Can mandatory military service increase confidence in the state across the population when only men are required to serve? To answer this question, we leverage the case of South Korea to examine how male-only conscription influences trust toward a critical state institution, the military. Based on the foreign policy opinion literature on the gender gap, we hypothesize that women hold different views of the military and respond in distinct ways to conscription. Analysis of public opinion data from 2003 to 2021 shows that women generally exhibit less trust in the military than men. Male conscription also has diverging effects along gender lines for parents of sons who must serve, increasing distrust of the military for their mothers while not affecting fathers. The findings suggest that mandatory military service can (further) divide opinions of the military across society.
AlmondG. A.VerbaS. (2015). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton University Press.
2.
AtkinsonD. B.FaheyK. (2023). Ain’t no fortunate son: The political calculus of conscription. Political Research Quarterly, 76, 1151–1167. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221119753
3.
BaeJ. (2018). The North Korean regime, domestic instability and foreign policy. North Korean Review, 14, 85–101.
4.
BaeJ. (2020). Limits of engagement? The Sunshine Policy, nuclear tests, and South Korean views of North Korea 1995-2013. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 20(3), 411–433.
5.
BaeJ.LeeY. (2021). Gender, events, and elite messages in mass opinion on foreign affairs. Journal of Global Security Studies, 6(2), ogz074, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz074
6.
BaeJ.LeeY. (2024). Conscription and gender in mass opinion on foreign affairs: South Korean views of North Korea. Journal of Global Security Studies, 9(1), ogad025, https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogad025
BershtlingO. (2023). “Mom calling the commanding officer”: The changing relationship between mothers and their sons serving in Israel Defense Forces. Armed Forces & Society. OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X231172778
10.
BoveV.Di LeoR.GianiM. (2022). Military culture and institutional trust: Evidence from conscription reforms in Europe. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12745
ChoulisI.BakakiZ.BöhmeltT. (2021). Public support for the armed forces: The role of conscription. Defence and Peace Economics, 32(2), 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2020.1848857
13.
ConoverP. J.SapiroV. (1993). Gender, feminist consciousness, and war. American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 1079–1099.
14.
De JuanA.HaassF.PierskallaJ. (2021). The partial effectiveness of indoctrination in autocracies: Evidence from the German Democratic Republic. World Politics, 73(4), 593–628.
15.
De MesquitaB. B.SiversonR. M.WollerG. (1992). War and the fate of regimes: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 638–646.
16.
DeschM. C. (2001). Civilian control of the military: The changing security environment. JHU Press.
17.
DesilverD. (2019). Fewer than a third of countries currently have a military draft; most exclude women. Pew Research Center.
EichenbergR. C. (2003). Gender differences in public attitudes toward the use of force by the United States, 1990-2003. International Security, 28(1), 110–141.
20.
EichenbergR. C. (2016). Gender difference in American public opinion on the use of military force, 1982–2013. International Studies Quarterly, 60(1), 138–148.
21.
EichenbergR. C.StollR. J. (2012). Gender difference or parallel publics? The dynamics of defense spending opinions in the United States, 1965–2007. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(2), 331–348.
22.
EriksonR. S.StokerL. (2011). Caught in the draft: The effects of Vietnam draft lottery status on political attitudes. American Political Science Review, 105(2), 221–237.
GeorgeJ. A.TeigenJ. M. (2008). NATO enlargement and institution building: Military personnel policy challenges in the post-Soviet context. European Security, 17(2–3), 339–366.
25.
GrantP. R. (1993). Ethnocentrism in response to a threat to social identity. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8(6), 143–154.
26.
HetheringtonM. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92(4), 791–808.
27.
HetheringtonM. J.HusserJ. A. (2012). How trust matters: The changing political relevance of political trust. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 312–325.
28.
HorowitzM. C.LevenduskyM. S. (2011). Drafting support for war: Conscription and mass support for warfare. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 524–534.
29.
HuddyL.FeldmanS.TaberC.LahavG. (2005). Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 593–608.
30.
KadercanB. (2013). Strong armies, slow adaptation: Civil-military relations and the diffusion of military power. International Security, 38(3), 117–152.
31.
KierE. (1995). Culture and military doctrine: France between the wars. International Security, 65–93.
32.
KleinU. (2002). The gender perspective of civil-military relations in Israeli society. Current Sociology, 50(5), 669–686.
33.
KrebsR. R. (2004). A school for the nation? How military service does not build nations, and how it might. International Security, 28(4), 85–124.
34.
KwonI. (2000). A feminist exploration of military conscription: The gendering of the connections between nationalism, militarism and citizenship in South Korea. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 3(1), 26–54.
35.
LauR. R.BrownT. A.SearsD. O. (1978). Self-interest and civilians’ attitudes toward the Vietnam War. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42(4), 464–482.
36.
LealD. L. (2005). American public opinion toward the military: Differences by race, gender, and class?Armed Forces & Society, 32(1), 123–138.
37.
LeanderA. (2004). Drafting community: Understanding the fate of conscription. Armed Forces & Society, 30(4), 571–599.
38.
LeviM. (1997). Consent, dissent, and patriotism. Cambridge University Press.
39.
LevitskyS. (2018). Latin America’s shifting politics: Democratic survival and weakness. Journal of Democracy, 29(4), 102–113.
40.
LevyJ. S. (1988). Domestic politics and war. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), 653–673.
41.
LevyJ. S. (1989). The diversionary theory of war: A critique. Handbook of War Studies, 1, 259–288.
42.
MalešičM.GarbM. (2018). Public trust in the military from global, regional and national perspectives. In CaforioG.NuciariM. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of the military (pp. 145–159). Springer.
43.
McDermottM. L.JonesD. R. (2022). Gender, sex, and trust in government. Politics & Gender, 18(2), 297–320.
44.
MoonS. (2005). Militarized modernity and gendered citizenship in South Korea. Duke University Press.
45.
MoskosC. C. (1988). A call to civic service: National service for country and community. The Free Press.
46.
MuellerJ. E. (1973). War, presidents, and public opinion. John Wiley.
47.
PosenB. R. (1993). Nationalism, the mass army, and military power. International Security, 18(2), 80–124.
48.
RhodesE. (1995). Constructing peace and war: An analysis of the power of ideas to shape American military power. Millennium, 24(1), 53–85.
49.
RosenS. P. (1995). Military effectiveness: Why society matters. International Security, 19(4), 5–31.
50.
RuddickS. (1995). Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Beacon Press.
ShapiroR. Y.MahajanH. (1986). Gender differences in policy preferences: A summary of trends from the 1960s to the 1980s. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(1), 42–61.
53.
SolarC. (2022). Trust in the military in post-authoritarian societies. Current Sociology, 70(3), 317–337.
54.
StamA. C. (1996). Win, lose, or draw: Domestic politics and the crucible of war. University of Michigan Press.
55.
TararA. (2006). Diversionary incentives and the bargaining approach to war. International Studies Quarterly, 50(1), 169–188.
Tiargan-OrrR.Eran-JonaM. (2016). The Israeli public’s perception of the IDF: Stability and change. Armed Forces & Society, 42(2), 324–343.
58.
WalzerM. (1977). Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations. Basic Books.
59.
WashingtonE. L. (2008). Female socialization: How daughters affect their legislator fathers’ voting on women’s issues. American Economic Review, 98(1), 311–332.
60.
WeberE. (1976). Peasants into Frenchmen. The modernization of rural France, 1870-1914. Stanford University Press.
61.
WroeA.AllenN.BirchS. (2013). The role of political trust in conditioning perceptions of corruption. European Political Science Review, 5(2), 175–195.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
