Background: Upper extremity motor impairment is common after stroke. The Hybrid Assistive Limb single-joint type (HAL-SJ), an exoskeletal robot with biosensors, assists voluntary movement by detecting biopotential signals. While there are reports of positive effects, optimal strategies and patient selection criteria remain unclear.
Objective: To map the evidence on HAL-SJ use for upper extremity recovery after stroke.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted using five databases (search date: September 20, 2025). The studies included stroke patients treated with HAL-SJ and reported motor function outcomes. Reviews, abstracts, and commentaries were excluded.
Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. HAL-SJ improved upper limb motor function across recovery phases, with several studies reporting clinically meaningful improvements assessed by measures such as the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Action Research Arm Test. Effective strategies included combining HAL-SJ with therapies such as botulinum toxin A and occupational therapy, and high-frequency training. Patients with moderate impairment benefited most; early intervention showed potential in severe cases.
Conclusion: HAL-SJ shows potential as a rehabilitation tool for stroke-related upper extremity motor impairment. However, all included studies were conducted in Japan, which may limit the generalizability of these findings. Large-scale, multicenter studies are needed to establish optimal intervention protocols.
BertaniR.MelegariC.De ColaM. C.BramantiA.BramantiP.CalabròR. S. (2017). Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurol Sci, 38(9), 1561–1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-2995-5
2.
BroeksJ. G.LankhorstG. J.RumpingK.PrevoA. J. (1999). The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: Results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil, 21(8), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382899297459
ChenZ.WangC.FanW.GuM.YasinG.XiaoS.HuangJ.HuangX. (2020). Robot-assisted arm training versus therapist-mediated training after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Healthc Eng, 2020, 8810867. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8810867
6.
DamschroderL. J.AronD. C.KeithR. E.KirshS. R.AlexanderJ. A.LoweryJ. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci, 4, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
7.
DelormeM.VergotteG.PerreyS.FrogerJ.LaffontI. (2019). Time course of sensorimotor cortex reorganization during upper extremity task accompanying motor recovery early after stroke: An fNIRS study. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 37(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-180877
8.
DuretC.HutinE.LehenaffL.GraciesJ. M. (2015). Do all subacute stroke patients benefit from robot-assisted therapy? A retrospective study. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 33(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-140418
9.
FukudaH.MorishitaT.OgataT.SaitaK.HyakutakeK.WatanabeJ.ShiotaE.InoueT. (2016). Tailor-made rehabilitation approach using multiple types of hybrid assistive limb robots for acute stroke patients: A pilot study. Assist Technol, 28(1), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2015.1080768
10.
HyakutakeK.MorishitaT.SaitaK.FukudaH.ShiotaE.HigakiY.InoueT.UeharaY. (2019). Effects of home-based robotic therapy involving the single-joint hybrid assistive limb robotic suit in the chronic phase of stroke: A pilot study. Biomed Res Int, 2019, 5462694. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5462694
11.
IwamotoY.ImuraT.SuzukawaT.FukuyamaH.IshiiT.TakiS.ImadaN.ShibukawaM.InagawaT.ArakiH.ArakiO. (2019). Combination of exoskeletal upper limb robot and occupational therapy improve activities of daily living function in acute stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 28(7), 2018–2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.03.006
12.
IwamotoY.ImuraT.TanakaR.MitsutakeT.JungH.SuzukawaT.TakiS.ImadaN.InagawaT.ArakiH.ArakiO. (2022). Clinical prediction rule for identifying the stroke patients who will obtain clinically important improvement of upper limb motor function by robot-assisted upper limb. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 31(7), 106517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106517
13.
IwamotoY.TanakaR.ImuraT.MitsutakeT.JungH.SuzukawaT.TakiS.ImadaN.InagawaT.ArakiH.ArakiO. (2023). Does frequent use of an exoskeletal upper limb robot improve motor function in stroke patients?Disabil Rehabil, 45(7), 1185–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2055163
14.
