This qualitative study of 20 public relations practitioners examines power in public relations through the lens of bio-power – the control and management of human life through regulatory and discursive forces (Foucault, 1978; Macey, 2009; Vogelaar, 2007). Results suggest that biopower exists as (1) hegemonic knowledges of ‘brokering information’, ‘shaping public opinion’, ‘adding value’, and ‘pleasing people’ and (2) disciplining forces of a workaholic culture and self-censorship. Findings suggest that based on specific hegemonic discourses about public relations, practitioners encounter bio-power and discipline themselves to conform with industry hegemonic discourses.
AppaduraiA (1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
2.
BenjaminA (1989) (ed.) The Lyotard Reader. London: Basil Blackwell, Inc.
3.
BergerB (2005) Power over, power with, and power to relations: Critical reflections on public relations, the dominant coalition, and activism. Journal of Public Relations Research17(1): 5–28.
4.
BestSKellnerD (1991) Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations. New York: The Guilford Press.
5.
BoydJWaymerD (2011) Organizational rhetoric: A subject of interest(s). Management Communication Quarterly25: 474–493.
6.
CorbinJStraussA (2008[1998]) Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
DeetzS (1987) Stories, accounts, and organizational power. ACA Bulletin61: 36–41.
8.
DozierDMGrunigLA (1992) The organization of the public relations function. In: GrunigJE (ed.) Excellence in Public Relations and Communications Management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 395–417.
9.
DuttaMJPalM (2011) Public relations and marginalization in a global context: A postcolonial critique. In: BardhanNWeaverCK (eds) Public Relations in Global Cultural Contexts: Multi-paradigmatic Perspectives. New York: Routledge, 195–225.
10.
Dutta-BergmanMJ (2005) Civil society and public relations: Not so civil after all. Journal of Public Relations Research17: 267–289.
11.
EdwardsL (2009) Symbolic power and public relations practice: Locating individual practitioners in their social context. Journal of Public Relations Research21: 251–272.
12.
EdwardsL (2012) Defining the ‘object’ of public relations research: A new starting point. Public Relations Inquiry1: 7–30.
13.
FederEK (2007) The dangerous individual(‘s) mother: Bio-power, family, and the production of race. Hypatia22(2): 60–77.
14.
FoucaultM (1973) The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. New York: Vintage Books.
15.
FoucaultM (1978) The History of Sexuality: Vol. 1, An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books.
16.
FoucaultM (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings. New York: Pantheon Books.
17.
FoucaultM (1980) The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage Books.
18.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies of Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
19.
GramsciA (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
20.
HallS (1993) Encoding, decoding. In: DuringS (ed.) The Cultural Studies ReaderLondon: Routledge, 90–103.
21.
HallS (ed.) (1997) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage, in association with the Open University.
22.
HaydenS (2001) Teenage bodies, teenage selves: Tracing the implications of bio-power in contemporary sexuality education texts. Women’s Studies in Communication24(1): 30-61.
23.
HeathRLMotionJLeitchJ (2010) Power and public relations: Paradoxes and programmatic thoughts. In: HeathRL (ed.) The Sage Handbook of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 191–204.
24.
HessDJ (1997) Science Studies: An Advanced Introduction. New York University Press.
25.
HodderI (2003) The interpretation of documents and material culture. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 155–175.
HoltzhausenDR (2000) Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research12(1): 93–114.
28.
HoltzhausenDR (2002) Towards a postmodern research agenda for public relations. Public Relations Review28: 251–264.
29.
HoltzhausenDR (2012) Public Relations as Activism: Postmodern Approaches to Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
30.
HoltzhausenDRVotoR (2002) Resistance from the margins: The postmodern public relations practitioner as organizational activist. Journal of Public Relations Research14(1): 57–84.
31.
LindlofTRTaylorBC (2002) Qualitative Communication Research Methods (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
MaceyD (1993) The Lives of Michel Foucault. London: Hutchinson.
33.
MaceyD (2009) Rethinking biopolitics, race and power in the wake of Foucault. Theory, Culture & Society26(6): 186–205.
34.
McHaleJPZompettiJPMoffittMA (2007) A hegemonic model of crisis communication: Truthfulness and repercussions for free speech in Kasky v. Nike. Journal of Business Communication44: 374–402.
35.
McWhorterL (2004) Sex, race, and bio-power: A Foucauldian geneology. Hypatia19(3): 38–61.
36.
MintzbergH (1983) Power in and around Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
37.
MotionJLeitchS (2007) A toolbox for public relations: The oeuvre of Michel Foucault. Public Relations Review3: 263–268.
38.
O’NeilJ (2003) An analysis of the relationships among structure, influence, and gender: Helping to build a feminist theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research15(2): 151–179.
39.
ØyvindIvan RulerB (2007) How public relations works: Theoretical roots and public relations perspectives. Public Relations Review33: 243–248.
40.
PalMDuttaMJ (2008) Public relations in a global context: The relevance of critical modernism as a theoretical lens. Journal of Public Relations Research20: 159–179.
41.
PfefferJ (1981) Power in Organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing.
42.
RakowLF (1989) From the feminization of public relations to the promise of feminism. In: TothELClineCG (eds) Beyond the Velvet Ghetto. San Francisco, CA: IABC Research Foundation, 287–297.
43.
ReberBHBergerBK (2006) Finding influence: Examining the role of influence in public relations practice. Journal of Communication Management10(3): 235–249.
44.
RoperJ (2005) Symmetrical communication: Excellent public relations or a strategy for hegemony?Journal of Public Relations Research17(1): 69–86.
45.
SlackJDWhittLA (1992) Ethics and cultural studies. In: GrossbergLNelsonCTreichlerPA (eds) Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, 571–592.
46.
SmuddePMCourtrightJL (2010) Public relations and power. In: HeathRL (ed.) The Sage Handbook of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 177–190.
47.
ThompsonJB (1990) Ideology in Modern Culture: Critical Social Theory and the Era of Mass Communication. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48.
VogelaarA (2007) Bio-power and the Institutionalization of Resistance: A Theoretical Exploration of the Human Genome Project’s Ethical Legal and Social Implications (ELSI) component. Paper presented at the 2007 National Communication Association conference, November, Chicago, IL, accessed from the Communication & Mass Media Complete electronic database.
49.
WeaverCMotionJRoperJ (2004) Truth, Power and Public Interest: A Critical Theorising of Propaganda and Public Relations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, May, New Orleans, LA.
50.
ZhangA (2010) Western Public Relations Theories in China: Hegemonic Influences or Intellectual Coexistence. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, June, Singapore. Paper accessed from the Communication & Mass Media Complete electronic database.
