This study examines journalism ethics research over the past five decades. To this effect, a bibliometric analysis was conducted on around 2000 published peer-reviewed articles between 1973 and 2024. The articles were retrieved from Scopus database and were authored by 3229 scholars. The findings suggest that there is an exponential growth of scholarly articles in journalism ethics research, especially during the last decade. The study also identifies trending themes, topics that may be losing their relevance, top authors, top institutions and top countries, most cited research articles as well as co-occurrence networks along with thematic evolution of journalism ethics research. The study also uses reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) to detect the ‘historical roots’ of journalism ethics. Findings suggest that rapid growth in journalism ethics research has been noticed since 2013. Findings also suggest that misinformation, fact-checking, artificial intelligence, fake news are hot topics in journalism ethics while regulations, press council themes are losing relevance. This study contributes to growing research that focuses on identifying trends and key concepts in journalism.
AgrawalSSharmaNBruniMEIazzolinoG (2023) Happiness economics: Discovering future trends through a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production416: 137860.
2.
AngPHKnobloch-WesterwickSAguadedI, et al. (2019) Intellectual Balkanization or globalization: The future of communication research publishing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly96(4): 963–979.
3.
BahjiAAcionLLaslettAAdinoffB (2023) Exclusion of the non-English-speaking world from the scientific literature: Recommendations for change for addiction journals and publishers. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs40(1): 6–13.
4.
BelseyAChadwickR (1992) Ethical Issues in Journalism and the Media. London: Routledge.
5.
BertrandCJ (2002) Media Ethics and Accountability Systems. New Brunswick, NJ; London: Transaction Publishers.
6.
BrownF (2011) Journalism Ethics: A Casebook of Professional Conduct for News Media. Portland, OR: Marian Street Press.
7.
CallonMCourtialJPLavilleF (1991) Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics22: 155–205.
8.
ChristiansCG (2005) Ethical theory in communications research. Journalism Studies6(1): 3–14.
9.
DelecroixBEppsteinR (2006) Co-word analysis for the non-scientific information example of reuters business briefings. Data Science Journal3: 80–87.
10.
DemeterM (2019) The winner takes it all: international inequality in communication and media studies today. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly96(1): 37–59.
11.
DeuzeM (2005) What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism6(4): 442–464.
12.
DonthuNKumarSMukherjeeD, et al. (2023) How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research133: 285–296.
13.
EmmelhainzC (2017) Supporting the expatriate social scientist: Faculty research and information access in post-Soviet Kazakhstan. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science49(1): 69–81.
14.
FanYOhmeJNeubergerC (2025) Digital turn without digital methods? Mapping the journey of journalism studies. Digital Journalism. OnlineFirst.
15.
FenglerSBastianMBrinkmannJ, et al. (2020) Covering migration—in Africa and Europe: results from a comparative analysis of 11 countries. Journalism Practice16(1): 140–160.
16.
FlewTSpurgeonCDanielA, et al. (2011) The promise of computational journalism. Journalism Practice6(2): 157–171.
17.
FrostC (2004) The press complaints commission: a study of ten years of adjudications on press complaints. Journalism Studies5(1): 101–114.
18.
GearhartSChoJ (2020) Mapping the History of Journalism & Mass Communication Educator: 30 Years of Publication (1990-2019). Journalism & Mass Communication Educator75(4): 375–391.
19.
GoyanesMJordáBHálóG (2024) The Impact of Methodological Diversity on Productivity, Views, and Citations: An Empirical Examination of Communication and its Most Productive Scholars. International Journal of Communication18: 5425–5447.
20.
HallinDManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HanitzschT (2007) Deconstructing journalism culture: toward a universal theory. Communication Theory17(4): 367–385.
22.
HanuschFBanjacS (2021) Do journalists share universal values? In: WardSJA (ed). Handbook of Global Media Studies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag, 71–90.
23.
HarcupT (2002) Journalists and Ethics: the quest for a collective voice. Journalism Studies3(1): 101–114.
24.
HarcupT (2007) The Ethical Journalist. London, UK: Sage.
25.
HaunschildRBornmannL (2022) Reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) in practice: a software tutorial. Scientometrics127: 7253–7271.
26.
JainJWaliaNSinghSJainE (2022) Mapping the field of behavioral biases: literature review using bibliometric analysis. Management Review Quarterly72: 823–855.
