Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research on the spontaneous combustion of coal caused by sulfur has always been focused on pyrite in coal but has rarely considered the influence of organic sulfur. In this paper, coal samples, rather than model compounds, were used to study the influence of organic sulfur content in coal on its spontaneous combustion process. The results of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and thermogravimetry, differential scanning calorimetry, and mass spectrometry indicate that organic sulfur in Shuiyu clean coal exists in forms of mercaptan, thioether, sulfone (sulfoxide), and thiophene. With the decrease of organic sulfur content, the characteristic temperature points and the peak values of the exothermic curves in the process of coal oxidation spontaneous combustion all shifted toward higher temperatures. The ignition activation energy of coal also increased, and the initial and peak gas evolution temperatures of the oxidation products shifted toward higher temperatures. These findings suggest that the reduction of organic sulfur content can inhibit the oxidation process and spontaneous combustion tendency of coal. This effectively reveals the mechanism of the spontaneous combustion of coal and is of great significance to future studies in this field.

Keywords

Coal organic sulfur oxidative spontaneous combustion thermogravimetric mass spectrometry XPS

Introduction

Accidents caused by the spontaneous combustion of coal could be severe, and the resulting losses of high-quality coal are financially significant. In view of the serious harm caused by the spontaneous combustion of coal, scholars worldwide have extensively studied the mechanisms of this spontaneous combustion (Chou, 2012; Dacka SW et al., 1984; Deng et al., 2015a; Hu et al., 2015; Ma et al., 2019; Qi et al., 2018; Shen and Zeng, 2021; Zhao et al., 2021a; Zhao et al., 2021b; Zhou and Tang, 2018; Zhu et al., 2019). Sulfur is a harmful element in coal, and it not only produces hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) and sulfur dioxide (SO₂) in the combustion process, causing environmental pollution, but is also important in restricting the utilization of coking coal resources (Li et al., 2018). Sulfur components in coal may be divided into two categories: inorganic and organic. Inorganic sulfur, mainly in the form of mineral sulfur, such as pyrite, can be removed by washing. Organic sulfur is generally found within the molecular structure of coal in the form of carbon–sulfur (C–S) bonds. The removal of organic sulfur has always been a major problem in the field of clean coal utilization (Borah and Baruah, 1997; Huffman et al., 1985; Huggins et al., 1983).

As early as the 17th century, British Plot and Swedish Berzelius proposed the pyrite leading theory (Marzec, 2002), believing that spontaneous combustion of coal is caused by the exothermic reaction of pyrite (contained in coal seams) with water and oxygen. Historically, research has focused on the occurrence of inorganic sulfur in coal, the influence of inorganic sulfur on spontaneous combustion characteristics, and the spontaneous combustion period of coal (Deng et al., 2015b). However, the role of organic sulfur groups in the process of spontaneous combustion of coal have often been ignored. Few scholars have reported on the impact of organic sulfur on the spontaneous combustion of coal (Borah et al., 2001; Gorbaty et al., 1990). Through their temperature-programmed oxidation experiment, Zhang et al. (2015; 2018) found that the oxidative activity of organic sulfur functional groups was in the order of mercaptan> sulfide> thiophene. However, the reaction mechanism of spontaneous combustion caused by organic sulfur functional groups was not analyzed in depth, and the selection of organic sulfur model compounds was not comprehensive. Some researchers (Xia and Xie, 2017; Zhang et al., 2016) used a theoretical method to calculate the reaction mechanism between thiophenol, thiophene, and O₂ in coal; however, their calculated results were not experimentally verified.

Because it is difficult to remove organic sulfur groups from coal, researchers commonly add organic-sulfur compounds to model compounds, such as molecular sieves, when analyzing the influence of organic sulfur groups on the spontaneous combustion characteristics of coal (Zhao et al., 2021b). This allows for the simulation of high-organic-sulfur coal samples with different sulfur groups and different organic sulfur contents. Because of the huge effect of steric hindrance and other chemical environments in the reaction process of organic sulfur groups, model compounds are selected to replace coal with high organic sulfur in experiments and in calculations. However, results generated from these substitutions cannot accurately reflect the influence of complex organic sulfur groups in coal on oxidative spontaneous combustion.

