Politicians perceive their representative role in a variety of ways: as a delegate of their party, a delegate of voters, or a trustee who exercises their mandate independent of any external principal. Existing research finds that the tendency to adopt a specific style of representation depends on system-level institutions and individuals’ political experience and profile. The influence of the party organisational context remains little understood. This study contributes to filling this gap by examining the effects of parties’ resources and intra-party distribution of power on the prevalence of party delegates among their candidates. Drawing on data from the Comparative Candidates Survey (CCS) and the Political Party Database (PPDB) we find that party organisation shapes representation in a way that has not previously been demonstrated: parties with more resources and parties in which members have the final say in candidate selection have a higher proportion of party delegates among their candidates. This demonstrates the centrality of party organisation to representation.
AndewegR (1997) Role specialisation or role switching? Dutch MPs between electorate and executive. The Journal of Legislative Studies3(1): 110–127.
2.
AndewegRB (2012) The consequences of representatives’ role orientations: attitudes, behaviour, perceptions. In: BlomgrenMRozenbergO (eds), Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures. Oxon: Routledge.
3.
AndewegRBThomassenJ (2011) Pathways to party unity: sanctions, loyalty, homogeneity and division of labour in the Dutch parliament. Party Polit17: 655–672.
4.
BlomgrenMRozenbergO (eds), (2012) Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures (Hardback) - Routledge. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge/ ECPR studies in European political science.
5.
CareyJMShugartMS (1995) Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: a rank ordering of electoral formulas. Eye Science Electronic Resource14: 417–439.
6.
CeronA (2016) Inter-factional Conflicts and Government Formation. Do Party Leaders Sort out Ideological Heterogeneity?Party Politics22(6): 797–808.
7.
CloseC (2018) Parliamentary party loyalty and party family: the missing link?Party Polit24: 209–219.
8.
CloseCGherghinaS (2019) Rethinking intra-party cohesion: towards a conceptual and analytical framework. Party Politics25: 652–663.
9.
CloseCGherghinaSSierensV (2019) Prompting Legislative Agreement and Loyalty: What Role for Intra-Party Democracy?Parliamentary Affairs72(2): 387–405.
10.
ConversePEPierceR (1986) Political Representation in France. Cambridge: Mass; London: Harvard University Press.
11.
CowleyPChildsS (2003) Too spineless to rebel? New labour’s women MPs. The British Journal of Psychiatry. Supplement33: 345–365.
12.
DamgaardE (1997) The political roles of Danish MPs. The Journal of Legislative Studies3: 79–90.
13.
EsaiassonP (2000) How members of parliament define their task. In: EsaiassonP.HeidarK. (eds), Beyond Westminster and Congress: The Nordic Experience. Cleveland, OH: Ohio State University Press, 51–82.
14.
EulauHBuchananWFergusonL, et al. (1959) The political socialization of American state legislators. Midwest Journal of Political Science3: 188–206.
15.
EulauHKarpsPD (1977) The puzzle of representation: specifying components responsiveness. Legislative Studies Quarterly2: 233–254.
16.
FarrellDMScullyR (2010) The European parliament: one parliament, several modes of political representation on the ground?Journal of European Public Policy17: 36–54.
17.
GaujaA (2012) Party dimensions of representation in westminster parliaments: Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. In: BlomgrenMRozenbergO (eds), Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 121–144.
18.
GherghinaS (2011) MPs’ role orientations in newly emerged democratic legislatures. The Journal of Legislative Studies17: 45–64.
19.
HeidarK (1997) Roles, structures and behaviour: norwegian parliamentarians in the nineties. The Journal of Legislative Studies3: 91–109.
20.
KamCJ (2009) Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
KatzRS (1997) Representational roles. European Journal of Political Research32: 211–226.
22.
KatzRSMairP (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics1: 5–28.
23.
KleinE (2021) Explaining legislative party switching in advanced and new democracies. Party Polit27: 329–340. h.
