Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Aiming at the problems of high cost, increased volume, low reliability, and environmental interference caused by sensor installation on permanent magnet synchronous motor, estimation method for motor speed and rotor position is proposed based on iterated cubature Kalman filter algorithm and applied to permanent magnet synchronous motor sensorless control. First, discrete mathematical model of permanent magnet synchronous motor in α-β coordinate system is established. Then, based on cubature Kalman filter and iterated cubature Kalman filter, simulation model of sensorless vector control system with dual closed-loop of permanent magnet synchronous motor speed and current is established. Also, simulation verification of two working conditions with given rotation speed and load is carried out. Finally, hardware experimental verification platform is built based on TMS320F28335 chip. Both simulation analysis and experimental results show that iterated cubature Kalman filter application to sensorless control of permanent magnet synchronous motor demonstrates good anti-load variation interference, stable motor operation, high motor speed and rotor position estimation accuracy, which suits the application with high requirement for precise motor control and mean important reference value and promotion significance.

Keywords

Iterated cubature Kalman filter permanent magnet synchronous motor sensorless control simulation

Introduction

In recent years, with the continuous improvement and perfection of performance of permanent magnet materials, permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) has gained rapid development. Owing to its simple structure, small size, high power factor, high torque–current ratio, low moment of inertia, easy heat dissipation and maintenance, it is widely applied in electric vehicles, robots, household appliances, numerical control machine tools, aerospace, and so on, occupying an increasingly important position in motor system.¹

In the conventional PMSM control method, mechanical sensors such as resolver, photoelectric encoder, tachogenerator, and so on, are usually used to detect magnetic pole position and rotation speed of motor rotor so that motor speed and torque control is achieved. However, mechanical sensor not only increases volume and cost of PMSM control system, but also is unsuitable for special environments with high temperature, high humidity, high vibration, and so on. More importantly, coaxiality of mechanical sensor and motor installation will also seriously affect motor control accuracy, limiting low cost and high precision development of PMSM. To extend PMSM to high precision application fields, many scholars have carried out fruitful studies on PMSM sensorless control technology.^2,3

PMSM sensorless control technology is to collect part of state quantity (such as current and voltage) of the motor, make real-time estimation of rotor position and speed of the motor through different estimation methods, thus realizing closed-loop control, improving control precision and anti-interference capability, so that various defects on speed control system owing to inaccuracies in application of mechanical sensor feedback data can be avoided.

In recent years, scholars have proposed a variety of control methods for PMSM sensorless control. For example, literatures^4–6 apply high frequency injection method to PMSM sensorless control. This method shows better control effect when motor runs at low speed, but there will be high frequency noise problem during operation at high speed, which requires special hardware for circuit processing and also requires the motor to have a salient pole effect, so the limitations are obvious. Chen et al.⁷ and Wang et al.⁸ propose sliding mode observer method, which has the advantages that the sliding mode is insensitive to system parameter perturbation and external interference, but also faces buffeting problem that affects estimation accuracy and resists improvement of control precision. Literatures^9–11 propose PMSM sensorless control method based on extended Kalman filter (EKF), which achieves good control effect. However, EKF algorithm needs calculation of complex Jacobian matrix, involves big calculation amount, poses high requirements on processor performance, and demands accurate motor mathematical model which is very difficult to achieve. Park and Wang¹² and Liu et al.¹³ propose unscented Kalman filter (UKF) algorithm which has high estimation accuracy. With vector and matrix operations to calculate mean and covariance, there is no need to calculate Jacobian matrix, but it has the disadvantages of long running time, easy filtering, and divergence. Hao and Lu¹⁴ and Liu et al.¹⁵ propose cubature Kalman filter (CKF) algorithm, but CKF has the disadvantages of slow convergence speed and reduced filtering accuracy in case of sudden system state change.

Aiming at the shortcomings of the above methods, such as low estimation accuracy, dependence on motor parameters and computational complexity, this article proposes PMSM sensorless control method based on iterated cubature Kalman filter (ICKF). First, discrete model of PMSM is established by Euler method. Second, PMSM space vector control system is constructed using motor rotor position and speed signal estimated by ICKF algorithm to achieve sensorless control of PMSM. Finally, estimation accuracy of the ICKF algorithm is verified via simulation and motor bench experiment. Compared with CKF algorithm, the proposed estimation algorithm has higher filtering accuracy and stability, and also demonstrates stronger anti-interference to load changes.