This study aims to reveal the actual influence of organic sulfur on the oxidative spontaneous combustion of coal. Considering the limitations when using model compounds, in this study, bromine water was used to remove part of the organic sulfur in coking coal to produce coal samples of the same type but with lower organic sulfur content. Then, the oxidative spontaneous combustion processes of coal samples with different organic sulfur contents were investigated using thermogravimetric (TG) and mass spectrometry (MS) experiments. Because the same type of coal was used, the influence of other factors on the spontaneous combustion process of coal was avoided.

Materials and methods

Coal-sample collection and treatment

The high sulfur coking coal samples used in our experiments were extracted from Shuiyu Coal Mine in Shanxi Province. To avoid the interference of inorganic sulfur on the process of oxidation spontaneous combustion of coal, it was removed from the coal by performing flotation in Taiyuan Coal Preparation Plant. After flotation, the clean coal was analyzed for sulfur content by Fenxi Coal Quality Testing Center (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sulfur elemental analysis of clean coal.

Particle size	Total sulfur content St, d%	Pyrite Sp, d%	Sulfate Ss, d%	Organic sulfur So, d%
6 mm	2.19	0.200	0.010	1.98

After flotation, the clean coal was divided and processed to produce five samples, each with a different sulfur content. The test was carried out with a liquid–solid ratio of bromine water (3%) to coal sample of 5:1, optimal reaction time of 5 min as fixed conditions, and repeated processes 1–4 times were carried out according to the above experimental conditions(Mu et al., 2021). After the reaction was terminated for each sample, the product was filtered and the chlorinated coal was washed to neutrality, dried, and then analyzed for sulfur content (see Table 2). The coal sample labeled 100 was unprocessed coal and contained the highest total sulfur content (2.19%). The coal sample labeled 101 was the first product of the reaction between coal and bromine water, while the sample labeled 104 was the forth product of the reaction between coal and bromine water (0.34%).

Table 2.

Sulfur content after treatment with bromine water.

	100	101	102	103	104
Sulfur content	2.19%	1.58%	0.79%	0.58%	0.34%
Ash	8.61%	7.96%	7.34%	6.88%	6.72%

Experiments

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) tests were performed on coal samples with different total organic sulfur contents to specify the forms of sulfur. These XPS tests were performed on an AXIS ULTRA^DLD with Al Kα radiation (with hʋ = 1486.6 eV), manufactured by Kratos, of the Ishazin Group. The sample analysis area was ∼700 × 300 μm. Other measurement parameters were 150 W working power, 160 eV full scanning transmissivity, 40 eV narrow scan transmission energy, 10⁻⁸ Pa vacuum, and 0.05 eV step size.

To investigate the influence of organic sulfur on the oxidative spontaneous combustion process of coal, thermogravimetric–mass spectrometry (TG-MS) experiments were performed on coal samples with different organic sulfur contents. A 10-mg sample was placed in an alumina crucible and tested with a Netzsch STA449F5-QMS403D instrument. In each test, the total flow rate of the carrier gas (80% N₂ and 20% O₂) was 50 mL/min, the heating rate was 5°C/min, and the temperature ranged from room temperature to 800°C.

Results and discussion

Forms of organic sulfur in coal

Results of sulfur analysis of the coal after flotation are shown in Table 1. This table shows that the total sulfur content in the coal after flotation was still high and formed mostly of organic sulfur, which is difficult to remove. Inorganic sulfur only forms about 10% of the total sulfur content, while organic sulfur accounts for the other 90%. Of the inorganic sulfur, 5% was sulfate and the remaining 95% was pyrite.

