research tool in a wide variety of settings. Based on recent experience with poverty research, we argue this method needs to be problematized and further rethought. The article draws on focus group studies conducted over seven years to argue that the method routinely excludes a key area of group interaction: group dynamics. Our work underlines how these are central to shaping group participation as well as the themes, absences and forms of reporting in studies. We employ Whitaker and Lieberman’s (1964) focal conflict theory as a methodology to follow the configuration of these dynamics within a group setting. Drawing on this analytic framework, and examples from the study, we argue that an orientation to group relations is essential to expanding the method’s sensitivity as an effective research procedure.
Allen, L. ( 2005) ‘Managing Masculinity: Young Men’s Identity Work in Focus Groups’, Qualitative Research5(1): 35-57.
2.
Anderson, L. ( 2006a) ‘On Apples, Oranges, and Autopsies: A Response to Commentators’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography35: 450-65.
3.
Anderson, L. ( 2006b) ‘Analytic Autoethnography’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography35: 373-95.
4.
Armstrong, D. ( 2005) Organization in the Mind: Psychoanalysis, Group Relations and Organizational Consultancy. London: Karnac Books.
5.
Bion, W. ( 1964) Experiences in Groups. London: Tavistock.
6.
Bloor, M. and McIntosh, J. ( 1990) ‘Surveillance and Concealment’, in S. Cunningham-Burley and N. McKegany (eds) Readings in Medical Sociology, pp. 159-81. Tavistock: London.
7.
Bott, E. ( 1971) Family and Social Network (2nd Edition). London: Tavistock.
8.
Brannen, J. and Pattman, R. ( 2005) ‘Work-Family Matters in the Workplace: The Use of Focus Groups in a Study of a UK Social Services Department’, Qualitative Research5(4): 523-42.
9.
Brazier, D. ( 1996) Group Process. Amida. URL: http://www.amidatrust.com/article_gpprocess.html
10.
Bromell, D. and Hyland, M. ( 2007) Social Inclusion and Participation: A Guide for Policy and Planning. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Social Development. URL: http://www.msd.govt.nz/work-areas/social-research/sip-guide.html
11.
Browne, K. ( 2005) ‘Snowball Sampling: Using Social Networks to Research Non-Heterosexual Women’, International Journal of Research Methodology8(1): 47-60.
12.
Carey, M.A. and Smith, M.W. ( 1994) ‘Capturing the Group Effect in Focus Groups: A Special Concern in Analysis’, Qualitative Health Research4(1): 123-7.
13.
Chronic Poverty Research Centre (n.d.) Methods Toolbox: Focus Groups and Interviews. URL: http://www.chronicpoverty.org/toolbox/Focusgroupsinterviews.php
14.
Conrad, K.(2009) ‘Surveillance, Gender and the Virtual Body in the Information Age’, Surveillance & Society6(4): 380-7.
15.
Dahl, H.M. ( 2008) ‘Changing Contexts of Home Help: A New Phase of NPM with More or Less Recognition?’, Paper to ‘Transforming Elderly Care at Local, National and Transnational Levels’ conference, Copenhagen, 26-28 June.
16.
Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. ( 2005) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Doherty, R. ( 2003) ‘Social Exclusion: Licence Through Ambiguity’ , Journal of Educational Enquiry4(2): 30-46.
18.
Foley, D. and Chowdhury, J. ( 2007) ‘Poverty, Social Exclusion and the Politics of Disability: Care as a Social Good and the Expenditure of Social Capital in Chuadanga, Bangladesh’, Social Policy & Administration41(4): 372-85.
19.
Forsyth, D. (n.d.) Group Resources Page. URL: http://facultystaff.richmond.edu/~dforsyth/gd/
20.
Foucault, M. ( 1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon.
21.
Franklin, K.K. and Lowry, C. ( 2001) ‘Computer-Mediated Focus Group Sessions: Naturalistic Inquiry in a Networked Environment’, Qualitative Research1(2): 169-84.
22.
Goffman, E. ( 1967) Interaction Ritual; Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.
23.
Goffman, E. ( 1988) Exploring the Interaction Order. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
24.
Greene, S. and Hogan, D. ( 2005) Researching Children’s Experiences: Approaches and Methods. London: Sage.
25.
