Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the effects of alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking on sperm quality using transmission electron microscopy and light microscopy.

Methods:

Semen samples were collected from 62 healthy men. The subjects were classified according to alcohol consumption and smoking status. Semen analysis was performed according to World Health Organization criteria. Transmission electron microscopy was used to examine sperm ultrastructure.

Results:

Heavy smoking (> 20 cigarettes/day) was associated with a decreased sperm count. Moderate/high alcohol consumption (≥15.4 g/day) was associated with an increase in morphologically abnormal sperm. Transmission electron microscopy revealed no effect of smoking on sperm ultrastructure. Alcohol consumption resulted in significant increases in morphologically abnormal nuclei and plasma membranes.

Conclusions:

Heavy smoking was associated with decreased sperm counts and alcohol consumption was associated with increased numbers of morphologically abnormal sperm.

Keywords

Alcohol consumption Light microscopy Smoking Spermatozoa Transmission electron microscopy

Introduction

Cigarette smoking is a widely recognised health hazard and a major cause of mortality, yet ∼20% of the worldwide adult population are smokers.¹ Alcohol abuse is also a major health issue and is responsible for 2.5 million deaths worldwide each year.² Smoking and alcohol consumption are frequently associated with impaired male reproductive function.^3,4

Studies have examined the effects of tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption on human seminal quality.^3–5 It is likely that smoking adversely affects male reproductive health.^3,5,6 Although chronic heavy alcohol consumption has been associated with abnormal sperm morphology,^4,7 studies regarding the relationship between moderate alcohol consumption and sperm morphology have yielded conflicting results.^3,6

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking on the sperm quality of healthy, randomly selected men, using transmission electron microscopy and light microscopy.

Patients and methods

Study Population

Men aged ≥ 20 years, who were attending Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea for routine medical screening in January 2005, were randomly recruited to the study via a computer generated random number scheme. Exclusion criteria were: (i) previous disease or surgery associated with reproductive function (including varicocele, cryptorchidism, epididymitis, mumps, azoospermia); vasectomy and vasectomy reversal; (ii) occupational chemical exposure; (iii) chronic renal failure, diabetes mellitus, hypertension or tuberculosis; (iv) history of excessive testicular heat injury. Participants were questioned regarding their careers, alcohol consumption, smoking habits, and medical and family histories.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee and Institutional Review Boards of Chung-Ang University. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to enrolment.

Study Groups

Subjects were initially stratified into four groups according to smoking status and alcohol consumption quartiles, with low alcohol intake classified as < 15.4 g/day and high intake as ≥ 15.4 g/day: nonsmokers with low alcohol intake (NL); nonsmokers with high alcohol intake (NH); smokers with low alcohol intake (SL); smokers with high alcohol intake (SH).

Subjects were further stratified according to the number of cigarettes smoked per day: 0, nonsmokers; 1 – 20, smokers; > 20, heavy smokers. In addition, the study population was divided into quartile groups according to alcohol consumption: very low (< 6.4 g/day); low (≥ 6.4 – < 15.4 g/day); moderate (≥ 15.4 – < 33.3 g/day); high (≥ 33.3 g/day).

Semen Analysis

Semen samples were collected into a sterile cup by masturbation in a comfortable room with audiovisual sexual stimuli, after 3 – 5 days abstinence. Samples were allowed to liquefy for 30 min, after which semen appearance, liquefaction, viscosity, volume and pH were assessed according to World Health Organization (WHO) procedures.⁸ Samples were examined via light microscopy and sperm count was determined using a haemocytometer. Motility was assessed using the sperm progression rating: A, rapid forward progressive motility; B, slow or sluggish progressive motility; C, nonprogressive motility; D, immotility. Motility was defined as normal when ≥ 50% of sperm were classified as grade A + B, or ≥ 25% were grade A.⁸ Sperm morphology was assessed using WHO criteria,⁹ and expressed as (morphologically normal sperm cells/total sperm cells) × 100%. All examinations were performed by a single specialist investigator (Y.W.K.) who was blinded to smoking/alcohol consumption status.

