The ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) n1 peak is the first of many that form part of the oscillating waveform. Previous work showed that up to 5 peaks can be elicited when an intact labyrinth is stimulated, with larger peaks contralaterally.
Objective
We investigated what happens to these later peaks when the n1 amplitude is enlarged, which is typically seen in superior canal dehiscence (SCD) and sometimes vestibular migraine (VM).
Methods
We measured oVEMPs elicited to air- (AC) and bone-conducted (BC) stimuli in 14 patients with SCD, 20 with SCD and classical migraine, 26 with clinically definite VM, and 20 with clinically definite VM and enlarged n1 peaks. We compared these results to 49 healthy volunteers.
Results
Both groups of SCD patients had the largest peaks, but the same number of peaks as healthy volunteers (maximum 4 for AC; 5 for BC). In contrast, patients with VM had more later peaks than other groups (maximum 6 for both stimuli).
Conclusions
As the patients with the largest amplitudes did not have prolonged oscillation in their waveforms, our results suggest that the oscillation may be enhanced by central processes, such as lack of habituation that is reported in patients with VM.
WeberKPRosengrenSMMichelsR, et al.Single motor unit activity in human extraocular muscles during the vestibulo-ocular reflex. J Physiol2012; 590(13): 3091–3101.
2.
DyballACWuXPKwokBYC, et al.After the n10: late oVEMP peaks in patients with unilateral vestibular loss and healthy volunteers. Exp Brain Res2025; 243(1): 10.
3.
SinghNKValappilNMithlajJA. Response rates and test-retest reliability of ipsilateral and contralateral ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential in healthy adults. Hear Bal Commun2015; 13(3): 126–133.
4.
DennisDLGovenderSChenP, et al.Differing response properties of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by air-conducted stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol2014; 125(6): 1238–1247.
5.
DennisDLGovenderSColebatchJG. Properties of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs and oVEMPs) evoked by 500Hz and 100Hz bone vibration at the mastoid. Clin Neurophysiol2016; 127(1): 848–857.
6.
ToddNPMRosengrenSMGovenderS, et al.Low-frequency tuning in the human vestibular–ocular projection is determined by both peripheral and central mechanisms. Neurosci Lett2009; 458(1): 43–47.
7.
MinorLBSolomonDZinreichJS, et al.Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1998; 124(3): 249–258.
8.
WardBKvan de BergRvan RompaeyV, et al.Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome: diagnostic criteria consensus document of the committee for the classification of vestibular disorders of the Bárány society. J Vestib Res2021; 31(3): 131–141.
9.
GovenderSFernandoTDennisDL, et al.Properties of 500Hz air- and bone-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) in superior canal dehiscence. Clin Neurophysiol2016; 127(6): 2522–2531.
10.
HalmagyiGMMcGarvieLAAwST, et al.The click-evoked vestibulo-ocular reflex in superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Neurology2003; 60(7): 1172–1175.
11.
RosengrenSMAwSTHalmagyiGM, et al.Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in superior canal dehiscence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2008; 79(5): 559–568.
12.
TaylorRLBlaivieCBomAP, et al.Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP) to skull taps in normal and dehiscent ears: mechanisms and markers of superior canal dehiscence. Exp Brain Res2014; 232(4): 1073–1084.
13.
TaylorRLMagnussenJSKwokB, et al.Bone-conducted oVEMP latency delays assist in the differential diagnosis of large air-conducted oVEMP amplitudes. Front Neurol2020; 11: 580184.
14.
TaylorRLBradshawAPHalmagyiGM, et al.Tuning characteristics of ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in intact and dehiscent ears. Audiol Neurootol2012; 17(4): 207–218.
15.
WelgampolaMSMigliaccioAAMyrieOA, et al.The human sound-evoked vestibulo-ocular reflex and its electromyographic correlate. Clin Neurophysiol2009; 120(1): 158–166.
16.
YoungASNhamBBradshawAP, et al.Clinical, oculographic, and vestibular test characteristics of vestibular migraine. Cephalalgia2021; 41(10): 1039–1052.
GillardDMSharonJD. Vestibular migraine. In: CraneBTLustigLde SouzaC (eds). Disorders of the Vestibular System: Diagnosis and Management. Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 201–228.
19.
HarriottAMSchwedtTJ. Migraine is associated with altered processing of sensory stimuli. Curr Pain Headache Rep2014; 18(11): 458.
20.
PengK-PMayA. Migraine understood as a sensory threshold disease. Pain2019; 160(7): 1494–1501.
21.
VingenJVParejaJAStørenO, et al.Phonophobia in migraine. Cephalalgia1998; 18(5): 243–249.