To analyze the forms of organic sulfur in Shuiyu coal, XPS tests were conducted on coal samples having different organic sulfur contents. The results were plotted (Figure 1) with respect to the strength of the electronic signal represented on the ordinate axis and the electron binding energy on the abscissa. By using the electron binding energy, organic sulfur forms in each sample were analyzed and their relative contents determined by examining the area under the fitting peaks. According to the measuring principle of XPS, the energy level of S 2p splits into two peaks of 2p_3/2 and 2p_1/2 due to the spin-orbital coupling when excited by X-rays. To guarantee the accuracy of sulfur form analysis, we applied curve fitting methods of 2p_3/2 and 2p_1/2 splitting peaks with relative areas of approximately 2:1, respectively, separated by 1.18 eV of energy according to an optimal Lorentzian–Gaussian percentage and full width at half maximum (Pietrzak et al., 2007).

Figure 1.

XPS spectrum of coal with different organic sulfur content.

By using this method, we fit six S 2p peaks. The binding energy of 162.1–163.6 eV is attributed to mercaptan, thioether, and pyritic sulfur. Binding energy of 164.0–164.4 eV of S 2p_3/2 is reported as thiophenic sulfur. Sulfone and sulfoxide are reported at 165.0–166.0 eV. The binding energy of 168.7 eV is attributed to sulfonate, and >168.7 eV is reported as inorganic sulfur components containing sulfonate and sulfate (Zhang et al., 2015).

All XPS analysis results of the sulfur forms on the surface of these coal samples are shown in Table 3. The table shows that organic sulfur in the forms of mercaptan and thioether, thiophene, sulfoxide, and sulfate existed in each of the coal samples. Because Shuiyu coal is a kind of bituminous coal with a higher degree of coalification, the forms of organic sulfur in coal are similar to the occurrence environment of coal structure, so thiophene sulfur is the main form of organic sulfur. In the unprocessed clean coal sample (serial number 100), approximately 81% of the organic sulfur was in the form of thiophene. Mercaptan, thioether, and sulfoxide (sulfone) comprised approximately 9%, and the rest was sulfate sulfur.

Table 3.

Assignment and content of S 2p peak in coal with different organic sulfur content.

Serial number		The peak position	Half peak width	The relative content/%	Peak position of belonging	content/%
100	1-1	163.60	0.90	2.58	Mercaptan and thioether	3.92
	1-2	164.78	0.90	1.34	Mercaptan sulfur ether thiophene sulfoxide sulfate	3.92
	2-1	164.00	1.00	54.43	Thiophene	81.08
	2-2	165.18	1.00	26.65	Thiophene	81.08
	3-1	165.00	1.00	3.35	Sulfoxide	5.44
	3-2	166.18	1.00	2.09	Sulfoxide	5.44
	4-1	168.50	1.20	6.10	Sulfate	9.56
	4-2	169.68	1.20	3.46	Sulfate	9.56
101	1-1	163.60	0.90	2.88	Mercaptan and thioether	4.32
	1-2	164.78	0.90	1.44	Mercaptan and thioether	4.32
	2-1	164.00	1.00	53.33	thiophene	80.00
	2-2	165.18	1.00	26.67	thiophene	80.00
	3-1	165.00	1.00	4.32	Sulfoxide	6.48
	3-2	166.18	1.00	2.16	Sulfoxide	6.48
	4-1	168.50	1.20	6.13	Sulfate	9.19
	4-2	169.68	1.20	3.06	Sulfate	9.19
102	1-1	163.40	0.90	3.22	Mercaptan and thioether	4.83
	1-2	164.58	0.90	1.61	Mercaptan and thioether	4.83
	2-1	164.00	1.00	45.02	thiophene	66.72
	2-2	165.18	1.00	21.70	thiophene	66.72
	3-1	164.85	1.00	10.93	Sulfoxide	16.40
	3-2	166.03	0.96	5.47	Sulfoxide	16.40
	4-1	168.10	1.20	8.04	Sulfate	12.06
	4-2	169.28	1.20	4.02	Sulfate	12.06
103	1-1	163.30	0.90	1.64	Mercaptan and thioether	4.46
	1-2	164.48	0.90	3.82	Mercaptan and thioether	4.46
	2-1	164.00	1.00	27.29	thiophene	60.94
	2-2	165.18	1.00	23.65	thiophene	60.94
	3-1	165.00	1.00	11.17	Sulfoxide	20.75
	3-2	166.18	1.00	9.58	Sulfoxide	20.75
	4-1	168.10	1.20	8.57	Sulfate	13.85
	4-2	169.28	1.20	5.28	Sulfate	13.85
104	1-1	163.30	0.90	2.16	Mercaptan and thioether	4.24
	1-2	164.48	0.90	2.08	Mercaptan and thioether	4.24
	2-1	164.00	1.00	22.68	thiophene	59.52
	2-2	165.18	1.00	26.84	thiophene	59.52
	3-1	165.00	1.00	10.90	Sulfoxide	22.85
	3-2	166.18	1.00	11.95	Sulfoxide	22.85
	4-1	168.20	1.20	7.93	Sulfate	13.39
	4-2	169.38	1.20	5.46	Sulfate	13.39