PMSM discrete mathematical model

According to the link between PMSM motion characteristics and different physical quantities in motor operation, using the hidden pole PMSM (L = Ld = Lq), nonlinear equation of PMSM based on α-β coordinate system can be obtained via the principle of coordinate transformation, as shown in equation (1)¹⁶

\begin{matrix} \frac{d i_{α}}{dt} = - \frac{R_{S}}{L} I_{α} + \frac{ψ_{m}}{L} ω_{r} \sin θ_{r} + \frac{V_{α}}{L} \\ \frac{d i_{β}}{dt} = - \frac{R_{S}}{L} I_{β} + \frac{ψ_{m}}{L} ω_{r} \cos θ_{r} + \frac{V_{β}}{L} \\ \frac{d ω_{r}}{dt} = \frac{1}{J} (T_{e} - T - D ω_{r}) \\ \frac{d θ_{r}}{dt} = ω_{r} \end{matrix}}

(1)

where L is stator inductance, $I_{α}$ is $α$ shaft current, $I_{β}$ is $β$ shaft current, $R_{s}$ is stator resistance, $ψ_{m}$ is rotor flux, $ω_{r}$ is rotor mechanical angular velocity, $θ_{r}$ is rotor electromagnetic angular position, and J is the rotor’s moment of inertia.

According to formula (1), PMSM nonlinear mathematical model equation can be rewritten into the form of state equation

\begin{matrix} \overset{\cdot}{x} (t) = f (x (t)) + B (u (t)) + υ (t) \\ y (t) = h (x (t)) + ω (t) \end{matrix}}

(2)

where $x (t)$ is state variable defined as $x = [I_{α} I_{β} ω_{r} θ_{r}]^{T}$ ; $u (t)$ is input vector defined as $u = [V_{α} V_{β}]^{T}$ ; $y (t)$ is system output variable defined as $y = [I_{α} I_{β}]^{T}$ . $υ (t)$ is system noise, $ω (t)$ is measured noise, $υ (t)$ and $ω (t)$ are zero mean Gaussian white noise. Q and R are the covariance matrices.

Therefore, by combining equations (1) and (2), it can be obtained that

f (x (t)) = [\begin{matrix} - \frac{R_{S} i_{α}}{L} + \frac{ω_{r} ψ_{m}}{L} \sin θ_{r} \\ - \frac{R_{S} i_{β}}{L} - \frac{ω_{r} ψ_{m}}{L} \cos θ_{r} \\ - \frac{B}{J} \\ ω_{r} \end{matrix}]

(3)

B = [\begin{matrix} \frac{1}{L} & 0 \\ 0 & \frac{1}{L} \\ 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{matrix}]

(4)

h (x (t)) = [\begin{matrix} i_{α} \\ i_{β} \end{matrix}]

(5)

Discretize the mathematical model of PMSM according to Euler method, then

\begin{matrix} x_{n} = F' (x_{n - 1}) + B' U_{n - 1} + υ_{n - 1} \\ y_{n} = H' (x_{n - 1}) + ω_{n - 1} \end{matrix}}

(6)

Let the sampling time be T, then in equation (6)

F' (x_{n - 1}) = [\begin{matrix} (1 - \frac{T R_{S}}{L}) i_{a, n - 1} + \frac{T y_{m} ω_{r, n - 1} \sin θ_{r, n - 1}}{L} \\ (1 - \frac{T R_{S}}{L}) i_{b, n - 1} - \frac{T y_{m} ω_{r, n - 1} \sin θ_{r, n - 1}}{L} \\ (1 - \frac{TB}{J}) ω_{r, n - 1} \\ q_{r, n - 1} + T ω_{r, n - 1} \end{matrix}]

(7)

B' = [\begin{matrix} \frac{T}{L} & 0 \\ 0 & \frac{T}{L} \\ 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{matrix}]

(8)

H' (X_{n - 1}) = [\begin{matrix} i_{α, k} \\ i_{β, k} \end{matrix}]

(9)

According to equations (2)–(9), a discrete mathematical model of PMSM based on ICKF algorithm can be established.