KlaidmanSBeauchampT (1987) The Virtuous Journalist. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
KovachBRosenstielT (2001) The Elements of Journalism. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.
30.
KozmanC (2021) Reconceptualizing Arab media research: moving from centrism toward inclusiveness and balance. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly98(1): 241–262.
31.
KreuterMWGreenMCCappellaJN, et al. (2007) Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine33(3): 221–235.
32.
LewisSC (2012) Tensions between professional control and open participation. Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society15(6): 836–866.
33.
LewisSC (2015) Journalism in an era of big data: cases, concepts, and critiques. Digital Journalism3(3): 321–330.
34.
LuthraR (2015) Transforming global communication research with a view to the margins. Communication Research and Practice1(3): 251–257.
35.
MalikBA (2025) Tracking the citations and applications of RPYS in academic publications: insights from Scopus data. Performance Measurement and Metrics. FirstOnline.
36.
MelladoC (2020) Beyond Journalistic Norms: Role Performance and News in Comparative Perspective. New York: Routledge.
37.
MoranREShaikhSJ (2022) Robots in the News and Newsrooms: Unpacking Meta-Journalistic Discourse on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Journalism. Digital Journalism10(10): 1756–1774.
38.
Nuño-MoralMVTrillo-DomínguezMGuerrero-BoteVP, et al. (2023) Analysis of national scientific domains in the journalism discipline (Scopus, 2003–2019). Journalism24(9): 1998–2020.
39.
ReeseSD (2010) Journalism and globalization. Sociology Compass4(6): 344–353.
40.
RomeroL (2018) A citation analysis of scholarly journals in communication studies. Portal: Libraries and the Academy18(3): 505–534.
41.
SandersK (2021) Why ethics still matters. In: PriceLTSandersKWyattWN (eds) The Routledge Companion to Journalism Ethics (9-17). London: Routledge.
42.
SangYLeeNYParkS (2024) Looking back at journalism ethics research over the past decade: an analysis of research in digital journalism, journalism, journalism practice, and journalism studies, 2013-2022. Journalism26(2): 365–386.
43.
Schatto-EckrodtTQuandtT (2023) Two decades of journalism studies: authorship, networks and diversity. Digital Journalism11(4): 630–652.
44.
ScheufeleDA (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication49(1): 103–122.
45.
SenA (2013) Press freedom: what is it good for?Index on Censorship42(3): 6–14.
46.
ShoemakerPReeseS (1991) Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. New York: Longman Trade/Caroline House.
47.
SingerJBLewisSCWahl-JorgensenK (2023) Journalism in the quarterly: a century of change in the industry and the academy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly100(4): 773–792.
48.
StarckK (2001) What's right/wrong with journalism ethics research?Journalism Studies2(1): 133–150.
49.
SteelJFirmstoneJConboyM, et al. (2025) Journalism and Ethical Praxis: A Thematic Analysis of Journalism Ethics Across Five European Countries. Journalism Practice, 1–18.
50.
SuzinaAC (2020) English as lingua franca. Or the sterilisation of scientific work. Media, Culture & Society43(1): 171–179.
51.
TankardJWChangT-KTsangK-J (1984) Citation networks as indicators of journalism research activity. Journalism Quarterly31(1): 89–124.
52.
ThomasRJ (2018) Harm in journalism. In: PlaisancePL (ed). Communication and Media Ethics. Boston/Berlin: De Gruyter Brill, 215–234.
53.
TribuseanI (2020) The Use of VR in Journalism: Current Research and Future Opportunities. In: JungTtom DieckMCRauschnabelPA (eds). Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality. Progress in IS. Cham: Springer.
WaisbordS (2018) Truth is what happens to news: on journalism, fake news, and post-truth. Journalism Studies19(13): 1866–1878.
56.
WardS (2011) Ethics and the Media: An Introduction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
57.
WardSJA (2015) The Invention of Journalism Ethics: The Path to Objectivity and beyond. (2nd edition). Montreal & Kingston; McGill-Queen’s University Press.
58.
WardSJA (2020) Journalism ethics. In: Wahl-JorgensenKHanitzschT (eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York and London: Routledge, 307–323.
59.
WardSJA (2021) What is global media ethics? In: WardSJA (ed). Handbook of Global Media Ethics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 5–21.