Comparison of the concentrations of the various organic sulfur forms in the different coal samples, as shown in Table 3, reveals changes in concentrations of those forms as a result of the desulfurization process. Concentrations of mercaptan and thioether remained relatively constant with the decrease of organic sulfur content. The relative content of sulfate and sulfoxide (sulfone) increased. The relative content of thiophene decreased significantly but was always the main form of organic sulfur in each coal sample. As the organic sulfur in coal was oxidized by bromine water, the content of the organic sulfur changed.

Influence of organic sulfur content on the oxidation spontaneous combustion process of coal

Coal samples processed by the bromine water treatment were analyzed using TG-DTG methods. The TG-DTG curves of the coal samples having different organic sulfur contents are shown in Figure 2. Because the structure of coal changes somewhat following bromine water treatment, only coal samples treated by bromine water were compared. No raw coal samples were analyzed for this comparison. Figure 2 shows that the variation trend of TG-DTG curves of coal samples having different organic sulfur contents was similar. According to the characteristic temperature points, the process of oxidation spontaneous combustion of coal may be divided into three processes as shown in Table 4.

Figure 2.

TG-DTG curves of coal samples having different organic sulfur contents.

Table 4.

Characteristic temperatures of coal samples having different organic sulfur contents.

Sample ID	T₁/°C	T₂/°C	T₃/°C	T₄/°C
101	131.522	314.022	471.522	600
102	133.347	315.847	473.347	600
103	144.382	319.382	481.882	600
104	145.314	322.814	482.814	600

From room temperature to temperature T₁, coal experiences water loss and weight loss. At room temperatures, various gas molecules are adsorbed in the pores of coal through physical adsorption. As temperatures increase, water molecules and small gas molecules are desorbed out of the pores of the coal, and it begins to lose weight.

Between points at approximately T₁ and T₂, temperatures are still relatively low, and coal undergoes oxidation and weight gain. Through this range of temperatures, adsorption of O₂ in coal changes from physical to chemical and the side chains and small molecular structures in the coal, as well as bridge bonds in polycyclic aromatic systems, begin to crack or depolymerize. As the temperature continues to increase, the reaction speeds up, increasing the number of active structures, which results in an increase in the coal's capacity to adsorb oxygen. The process is characterized by the coal sample weight changing from a decreasing to an increasing trend as more O₂ is adsorbed. Temperature T₂ is defined as the point where the weight gain of coal reaches a maximum value (see T₂ in Figure 2). Reviewing the values of T₁ for the four coal samples, reveals that the higher the organic sulfur content, the lower the value of T₁. This indicates that the temperature at which coal enters the low temperature oxidation and weight gain stage decreases with increasing organic sulfur content.

The temperature range approximately between T₂ and T₄ is described as the rapid oxidation stage of coal. Aromatic ring and other active structures in coal begin to react rapidly, generating a large amount of gas products like CO and CO₂ and releasing much heat. At this stage, coal again experiences weight loss. The final manifestation is that the rate of weight loss increases until it reaches a point of maximum weight loss rate (defined as temperature T₃). This is shown as the lowest point on the DTG curve. Subsequently, the weight loss rate of the coal sample decreases gradually until the weight of the coal remains nearly constant and it reaches the burnout temperature point, T₄. Table 4 shows that whether it is the maximum weight point (T₂) or the maximum weight loss rate point (T₃), the lower the organic sulfur content, the higher the characteristic temperature point value. This indicates that the temperature at which coal enters the rapid oxidation stage decreases with increasing organic sulfur content.