ICKF algorithm

CKF algorithm is a recently proposed filter algorithm for nonlinear systems. Based on spherical-radial cubature criterion, through new points generated after transfer of some cubature points with equal weights by nonlinear system equation, the algorithm predicts system state of the next moment. There is no need to linearize the system model,^17–19 CKF has advantages of slow convergence rate and decreased filtering accuracy in case of sudden change of the system state.

In this article, Gauss-Newton iterative algorithm is fused to CKF algorithm, and ICKF algorithm-based PMSM sensorless control method is proposed. The specific process is as follows:

For a discrete nonlinear system, its state equation and measurement equation can be written as

\begin{matrix} x_{k + 1} = f (x_{k}) + u_{k} \\ y_{k} = h (x_{k}) + v_{k} \end{matrix}}

(10)

$x_{k}$ is state vector of the system, $y_{k}$ measurement value of the system; $f (\cdot)$ is nonlinear state transition equation of the system, $h (\cdot)$ is nonlinear measurement equation; $u_{k}$ indicates system process noise, $v_{k}$ indicates measurement noise of the system, $u_{k}$ and $v_{k}$ are independent Gaussian white noise sequences, which meet $u_{k} ~ N (0, {σ^{2}}_{u_{k}})$ , $v_{k} ~ N (0, {σ^{2}}_{v_{k}})$ , ${σ^{2}}_{u_{k}}$ and ${σ^{2}}_{v_{k}}$ are covariance matrix of $u_{k}$ and $v_{k}$ , respectively.

CKF algorithm produces a set of equal-weight volume points via spherical-radial cubature criterion, and then calculates mean and covariance of the nonlinearly transformed random variables in accordance with volume numerical integration principle. That is, CKF algorithm first calculates the basic volume point and the corresponding weight using equations (11) and (12)

ξ_{i} = \sqrt{\frac{m}{2}} {[\begin{matrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ ⋮ \\ 0 \end{matrix}], \dots, [\begin{matrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ ⋮ \\ 1 \end{matrix}], [\begin{matrix} - 1 \\ 0 \\ ⋮ \\ 0 \end{matrix}], \dots, [\begin{matrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ ⋮ \\ - 1 \end{matrix}]}

(11)

ω_{i} = \frac{1}{m}

(12)

In the formula, $ξ_{i}$ represents the basic volume point, $m$ represents the number of volume points, and $ω_{i}$ represents the weight of each volume point. According to the third-order spherical-phase path volume principle, the number of selected volume points is twice that of the state vector dimension. That is, when the dimension of the state space vector is $n_{x}$ , $m = 2 n_{x}$ .

After the volume point is obtained, these volume points are transmitted through the nonlinear system to obtain a more accurate posterior mean and covariance. Then, combine the state prediction and measurement update ideas in Kalman filter to estimate the system state.

The flow of ICKF algorithm is as follows:

I. Time update

1. Assuming that the state covariance matrix $P_{k}$ at the moment is positive definite, the covariance matrix is subjected to Cholesky decomposition

S_{k} = chol (P_{k})

(13)

2. Calculate the volume point $X_{k, i} (i = 1, 2, \dots, m)$

X_{k, i} = S_{k} ξ_{i} + {\hat{x}}_{k}

(14)

where $ξ_{i}$ represents basic volume point generated by application formula (11), and ${\hat{x}}_{k}$ represents the optimal estimation of the time state ${\hat{x}}_{k}$ .