Transmission Electron Microscopy

Semen samples were transferred to a 15-ml polyethylene centrifuge tube and combined with 2.5% gluteraldehyde (0.1 M phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4, 4 °C). The tube was capped and repeatedly inverted until thoroughly mixed. After fixation overnight at 4 °C, the specimen was centrifuged at 500 g for 5 min and the sperm pellet was transferred to a 2 ml polypropylene centrifuge tube. Pellets were washed in 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.4, 4 °C) and postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h. Samples were dehydrated in ascending graded ethanol solutions and embedded in epoxy resin in the same polypropylene tube. Before each processing step, sperm were pelleted by centrifugation at 500 g for 5 min, and resuspended in the reagent. After a final centrifugation at 500 g for 5 min in fresh resin, pelleted samples were polymerised at 60 °C for 24 h. Blocks containing abundant sperm were identified by visual examination, and sections (60 – 80 nm thick) were cut. Sections were double stained with 4% uranyl acetate in 70% ethanol for 20 min, followed by lead citrate for 10 min. Sections were examined using an H7500 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) at 2500 – 30000 × magnification. Ultrastructures evaluated included acrosomes (present or absent), nuclei (shape, chromatin), cytoplasmic residues (present or absent), mitochondria (shape, helix assembly), axonemes (pattern, arms, and shape), accessory fibres and number of fibrous sheaths.¹⁰ A single specialist investigator (T.H.K.) who was blinded to smoking/alcohol consumption status examined 100 ultrastructures for each characteristic.

Statistical Analyses

Data were presented as mean ± SD. Sperm count data were highly skewed and were therefore log-transformed before statistical analysis. Between-group comparisons were performed using one-way analysis of variance and Scheffé's post hoc test. Statistical analyses were carried out with STATA^® software, version 10.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The study included 62 participants (mean age 37.9 ± 2.0 years, range 34 – 44 years). Demographic and basic semen characteristics stratified according to smoking status and alcohol consumption are shown in Table 1. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in age or proportion of morphologically normal sperm. Semen volume, sperm count and sperm motility were lower in smokers than in nonsmokers, but these differences were not statistically significant. Representative transmission electron photomicrographs of normal sperm (from a nonsmoker with a low alcohol intake) and abnormal sperm (from a smoker with a high alcohol intake) are shown in Figs 1 and 2, respectively.

Figure 1:

Representative transmission electron photomicrographs of sperm from a 36-year-old nonsmoker with a low alcohol consumption (< 15.4 g/day). (A) Longitudinal section of the head region (acrosome and nucleus) showing no cytoplasmic residue. Scale bar, 3 μm. (B) Longitudinal section of the midpiece head region showing regular shape and helical mitochondrial assembly. Scale bar, 3 μm. (C) Cross section of tail, indicating the structure of the axoneme (nine pairs of filaments arranged radially around two central filaments [9 + 2 arrangement]). Scale bar, 0.1 μm. (D) The axonemal microtubule system is surrounded by nine accessory fibres. The outer fibrous sheath is a normal shape. Scale bar, 0.1 μm

Figure 2:

Representative transmission electron photomicrographs of sperm from a 39-year-old smoker with a high alcohol consumption (≥ 15.4 g/day). (A) The head region shows acrosomal hypoplasia, uncondensed chromatin and an irregularly shaped nucleus. Scale bar, 3 μm. (B) Cytoplasmic residue in the midpiece. Scale bar, 3 μm. (C) The shape and helical mitochondrial assembly are irregular and swollen. Scale bar, 3 μm (D) The axoneme is composed of nine pairs of filaments, with the central pair of filaments absent (9 + 0 arrangement). Scale bar, 0.1 μm

Table 1:

