Although critical scholars have used the work of Michel Foucault to theorize about organizational power for almost 20 years now, many such scholars see his work as limiting and regulate his ideas to theoretical explorations of domination and resistance. Leaning heavily on the work of Jones (2002), I argue that Foucault’s work has broader usefulness when developed through the process of reinheritance. I illustrate how a reinheritance reading of Foucault’s work on power provides new insights into the enactment of power in organizational life. Such a reinheritance of Foucault broadens organizational theorizing on power to move it beyond domination and discipline and on to pleasure, desire, and choice. Furthermore, my expanded reading of Foucault’s work permits the exploration of relational constructs that are predominately voluntary, nontask related, and pleasurable, yet nonetheless powerful in organizational life.
Allen, A. (1996). Foucault on power: A theory for feminists. In S. Heckman (Ed.), Feminist interpretation of Michel Foucault (pp. 265-282) University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
2.
Barker, J. R. (1999). The discipline of teamwork: Participation and concertive control. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Barker, J. R., & Cheney, G. (1994). The concept and the practices of discipline in contemporary organizational life. Communication Monograph, 61, 19-41.
4.
Barratt, E. (2004). Foucault and the politics of critical management studies. Culture and Organization, 10, 191-202.
5.
Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, post modernism, and organizational analysis: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 9, 221-235.
6.
Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.
7.
Dixon, M. A. (2004). Silencing of the lambs: The Catholic Church’s response to the 2002 sexual abuse scandal. The Journal of Communication and Religion, 27, 63-86.
8.
Dougherty, D. S. (1999). Dialogue through standpoint: Understanding women’s and men’s standpoints of sexual harassment. Management Communication Quarterly, 12, 436-468.
9.
Dougherty, D. S. (2002). Gendered constructions of power during discourse about sexual harassment: A feminist standpoint analysis. Paper presented at the annual National Communication Association conference, New Orleans, LA.
10.
Faubion, J. (1994). Introduction. In J. Faubion (Ed.), Aesthetics, method, and epistemology: Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984 (pp. i-xxxix). New York: New Press.
11.
Foucault, M. (1961). Madness and civilization. New York: Pantheon.
12.
Foucault, M. (1973). Birth of the clinic. New York: Pantheon.
13.
Foucault, M. (1976). Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
14.
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things. New York: Pantheon.
15.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
16.
Foucault, M. (1977a). Discipline and punish. New York:Pantheon.
17.
Foucault, M. (1977b). Language, counter-memory, practice. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18.
Foucault, M. (1978a) The history of sexuality, Volume 1. New York: Random House.
19.
Foucault, M. (1978b). Sei to kenryoku. Gendi-Shiso [Lectures in Tokyo]. pp. 58-77.
20.
Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208-228) Chicago: University of Chicago.
21.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 12-25). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
22.
Foucault, M. (1993). About the beginning of the hermeneutics of the self. Political Theory, 21, 198-227.
23.
Foucault. M. (1994a). Governmentality. In J. Faubion (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984 (pp.201-222). New York: New Press.
24.
Foucault, M. (1994b). Friendship as a way of life. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 135-140). New York: New Press.
25.
Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended: Lectures at the College of France 1975-1976. New York: Picador.
26.
Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (1996). PC or not PC: Sexual harassment and the question of ambivalence. Human Relations, 49, 373-393.
27.
Jones, C. (2002). Foucault’s inheritance/inheriting Foucault. Culture and Organization, 18, 225-238.
28.
Knights, D., & Vurdubakis, T. (1994). Foucault, power, resistance, and all that. In J. M. Jermier, D. Knights, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Resistance & power in organizations (pp. 167-198). New York: Routledge.
29.
Knights, D., & Willmott, H. (1989). Power & subjectivity at work. Sociology, 23, 535-558.
30.
Langsdorf, L. (1997). Refusing individuality: How human beings are made into subjects. Communication Theory, 7, 321-342.
31.
Lee, A. (Director). (2005). Brokeback mountain [Motion picture]. United States: Universal Pictures.
32.
Lemke, T. (2000, September). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Paper presented at the Rethinking Marxism conference, University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
33.
Marx, K. (1906). Capital: A critique of political economy. Chicago: Kerr Company.
34.
Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy. New York: Vintage.
35.
McKinlay, A., & Starkey, K. (1998). Afterword. In A. McKinlay & K. Starkey (Eds.), Foucault, management, and organization theory (pp.230-241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
McMillan, K. (2004). Trust and the virtues: A solution to the accounting scandals?Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15, 943-953.
37.
Mumby, D. K. (1996). Feminism, postmodernism, and organizational communication studies: A critical reading. Management Communication Quarterly, 9, 259-295.
38.
Mumby, D. K., & Deetz, S. (1990). Power, discourse, and the workplace: Reclaiming the critical tradition. Communication Yearbook, 13, 18-47.
39.
Pierce, T., & Dougherty, D. S. (2002). The construction, enactment, and maintenance of power as domination through an acquisition: The case of TWA and Ozark. Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 129-165.
40.
Prichard, C. (2003). Creative selves? Critically reading creativity in management. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11, 265-276.
41.
Reynolds, J., & Roffe, J. (2004). Understanding Derrida. New York: Continuum.
42.
Sheridan, A. (1980). Michel Foucault: The will to truth. London: Routledge.
43.
Smith, F. L., & Keyton, J. (2001). Organizational storytelling: Metaphors for relational power and identity struggles. Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 149-182.
44.
Starkey, K., & Hatchuel, A. (2002). The long detour: Foucault’s history of desire and pleasure. Organizations, 9, 641-656.
45.
Sewell, G., & Wilkinson, B. (1992). Empowerment or emasculation? Shopfloor surveillance in a total quality organization. In P. Blayton & P. Turnbull (Eds.), Reassessing human resource (pp. 615-633). London: Sage.
46.
Trethewey, A. (2000b). Cultured bodies: Communication as constitutive of culture and embodied identity. Electronic Journal of Communication, 10, Article TRETHEV10N1200. Retrieved September 27, 2002, from http://www.cios.org/getfile/TRETH_V10N1200
47.
Trethewey, A. (2000b) Revisioning control: A feminist critique of disciplined bodies. In P. M. Buzzanell (Ed.), Rethinking organizational and managerial communication from feminist perspectives (pp. 107-127). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