3. Calculate the volume point propagated through nonlinear equation of state

X_{k + 1, i} = f (X_{k, i})

(15)

4. Calculate the state prediction value ${\bar{x}}_{k + 1}$ by using the volume point after the state transition

{\bar{x}}_{k + 1} = \sum_{i = 1}^{m} ω_{i} X_{k + 1, i}

(16)

5. Calculate the state error covariance ${\bar{P}}_{k + 1}$

{\bar{P}}_{k + 1} = \sum_{i = 1}^{m} {ω_{i} X_{k + 1, i} (X_{k + 1, i})}^{T} - {\bar{x}}_{k + 1} {({\bar{x}}_{k + 1})}^{T} + {σ_{u_{k}}}^{2}

(17)

II. Measurement update

1. ${\bar{p}}_{k + 1}$ generated in equation (17) is further subjected to Cholesky decomposition

S_{k + 1} = chol ({\bar{P}}_{k + 1})

(18)

2. Generate a new volume point ${\tilde{X}}_{k + 1, i}$

{\tilde{X}}_{k + 1, i} = S_{k + 1} x_{i} + {\bar{x}}_{k + 1}

(19)

3. Measure the newly generated volume points by nonlinear equation

y_{k + 1, i} = h ({\tilde{X}}_{k + 1, i})

(20)

4. Calculate the measured predicted value ${\hat{y}}_{k + 1}$

{\hat{y}}_{k + 1} = \sum_{i = 1}^{m} ω_{i} y_{k + 1, i}

(21)

5. Calculate the measured auto-covariance $P_{k + 1}^{y y}$ and cross-covariance $P_{k + 1}^{x y}$

P_{k + 1}^{y y} = \sum_{i = 1}^{m} ω_{i} y_{k + 1, i} {(y_{k + 1, i})}^{T} - {\hat{y}}_{k + 1} {({\hat{y}}_{k + 1})}^{T} + σ_{v_{k}}^{2}

(22)

P_{k + 1}^{x y} = \sum_{i = 1}^{m} ω_{i} {\tilde{X}}_{k + 1, i} {(y_{k + 1, I})}^{T} - {\bar{x}}_{k + 1} {({\hat{y}}_{k + 1})}^{T}

(23)

6. Calculate Kalman filter gain $K_{k + 1}$

K_{k + 1} = P_{k + 1}^{x y} {(P_{k + 1}^{y y})}^{- 1}

(24)

7. Update state estimate

x_{k + 1} = {\bar{x}}_{k + 1} + K_{k + 1} (y_{k + 1} - {\hat{y}}_{k + 1})

(25)

8. Update error covariance estimate of the state

P_{K + 1} = {\bar{P}}_{K + 1} - K_{K + 1} P_{k + 1}^{y y} {(K_{k + 1})}^{T}

(26)

The above two processes of time update and measurement update represent a standard CKF update process.

III. Iteration update

The difference between the implementation of ICKF algorithm and CKF algorithm lies in measurement update. ICKF algorithm introduces Gauss-Newton iterative algorithm into the update of mean and covariance of state. For solution of $x_{k + 1}$ at the moment $k + 1$ by standard CKF algorithm, one-step predicted results ${\bar{x}}_{k + 1}$ and ${\bar{P}}_{k + 1}$ are adopted in measurement update. In measurement update of ICKF algorithm, Gauss-Newton iterative algorithm is used to iterate the existing prediction results ${\bar{x}}_{k + 1}$ and covariance ${\bar{P}}_{k + 1}$ , and the defined cost function takes the minimum value as the iteration end condition to solve the values of $x_{k + 1}$ and $P_{k + 1}$ , so estimated value of ICKF algorithm is closer to the true value. The overall architecture of the two algorithms is consistent, the hardware requirements are the same, and the difference in computational complexity is not obvious. ICKF algorithm flow chart is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

ICKF algorithm flow chart.

ICKF’s measurement update is as follows

1. Define the cost function as

\begin{matrix} J (x_{k + 1}) = & {(x_{k + 1} - {\bar{x}}_{k + 1})}^{T} {\bar{P}}_{K + 1}^{- 1} (x_{k + 1} - {\bar{x}}_{k + 1}) \\ + {(y_{k + 1} - h ({\bar{x}}_{k + 1})}^{T} R_{K + 1}^{- 1} (y_{k + 1} - h ({\bar{x}}_{k + 1}) \end{matrix}

(27)

