Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
“We diagnose,but can we assess?”: Guidance and research center teachers’ opinions on the problems in the assessment and diagnosis of students with visual impairments in Türkiye
This study aims to explore the opinions of teachers working in guidance and research centers (GRC) in Türkiye regarding problems in the educational assessment and diagnosis of students with visual impairments. Using a qualitative case study design, data were collected from 15 purposively selected teachers experienced in assessing students with visual impairments. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and the data were analyzed through content analysis. The findings revealed 2 main themes, 5 categories, and 17 codes. Teachers reported difficulties in communicating with both students and families, which negatively affected the assessment process. They emphasized the need for individualized assessment tools and better use of existing ones. In addition, they highlighted the importance of a holistic approach, effective communication, and inter-professional collaboration to improve the process. The study underscores the necessity of supportive practices to ensure more accurate and inclusive assessment and diagnosis for students with visual impairments.
AdıgüzelS.KizirM.EratayE. (2017). Determination of the problems experienced by special education teachers working with individuals with severe and multiple disabilities (SMD). Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 18(1), 5–59. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.296901
2.
AdioA.BekibeleC.LewerenzD.LawrenceL. (2020). Low vision assessment training in Nigeria: Time to improve human resource in developing countries. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 39(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619620915263
3.
AkarH. (2019). A case study. In SabanA.ErsoyA. (Eds.), Qualitative research designs in education (pp. 139–176). Anı.
4.
AvcıoğluH. (2013). Assessment of individuals with special needs. Vize.
5.
CarnabyS. (2007). Developing good in practice clinical assessment of people with profound intellectual disabilities and multiple impairment. Journal of Politics and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 4(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2007.00105.x
6.
ÇayE.SivrikayaT.Eldeniz ÇetinM. (2022). Views of the personnel who perform educational assessment in guidance research centers on the assessment processes of individuals with multiple disabilities. Van Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Education Faculty, 19(3), 1047–1067. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.1108291
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE.
8.
GöksoyS.ÖksüzK. (2019). Problems experienced and solution suggestions of teachers working in guidance and research centers in the educational diagnosis process. Diyalektolog National Journal of Social Sciences, 20, 65–80. https://doi.org/10.22464/diyalektolog.282
9.
Grisham-BrownJ. (2000). Transdisciplinary activity assessment for young children with multiple disabilities: A programme planning approach. Young Exceptional Children, 3(2), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/109625060000300201
10.
GülerM. (2023). Development and assessment of a teaching program on environmental problems for secondary school students with visual impairment [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Trabzon University, Institute of Graduate Education.
11.
Işıkdoğan UğurluN.KayhanN. (2018). Examination of classroom teachers’ opinions on the educational assessment processes of students with special needs. Adiyaman University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 29, 626–669. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.398385
12.
KırbıyıkM. E. (2011). Opinions of guidance teachers working in the special education assessment board on the educational assessment and diagnosis process [Master’s thesis]. Uşak University.
13.
Kaplan ŞahinB. (2016). Assessment of the competence of teachers working in guidance research centers regarding the educational assessment process of children with autism spectrum disorder [Master’s thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University.
14.
KargınT. (2007). Educational assessment and individualized education program preparation process. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 8(1), 1–15.
15.
KirkS.GallagherJ. J.ColemanM. R. (2014). Educating exceptional children. Cengage Learning.
16.
KreuzerD. T. (2007). An analysis of writing practices in 4th-and 5th-grade students with visual impairments. University of California, Berkeley with San Francisco State University.
17.
LopesM. C. B.SantosM. A.dos NakanamiC. R.CostaM. F. (2024). Validation of the functional vision assessment for children (FVEC) battery. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 43(1), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196231225078
18.
MassofR. W. (2002). A model of the prevalence and low incidence vision and blindness among adults in the US. Optometry and Vision Science, 79(1), 31–38.
19.
McKillopE.DuttonG. N. (2008). Impairment of vision in children due to damage to the brain: A practical approach. British and Irish Orthoptic Journal, 5(5), 8–14.
NakkenH.VlaskampC. (2007). There is a need for a taxonomy for profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 4(2), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2007.00104.x
25.
OkcuB. (2016). Teaching concepts related to the unit “States of Matter and Heat” to students with visual impairments in the 8th grade of primary school [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Atatürk University.
26.
ÖzyürekM. (2015). Measurement and assessment in special education. Kök.
27.
PillingR. F.OuthwaiteL.BruceA. (2016). Assessing visual function in children with complex disabilities: The Bradford visual function box. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 100(8), 1118–1121. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307558
28.
RiaziF. (2018). Assessment of vision behaviors in children with cortical visual impairment due to cerebral palsy (CP). Function and Disability Journal, 1(2), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.30699/fdisj.01.2.47
29.
SafakP. (2013). Education of children with severe and multiple disabilities. Vize.
30.
SafakP.CakmakS.KarakocT.Aydin O’DwyerP. (2021). Development of Gazi functional vision assessment instrument. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1973–1987. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.1973
TadićV.CooperA.CumberlandP.Lewando-HundtG.RahiJ. S. (2013). Development of the functional vision questionnaire for children and young people with visual impairment: The FVQ_CYP. Ophthalmology, 120(12), 2725–2732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.055
33.
ToporI. R.ErinJ. N. (2000). Educational assessment of vision function in infants and children. In SilverstoneB.LangM. A.RosenthalB.FayeE. E. (Eds.), The Lighthouse handbook on vision impairment and rehabilitation (pp. 821–831). Oxford University Press.
34.
TuncerT. (2013). Children with visual impairment. In VuranS. (Ed.), Special education (pp. 289–321). Maya.
35.
YıldırımA.ŞimşekH. (2018). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Seçkin.
36.
YıldırımH. H. (2023). Screening, diagnosis and assessment processes of visual impaired children in early childhood. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Journal of Education Faculty (REFAD), 3(2), 19–28.
37.
YılmazE.BatuE. S. (2016). Opinions of primary school teachers from different branches on individualized education program, legal regulations and inclusive practices. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 17(03), 247–268.
38.
YürekliM.ŞafakP. (2022). Opinions of teachers working in guidance and research centers on the educational assessment and diagnosis processes of individuals with severe and multiple disabilities. Journal of National Education Special Education and Guidance, 2(3), 246–280.
39.
ZimmermannA.SilvaS. V. D.ZimmermannS. M. V.LiraR. P. C.CarvalhoK. M. M. D. (2015). Teller test with functional vision evaluation in children with low vision. Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia, 74, 362–365. https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7280.20150076