Demographic and semen characteristics of healthy men, stratified according to smoking status and alcohol consumption (n = 62)

Characteristic	Nonsmokers		Smokers
Characteristic	Low alcohol^a n = 8	High alcohol^b n = 5	Low alcohol^a n = 21	High alcohol^b n = 28
Age, years	39.5 ± 2.6	35.4 ± 1.2	39.1 ± 1.7	37.0 ± 1.0
Semen volume, ml	3.5 ± 0.8	2.7 ± 0.4	2.6 ± 0.3	2.4 ± 0.2
Sperm count, × 10⁶/ml	92.4 ± 29.4	71.8 ± 14.9	55.5 ± 19.0	58.8 ± 8.0
Sperm motility, %^c	53.3 ± 5.0	56 ± 5.2	44.9 ± 3.6	47.6 ± 3.3
Sperm morphology^d	24.9 ± 2.2	18.9 ± 2.0	23.2 ± 4.9	18.7 ± 1.8

Data presented as mean ± SD.

Alcohol intake < 15.4 g/day.

Alcohol intake ≥ 15.4 g/day.

Grade A or B.⁸

(Morphologically normal sperm cells/total sperm cells) × 100%.⁹

No statistically significant between-group differences (P ≥ 0.05; one way analysis of variance).

Table 2 shows data regarding semen volume and sperm count, motility and morphology stratified according to the number of cigarettes smoked or the quantity of alcohol consumed. The mean sperm count was significantly lower in heavy smokers than in smokers, and the proportion of morphologically normal sperm cells was significantly lower in those with high alcohol consumption compared with those with moderate alcohol consumption (P < 0.05 for both comparisons; Table 2).

Table 2:

Semen quality parameters assessed by light microscopy in semen from healthy men, stratified according to the number of cigarettes smoked or the quantity of alcohol consumed (n = 62)

Parameter	Smoking^a			Alcohol consumption^b
Parameter	Nonsmokers n = 13	Smokers n = 22	Heavy smokers n = 27	Very low n = 17	Low n = 13	Moderate n = 18	High n = 14
Semen volume, ml	3.0 ±0.3	2.7 ±0.3	2.4 ± 0.2	2.5 ± 0.3	2.7 ±0.3	2.8 ± 0.3	2.4 ±0.3
Sperm count, × 10⁶ml	74.2 ± 15.2	86.8 ± 11.5	45.7 ± 10.5^c	65.7 ± 14.2	61.6 ±5.5	68.4 ± 13.2	68.3 ± 14.6
Sperm motility, %	54.8 ±4.6	46.8 ±3.5	46.0 ± 3.2	46.9 ±4.3	45.9 ±4.7	49.2 ±4.0	50.0 ±4.4
Sperm morphology, %	23.7 ±2.6	18.1 ±2.0	19.7 ± 1.8	21.7 ± 2.3	18.1 ± 2.5	22.9 ± 2.2	16.0 ± 0.4^d

Data presented as mean ± SD.

Nonsmoker, 0 cigarettes/day; smoker, 1 - 20 cigarettes/day; heavy smoker > 20 cigarettes/day.

Very low, < 6.4 g/day; low, ≥ 6.4 - < 15.4 g/day; moderate, ≥ 15.4 - < 33 g/day; high, ≥ 33 g/day.

P < 0.05 vs smokers; one way analysis of variance and Scheffé's post hoc test.

P < 0.05 vs moderate; one way analysis of variance and Scheffé's post hoc test.

Data regarding ultrastructural characteristics of sperm stratified according to smoking or alcohol consumption are shown in Table 3. Smoking was not associated with any differences in ultrastructural characteristics. Moderate and high alcohol consumption were associated with significantly fewer normally shaped nuclei than very low alcohol consumption (P < 0.05 for both comparisons; Table 3). In addition, significantly fewer sperm cells in the low alcohol consumption group were found to have normal plasma membranes than in the very low alcohol group (P < 0.05; Table 3).