2. Solve the minimum value point of the cost function using Gauss-Newton nonlinear iterative method, and the iterative formula for $J (x_{k + 1})$ to achieve minimum value can be obtained as

\begin{matrix} x_{k + 1}^{(j + 1)} = & {\bar{x}}_{k + 1} + {\bar{P}}_{k + 1} {(H_{k + 1}^{(j)})}^{T} {(H_{k + 1}^{(j)} {\bar{P}}_{K + 1} {(H_{k + 1}^{(j)})}^{T} + R_{K + 1})}^{- 1} \\ \cdot [y_{k + 1} - ({hx}_{k + 1}^{(j)}) - H_{k + 1}^{(j)} ({\bar{x}}_{k + 1}) - x_{k + 1}^{(j)}] \end{matrix}

(28)

where j represents the j-th iteration, $H_{k + 1}^{j} = \partial h (x_{k + 1}) / \partial x_{k + 1} |_{x_{k + 1} = x_{k + 1}^{(j)}}$

In equation (28), $(H_{k + 1}^{(j)} {\bar{P}}_{K + 1} (H_{k + 1}^{(j)})^{T} + R_{K + 1})$ and ${\bar{P}}_{k + 1} (H_{k + 1}^{(j)})^{T}$ are auto-covariance and cross-covariance of the approximate state measurement, which are obtained after linearization of measurement equation, that is,

P_{k + 1}^{yy (j)} = H_{k + 1}^{(j)} {\bar{P}}_{K + 1} {(H_{k + 1}^{(j)})}^{T} + R_{K + 1}

(29)

P_{k + 1}^{xy (j)} = {\bar{P}}_{k + 1} {(H_{k + 1}^{(j)})}^{T}

(30)

3. ICKF algorithm uses the newly generated volume point ${\tilde{X}}_{K + 1, i}^{(j)}$ and the corresponding measurement value $y_{K + 1, i}^{(j)}$ in the j-th iteration to calculate $P_{k + 1}^{y y (j)}$ , $P_{k + 1}^{x y (j)}$ , and $K_{k + 1}^{(j)}$ according to equations (22)–(24), so that state estimation $x_{k + 1}^{(j + 1)}$ and covariance $P_{k + 1}^{(j + 1)}$ are updated by measurement value iteration at the current moment.

Then $x_{k + 1}^{(j + 1)}$ and $P_{k + 1}^{(j + 1)}$ can be expressed as

x_{k + 1}^{(j + 1)} = {\bar{x}}_{k + 1} + K_{k + 1}^{j} [y_{k + 1} - h (x_{k + 1}^{(j)}) - {(P_{k + 1}^{x y (j)})}^{T} {\hat{P}}_{k + 1}^{- 1} ({\bar{x}}_{k + 1} - x_{k + 1}^{(j)})]

(31)

P_{k + 1}^{(j + 1)} = {\bar{P}}_{k + 1} - K_{k + 1}^{(j)} (P_{k + 1}^{y y (j)}) {(K_{k + 1}^{(j)})}^{T}

(32)

4. Set the iteration end condition:

‖ x_{k + 1}^{j + 1} - x_{k + 1}^{j} ‖ \leq ε or j = N_{\max}

(33)

where $ε$ and $N_{\max}$ are, respectively, the pre-set threshold and the maximum number of iterations.

Therefore, when the number of iterations is N, the state estimation and covariance at time k+1 are

\begin{matrix} x_{k + 1} = x_{k + 1}^{(N)} \\ P_{k + 1} = P_{k + 1}^{(N)} \end{matrix}}

(34)

ICKF-based PMSM vector control

PMSM control system is a nonlinear, strongly coupled, multivariable time-varying parameter system. The rotor position signal is a crucial parameter in the control process. To overcome the shortcomings caused by the mechanical position sensor, sensorless control is currently commonly adopted.

Since this article mainly studies ICKF algorithm-based PMSM sensorless control, vector control method is adopted. The core of PMSM vector control algorithm is coordinate transformation which includes static coordinate transformation (Clark transformation) and synchronous rotational coordinate transformation (Park transformation). The coordinate relationship between natural coordinate system ABC, stationary coordinate system α-β, and synchronous rotating coordinate system d-q is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Relationship between the three coordinate systems.