In summary, with the decrease of organic sulfur content, the three characteristic temperature points (T₁, T₂, and T₃) of coal all shift toward higher temperatures. This demonstrates that as the organic sulfur content increases, coal is more prone to oxidation and combustion and its tendency for spontaneous combustion increases.

Ignition activation energy of coal having different organic sulfur contents

The thermogravimetric (TG) curve not only reflects the weight and temperature changes of coal during the oxidation reaction, but also may be used to study the kinetics of the oxidation reaction process. According to the Arrhenius equation, the approximate integral formula of Coats-Redfern was derived:

\ln [\frac{G (α)}{T^{2}}] = \ln (\frac{A R}{β E}) - \frac{E}{R T}

(1)

where G(α) is the mechanism function, α is the conversion percentage, T is the temperature (K), A is the former factor, R is the molar gas constant (8.314 J·mol⁻¹·K), β is the constant heating rate (K·min⁻¹), and E is the activation energy (J·mol⁻¹).

According to the double extrapolation method, the mechanism function −[ln(1−α)]^3/2 was used as the most probable mechanism function of the coal oxidation reaction (Deng et al., 2013; Sun, 2008). On the graph, 1/T was used as the abscissa and ln[G(α)/T²] as the ordinate. As shown in Figure 3, the curve is approximately a straight line with a slope of −E/R. The ignition activation energy of coal (E) can be obtained from the slope of the line in the low-temperature oxidation stage. As shown by Figure 3, the experiment resulted in a good correlation. The activation energies calculated from the slopes (−E/R) are shown in Table 5.

Figure 3.

Fitting curve of activation energy of coal samples with different organic sulfur contents.

Table 5.

Ignition activation energy of coal samples with different organic sulfur contents.

	104	103	102	101
Activation energy/J*mol⁻¹	96268.584	82625.954	81158.056	81065.026
The slope	−11579.093	−9938.171	−9761.614	−9750.424

The ignition activation energy of coal refers to the energy barrier that coal needs to overcome to adsorb and react to oxygen (including physical and chemical adsorption). This is the minimum threshold energy required for the coal oxidation spontaneous combustion reaction. This threshold value may be used to directly characterize the oxidation spontaneous combustion tendency of coal of different organic sulfur contents. Table 5 shows that among the four coal samples treated with chemical reagents, the activation energy of coal sample 101 (having the greatest organic sulfur content) had the lowest activation energy, and coal sample 104 (having the least organic sulfur content) had the highest The activation energy of coal varies inversely with organic sulfur content. Thus, the greater the organic sulfur content in coal, the lower the ignition activation energy, and the more the coal will be prone to oxidation spontaneous combustion. The spontaneous combustion tendency of coal is directly related to organic sulfur content.

Exothermic properties of coal having different organic sulfur contents

The exothermic curves of coal with different organic sulfur contents are shown in Figure 4. All differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves began to rise after 40°C, indicating the coal samples entered the exothermic phase above that temperature. As the temperature increased, the exothermic curve peaked around 480°C and then gradually decreased. This figure also shows that with decreasing organic sulfur content, the temperature at the maximum point of the exothermic curve shifted toward higher temperatures. Peak temperatures of the coal samples may be ranked as 101 < 102 < 103 < 104. Compared to coal sample 101, the peak temperature of the exothermic curve of coal sample 104 increased by 14°C. This indicates that the lower the sulfur content, the slower the oxidation process, and that the oxidation process of coal is inhibited with decreasing organic sulfur content.

Figure 4.

DSC curves of coal samples with different organic sulfur contents.

Release of regular oxidation products of coal samples with different organic sulfur contents

During the heating process of coal, three distinct stages occur: degassing, pyrolysis, and condensation. Gas products are mainly generated from the pyrolysis process as small molecular functional groups break off from the main chain of coal to form gas products.

