Positive contact predicts reduced prejudice, but negative contact may increase prejudice at a stronger rate. The current project builds on this work in four ways: establishing an understanding of contact that is grounded in subjective experience, examining the affective mediators involved in the negative contact–prejudice relationship, extending research on the effects of positive and negative contact to minority groups, and examining the contact asymmetry experimentally. Study 1 introduced anger as a mediator of the relationships between positive and negative contact and prejudice among White Americans (N = 371), using a contact measure that reflected the frequency and intensity of a wide range of experiences. Study 2 found a contact asymmetry among Black and Hispanic Americans (N = 365). Study 3 found initial experimental evidence of a contact asymmetry (N = 309). We conclude by calling for a more nuanced understanding of intergroup contact that recognizes its multifaceted and subjective nature.
AbersonC. L. (2015). Positive intergroup contact, negative intergroup contact, and threat as predictors of cognitive and affective dimensions of prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 743-760.
2.
AbersonC. L.HaagS. C. (2007). Contact, perspective taking, and anxiety as predictors of stereotype endorsement, explicit attitudes, and implicit attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 179-201.
3.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
AlperinA.HornseyM. J.HaywardL. E.DiedrichsP. C.BarlowF. K. (2014). Applying the contact hypothesis to anti-fat attitudes: Contact with overweight people is related to how we interact with our bodies and those of others. Social Science and Medicine, 123, 37-44.
5.
BarlowF. K.HornseyM. J.ThaiM.SenguptaN. K.SibleyC. G. (2013). The wallpaper effect: The contact hypothesis fails for minority group members who live in areas with a high proportion of majority group members. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e82228.
6.
BarlowF. K.LouisW. R.HewstoneM. (2009). Rejected! Cognitions of rejection and intergroup anxiety as mediators of the impact of cross-group friendships on prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 389-405.
7.
BarlowF. K.PaoliniS.PedersenA.HornseyM. J.RadkeH. R. M.HarwoodJ.. . . SibleyC. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1629-1643.
8.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
9.
BinderJ.ZagefkaH.BrownR.FunkeF.KesslerT.MummendeyA.. . . LeyensJ. P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843-856.
10.
BroudyR.BrondoloE.CoakleyV.BradyN.CassellsA.TobinJ. N.SweeneM. (2007). Perceived ethnic discrimination in relation to daily moods and negative social interactions. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 31-43.
11.
ClaeysW.TimmersL. (1993). Some instantiations of the informational negativity effect: Positive-negative asymmetry in category breadth and in estimated meaning similarity of trait adjectives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 111-129.
12.
DeStenoD.DasguptaN.BartlettM. Y.CajdricA. (2004). Prejudice from thin air: The effect of emotion on automatic intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 15, 319-324.
13.
DixonJ.DurrheimK.TredouxC. (2005). Beyond the optimal contact strategy: A reality check for the contact hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 697-711.
14.
DixonJ.TredouxC.DurrheimK.TroppL. R.EatonL.ClackB. (2010). Challenging the stubborn core of opposition to equality: Racial contact and policy attitudes. Political Psychology, 31, 831-855.
15.
GrafS.PaoliniS.RubinM. (2014). Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 536-547.
16.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
HenryP. J.SearsD. O. (2002). The symbolic racism 2000 scale. Political Psychology, 23, 253-283.
18.
IslamM. R.HewstoneM. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700-710.
19.
JohnsonJ. D.LecciL. (2003). Assessing anti-white attitudes and predicting perceived racism: The Johnson-Lecci scale. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 299-312.
20.
LevinS.van LaarC.SidaniusJ. (2003). The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendships on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 76-92.
21.
MackieD. M.DevosT.SmithE. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616.
22.
PaoliniS.HarwoodJ.RubinM. (2010). Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1723-1738.
23.
PaoliniS.HarwoodJ.RubinM.HusnuS.JoyceN.HewstoneM. (2014). Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 548-562.
24.
PettigrewT. F. (2008). Future directions for intergroup contact theory and research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 187-199.
25.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.
26.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922-934.
27.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (2003). The antecedents and implications of interracial anxiety. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 790-801.
28.
StephanC. W.StephanW. G.DemitrakisK. M.YamadaA. M.ClasonD. L. (2000). Women’s attitudes toward men: An integrated threat theory approach. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 63-73.
29.
StephanW. G.BonieckiK. A.YbarraO.BettencourtA.ErvinK. S.JacksonL. A.RenfroC. L. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242-1254.
30.
StephanW. G.FinlayK. (1999). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 729-743.
31.
StephanW. G.StephanC. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157-175.
32.
SwartH.HewstoneM.ChristO.VociA. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1221-1238.
33.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L.CohenL. L.FitzgeraldD. C.BylsmaW. H. (2003). African American college students’ experiences with everyday racism: Characteristics of and responses to these incidents. Journal of Black Psychology, 29, 38-67.
34.
TamT.HewstoneM.CairnsE.TauschN. (2007). The impact of intergroup emotions on forgiveness in Northern Ireland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 119-135.
35.
TauschN.HewstoneM.RoyR. (2009). The relationships between contact, status and prejudice: An integrated threat theory analysis of Hindu–Muslim relations in India. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19, 83-94.
36.
TechakesariP.BarlowF.Kate HornseyM. J.SungB.ThaiM.ChakJ. L. Y. (2015). An investigation of positive and negative contact as predictors of intergroup attitudes in the United States, Hong Kong, and Thailand. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 454-468.
37.
ThompsonL. (1993). The impact of negotiation on intergroup relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 304-325.
38.
TroppL. R. (2003). The psychological impact of prejudice: Implications for intergroup contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 131-149.
39.
TroppL. R. (2006). Stigma and intergroup contact among members of minority and majority status groups. In LevinS.Van LaarC. (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 171-191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
TroppL. R.HawiD. R.Van LaarC.LevinS. (2012). Cross-ethnic friendships, perceived discrimination, and their effects on ethnic activism over time: A longitudinal investigation of three ethnic minority groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 257-272.
41.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2005a). Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1145-1158.
42.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2005b). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951-957.
43.
VociA.HewstoneM. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 37-54.
44.
WangY. W.DavidsonM. M.YakushkoO. F.SavoyH. B.TanJ. A.BleierJ. K. (2003). The scale of ethnocultural empathy: Development, validation, and reliability. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 221-234.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