Grim, B., Harom, A. and Gromis, J. ( 2006) ‘Focused Group Interviews as an Innovative Quanti-Qualitative Methodology (QQM): Integrating Quantitative Elements into a Qualitative Methodology’ , The Qualitative Report11(3): 516-37.
26.
Hinshelwood, R.D. ( 1994) ‘Attacks on the Reflective Space’, in V. Schermer and M. Pines (eds) Ring of Fire, pp. 86-106. London: Routledge.
27.
Hydén, L.C. and Bülow, P.H. ( 2003) ‘Who’s Talking: Drawing Conclusions from Focus Groups - Some Methodological Considerations’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology6(4): 305-21.
28.
International Poverty Centre (2006) Poverty in Focus: What is Poverty? Concepts and Measures. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
29.
Jensen, J., Krishnan, V., Spittal, M. and Sathiyandra, S. ( 2003) ‘New Zealand Living Standards: Their Measurement and Variation, with an Application to Policy’, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand20: 72-97.
30.
Johnson, A. ( 1996) ‘"It’s Good to Talk": The Focus Group and the Sociological Imagination’, The Sociological Review44(3): 517-38.
31.
Jowett, M. and O’Toole, G. ( 2006) ‘Focusing Researchers’ Minds: Contrasting Experiences of Using Focus Groups in Feminist Qualitative Research’ , Qualitative Research6(4): 453-72.
32.
Kitzinger, J. ( 1994) ‘The Methodology of Focus Groups: The Importance of Interaction Between Research Participants’, Sociology of Health & Illness16(1): 103-21.
33.
Laderchi, C., Saith, R. and Stewart, F. ( 2003) Does it Matter that We Do Not Agree on the Definition of Poverty? A Comparison of Four Approaches. Oxford: Oxford Development Studies.
34.
Lewin, K. ( 1972) ‘Need, Force and Valence in Psychological Fields’ , in E.P. Hollander and R.G. Hunt (eds) Classic Contributions to Social Psychology. London: Oxford University Press.
35.
Lezaun, J. ( 2007) ‘A Market Of Opinions: The Political Epistemology of Focus Groups’, The Sociological Review55 (Supplement 2): 130-51.
36.
Merton, R. ( 1987) ‘The Focussed Interview and Focus Groups: Continuities and Discontinuities’, The Public Opinion Quarterley51(4): 550-66.
37.
Mitchell, T. ( 1999) ‘Society, Economy, and the State Effect’, in G. Steinmetz (ed.) State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn, pp. 76-97. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
38.
Morgan, D.L. (ed.) (1993) Successful Focus Groups. Advancing the State of the Art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Morgan, D.L. ( 1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Nitsun, M. ( 1966) The Anti-Group: Destructive Forces in the Group and Their Creative Potential. London: Routledge .
41.
Parker, A. and Tritter, J. ( 2006) ‘Focus Group Method and Methodology: Current Practice and Recent Debate’, International Journal of Research & Method in Education29(1): 23-37.
42.
Petersen, A.D., Petersen, A.R. and Bunton, R. ( 1997) Foucault, Health and Medicine. New York: Routledge.
43.
Poole, M., Hollingshead, A., McGrath, J., Moreland, R. and Rohrbaugh, J. ( 2004) ‘Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Small Groups’ , Small Group Research35(1): 3-16.
44.
Pösö, T., Honkatukia, P. and Nyqvist, L. ( 2008) ‘Focus Groups and the Study of Violence’, Qualitative Research8(1): 73-89.
45.
Presbyterian Support Otago (2002) How Much is Enough? Life Below the Poverty Line in Dunedin July 2002. Dunedin: Presbyterian Support Otago. URL: http://www.theglobalbridge.co.nz/poverty/forward.htm
46.
Presbyterian Support Otago (2003) How Much is Enough? Life Below the Poverty Line in Dunedin. Update One, October 2003. Dunedin: Presbyterian Support Otago.
47.
Presbyterian Support Otago (2009) Can We Do Better? Voices of Poverty 2008. Dunedin: Presbyterian Support Otago. URL: http://ps.org.nz/Site/Otago/Library/Default.aspx
48.
