Individual differences matter in foreign language writing. Yet, little information exists on female students in Saudi Arabia, a patriarchal society that is being re-engineered to foster gender equity. This study asked whether particular psychological dispositions can account for the performance in English composition of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) and non-STEM Saudi female students (i.e. an understudied population whose first language is Arabic). Examined were dispositions such as anxiety, which was expected to be detrimental to attainment, and self-efficacy and emotional intelligence, which were expected to be beneficial. A sample of 430 Saudi female students for whom English was their second language was surveyed. Students had completed a required English composition course the previous semester. Cluster analysis illustrated three distinct groups of students. Students who did not report anxiety were either STEM or a subsection of non-STEM students. The remaining non-STEM students reported anxiety as well as lower self-efficacy, emotional intelligence, and writing attainment than the other two groups. Findings suggest that, within this particular understudied population, consideration of individual differences can inform the selection of remedies for at-risk students in English composition courses.
AbdolrezapourP. (2013). The relationship between emotional intelligence and EFL learners’ writing performance. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 70, 331–339.
2.
AhmedJ.NazF.L.MuhammadW.NisaA.U.KhanA.U. (2022). The role of self-efficacy in emotional intelligence and career adaptability challenges among Ph.D. Scholars. Journal of Policy Research, 8, 81–87.
3.
AhmedW. (2018). Developmental trajectories of math anxiety during adolescence: Associations with STEM career choice. Journal of Adolescence, 67, 158–166.
4.
Al AlharethY.Al AlharethY.Al DighrirI. (2015). Review of women and society in Saudi Arabia. American Journal of Educational Research, 3, 121–125.
5.
Al AsmariA. (2013). Investigation of writing strategies, writing apprehension, and writing achievement among Saudi EFL-Major students. International Education Studies, 6, 130–143.
6.
AlfarwanS. (2022). Is it all bad? Saudi EFL student perceptions of the role of anxiety when writing. Saudi Journal of Language Studies, 2, 1–16.
7.
AloairdhiN.M. (2019). Writing anxiety among Saudi female learners at some Saudi Universities. English Language Teaching, 12(9), 55–65.
8.
AlsowatH.H. (2016). Foreign language anxiety in higher education: A practical framework for reducing FLA. European Scientific Journal, 12, 193–220.
9.
AlsowatH.H. (2020). Evidence-based practices of english language teaching: A meta-analysis of meta-analyses. English Language Teaching, 13(11), 75–93.
10.
AlshuwaikhatH.M.MohammedI. (2017). Sustainability matters in national development visions: Evidence from Saudi Arabia’s Vision for 2030. Sustainability, 9, 408.
11.
Al-ZohbiG.PilottiM.A.E. (2023). Contradictions about sustainability: A case study of college students from Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 15, 3483.
12.
Asher BlackDeerA.Patterson Silver WolfD.A.MaguinE.Beeler-StinnS. (2021). Depression and anxiety among college students: Understanding the impact on grade average and differences in gender and ethnicity. Journal of American College Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2021.1920954
13.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
14.
BanduraA. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38, 9–44.
15.
BeneschS. (2013). Considering emotions in critical English language teaching: Theories on praxis. Routledge.
16.
BensalemE. (2018). Foreign language anxiety of EFL students: Examining the effect of self-efficacy, self-perceived proficiency and socio biographical variables. Arab World English Journal, 9, 38–55.
17.
ChecklandP.HolwellS. (2007). Action research. In KockN. (Ed.), Information systems action research. Integrated series in information systems (pp. 3–17). Springer.
18.
ChenG.GullyS.M.EdenD. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83.
19.
ChenG.GullyS.M.WhitemanJ.A.KilcullenB.N. (2000). Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 835–847.
20.
ChengY.S. (2002). Factors associated with foreign language writing anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 35, 647–656.
21.
ChengY.S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 313–335.
22.
ChengY.S.HorwitzE.K.SchallertD.L. (1999). Language anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning, 49, 417–446.
23.
CohenB.H. (2001). Explaining psychological statistics. John Wiley & Sons.
24.
CooperA.PetridesK.V. (2010). A psychometric analysis of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire–Short Form (TEIQue–SF) using item response theory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 449–457.
25.
CornwellS.McKayT. (2000). Establishing a valid, reliable measure of writing apprehension for Japanese students. JALT Journal, 22, 114–139.
26.
DeVellisR.F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage.
27.
DewaeleJ.M.PetridesK.V.FurnhamA. (2008). Effects of trait emotional intelligence and sociobiographical variables on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety among adult multilinguals: A review and empirical investigation. Language Learning, 58, 911–960.
28.
DonovanM.S.BransfordJ.D. (2005). How students learn: History in the classroom. National Academies Press.
29.
EbrahimiM.R.KhoshsimaH.Zare-BehtashE. (2018). The impacts of emotional intelligence enhancement on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ writing skill. International Journal of Instruction, 11, 437–452.
30.