Table 3:

Ultrastructural characteristics assessed by transmission electron microscopy in sperm from healthy men, stratified according to the number of cigarettes smoked or the quantity of alcohol consumed (n = 62)

Characteristic	Smoking^a			Alcohol consumption^b
Characteristic	Nonsmokers n = 13	Smokers n = 22	Heavy smokers n = 27	Very low n = 17	Low n = 13	Moderate n = 18	High n = 14
Acrosome present	84.4 ± 1.8	83.5 ± 1.4	84.4 ± 1.2	84.8 ± 1.6	84.7 ± 1.8	83.1 ± 1.5	84.1 ± 1.7
Nucleus
Normal shape	50.2 ± 2.5	45.5 ± 1.9	46.8 ± 1.7	50.5 ± 2.0	49.0 ± 2.4	44.5 ± 2.2*	44.0 ± 2.2*
Chromatin	70.3 ± 3.6	67.6 ± 2.7	70.6 ± 2.5	69.4 ± 3.2	63.3 ± 3.4	73.1 ± 2.9	70.6 ± 3.2
Cytoplasmic residue absent	79.8 ± 4.5	75.3 ± 3.4	72.2 ± 3.1	68.6 ± 4.1	76.5 ± 4.4	77.0 ± 3.8	77.6 ± 4.2
Mitochondria
Normal shape	82.4 ± 2.0	82.3 ± 1.5	84.2 ± 1.4	84.1 ± 1.8	80.2 ± 2.0	83.3 ± 1.7	84.5 ± 1.9
Normal helix	79.8 ± 2.6	80.4 ± 1.9	82.0 ± 1.8	82.4 ± 2.3	78.4 ± 2.5	79.4 ± 2.1	83.6 ± 2.3
Axoneme
Normal pattern	58.2 ± 3.4	60.4 ± 2.6	57.9 ± 2.4	59.1 ± 3.2	58.7 ± 3.4	58.8 ± 2.9	58.8 ± 3.3
Normal arms	58.7 ± 3.0	61.4 ± 2.3	59.9 ± 2.1	60.4 ± 2.8	60.1 ± 3.0	58.1 ± 2.6	62.7 ± 2.9
Normal shape	95.5 ± 3.8	96.0 ± 2.9	90.8 ± 2.6	91.1 ± 3.4	96.1 ± 3.7	95.9 ± 3.2	91.7 ± 3.5
Accessory fibre normal	78.3 ± 2.2	77.6 ± 1.6	77.9 ± 1.5	77.4 ± 1.9	75.8 ± 2.1	76.8 ± 1.8	75.6 ± 2.0
Fibrous sheath normal	87.2 ± 1.9	88.6 ± 1.4	89.0 ± 1.3	89.9 ± 1.7	87.1 ± 1.8	87.1 ± 1.6	89.7 ± 1.7
Plasma membrane normal	99.8 ± 0.2	99.7 ± 0.1	99.9 ± 0.1	100.0 ± 0.2	99.4 ± 0.2*	99.9 ± 0.1	99.8 ± 0.2

Data presented as mean ± SD.

Nonsmoker, 0 cigarettes/day; smoker, 1 - 20 cigarettes/day; heavy smoker > 20 cigarettes/day.

Very low, < 6.4 g/day; low, ≥ 6.4 - < 15.4 g/day; moderate, ≥ 15.4 - < 33 g/day; high, ≥ 33 g/day.

P < 0.05 vs very low; one way analysis of variance and Scheffé's post hoc test.