The main gas products from pyrolysis of coal include hydrogen (H₂), water (H₂O), methane (CH₄), and carbon dioxide (CO₂), along with sulfur dioxide (SO₂), hydrogen sulfide (H₂S), and if the coal contains sulfur, small molecule organic sulfur (COS) (Liu et al., 2016). The mass spectrum (MS) of oxidation products produced during the oxidation process by coal samples with different organic sulfur contents are shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Mass spectrum of oxidation products of coal with different organic sulfur contents.

The release of SO₂ during pyrolysis of coal can be divided into two stages. The first stage is at 400–600°C. The release of SO₂ in this stage is mainly due to the organic sulfur in coal. The second stage is around 1000°C, where the release of SO₂ is related to pyrite.

Because we investigated only the release of regular organic sulfur during the pyrolysis of coal, we only examined the peaks from 400–600°C. Figure 5 shows that the SO₂ release curves of coal samples with different organic sulfur contents had different release peaks with different strengths around 480°C. Coal sample 101 had the lowest peak temperature (474°C), and coal sample 104 had the highest peak temperature (487°C). This indicates that the higher the organic sulfur content in coal, the lower the peak temperature. This rule can also be confirmed by the release of COS, a gas product generated by the thermal decomposition of organic sulfur groups during the pyrolysis of coal. The regular release of COS was similar to that of SO₂. The different release peaks of the four samples also strongly indicate that with decreasing organic sulfur content, the initial and peak temperatures of COS evolution both gradually shift toward higher temperatures. It shows that as the organic sulfur content in coal increases, the sulfur-containing groups are more likely to react with oxygen to release COS and SO₂; that is, the greater tendency of spontaneous combustion of coal.

The CO₂ produced during coal pyrolysis mainly comes from the decomposition of oxygen-containing functional groups such as carboxyl groups and aldehyde groups in coal. The shape of the CO₂ release peak is high and wide. Also, the maximum points of the CO₂ release peak of the coal samples all appeared at 470–490°C.

Methane is generated by the chain scission of aliphatic or aromatic side chains containing methyl functional groups in coal. As shown in Figure 5, the ion current curves of methane mass spectrum show a single peak similar to the Gaussian distribution, and the shape of the peak is relatively wide, and the range of the peak is 450–500°C. Similar to the first two gases, with the decrease of organic sulfur content in coal, the initial precipitation temperature and the peak temperature of CO₂ and CH₄ gradually shift to the high temperature. It indicated that the higher the organic sulfur content in coal, the more likely the coal is to undergo thermal decomposition at a lower temperature to release CO₂ and CH₄, that is, the greater the spontaneous combustion tendency of coal.

As with SO₂ and COS, with the decrease in the organic sulfur content in coal, the initial and peak evolution temperatures of CO₂ and CH₄ gradually shift toward higher temperatures. This indicates that the higher the organic sulfur content in coal, the more likely the coal will undergo thermal decomposition at a lower temperature, thus releasing CO₂ and CH₄. The spontaneous combustion tendency of coal increases with increasing organic sulfur content. This is consistent with the conclusions based on the TG-DSC curve and ignition activation energy analysis of coal.

The reason for this phenomenon is related to the activity of organic sulfur groups in coal. The common chemical bonds and the bond energies involved in coal are shown in Table 6. Based on the XPS analysis, the organic sulfur groups in coal are mainly in forms of mercaptans, thioethers, sulfoxides (sulfones), and thiophenes. Compared with similar chemical bonds in other groups in coal, the chemical bonds in organic sulfur groups have lower bond energy and greater chemical activity. Therefore, it is easier to break the C–S bonds during the low-temperature oxidation process. The breakage of chemical bonds can release considerable heat, thus accelerating the oxidation spontaneous combustion of coal. In consequence, the spontaneous combustion tendency of coal is related to its organic sulfur content.

Table 6.

The energy of the common chemical bonds in coal.