ErkanY.D.SabanA.I. (2011). Writing performance relative to writing apprehension, self-efficacy in writing, and attitudes towards writing: A correlational study in Turkish tertiary-level EFL. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 13, 163–191.
31.
EstajiM.ShahmoradiY. (2016). The Interplay of emotional intelligence, EFL students’ gender, and their writing performance: A correlational study of Iranian university students. Applied Research on English Language, 5, 173–190.
32.
EuchiJ.OmriA.Al-TitA. (2018). The pillars of economic diversification in Saudi Arabia. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 14, 330–343.
33.
EysenckM.W.CalvoM.G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 409–434.
34.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
GollinsA.GentnerD. (2016). A framework for a cognitive theory of writing. In GreggL.W.SteinbergE.R. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 51–72). Routledge.
37.
GolparvarS.E.KhafiA. (2021). The role of L2 writing self-efficacy in integrated writing strategy use and performance. Assessing Writing, 47, 100504.
38.
GriffithsC.SoruçA. (2020). Individual differences in language learning. Springer.
39.
HaikalisM.DoucetteH.MeiselM.K.BirchK.BarnettN.P. (2022). Changes in college student anxiety and depression from pre-to during-COVID-19: Perceived stress, academic challenges, loneliness, and positive perceptions. Emerging Adulthood, 10, 534–545.
40.
HanJ.HiverP. (2018). Genre-based L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of change. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 44–59.
41.
HorwitzE.K. (2010). Foreign and second language anxiety. Language Teaching, 43, 154–167.
42.
HuertaM.GoodsonP.BeigiM.ChlupD. (2017). Graduate students as academic writers: Writing anxiety, self-efficacy and emotional intelligence. Higher Education Research and Development, 36, 716–729.
43.
JürgensP.StarkB.MaginM. (2020). Two half-truths make a whole? On bias in self-reports and tracking data. Social Science Computer Review, 38, 600–615.
44.
KhadawardiH.A. (2022). Saudi learners’ perceptions of academic writing challenges and general attitude towards writing in English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13, 645–658.
45.
KırmızıÖ.KırmızıG.D. (2015). An investigation of L2 learners’ writing self-efficacy, writing anxiety and its causes at higher education in Turkey. International Journal of Higher Education, 4, 57–66.
LeeM.K.EvansM. (2019). Investigating the operating mechanisms of the sources of L2 writing self-efficacy at the stages of giving and receiving peer feedback. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 831–847.
48.
LevyH.E.FaresL.RubinstenO. (2021). Math anxiety affects females’ vocational interests. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 210, 105214.
49.
LowieW.M.VerspoorM.H. (2019). Individual differences and the ergodicity problem. Language Learning, 69, 184–206.
50.
LuoT.SoW.W.M.WanZ.H.LiW.C. (2021). STEM stereotypes predict students’ STEM career interest via self-efficacy and outcome expectations. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1–13.
51.
MellingerC.D.HansonT.A. (2020). Methodological considerations for survey research: Validity, reliability, and quantitative analysis. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series: Themes in Translation Studies, 19, 172–190.
52.
MertlerC.A. (Ed.). (2019). The Wiley handbook of action research in education. John Wiley & Sons.
53.
MorenoR.KilpatrickJ. (2018). Student perceptions of self-efficacy in the foreign language classroom: A design-based research study. EDeR. Educational Design Research, 2, 1–26.
54.
MorrisL.W.DavisM.A.HutchingsC.H. (1981). Cognitive and emotional components of anxiety: Literature review and a revised worry–emotionality scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(4), 541–555.
55.
MulhemH.PilottiM.A.El AlaouiK.Al KuhayliH.A. (2020). Islamic knowledge or Saudi knowledge? Female religious students and the problem of cultural norms in a changing Arabian society. Religious Education, 115, 522–535.
56.
O’DeaR.E.LagiszM.JennionsM.D.NakagawaS. (2018). Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM. Nature Communications, 9, 3777.
57.
ÖztürkG.SaydamD. (2017). Anxiety and self-efficacy in foreign language writing: The case in Turkey. Başkent University Journal of Education, 1, 10–21.
58.
PapadakisS.TousiaC.PolychronakiK. (2018). Women in computer science. The case study of the Computer Science Department of the University of Crete, Greece. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 9, 142–151.
59.
PetridesK.V.FurnhamA. (2006). The role of trait emotional intelligence in a gender-specific model of organizational variables. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 552–569.
60.
PilottiM.A.E. (2021). What lies beneath sustainable education? Predicting and tackling gender differences in STEM academic success. Sustainability, 13, 1671.
61.
PilottiM.A.E.Al GhazoR.Al ShamsiS.J. (2022). Academic entitlement amid social change in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14, 1718–1730.
62.
PilottiM.A.E.ElmoussaO. (2022). Initial approach to a research writing course: A case study of STEM and non-STEM female students under pressure to succeed. Cogent Education, 9, 2127471.
63.
PilottiM.A.E.NazeeruddinE.AlkuhayliH.ElmoussaO. (2022). Predicting performance of Middle Eastern female students: A challenge for sustainable education. Psychology in the Schools, 59, 1790–1801.