Discussion

Tobacco smoking is known to have a detrimental effect on sperm quality, in particular concentration, motility and morphology.^{11 – 14} Smoking has also been associated with increased levels of aneuploidy in human sperm,^15,16 lower seminal plasma antioxidant levels^16,17 and increased oxidative damage to sperm DNA.^18,19 In addition, chronic alcohol intake may affect male fertility by decreasing sperm volume, count and motility, and by affecting morphology.^4,20,21

Several studies have reported the effects of cigarette smoking or alcohol intake on sperm characteristics determined by light microscopy,^{4,11– 14,20,21} but few transmission electron microscopy studies have been conducted. The effects of cigarette smoking on sperm quality have also been studied by DNA analysis.^{15– 19,22,23} Reports concerning malformation of sperm related to infertility have demonstrated that transmission electron microscopy can be a valuable tool in determining the presence and nature of morphological defects.^{24 – 27} Some studies have used transmission electron microscopy to demonstrate smoking- or alcohol-associated morphological changes in sperm ultrastructure.^28,29 The present study used the sensitive transmission electron microscopy method to maximize detection of the effects of smoking and alcohol on sperm. A systematic classification of the ultrastructural pathology of human sperm is difficult to compile because of its organisational complexity. The current study therefore followed recognized protocols to investigate all ultrastructures comprehensively.¹⁰

A meta-analysis found that smoking was associated with a 13 – 17% decrease in sperm concentration.³⁰ In addition, cigarette smoking has been shown to be associated with reductions in several parameters including sperm numbers, motility and normal morphology.⁵ Data from the present study indicate an association between smoking and sperm count, but not semen volume, motility or morphology.

Alcohol consumption was associated with an increase in morphologically abnormal sperm in the present study, which is consistent with the findings of others.²⁰ The sperm head is considered normal when the plasma membrane, nuclear envelope, acrosome and chromatin are all of normal appearance; in addition, normal axonemal components, mitochondria and plasma membrane are required for the tail to be considered normal.²⁷ Axonemal or periaxonemal anomalies and axonemal deficiencies are presented in infertile men, and are thought to interfere with sperm motility.^31,32 Regional nuclear shape malformation has been associated with DNA damage in spermatozoa.³³ There were significant differences in the numbers of sperm with morphologically abnormal nuclei and plasma membranes associated with alcohol consumption in the present study.

In conclusion, the present study revealed an association between heavy smoking (> 20 cigarettes/day) and decreased sperm count. In addition, alcohol consumption was associated with increased numbers of morphologically abnormal sperm.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Hanmi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Chung-Ang University Research Institute for Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Conflicts of interest: The authors had no conflicts of interest to declare in relation to this article.

References

Eriksen

, Mackay

, Ross

(eds): The Tobacco Atlas, 4th edn. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2012.

World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011.

Martini

, Molina

, Estofán

: Effects of alcohol and cigarette consumption on human seminal quality. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 374–377.

Muthusami

, Chinnaswamy

: Effect of chronic alcoholism on male fertility hormones and semen quality. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 919–924.

Künzle

, Mueller

, Hänggi

: Semen quality of male smokers and nonsmokers in infertile couples. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 287–291.

, Lin

, Li

: Association between socio-psycho-behavioral factors and male semen quality: systematic review and meta-analyses. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 116–123.

Donnelly

, McClure

, Kennedy

: Direct effect of alcohol on the motility and morphology of human spermatozoa. Andrologia 1999; 31: 43–47.

World Health Organization: Laboratory manual of the WHO for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2001; 37: I–XII, 1-123 [in Italian].

Kruger

, du Toit

, Franken

: Sperm morphology: assessing the agreement between the manual method (strict criteria) and the sperm morphology analyzer IVOS. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 134–141.

10.

Baccetti

, Bernieri

, Burrini

: Notulae seminologicae. 5. Mathematical evaluation of interdependent submicroscopic sperm alterations. J Androl 1995; 16: 356–371.

11.

Vine

, Tse

, Hu

: Cigarette smoking and semen quality. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 835–842.

12.

Zhang

, Meng

, Wang

: Effect of smoking on semen quality of infertile men in Shandong, China. Asian J Androl 2000; 2: 143–146.

13.

