Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study investigates how learner language proficiency and peer familiarity interact to shape English as a Foreign Language students’ engagement with peer feedback, drawing on Fredricks et al.’s tripartite model of engagement (affective, cognitive, behavioral), self-determination theory, and social interdependence theory to conceptualize engagement as a socially mediated and motivationally dynamic process. To interpret engagement variation, the study incorporates self-determination theory and social interdependence theory, conceptualizing engagement as socially mediated and motivationally dynamic. Three research questions examine how language proficiency influences engagement, peer familiarity affects engagement across feedback roles, and the two variables interact, especially for low-proficiency learners. A 2 × 2 factorial mixed-methods design involved 212 Chinese university students in an academic writing course. Participants were grouped by proficiency (high and low) and peer familiarity (familiar and unfamiliar). Quantitative data from post-task questionnaires were analyzed using analysis of variance and regression; qualitative data from 16 interviews were thematically analyzed. Findings show that language proficiency was the strongest predictor of engagement, especially in a feedback-giving role. Peer familiarity selectively enhanced affective and behavioral engagement for low-proficiency learners. Interviews revealed that peer familiarity fostered emotional safety, interpretive confidence, and revision agency, particularly among socially vulnerable learners. These findings support a differentiated, role-sensitive model of engagement shaped by learner traits and relational context. Theoretically, the study extends engagement research by applying self-determination and social interdependence theories to explain how language proficiency and familiarity interact. Pedagogically, it recommends pairing and task design strategies aligned with learners’ relational readiness and language proficiency.

Keywords

English as a Foreign Language writing peer feedback learner engagement peer familiarity learner language proficiency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Carless

Boud

(2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Chen

(2025). Investigating relationships among students’ affective, behavioral and cognitive engagement with peer feedback on EFL writing. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 84, 101430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101430

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Creswell

J.W.

Clark

V.L.P.

(2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Cui

Schunn

C.D.

(2024). Peer feedback that consistently supports learning to write and read: Providing comments on meaning-level issues. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(8), 1168–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2364025

Dao

Duong

Nguyen

M.X.N.C

. (2021). Effects of SCMC mode and learner familiarity on peer feedback in L2 interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(7), 1206–1235. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1976212

Deci

E.L.

Ryan

R.M.

(2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the Self-Determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Fan

(2020). Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100775

10.

Fredricks

J.A.

Blumenfeld

P.C.

Paris

A.H.

(2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

11.

Han

Hyland

(2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002

12.

Jin

Jiang

M.M.

Chen

(2022). “Their encouragement makes me feel more confident”: Exploring peer effects on learner engagement in collaborative reading of academic texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 60, 101177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101177

13.

Johnson

D.W.

Johnson

R.T.

(2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(4), 285–358.

14.

Liang

Xie

(2023). Exploring the effects of planning conditions and peer familiarity on Chinese EFL learners’ argumentative writing. System, 115, 103057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103057

15.

Little

Dawson

Boud

Tai

(2025). What does it take to provide effective peer feedback? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(5), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2475059

16.

Liu

Ding

Niu

(2025). Effects of peer familiarity on Chinese English learners’ L2 learning in collaborative writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12600

17.

Man

Kong

Chau

M.H.

(2024). Developing student feedback literacy through peer review training. RELC Journal, 55(2), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221078380

18.

Nicol

Thomson

Breslin

(2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518

19.

Peungcharoenkun

Waluyo

(2024). Students’ affective engagements in peer feedback across offline and online English learning environments in Thai higher education. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00286-w

20.

Qian

(2025). Toward a better understanding of student engagement with peer feedback: A longitudinal study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 63(1), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0108

21.

Sippel

(2024). Maximizing the benefits of peer interaction: Form-focused instruction and peer feedback training. Language Teaching Research, 28(2), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211004638

22.

Teng

L.S.

Zhang

L.J.

(2020). Empowering learners in the second/foreign language classroom: Can self-regulated learning strategies-based writing instruction make a difference? Journal of Second Language Writing, 48, 100701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100701

23.

Van Gennip

N.A.

Segers

M.S.

Tillema

H.H

. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002

24.

van Heerden

Bharuthram

. (2021). Knowing me, knowing you: The effects of peer familiarity on receiving peer feedback for undergraduate student writers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(8), 1191–1201. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1863910

25.

van Lier

(Ed.). (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Springer Netherlands.

26.

Winstone

N.E.

Boud

(2020). The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 656–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687

27.

Winstone

Carless

(2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351115940

28.

Jiang

(2020). Doctoral students’ engagement with journal reviewers’ feedback on academic writing. Studies in Continuing Education, 44(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2020.1781610

29.

Zhang

Zheng

Yuan

Zhang

(2018). Understanding student engagement with peer feedback on master’s theses: A Macau study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467879

30.

Zhou

Jiang

(2024). Secondary students’ L2 writing motivation and engagement: The impact of teachers’ instructional approaches and feedback practices. Applied Linguistics Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0200

31.

Zhang

Schunn

Chen

(2023). EFL student engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: A longitudinal study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101255

32.

Zhang

Hyland

(2022). Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach. Assessing Writing, 51, 100586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100586

How language proficiency and peer familiarity shape engagement with feedback in English as a Foreign Language writing

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References