64.
PilottiM.A.E.WakedA.El AlaouiK.KortS.ElmoussaO.J. (2023). The emotional state of second-language learners in a research writing course: Do academic orientation and major matter?Behavioral Sciences, 13, 919.
65.
PollioH.R.BeckH.P. (2000). When the tail wags the dog: Perceptions of learning and grade orientation in, and by, contemporary college students and faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 84–102.
66.
RachawongM.PhusawisotP. (2022). Reconsidering writing anxiety among EFL learners. NIDA Journal of Language and Communication, 27, 79–89.
67.
RahimiM.ZhangL.J. (2019). Writing task complexity, students’ motivational beliefs, anxiety and their writing production in English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 32, 761–786.
68.
Ramón-ArbuésE.Gea-CaballeroV.Granada-LópezJ.M., et al. (2020). The prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress and their associated factors in college students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 7001.
69.
SabtiA.A.Md RashidS.NimehchisalemV.DarmiR. (2019). The impact of writing anxiety, writing achievement motivation, and writing self-efficacy on writing performance: A correlational study of Iraqi tertiary EFL Learners. Sage Open, 9, 1–13.
70.
SackettP.R.LievensF.Van IddekingeC.H.KuncelN.R. (2017). Individual differences and their measurement: A review of 100 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 254–273.
71.
SadeghiK.FarzizadehB. (2012). The relationship between multiple intelligences and writing ability of Iranian EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 5, 136–142.
72.
SafdarS.FriedlmeierW.MatsumotoD., et al. (2009). Variations of emotional display rules within and across cultures: A comparison between Canada, USA, and Japan. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41, 1–10.
73.
SalehW.MalibariA. (2021). Saudi women and vision 2030: bridging the gap?Behavioral Sciences, 11, 132.
74.
Sánchez-CardonaI.Ortega-MaldonadoA.SalanovaM.MartínezI.M. (2021). Learning goal orientation and psychological capital among students: A pathway to academic satisfaction and performance. Psychology in the Schools, 58, 1432–1445.
75.
SantosA.WangW.LewisJ. (2018). Emotional intelligence and career decision-making difficulties: The mediating role of career decision self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 107, 295–309.
76.
SarasonI.G.SarasonB.R.PierceG.R. (1990). Anxiety, cognitive interference, and performance. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 1–18.
77.
SauceB.MatzelL.D. (2013). The causes of variation in learning and behavior: Why individual differences matter. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 395.
78.
SchererK.R.MatsumotoD.WallbottH.G.KudohT. (2013). Emotional experience in cultural context: A comparison between Europe, Japan, and the United States. In SchererK.R. (Ed.), Facets of emotion (pp. 5–30). Psychology Press.
79.
ShaoK.YuW.JiZ. (2013). The relationship between EFL students’ emotional intelligence and writing achievement. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7, 107–124.
80.
SieglingA.B.PetridesK.V.MartskvishviliK. (2015). An examination of a new psychometric method for optimizing multi-faceted assessment instruments in the context of trait emotional intelligence. European Journal of Personality, 29, 42–54.
81.
SpencerS.J.LogelC.DaviesP.G. (2016). Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 415–437.
82.
StevensJ.P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum.
83.
StrackJ.EstevesF. (2015). Exams? Why worry? Interpreting anxiety as facilitative and stress appraisals. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 28, 205–214.
84.
SunT.WangC. (2020). College students’ writing self-efficacy and writing self-regulated learning strategies in learning English as a foreign language. System, 90, 102221.
85.
SunT.WangC.LambertR.G.LiuL. (2021). Relationship between second language English writing self-efficacy and achievement: A meta-regression analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 100817.
86.
SyedJ.AliF.HennekamS. (2018). Gender equality in employment in Saudi Arabia: A relational perspective. Career Development International, 23, 163–177.
87.
TaherdoostH. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5, 2296–1747.
88.
TawfikA.A.HungW.GiabbanelliP.J. (2020). Comparing how different inquiry-based approaches impact learning outcomes. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14, 1–16.
89.
TeimouriY.GoetzeJ.PlonskyL. (2019). Second language anxiety and achievement: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 363–387.
90.
TsiriotakisI.K.VassilakiE.SpantidakisI.StavrouN.A. (2017). The examination of the effects of writing strategy-based procedural facilitative environments on students’ English foreign language writing anxiety levels. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2074.
91.
TruongT.N.N.WangC. (2019). Understanding Vietnamese college students’ self-efficacy beliefs in learning English as a foreign language. System, 84, 123–132.
92.
UsherE.L.PajaresF. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78, 751–796.
93.
VandewalleD.NerstadC.G.DysvikA. (2019). Goal orientation: A review of the miles traveled and the miles to go. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 115–144.
94.
WoodrowL. (2011). College English writing affect: Self-efficacy and anxiety. System, 39, 510–522.
95.
ZabihiR. (2018). The role of cognitive and affective factors in measures of L2 writing. Written Communication, 35, 32–57.