The idea of motor vector control method is inspired by the fact that armature current and excitation current of DC motor are perpendicular to each other, without coupling and allowing independent control. By vector transformation, the stator three-phase current of AC motor is decomposed to realize the control of stator current magnitude and direction, thus achieving the purpose of decoupling direct axis and quadrature axis components, and making them into mutually perpendicular and independent torque current components and excitation components, so that AC motor has similar control performance as DC motor.^20,21

Based on the previous ICKF, PMSM discrete mathematical model and PMSM vector control method, the ICKF-based PMSM sensorless vector control system established in Matlab/Simulink environment is shown in Figure 3. The system adopts a double closed-loop control scheme of speed and current, and both the speed loop and the current loop use a PI regulator.²²

Figure 3.

ICKF-based PMSM sensorless vector control block diagram.

According to Figure 3, the control system includes two core modules of two-level space vector modulation (SVPWM) and ICKF algorithm estimation, where SVPWM is derived from the principle that AC motor stator flux linkage tracks a circular trajectory. To make inverter output sine wave and control torque ripple to obtain better performance, this article adopts SVPWM technology to control PWM with the controller and PMSM as a whole. ICKF algorithm estimation module is established by S function of Matlab/Simulink. The input currents $i_{α}$ and $i_{β}$ are obtained by coordinate transformation of the actual measured phase current. The input voltage $u_{α}^{*}$ and $u_{β}^{*}$ are also instruction values of the input SVPWM module, and the instruction value can more truly reflect motor terminal voltage, avoiding the error caused by motor (PMSM) voltage measurement in the conventional method. The output signal is an estimate of motor speed and rotor position; the rotation speed signal is fed back to achieve closed-loop control of rotation speed; the position signal is used for field orientation.

Simulation analysis

According to the above analysis, PMSM sensorless vector control models based on CKF and ICKF are established in Matlab/Simulink environment, respectively, and simulation under two working conditions with given rotation speed and load is carried out.

Some PMSM parameters are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Some PMSM parameters.

Rated power $P_{e}$	1.2 kw
Rated rotation speed $N_{e} min^{- 1}$	1500 r/min
Stator winding inductance $L (L_{d} = L_{q})$	0.000835 H
Stator phase winding resistance $R_{S}$	2.875 Ω
Moment of inertia $J$	0.008 kg·m²
Moment of inertia $D$	0.002 N·m·S
Permanent magnet flux $ψ_{m}$	0.175 wb
Number of pole pairs $P_{n}$	4

After a lot of trials and errors, under the premise of ensuring convergence and dynamic tracking, the system process noise covariance matrix ${σ^{2}}_{u_{k}} = diag [0.01 0.02 0.240.001]$ , noise covariance matrix ${σ^{2}}_{v_{k}} = diag [0.01 0.01]$ , and initial error covariance matrix $P = diag [0.10.1500.1]$ are obtained.

1. Simulation conditions with no load at a given rotation speed of 1000 r/min.

Figures 4 –7 show the PMSM simulation results with no load at a given rotation speed of 1000 r/min.

Figure 4.

Comparison curve of estimated and actual values of PMSM rotation speed under no load.

Figure 5.

Comparison curve of PMSM speed estimation error under no load.

Figure 6.

Comparison curve of estimated and actual values of PMSM rotor position under no load.

Figure 7.

Comparison curve of PMSM rotor position estimation error under no load.

According to Figures 4 and 5, compared with CKF algorithm, ICKF algorithm can estimate PMSM rotation speed more accurately. When CKF algorithm is adopted, there exists big error value in rotation speed estimation when the motor speed rises, and the instantaneous maximum error can exceed 1000 r/min. However, ICKF algorithm has much smaller error value, with instantaneous maximum error less than 20 r/min, and stable and accurate estimation result is achieved in a shorter period of time. When the motor speed rises to a given rotation speed of 1000 r/min, the rotation speed estimation value only fluctuates slightly above and below the given rotation speed, tending to decrease gradually with time. It demonstrates that PMSM sensorless control using ICKF algorithm has better stability and convergence than CKF algorithm regardless the startup phase or the given speed operation phase. From the start of the PMSM to the stable operation phase, the ICKF algorithm has a higher accuracy for estimating the motor speed.

According to Figures 6 and 7, ICKF algorithm performs better in motor rotor position estimation. In the motor startup phase, ICKF algorithm and CKF algorithm show no obvious superiority in rotor position estimation, but after the motor runs stably, ICKF algorithm has much smaller estimation error and better convergence than CKF algorithm. Therefore, ICKF algorithm can estimate motor rotor position more accurately than CKF algorithm.

