The article presents an empirical analysis of whether, how, and why people are active to either support or protest against the Bundeswehr. Public opinion polls consistently report high levels of trust in the military. According to the social-psychological approach of participation theory, this trust should lead to corresponding actions. However, the literature on civil–military gaps claims that the majority of people pay mere lip service to soldiers rather than actively support the armed forces. No active support despite high levels of trust? In an effort to empirically test the level and the determinants of the public’s support for and protest against the military, an activity scale was included in a representative opinion poll in Germany. The analyses show that a fairly large part of the German population engages in activities that support the Bundeswehr and that public trust in the military predicts that supportive behavior. Importantly, trust in the armed forces remains a strong predictor of citizens’ activities related to the armed forces even when controlling for numerous other factors. Taken together, these findings contradict the widely shared view of a civil–military gap and instead provide empirical evidence for the social-psychological approach of participation theory.
AllenC.BraunW. (2013). Trust: Implications for the army profession. Military Review, 93(5), 73-85.
2.
BiehlHFiebigR. (2011). Zum Rückhalt der Bundeswehr in der Bevölkerung: Empirische Hinweise zu einer emotional geführten DebatteSozialwissenschaftliches Institut der Bundeswehr.
3.
BiehlH. (2015). Support Our Troops!?: Unterstützung und Ablehnung von Streitkräften im europäischen Vergleich. In H. Biehl, & H. Schoen (Eds.)Sicherheitspolitik und Streitkräfte im Urteil der Bürger: Theorien, Methoden, Befunde (pp. 237-262). Springer VS.
4.
BacevichA. (2013). Breach of trust: How Americans failed their soldiers and their country. Metropolitan Books.
5.
BremmK. J. (2005). Wehrhaft wider willen? Die debatte um die bewaffnung Westdeutschlands in den fünfziger jahren. In BremmK.-J.RinkM.MackH.-H. (Eds.), Entschieden für frieden: 50 jahre Bundeswehr (pp. 283-297). Rombach Verlag.
6.
BrooksR (2016). How everything became war and the military became everything: Tales from the Pentagon. Simon & Schuster.
7.
BrooksR. A. (2019). Integrating the civil–military relations subfield. Annual Review of Political Sciences, 22, 379-398.
8.
BulmahnT. (2004). Bevölkerungsbefragung zum sicherheits- und verteidigungspolitischen Meinungsbild in Deutschland. Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut der Bundeswehr.
9.
BurbachD. T. (2019). Partisan dimensions of confidence in the U.S. Military, 1973-2016. Armed Forces & Society, 45(2), 211-233.
10.
BurkJ. (2018). Military mobilization in modern western societies. In CaforioG.NuciariM. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of the military (2nd ed., pp. 111-128). Springer International Publishing.
11.
CaforioG. (Ed.). (2007). Cultural differences between the military and parent society in democratic countries. Elsevier.
12.
CampbellA.ConverseP.MillerW.StokesD. (1960). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.
13.
ClementR. (2005). Bürgerbundeswehr. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 55(21), 3-5.
14.
ClementR. (2007). Auslandseinsätze und Transformation der Bundeswehr. In JägerT.HöseA.OppermannK. (Eds.), Deutsche Außenpolitik: Sicherheit, Wohlfahrt, Institutionen und Normen (pp. 123-140). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
15.
CohenA.CohenS. A. (2020). Beyond the conventional civil–military “gap”: Cleavages and convergences in Israel. Armed Forces and Society, doi: 10.1177/0095327X20903072.
CohnL.ColettaD.FeaverP. (2018). Civil-military relations. In GheciuA.WohlforthW. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international security (pp. 711-726). Oxford University Press.
18.
CollinsJ. J.HolstiO. R. (1999). Civil-military relations: How wide is the gap?International Security, 24(2), 199-207.
19.
CollmerS. (2002). Einstellungsmuster der deutschen Bevölkerung zu Fragen einer Gemeinsamen Europäischen Sicherheitspolitik. In ErnstW.KernicF. (Eds.), Öffentliche Meinung und Europäische Sicherheitspolitik: Eine gesamteuropäische Vergleichsanalyse (pp. 147-197). Nomos.
20.
ConwayM. (2000). Political participation in the United States (3rd ed.). CQ Press.
21.
DurandinC. (2013). Le déclin de l'armée française. François Bourin Editeur.
22.
Eurobarometer (2019). Public opinion in the European Union.European Commission.
23.
FeaverP.KohnR. (Eds.). (2001). Soldiers and civilians: The civil-military gap and American national security. MIT Press.
24.
FeldmeyerK. (2005). Die neue Bundeswehr: Von der Verteidigungs- zur Interventionsarmee. Internationale Politik, 60(6), 68-74.
25.
FleckensteinB. (2000). Germany: Forerunner of a postnational military? In MoskosC.WilliamsJ.SegalD. (Eds.), The postmodern military: Armed forces after the Cold War (pp. 80-100). Oxford University Press.
26.
FleckensteinB.RäderH.-G. (1993). Die neue deutsche Sicherheitspolitik im Meinungsbild der Bevölkerung. Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut der Bundeswehr.
27.
FrankeJ. (2012). Wie integriert ist die Bundeswehr? Eine Untersuchung zur Integrationssituation der Bundeswehr als Verteidigungs- und Einsatzarmee. Nomos.
28.
GreenD.ShapiroI. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. Yale University Press.
29.
HeinsV.WarburgJ. (2004). Kampf der Zivilisten: Militär und Gesellschaft im Wandel. Transcript.
