Writing in a foreign language is a particularly difficult skill to develop, especially when young learners are concerned because they are parallelly learning to write in their L1 and do not have strong oral foundations in their L2. The issue becomes even more complex when the ways to assess young learners’ writing are considered, given that research has shown there is room for improvement regarding English language teachers’ assessment literacy. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to examine the practices and challenges of assessing the writing of young EFL learners in Croatia. In the first part of the study, 97 English language teachers working with learners from year 1 to year 4 of elementary school (children aged 7 to 10) took an online questionnaire with close-ended and open-ended questions. In the second part, I analyzed the writing tasks that the learners were assigned by the teachers in the school. The results show that teachers do not always use appropriate writing tasks for summative assessment, that they need more support in creating language tests, and that Croatian universities need to do more to prepare future teachers to teach and assess young English language learners.
BachmanL. F.PalmerA. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford University Press.
2.
BerkL. E. (2017). Development through the lifespan (7th ed.). Pearson.
3.
BlandJ. (Ed.). (2015). Teaching English to young learners. Critical issues in language teaching with 3–12 year olds. Bloomsbury Academic.
4.
BrumenM.CagranB.RixonS. (2009). Comparative assessment of young learners’ foreign language competence in three Eastern European countries. Educational Studies, 35(3), 269–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690802648531
5.
BrumfitC.MoonJ.TongueR. (Eds.) (1991). Teaching English to children: From practice to principle. Collins ELT.
6.
CameronL. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge University Press.
7.
CindrićI. (2020). Assessment and the competence to assess young foreign language learners. University of Zagreb Faculty of Teacher Education.
8.
CookV. (2005). Written language and foreign language teaching. In CookV.BassettiB. (Eds.), Second language writing systems (pp. 424–441). Multilingual Matters.
9.
CookV. (2008). Second language learning and language teaching. Hodder Education.
10.
CowanN. (2016). Working memory maturation: Can we get at the essence of cognitive growth?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(2), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615621279
11.
Cushing WeigleS. (2009). Assessing writing (6th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
12.
EdelenbosP.Kubanek-GermanA. (2004). Teacher assessment: the concept of ‘diagnostic competence’. Language Testing, 21(3), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532204lt284oa
13.
EneverJ.(Ed.). (2011). Early language learning in Europe. British Council.
14.
European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2012). Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe – 2012 edition. Eurydice Report. Publications Office of the European Union.
15.
European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2017). Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe – 2017 edition. Eurydice Report. Publications Office of the European Union.
16.
HildG.NikolovM. (2011). Teachers’ views on tasks that work with primary school EFL learners. In LehmannM.LugossyR.HorváthJ. (Eds.), UPRT 2010: Empirical studies in English applied linguistics (pp. 47–62). Lingua Franca Csoport.
17.
HughesA. (2003). Testing for language teachers (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
18.
Ioannou-GeorgiouS.PavlouP. (2003). Assessing young learners. Oxford University Press.
19.
JangE. E. (2014). Focus on assessment. Oxford University Press.
20.
KonradE.HolzknechtF.SchwarzV.SpöttlC. (2018). Assessing writing at lower levels: Research findings, task development locally and internationally, and the opportunities presented by the extended CEFR descriptors. British Council.
21.
KošutaN.PatekarJ.Vičević IvanovićS. (2017). Plurilingualism in Croatian foreign language policy. Strani jezici, 46(1–2), 85–100.
22.
Kurikulum nastavnog predmeta Engleski jezik za osnovne škole i gimnazije. (2019). Narodne novine.
23.
LeeI.MakP.YuanR. E. (2019). Assessment as learning in primary writing classrooms: An exploratory study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 62, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.04.012
24.
ManchónR. M. (Ed.) (2011). Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language. John Benjamins.
25.
McKayP. (2006). Assessing young language learners. Cambridge University Press.
26.
Nastavni plan i program za osnovnu školu. (2006). Ministarstvo znanosti, obrazovanja i športa.
27.
NikolovM. (1999). Why do you learn English? Because the teacher is short. A study of Hungarian children’s foreign language learning motivation. Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889900300103
28.
NikolovM. (2016). Trends, issues, and challenges in assessing young language learners. In NikolovM. (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 1–18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22422-0_1
29.
PatekarJ. (2014). Implikacije razvojnih obilježja djece rane školske dobi za nastavu stranoga jezika. [Implications of young children’s developmental characteristics for foreign language teaching.]Metodički ogledi, 21(1), 67–81.
30.
PatekarJ. (2016a). A possible order of teaching English tenses in primary school. Metodički ogledi, 23(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.21464/mo43.231.6586
31.
PatekarJ. (2016b). From instructions to guidelines – changes in the new EFL curriculum [Paper presentation]. 30th International Scientific Conference of the Croatian Applied Linguistics Society, Rijeka, Croatia.
32.
PinterA. (2006). Teaching young language learners. Oxford University Press.
33.
Prošić-SantovacD.SavićV.RixonS. (2019). Assessing young English language learners in Serbia: Teachers’ attitudes and practices. In Prošić-SantovacD.RixonS. (Eds.), Integrating assessment into early language learning and teaching [epub] (pp. 469–497). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/PROSIC4818
34.
Rea-DickinsP.RixonS. (1999). Assessment of young learners of English: Reasons and means’. In RixonS. (Ed.), Young learners of English: Some research perspectives (pp. 89–101). Longman, British Council.
35.
RixonS. (2000). Collecting eagle’s eye data on the teaching of English to young learners: The British Council overview. In MoonJ.NikolovM. (Eds.), Research into teaching English to young learners (pp. 153–167). University of Pécs Press.
36.
RixonS. (2013). British Council survey of policy and practice in primary English language teaching worldwide. British Council.
37.
RixonS. (2016). Do developments in assessment represent the ‘Coming of Age’ of young learners English language teaching initiatives? The international picture. In NikolovM. (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 19–42). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22422-0
38.
RixonS.Prošić-SantovacD. (2019). Introduction: Assessment and early language learning. In Prošić-SantovacD.RixonS. (Eds.), Integrating assessment into early language learning and teaching [epub] (pp. 29–56). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/PROSIC4818
Vičević IvanovićS.PatekarJ.KošutaN. (2019). Do study programs in Croatia prepare future foreign language teachers to work with young learners?Croatian Journal of Education, 21(1), 307–344. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v21i1.2941
41.
VogtK.TsagariD. (2014). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers: Findings of a European study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 374–402. http://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.960046
42.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.
43.
WinkeP.LeeS.AhnJ. I.ChoiI.CuiY.YoonH.-J. (2018). The cognitive validity of child English language tests: What young language learners and their native-speaking peers can reveal. TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 274–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.396
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