JuckettL. A.WengerdL. R.FaietaJ.GriffinC. E. (2020). Evidence-based practice implementation in stroke rehabilitation: A scoping review of barriers and facilitators. Am J Occup Ther, 74(1), 7401205050p1–7401205050p14. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.035485
15.
KawamotoH.TaalS.NinissH.HayashiT.KamibayashiK.EguchiK.SankaiY. (2010). Voluntary motion support control of robot suit HAL triggered by bioelectrical signal for hemiplegia. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2010, 462–466. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626191
16.
KwakkelG.KollenB. (2007). Predicting improvement in the upper paretic limb after stroke: A longitudinal prospective study. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 25(5–6), 453–460.
17.
KwakkelG.KollenB. J.van der GrondJ.PrevoA. J. (2003). Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: Impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke, 34(9), 2181–2186. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000087172.16305.CD
18.
LeemM. J.KimG. S.KimK. H.YiT. I.MoonH. I. (2019). Predictors of functional and motor outcomes following upper limb robot-assisted therapy after stroke. Int J Rehabil Res, 42(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000349
19.
MolteniF.GasperiniG.CannavielloG.GuanziroliE. (2018). Exoskeleton and end-effector robots for upper and lower limbs rehabilitation: Narrative review. PM R, 10(9 Suppl 2), S174–S188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.06.005
20.
MorishitaT.InoueT. (2016). Robot-assisted rehabilitation using multiple types of hybrid assistive limb for acute stroke patients. Surg Cereb Stroke, 44(4), 302–306. https://doi.org/10.2335/scs.44.302
21.
NakayamaH.JørgensenH. S.RaaschouH. O.OlsenT. S. (1994). Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 75(4), 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9993(94)90161-9
22.
Nichols-LarsenD. S.ClarkP. C.ZeringueA.GreenspanA.BlantonS. (2005). Factors influencing stroke survivors’ quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke, 36(7), 1480–1484. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000170706.13595.4f
23.
RodgersH.BosomworthH.KrebsH. I.van WijckF.HowelD.WilsonN.AirdL.AlvaradoN.AndoleS.CohenD. L.DawsonJ.Fernandez-GarciaC.FinchT.FordG. A.FrancisR.HoggS.HughesN.PriceC. I.TernentL.TurnerD. L.ShawL. (2019). Robot assisted training for the upper limb after stroke (RATULS): A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 394(10192), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31055-4
24.
SaitaK.MorishitaT.HyakutakeK.FukudaH.ShiotaE.SankaiY.InoueT. (2017). Combined therapy using botulinum toxin A and single-joint hybrid assistive limb for upper-limb disability due to spastic hemiplegia. J Neurol Sci, 373, 182–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.12.056
25.
SaitaK.MorishitaT.HyakutakeK.OgataT.FukudaH.KamadaS.InoueT. (2020). Feasibility of robot-assisted rehabilitation in poststroke recovery of upper limb function depending on the severity. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 60(4), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0268
26.
SwayneO. B.RothwellJ. C.WardN. S.GreenwoodR. J. (2008). Stages of motor output reorganization after hemispheric stroke suggested by longitudinal studies of cortical physiology. Cereb Cortex, 18(8), 1909–1922. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm218
27.
TakebayashiT.TakahashiK.AmanoS.GoshoM.SakaiM.HashimotoK.HachisukaK.UchiyamaY.DomenK. (2022). Robot-assisted training as self-training for upper-limb hemiplegia in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 53(7), 2182–2191. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037260
28.
UebaT.HamadaO.OgataT.InoueT.ShiotaE.SankaiY. (2013). Feasibility and safety of acute phase rehabilitation after stroke using the hybrid assistive limb robot suit. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 53(5), 287–290. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.53.287
29.
WallA.BorgJ.PalmcrantzS. (2015). Clinical application of the hybrid assistive limb (HAL) for gait training: A systematic review. Front Syst Neurosci, 9, 48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00048
30.
WuJ.ChengH.ZhangJ.YangS.CaiS. (2021). Robot-assisted therapy for upper extremity motor impairment after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther, 101, pzab010. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab010
