While access to school is one crucial aspect of education equality, there is a lack of research on factors that influence the distance that pupils travel to school. Previous studies have failed to reveal the relationship between pupils’ socio-spatial characteristics and travel distance. This paper uncovers the multilevel structure, ignored hitherto, that underpins the determinants of pupils’ travel distance. Using detailed travel survey data for Beijing and an appropriate multilevel modelling approach, this research reveals that contextual variation remains, having taken account of compositional (individual-level) variables; and that contextual factors, that is, school density and neighbourhood context, are more influential when compared with individual-level factors except for education stage and housing type. The policy implications include improved planning for schools in comparatively deprived areas, increased provision of affordable housing and enhanced education opportunities for migrant children.
BallSJBoweRGewirtzS (1995) Circuits of schooling: A sociological exploration of parental choice of school in social class contexts. The Sociological Review43: 52–78.
2.
BiBZhangX (2016) ‘Attending nearby schools’ in Central Beijing: Influencing factors and the policy distortion. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development4: 31–48.
3.
BrighouseH (2000) School Choice and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
ChenMXZhangWZLuDD (2015) Examining spatial pattern and location choice of affordable housing in Beijing, China: Developing a workable assessment framework. Urban Studies52: 1846–1863.
5.
CurleyAM (2005) Theories of urban poverty and implications for public housing policy. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare32: 97–119.
6.
DadashpoorHRostamiFAlizadehB (2016) Is inequality in the distribution of urban facilities inequitable? Exploring a method for identifying spatial inequity in an Iranian city. Cities52: 159–172.
7.
De La FuenteHRojasCSaladoMJ, et al. (2013) Socio-spatial inequality in education facilities in the Concepción Metropolitan Area (Chile). Current Urban Studies1: 117–129.
8.
FieldingA (2004) The role of the Hausman test and whether higher level effects should be treated as random or fixed. Multilevel Modelling Newsletter16: 3–9.
9.
FieldingA (2010) Module 8, Multilevel Modelling in Practice: Research Questions, Data Preparation and Analysis. LEMMA VLE, University of Bristol, Centre for Multilevel Modelling.
GoldsteinHSilverR (1989) Multilevel and multivariate models in survey analysis. In: SkinnerCJHoltDSmithTMF (eds) Analysis of Complex Surveys. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
12.
GordonIMonastiriotisV (2007) Education, location, education: A spatial analysis of English secondary school public examination results. Urban Studies44: 1203–1228.
13.
GuCChanRCKLiuJ, et al. (2006) Beijing’s socio-spatial restructuring: Immigration and social transformation in the epoch of national economic reformation. Progress in Planning66: 249–310.
14.
HamnettCButlerT (2011) ‘Geography matters’: The role distance plays in reproducing educational inequality in East London. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers36: 479–500.
15.
HamnettCButlerT (2013) Distance, education and inequality. Comparative Education49: 317–330.
16.
IsraelEFrenkelA (2017) Social justice and spatial inequality: Toward a conceptual framework. Progress in Human Geography42: 647–665.
17.
JonesKBullenN (1994) Contextual models of urban house prices: A comparison of fixed-coefficient and random-coefficient models developed by expansion. Economic Geography70: 252–272.
18.
LevinHM (1976) Educational opportunity and social inequality in Western Europe. Social Problems24: 148–172.
19.
LoganJRMincaEAdarS (2012) The geography of inequality: Why separate means unequal in American public schools. Sociology of Education85: 287–301.
20.
MingHH (2014) The Education of Migrant Children and China’s Future: The Urban Left Behind. Abingdon: Routledge.
21.
OECD (2016) Education at A Glance 2016: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
22.
OwenGHarrisRJonesK (2016) Under examination: Multilevel models, geography and health research. Progress in Human Geography40: 394–412.
23.
PacioneM (1989) Access to urban services – The case of secondary schools in Glasgow. The Scottish Geographical Magazine105: 12–18.
24.
PickettKEPearlM (2001) Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: A critical review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health55: 111–122.
25.
RobinsonWS (1950) Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review15: 351–357.
26.
SampsonRJ (2003) The neighborhood context of well-being. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine46: S53–S64.
27.
SenA (2001) Development as Freedom. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
28.
ShuttleworthIGouldM (2010) Distance between home and work: A multilevel analysis of individual workers, neighbourhoods, and employment sites in Northern Ireland. Environment and Planning A42: 1221–1238.
29.
SmallMLNewmanK (2001) Urban poverty after the truly disadvantaged: The rediscovery of the family, the neighborhood, and culture. Annual Review of Sociology27: 23–45.
30.
SojaE (2009) The city and spatial justice. Justice Spatiale / Spatial Justice1: 1–5.
31.
Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (2006) Compulsory Education Law of PRC. Article 12.
32.
SteeleF (2008) Introduction to multilevel modelling – MLwiN practicals. LEMMA VLE Module 5, pp. 1–48.
33.
SubramanianSVJonesKKaddourA, et al. (2009) Revisiting Robinson: The perils of individualistic and ecologic fallacy. International Journal of Epidemiology38: 342–360.
34.
TalenE (2001) School, community, and spatial equity: An empirical investigation of access to elementary schools in West Virginia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers91: 465–486.
WatersJL (2017) Education unbound? Enlivening debates with a mobilities perspective on learning. Progress in Human Geography41: 279–298.
38.
WilliamsSWangF (2014) Disparities in accessibility of public high schools, in metropolitan Baton Rouge, Louisiana 1990–2010. Urban Geography35: 1066–1083.
39.
WithamM (1997) The economics of (not) closing small rural schools. Paper presented at Ph.D. symposium for candidates and supervisors: A focus on rural issues. Townsville, Queensland, Australia, July 1997.
40.
WodtkeGTHardingDJElwertF (2011) Neighborhood effects in temporal perspective: The impact of long-term exposure to concentrated disadvantage on high school graduation. American Sociological Review76: 713–736.
41.
WuQZhangXWaleyP (2016) Jiaoyufication: When gentrification goes to school in the Chinese inner city. Urban Studies53: 3510–3526.
42.
XiangLStillwellJBurnsL, et al. (2018) A geodemographic classification of sub-districts to identify education inequality in Central Beijing. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems70: 59–70.
43.
YangZYiCZhangW, et al. (2014) Affordability of housing and accessibility of public services: Evaluation of housing programs in Beijing. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment29: 521–540.