24.
KöllnA-K (2014) Party Decline and Response: The Effects of Membership Decline on Party Organisations in Western Europe, 1960-2010.
25.
LittleCFarrellD (2017) Party organization and party unity. In: ScarrowSEWebbPDPoguntkeT (eds), Organizing Representation: Political Parties, Participation and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
MairPvan BiezenI (2001) Party membership in twenty European democracies, 1980-2000. Party Politics7: 5–21.
27.
MayhewDR (1974) Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.
28.
ÖnnudóttirEH (2016) Political parties and styles of representation. Party Politics22: 732–745.
29.
ÖnnudóttirEH (2014) Policy congruence and style of representation: party voters and political parties. West European Politics37: 538–563.
30.
ÖnnudóttirEHvon SchoultzÅ (2021) Candidates’ representational roles. In: WinterLDKarlsenRSchmittH (eds), Parliamentary Candidates between Voters and Parties : A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge, 120–141.
31.
PierceR (1999) Mass-elite issue linkages and the responsible party model. In: MillerWEPierceRThomassenJ, et al. (eds), Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 9–32.
32.
PiletJ-BFreireACostaO (2012) Ballot structure, district magnitude and constituency-orientation of MPs in proportional representation and majority electoral systems. Representation48: 359–372.
33.
PoguntkeTScarrowSEWebbPD, et al. (2016) Party rules, party resources and the politics of parliamentary democracies: How parties organize in the 21st century. Party Politics22: 661–678.
34.
SearingD (1994) Westminster’s World: Understanding Political Roles. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
35.
ShomerY (2009) Candidate Selection Procedures, Seniority, and Vote-Seeking BehaviorComparative Political Studies. Comparative Political Studies42(7): 945–970.
36.
ShomerY (2016) The Electoral Environment and Legislator Dissent. Comparative Politics48(4): 557–578.
37.
SiebererU (2006) Party unity in parliamentary democracies: a comparative analysis. The Journal of Legislative Studies12: 150–178.
38.
StrømK (2012) Roles as strategies: towards a logic of legislative behaviour. In: BlomgrenMRozenbergO (eds), Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 85–100.
39.
StrømK (1997) Rules, reasons and routines: legislative roles in parliamentary democracies. In: MüllerWCSaalfeldT (eds), Members of Parliament in Western Europe. Roles and Behaviour. London: Frank Cass, 155–174.
40.
StudlarDTMcAllisterI (1996) Constituency activity and representational roles among Australian legislators. The Journal of Politics58: 69–90.
41.
SudulichLTrummSBridgewaterJ (2020) Parliamentary representation: a cross-national study of candidates’ views. Parliamentary Affairs73: 522–542.
42.
TavitsM (2012) Party organizational strength and party unity in post-communist Europe. European Political Science Review4: 409–431.
43.
van BiezenIKopeckyP (2015) Patterns of Party Funding in European Democracies. Presented at the ECPR General Conference. Montréal.
44.
Van HauteEGaujaA (2015) Party Members and Activists. New-York: Routledge.
45.
von dem BergeBPoguntkeT (2017) Varieties of intra-party democracy: conceptualization and index construction. In: ScarrowSEWebbPPoguntkeT (eds), Organizing Political Parties. Representation, Participation and Power. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. 136–157.
46.
WahlkeJCEulauHBuchananW, et al. (1962) The legislative system. In: Explorations in Legislative Behavior. New York: John Wiley.
47.
WesselsBGieblerH (2011) Choosing a Style of Representation: The Role of Institutional and Organizational Incentives. Presented at the 6th ECPR General Conference. University of Iceland.
48.
ZittelT (2012) Legislators and their representational roles: strategic choices or habits of the heart? In: BlomgrenMRozenbergO (eds), Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures. London & New York: Routledge/ECPR Studies in European Political Science, 37–65.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