30.
HinesL. A.GribbleR.WesselyS.DandekerC.FearN. T. (2014). Are the armed forces understood and supported by the public? A view from the United Kingdom. Armed Forces & Society, 41(4), 688-713.
31.
HolstiO. R. (1998/99). A widening gap between the military and civilian society? Some evidence 1976-1996. International Security, 23(3), 5-42.
32.
HuntingtonS. (1985 [1957]). The Soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil-military relations (rev. ed.). Harvard University Press.
33.
JanowitzM. (2017 [1960]). The professional soldier: A social and political portrait. Free Press.
34.
KöhlerH. (2005). Einsatz für Freiheit und Sicherheit: Rede von Bundespräsident Horst Köhler bei der Kommandeurtagung der Bundeswehr am 10. Oktober 2005. Bundespräsidialamt.
KümmelG. (2001). Civil-military relations in Germany: Past, present and future. Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut der Bundeswehr.
37.
LaPierreR. T. (1934). Attitudes vs. Actions. Social Forces, 13(2), 230-237.
38.
MilbrathL.GoelM. (1977). Political participation: How and why do people get involved in politics? (2nd ed.). Rand McNally.
39.
MoskosC. C. (1977). From institution to occupation: Trends in military organization. Armed Forces & Society, 4(1), 41-50.
40.
MoskosC. (2000). Toward a postmodern military: the United States as a paradigm. In MoskosC.WilliamsJ.SegalD. (Eds.), The postmodern military: Armed forces after the cold war (pp. 14-31). Oxford University Press.
41.
MoskosC.BurkJ. (1998). The postmodern military. In BurkJ. (Ed.), The adaptive military: Armed forces in a turbulent world (pp. 163-182). Transaction Publishers.
42.
MünklerH. (2007). Heroische und postheroische Gesellschaften. Merkur, 61(700), 742-752.
43.
OlsonM. (2002 [1965]). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups (12th printing). Harvard University Press.
44.
OppK.-D. (1986). Soft incentives and collective action: Participation in the anti-nuclear movement. British Journal of Political Science, 16(1), 87-112.
45.
PfaffenzellerS. (2010). Conscription and democracy: The mythology of civil-military relations. Armed Forces & Society, 36(3), 481-504.
46.
Rahbek-ClemmensenJ.ArcherE. M.BarrJ.BelkinA.GuerreroM.HallC.SwainK. E. O. (2012). Conceptualizing the civil-military gap: A research note. Armed Forces & Society, 38(4), 669-678.
47.
RattingerH. (2009). Einführung in die politische soziologie. Oldenbourg.
48.
ReicheltJ.MeyerJ. (2010). Ruhet in frieden, soldaten! wie politik und Bundeswehr die wahrheit über Afghanistan vertuschten. Fackelträger Verlag.
49.
RobbeR. (2010). Unterrichtung durch den wehrbeauftragten: Jahresbericht 2009. 51. Bericht. Deutscher Bundestag.
RohallD. E.EnderM. G.MatthewsM. D. (2006). The effects of military affiliation, gender, and political ideology on attitudes toward the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Armed Forces & Society, 33(1), 59-77.
52.
RosenbergM.HovlandC. (1960). Cognitive, affective and behavioral components of attitudes. In HovlandC.RosenbergM. (Eds.), Attitude organization and change (pp. 1-14). Yale University Press.
53.
Soldat und Gesellschaft (1981). Die Diskussion des Bundesministers der Verteidigung mit Soldaten und Vertretern gesellschaftlicher Gruppen am 23. und 24. April 1981 in Bonn ‐ Protokoll. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
54.
SteinbrecherM. (2009). Politische Partizipation in Deutschland. Nomos.
55.
SteinbrecherMBiehlH.GrafT. (2019). Sicherheits- und verteidigungspolitisches Meinungsbild in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Ergebnisse und Analysen der Bevölkerungsbefragung 2019. Zentrum für Militärgeschichte und Sozialwissenschaften der Bundeswehr.
56.
SteinmeierF.-W. (2020). Bundespräsident Frank-Walter Steinmeier beim Feierlichen Gelöbnis zum 65. Gründungstag der Bundeswehr am 12. November 2020 in Schloss Bellevue. Bundespräsidialamt.
57.
StrachanH. (2003). The civil-military ‘gap’ in Britain. Journal of Strategic Studies, 26(2), 43-63.
58.
Tiargan-OrrR.Eran-JonaM. (2016). The Israeli public’s perception of the IDF: Stability and change. Armed Forces & Society, 42(2), 324-343.
59.
van der MeulenJ (2004). High confidence, low sacrifice: Paradoxes of civil-military relations. International conference of the joint initiative in German and European studies (pp. 11-13). University of Toronto. March 2004.
60.
VennessonP. (2003). Civil-military relations in France: Is there a gap?Journal of Strategic Studies, 26(2), 29-42.
61.
VerbaS.BradyH.SchlozmanK. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
62.
VerbaS.NieN. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Harper & Row.
63.
von BredowW. (2015). Sicherheit, Sicherheitspolitik und Militär: Deutschland seit der Vereinigung. Springer VS.
64.
WeltzF. (1964). Wie steht es um die Bundeswehr?Nannen Verlag.
65.
WlezienC. (1995). The public as thermostat: Dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 981-1000.
WürichS.SchefferU. (2014). Operation Heimkehr: Bundeswehrsoldaten über ihr Leben nach dem Auslandseinsatz. Ch. Links Verlag.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