22.
ShinJHKimYKKimHJ, et al.Altered brain metabolism in vestibular migraine: comparison of interictal and ictal findings. Cephalalgia2014; 34(1): 58–67.
23.
RussoAMarcelliVEspositoF, et al.Abnormal thalamic function in patients with vestibular migraine. Neurology2014; 82(23): 2120–2126.
24.
AmbrosiniARossiPDe PasquaV, et al.Lack of habituation causes high intensity dependence of auditory evoked cortical potentials in migraine. Brain2003; 126(Pt 9): 2009–2015.
25.
MurofushiTGotoFTsubotaM. Vestibular migraine patients show lack of habituation in auditory middle latency responses to repetitive stimuli: comparison with Meniere’s disease patients. Front Neurol2020; 11: 24.
26.
GoadsbyPJHollandPRMartins-OliveiraM, et al.Pathophysiology of migraine: a disorder of sensory processing. Physiol Rev2017; 97(2): 553–622.
27.
TaylorRLZagamiASGibsonWP, et al.Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials to sound and vibration: characteristics in vestibular migraine that enable separation from Menière’s disease. Cephalalgia2012; 32(3): 213–225.
28.
ICHD-3. Headache classification committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) the international classification of headache disorders. Cephalalgia2018; 38(1): 1–211.
29.
TaylorRLWijewardeneAAGibsonWPR, et al.The vestibular evoked-potential profile of Ménière’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol2011; 122(6): 1256–1263.
30.
BrantbergKLöfqvistLFranssonPA. Large vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in response to bone-conducted sounds in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Audiol Neurootol2004; 9(3): 173–182.
31.
CurthoysISSmithCMBurgessAM, et al.A review of neural data and modelling to explain how a Semicircular Canal Dehiscence (SCD) causes enhanced VEMPs, Skull Vibration Induced Nystagmus (SVIN), and the Tullio phenomenon. Audiol Res2023; 13(3): 418–430.
32.
CareyJPHirvonenTPHullarTE, et al.Acoustic responses of vestibular afferents in a model of superior canal dehiscence. Otol Neurotol2004; 25(3): 345–352.
33.
StenfeltS. Model predictions for bone conduction perception in the human. Hear Res2016; 340: 135–143.
34.
GovenderSBiswasRKWelgampolaMS, et al.Magnitude, variability and symmetry in head acceleration and jerk and their relationship to cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. J Vestib Res2023; 33(5): 325–338.
35.
RahmanNHehirJStidhamKR, et al.Differences in vestibulo-ocular reflex time constants in patients with vestibular migraine versus vestibular neuritis/labyrinthitis. Am J Otolaryngol2022; 43(5): 103583.
36.
ArriagaMAChenDAHillmanTA, et al.Visually enhanced vestibulo-ocular reflex: a diagnostic tool for migraine vestibulopathy. Laryngoscope2006; 116(9): 1577–1579.
37.
KimEKSienkoNGardiA, et al.Visually enhanced vestibulo-ocular reflex gain in patients with vestibular disease. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol2023; 8(4): 1061–1067.
38.
HanniganIPRosengrenSMBharathyGK, et al.Subjective and objective responses to caloric stimulation help separate vestibular migraine from other vestibular disorders. J Neurol2024; 271(2): 887–898.
39.
KingSPriesolAJDavidiSE, et al.Self-motion perception is sensitized in vestibular migraine: pathophysiologic and clinical implications. Sci Rep2019; 9(1): 14323.
40.
MoranMVitkovicJ. Perceptual differences in vestibular migraine populations in response to vestibular function testing. Aust N Z J Audiol2013; 33(1): 1–14.
41.
JeongS-HOhS-YKimH-J, et al.Vestibular dysfunction in migraine: effects of associated vertigo and motion sickness. J Neurol2010; 257(6): 905–912.
42.
AwSTToddMJAwGE, et al.Click-evoked vestibulo-ocular reflex. Neurology2006; 66(7): 1079–1087.
43.
BlanksRHIAndersonJHPrechtW. Response characteristics of semicircular canal and otolith systems in cat. II. Responses of trochlear motoneurons. Exp Brain Res1978; 32(4): 509–528.
44.
SasakiMHiranumaKIsuN, et al.Is there a three neuron arc in the cat utriculo-trochlear pathway?Exp Brain Res1991; 86(2): 421–425.
45.
UchinoYSasakiMSatoH, et al.Utriculoocular reflex arc of the cat. J Neurophysiol1996; 76(3): 1896–1903.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