Richardson, L. and Le Grand, J. ( 2002) ‘Outsider and Insider Expertise: The Response of Residents of Deprived Neighbourhoods to an Academic Definition of Social Exclusion’ , Social Policy & Administration36(5): 496-515.
49.
Ringer, T.M. ( 2002) Group Action: The Dynamics of Groups in Therapeutic, Educational and Corporate Settings. London: Jessica Kingsley.
50.
Roulston, K. ( 2006) ‘Close Encounters of the "CA" Kind: A Review of Literature Analysing Talk in Research Interviews’, Qualitative Research6(4): 515-34.
51.
Rutan, J.S., Stone, W.N. and Shay, J.J. ( 2007) Psychodynamic Group Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.
52.
Sacks, H. ( 1992) Lectures on Conversation, Volumes I and II, edited by G. Jefferson with an introduction by E.A. Schegloff.Oxford: Blackwell.
53.
Savage, M. ( 2008) ‘Elizabeth Bott and the Formation of ModernBritish Sociology’, The Sociological Review56(4): 579-603.
54.
Sherraden, M. ( 2001) ‘Asset Building Policy and Programs for the Poor’ , in T. Shapiro and E.N. Wolff (eds) Assets for the Poor: The Benefits of Spreading Asset Ownership, pp. 302-33. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
55.
Silverman, D. ( 1998) Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis . New York: Oxford University Press .
56.
Smithson, J. ( 2000) ‘Using and Analysing Focus Groups: Limitations and Possibilities’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology3(2): 103-19.
57.
Stewart, D., Shamdasani, P. and Rook, D. ( 2007) Focus Groups: Theory and Practice (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
Turney, L. and Pocknee, C. ( 2004) ‘Virtual Focus Groups: New Technologies, New Opportunities, New Learning Environments’, in R. Atkinson , C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer and R. Phillips (eds) Beyond the Comfort Zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference, pp. 905-12. Perth, 5-8 December. URL: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/turney.html
59.
Waldegrave, C. and Stephens, R. ( 2000) ‘Poverty: The Litmus Test of Social and Economic Policy Failure’, Second Biennial Aotearoa New Zealand International Development Studies Network (DEVNET) Conference, Poverty Prosperity and Progress (Victoria University of Wellington, November 2000).
60.
Waldegrave, C. and Stuart, S. ( 1996) ‘Participation in Poverty Research: Drawing on the Knowledge of Low Income Householders to Establish an Appropriate Measure for Monitoring Social Policy Impacts’, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 7, URL: http://www.familycentre.org.nz/Publications/filesSocialPolicyResearch/spj7-participation-poverty.pdf?PHPSESSID=4674b0e9
61.
Wall, D.S. and Williams, M. ( 2007) ‘Policing Diversity in the Digital Age: Maintaining Order in Virtual Communities’, Criminology and Criminal Justice7(4): 391-415.
62.
Wheelan, S. (ed.) (2005) The Handbook of Group Research and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
Whitaker, D. ( 2000) ‘Theory-Building, Theory-Use and Practice in Group Psychotherapy’, Group Analysis33: 559-73.
64.
Whitaker, D. ( 2001) Using Groups to Help People (2nd Edition). Hove: Brunner-Routledge .
65.
Whitaker, D. and Lieberman, M. ( 1964) Psychotherapeutic Change Through the Group Process. New Brunswick, NJ: AldineTransaction.
66.
Whitaker, D. and Lieberman, M. ( 2008) Psychotherapeutic Change Through the Group Process. New Brunswick, NJ: AldineTransaction.
67.
Wibek, V., Abrandt, M. and Gren, D. ( 2007) ‘Learning in Focus Groups: An Analytical Dimension for Enhancing Focus Group Research’, Qualitative Research7(2): 249-67.
68.
Wilkinson, S. and Kitzinger, C. ( 2000) ‘"Clinton Faces Nation": A Case Study in the Construction of Focus Group Data as Public Opinion’, The Sociological Review48(3): 408-24.
69.
Wittenbaum, G. and Moreland, R. ( 2008) ‘Small-Group Research in Social Psychology: Topics and Trends over Time’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass2(1): 187-203.
70.
Young, R. ( 1999) ‘Group Therapies and Group Dynamics’, Paper delivered to the Department of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, 12 January. URL: http://www.human-nature.com/rmyoung/papers/pap118h.html