Chemical bonds	Bond energy (kJ·mol⁻¹)	Chemical bonds	Bond energy (kJ·mol⁻¹)	Chemical bonds	Bond energy (kJ·mol⁻¹)
C-O	326	O-H	464	C=C	611
C-C	332	C-H	460	C=S	536
C-S	272	S-H	339	S=O	548
				C=O	326

However, the factors that can affect the spontaneous combustion of coal are varied, including volatile, moisture and other active groups in coal, such as hydroxyl and methyl, etc. Therefore, the sulfur content is one of the factors that affect the spontaneous combustion of coal. Even so, it can be seen from the experiment that the organic sulfur content has an irreplaceable effect on the spontaneous combustion of coal, because the coal samples for experiment are the same kind of coal and have the same treatment.

Conclusions

Organic sulfur in Shuiyu coking coal exists in forms of mercaptans, thioethers, sulfoxides (sulfones), and thiophenes. With the reduction of organic sulfur content in coal, thiophene remained the main form of organic sulfur in coal.

With decreasing organic sulfur content, the characteristic temperatures at which coal entered the weight gain stage (T₁), entered the rapid oxidation stage (T₂), and reached the maximum weight loss rate point (T₃), all shifted toward higher temperatures, Furthermore, the ignition activation energy of coal and the peak temperature of the exothermic curve increased. It was shown that the reduction of organic sulfur content inhibited the oxidation process of coal.

The spontaneous combustion tendency of coal decreases with the reduction of organic sulfur content, and the initial and the peak evolution temperatures of oxidation products both shifted toward higher temperatures. This is consistent with the ignition activation energy analysis of coal.

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-eea-10.1177_01445987211049045 - Supplemental material for Effects of organic sulfur on oxidation spontaneous combustion characteristics of coking coal

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-eea-10.1177_01445987211049045 for Effects of organic sulfur on oxidation spontaneous combustion characteristics of coking coal by Fei Gao, Zhe Jia, Mei-ling Qin and Xiao-gang Mu, Yi-fei Teng, Ying-di Li, Qi-hui Bai in Energy Exploration & Exploitation

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51874161) and Youth Fund of Liaoning Province Education Administration (LJ2017QL001).

Author contributions

The paper was a collaborative effort among the authors. Fei Gao and Zhe Jia conceived and designed the experiments, authored the paper; Yafei Shan proposed the idea; Xiaogang Mu performed the experiments; Ruijie Sun and Qihui Bai analyzed the data; Yifei Teng and Yingdi Li modified the paper.

Data availability statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and Youth Fund of Liaoning Province Education Administration (grant number 51874161, LJ2017QL001).

ORCID iD

Fei Gao

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Borah

Baruah

(1997) Electron transfer process 1. Removal of organic sulphur from high sulphur Indian coal. Fuel 78: 1083–1088.

Borah

Baruah

Haque

(2001) Oxidation of high sulphur coal. Part 1. Desulphurisation and evidence of the formation of oxidised organic sulphur species. Fuel 80(4): 501–507.

Chou

(2012) Sulfur in coals: A review of geochemistry and origins. International Journal of Coal Geology 100: 1–13.

Dacka

Hobdaya

Smitha

, et al. (1984) Free-radical involvement in the drying and oxidation of victorian brown coal. Fuel 63(1): 39–42.

Deng

Dai

Deng

, et al. (2013) Reaction mechanism of phenylthiophenol organic sulfur in coal with O₂. Journal of China Coal Society (8): 30–37.

Deng

Zhang

, et al. (2015a) Effects of pyrite on the spontaneous combustion of coal. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology 2: 306–311.

Deng

Xiao

, et al. (2015b) Experimental studies of spontaneous combustion and anaerobic cooling of coal. Fuel 157: 261–269.

Gorbaty

George

Kelemen

(1990) Chemistry of organically bound sulphur forms during the mild oxidation of coal. Fuel 69(8): 1065–1067.

Yang

Zhou

, et al. (2015) Coal spontaneous combustion prediction in gob using chaos analysis on gas indicators from upper tunnel. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 26: 461–469.

10.

Huffman

Huggins

Dunmyre

, et al. (1985) Comparative sensitivity of various analytical techniques to the low-temperature oxidation of coal. Fuel 64(6): 849–856.

11.

Huggins

Huffman

Lin

(1983) Observations on low-temperature oxidation of minerals in bituminous coals. International Journal of Coal Geology 3(2): 157–182.

