Free accessResearch articleFirst published online 2006-9
The Acuity of School Nurses on Their Ability to Improve Eating Habits in 11–16 Year Old Students in Denmark — An Interview Study Inspired by the Health Belief Model
The aim of the study was to investigate the acuity of school nurses regarding their opportunities and limitations to improve eating habits in 11–16 year old Danish schoolchildren, as it is well known that this age group often demonstrates unhealthy habits. The study's methodology was qualitative, exploratory and descriptive and took the form of a semi-structured interview investigation involving eight school nurses from four municipalities in the Copenhagen metropolitan area. The interviews were analysed using hermeneutic interpretation principles and were categorized with the assistance of a model inspired by the Health Belief Model. The school nurses' perceptions of their opportunities for action included: health-related discussions with children; empowering children to be responsible for their own health; and ensuring that healthy meals were made available in schools. They saw the limitations as being: group pressure; parents being too busy and unsupportive, as well as the absence of goal setting, common viewpoints and planning processes with teachers. As a result a conflict exists between what the school nurses want to achieve and what they currently are achieving.
KingA.The health of youth: A report of the 1993–94 survey results of health behaviour in school-aged children: A WHO cross-national study. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation, Regional Office for Europe; 1996.
2.
RuxtonCHKirkTRBeltonNRHolmesMA. Relationships between social class, nutrient intake and dietary patterns in Edinburgh schoolchildren. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 1996; 47: 341–9.
3.
CurrieCHurrelmannKSettertobulteWSmithRToddJ, editors. Health and Health Behaviour among Young People: Health behaviour in school- aged children: A WHO cross-national study (HBSC): International report. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2000.
4.
CurrieC. (eds.) Young peoples Health in Context: International report from the HBSC 2001/02. Who Policy Series: Health policy for children and adolescents Issue 4. WHO regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen; 2004.
5.
Sundhedsministeriet.Regeringens folkesundhedsprogram 1999–2008 (The Government's public health programme 1999–2008. Ministry of health). Copenhagen: Sundhedsministeriet; 1999.
6.
Sundhedsstyrelsen.Forebyggende sundhedsordninger for børn og unge. (Health services for children and adolescents. National Board of Health). Danish. Retningslinier. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen; 1995.
7.
FrenchSAStablesG. Environmental interventions to promote vegetable and fruit consumption among youth in school settings. Prev Med. 2003; 37: 593–610.
8.
ChoHNadowMZ. Understanding barriers to implementing quality lunch and nutrition education. J Community Health. 2004; 29: 422–435.
9.
SmithC.. The health promoting school: Progress and future challenges in Welsh secondary schools. Health Promot Int. 1992; 7: 171–179.
10.
MukomaWFlisherAJ. Evaluations of health promoting schools: A review of nine studies. Health Promot Int. 2004; 19: 357–368.
11.
ContentoIRManningADShannonB. Research Perspective on School-based Nutrition Education. J Nutr Educ. 1992; 24: 247–60.
12.
HurrelmannKLeppinANordlohneE. Promoting health in schools: The German example. Health Promot Int. 1995; 10: 121–31.
13.
KleppK-IAnderssenN. The Nordic Countries: Perspectives in school health. J Sch Health. 1990; 60: 342–8.
14.
HjälmhultEWoldBSamdalO. School Health Services and Health Promotion: Collaboration between school nurses and teachers in the Norwegian schools in «European network of health promoting schools. Vård i Norden. 2002; 22 (1): 42–46.
15.
JanzNKBeckerMH. The Health Belief Model: A decade Later. Health Educ Q. 1984; 11: 1–47.
16.
StrecherVJRosenstockIM. The Health Belief Model. In: GlanzKLewisFMRimerBK, eds. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass; 1997: 41–60.
17.
BanduraA. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs N.J.: Prentice Hall; 1986.
18.
PerryCLKleppK.-IHalperA. Promoting healthy eating and physical activity patterns among adolescents: A pilot study of ‘Slice of Life’. Health Educ Res. 1987; 2: 93–103.
19.
RosenstockIMStrecherVJBeckerMH. Social Learning Theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q. 1988; 15: 175–83.
20.
KvaleS. Interviews — an introduction to the qualitative research interview. London, Sage Publications; 1996.
21.
WallstonBSWallstonKA. Social psychological models of health behavior: An examination and integration. In BaumATaylorSESingerJE, editors. Handbook of psychology and health: Vol. 4: Social psychological aspects of health. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 1984: 23–54.
22.
RobsonC. Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner researchers. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1993.
23.
HølundU. Explanation and change of adolescents' dietary behavior [doctoral dissertation]. Aarhus: The Royal Dental College; 1991.
24.
BarnesMCourtneyMDPrattJWalshAM. School-Based Youth Health Nurses: Roles, Responsibilities, Challenges and Rewards. Public Health Nurs. 2004; 21: 316–322.
25.
HagquistCStarrinB. Health education in schools — from information to empowerment models. Health Promot Int. 1997; 12: 225–32.
26.
BourdieuP. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: University Press; 1999.
27.
Neumark-SztainerDWallMPerryCStoryM. Correlates of fruit and vegetable intake among adolescents. Findings from Project EAT. Prev Med. 2003; 37: 198–208.
28.
SamuelsonGBrattebyL-EEnghardtHHedgrenM. Food habits and energy and nutrient intake in Swedish adolescents approaching the year 2000. Acta PaediatrSuppl. 1996; 415: 1–19.
29.
ChapmanGMacLeanH. Junk food and healthy food: Meanings of food in adolescent women's culture. J Nutr Educ. 1993; 25: 108–13.
30.
WhiteheadD. A social cognitive model for health education/health promotion practice. J Adv Nurs. 2001; 36(3): 417–423.