Rubes

, Lowe

, Moore

2nd : Smoking cigarettes is associated with increased sperm disomy in teenage men. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 715–723.

14.

Chia

, Lim

, Tay

: Factors associated with male infertility: a case-control study of 218 infertile and 240 fertile men. BJOG 2000; 107: 55–61.

15.

Shi

, Ko

, Barclay

: Cigarette smoking and aneuploidy in human sperm. Mol Reprod Dev 2001; 59: 417–421.

16.

DeMarini

: Genotoxicity of tobacco smoke and tobacco smoke condensate: a review. Mutat Res 2004; 567: 447–474.

17.

Liu

, Gao

, Zhang

: Seminal plasma zinc level may be associated with the effect of cigarette smoking on sperm parameters. J Int Med Res 2010; 38: 923–928.

18.

Shen

, Chia

, Ong

: Evaluation of oxidative DNA damage in human sperm and its association with male infertility. J Androl 1999; 20: 718–723.

19.

Saleh

, Agarwal

, Sharma

: Effect of cigarette smoking on levels of seminal oxidative stress in infertile men: a prospective study. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 491–499.

20.

Goverde

, Dekker

, Janssen

: Semen quality and frequency of smoking and alcohol consumption - an explorative study. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 1995; 40: 135–138.

21.

Carlsen

, Giwercman

, Keiding

: Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. BMJ 1992; 305: 609–613.

22.

Elshal

, El-Sayed

, Elsaied

: Sperm head defects and disturbances in spermatozoal chromatin and DNA integrities in idiopathic infertile subjects: association with cigarette smoking. Clin Biochem 2009; 42: 589–594.

23.

El-Melegy

, Ali

: Apoptotic markers in semen of infertile men: association with cigarette smoking. Int Braz J Urol 2011; 37: 495–506.

24.

El-Taieb

, Herwig

, Nada

: Oxidative stress and epididymal sperm transport, motility and morphological defects. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 144 (Suppl. 1): S199–S203.

25.

Moretti

, Pascarelli

, Giannerini

: 18, X, Y aneuploidies and transmission electron microscopy studies in spermatozoa from five carriers of different reciprocal translocations. Asian J Androl 2009; 11: 325–332.

26.

Visco

, Raffa

, Elia

: Morphological sperm defects analyzed by light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy and their correlation with sperm motility. Int J Urol 2010; 17: 259–266.

27.

Skowronek

, Alciaturi

, Casanova

: Value of quantitative ultramorphological sperm analysis in infertile men. Reprod Biol 2010; 10: 125–139.

28.

Collodel

, Capitani

, Pammolli

: Semen quality of male idiopathic infertile smokers and nonsmokers: an ultrastructural study. J Androl 2010; 31: 108–113.

29.

Jin

, Zhao

, Chen

: Ultrastructural changes of the rat convoluted seminiferous tubule after alcohol consumption. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2006; 12: 505–509 [in Chinese, English abstract].

30.

Vine

, Margolin

, Morrison

: Cigarette smoking and sperm density: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 35–43.

31.

Escalier

, David

: Pathology of the cytoskeleton of the human sperm flagellum: axonemal and peri-axonemal anomalies. Biol Cell 1984; 50: 37–52.

32.

Courtade

, Lagorce

, Bujan

: Clinical characteristics and light and transmission electron microscopic sperm defects of infertile men with persistent unexplained asthenozoospermia. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 297–304.

33.

Mauri

, Oliveira

, Baruffi

: Significance of extruded nuclear chromatin (regional nuclear shape malformation) in human spermatozoa: implications for ICSI. Int J Androl 2011; 34: 594–599.

The Effects of Smoking and Alcohol Intake on Sperm Quality: Light and Transmission Electron Microscopy Findings

Abstract

Objective:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Introduction

Patients and methods

Study Population

Study Groups

Semen Analysis

Transmission Electron Microscopy

Statistical Analyses

Results

Discussion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

References