12.

Yang

, et al. (2018) Laboratory study on the inhibitory effect of free radical scavenger on coal spontaneous combustion. Fuel Processing Technology 171(3): 350–360.

13.

Liu

Cui

, et al. (2016) Analysis of main products and pyrolysis kinetics of coal pyrolysis gas. Coal Geology & Exploration 44(6): 27–32+37.

14.

Zou

Ren

, et al. (2019) Reactivity and spontaneous combustion characteristics of high-sulphur coal during low-temperature oxidation. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology 21(3): 375–389.

15.

Marzec

(2002) Towards an understanding of the coal structure: a review. Fuel Processing Technology 77–78(25): 25–32.

16.

Liu

Gao

, et al. (2021) Microwave-assisted removal of sulfur in large particle size coal by bromine water. Fuel 289: 119838.

17.

Pietrzak

Grzybek

Wachowska

(2007) XPS Study of pyrite-free coals subjected to different oxidizing agents. Fuel 86(16): 2616–2624.

18.

Chen

Xin

, et al. (2018) Reaction mechanism and thermodynamic properties of aliphatic hydrocarbon groups during coal self-heating. Energy & Fuels 32(10): 10469–10477.

19.

Shen

Zeng

(2021) Investigation of the kinetics of spontaneous combustion of the major coal seam in Dahuangshan mining area of the Southern Junggar coalfield Xinjiang China. Scientific Reports 11(1): 1–12.

20.

Sun

(2008) Study on coal spontaneous combustion resistance modification . PhD Thesis, Liaoning Technical University, China.

21.

Xia

Xie

(2017) A technological review of developments in chemical-related desulfurization of coal in the past decade. International Journal of Mineral Processing 161: 65–71.

22.

Zhang

, et al. (2018) Study on the change of organic sulfur forms in coal during low-temperature oxidation process. Fuel 222: 350–361.

23.

Zhang

, et al. (2015) Studies on the low-temp oxidation of coal containing organic sulfur and the corresponding model compounds. Molecules 20(12): 22241–22256.

24.

Zhang

Yang

, et al. (2016) Research on the composition and distribution of organic sulfur in coal. Molecules 21(5): 630–640.

25.

Zhao

Qin

Zhao

, et al. (2021a) Data on the sulfur-containing polycyclic aromatic compounds of high-sulfur coal of SW China. Data in Brief 37: 107218–107218.

26.

Zhao

Qin

Zhao

, et al. (2021b) Origin and geological implications of super high sulfur-containing polycyclic aromatic compounds in high-sulfur coal. Gondwana Research 96: 219–231.

27.

Zhou

Tang

(2018) A novel sodium carboxymethyl ellulose/aluminium citrate gel for extinguishing spontaneous fire in coal mines. Fire and Materials 42(7): 760–769.

28.

Zhu

Dai

Tang

(2019) Effect of moisture content on self-heating reaction of long flame coal. Safety in Coal Mines 50(08): 46–50+55.

Chemical bonds	Bond energy (kJ·mol⁻¹)	Chemical bonds	Bond energy (kJ·mol⁻¹)	Chemical bonds	Bond energy (kJ·mol⁻¹)
C-O	326	O-H	464	C=C	611
C-C	332	C-H	460	C=S	536
C-S	272	S-H	339	S=O	548
				C=O	326

Chemical bonds	Bond energy (kJ·mol⁻¹)	Chemical bonds	Bond energy (kJ·mol⁻¹)	Chemical bonds	Bond energy (kJ·mol⁻¹)
C-O	326	O-H	464	C=C	611
C-C	332	C-H	460	C=S	536
C-S	272	S-H	339	S=O	548
				C=O	326

Chemical bonds	Bond energy (kJ·mol⁻¹)	Chemical bonds	Bond energy (kJ·mol⁻¹)	Chemical bonds	Bond energy (kJ·mol⁻¹)
C-O	326	O-H	464	C=C	611
C-C	332	C-H	460	C=S	536
C-S	272	S-H	339	S=O	548
				C=O	326