2. At t = 0.2 s, the load torque changes from 0 $N \cdot m$ to 5 $N \cdot m$ in simulation condition.

In order to verify the anti-interference ability of ICKF algorithm-based PMSM sensorless control system in case of sudden change in motor load torque, during the simulation, the load torque $N \dot{m}$ is suddenly applied at t = 0.2 s, with the simulation results shown in Figures 8 –11.

Figure 8.

Comparison curve between estimated and actual values of PMSM rotation speed under sudden load.

Figure 9.

Comparison curve of PMSM rotation speed estimation error under sudden load.

Figure 10.

Comparison of estimated and actual PMSM rotor position values under sudden load.

Figure 11.

Comparison curve of PMSM rotor position estimation error under sudden load.

According to Figures 8 –11, ICKF algorithm-based PMSM sensorless control system can better resist interference of sudden load change than CKF algorithm-based PMSM sensorless control system. When t = 0.2 s, after the load torque 5 $N \cdot m$ is suddenly applied, rotation speed and position estimation value based on ICKF algorithm can better match the actual motor speed value with rapid response. However, in case of CKF algorithm-based PMSM sensorless control system, estimation value of CKF algorithm cannot reach the given rotation speed quickly after the motor reaches a given rotation speed. There exists a certain fluctuation range of error compared with the actual given rotation speed of the motor, about 10 r/min. Therefore, in terms of anti-load interference, ICKF algorithm-based PMSM sensorless control system shows better performance.

The above simulation analysis shows that ICKF algorithm can estimate motor speed and rotor position more accurately by selecting appropriate controller parameters. Application of ICKF algorithm to PMSM sensorless control can meet the demands of more precise PMSM control. At the same time, it can be seen from the simulation that the result of the ICKF algorithm is very timely, and the response to the actual value changes quickly. The maximum delay of the estimated value and the actual value is about 0.02 s, which is more timely than the response of the CKF algorithm. Execution is more efficient.

Bench experiment

In order to further verify the actual control effect of ICKF algorithm-based PMSM sensorless control system, a hardware experimental platform as shown in Figure 12 was established. The experimental platform includes a host computer, a motor-driven experiment box, a PMSM and a loading motor for load application. The motor-driven experiment box includes a control circuit and a drive circuit, where the control circuit takes DSP chip TMS320F28335 produced by TI as the main control chip, which provides sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SVPWM) signal for three-phase controllable inverter circuit in the drive circuit. The inverter output is used to drive the controlled PMSM. The nameplate parameters of the experimental PMSM are consistent with the motor parameters set in previous simulation experiment, as shown in Table 1. The rotation speed and position signals obtained by CKF algorithm-based mechanical sensors in the comparative experiment are not involved in closed-loop control and are only used for comparison of experimental results.

Figure 12.

ICKF-based three-phase PMSM sensorless control experimental platform.

Run the CCS3.3 software in the host computer, connect the motor-driven experiment box with the host computer through the simulator, open and compile the three-phase PMSM sensorless vector control model based on CKF and ICKF algorithm in Matlab/Simulink environment, then C language code for DSP is automatically generated using cSPACE experimental device. After the code is generated, it is downloaded to the main processor TMS320F28335 DSP of the motor-driven experimental box through the emulator for online debugging, and PMSM movement is controlled via parameter adjustment. The host computer receives data using serial port tool, and the experimental result map is drawn using Matlab software.

To verify the simulation results of the two working conditions set by simulation analysis, in the bench experiment, working condition was set as no load at rotation speed of 1000 r/min in the 0~0.2s time period, and 5 $N \cdot m$ load torque was applied at 0.2 s. The experimental results are shown in Figures 13 –16.

Figure 13.

PMSM rotation speed estimation curve.

Figure 14.

PMSM speed estimation error curve.

Figure 15.

PMSM rotor position estimation curve.

Figure 16.

PMSM rotor position estimation error curve.

According to Figures 13 –16, ICKF algorithm can more accurately estimate motor speed and rotor position compared with CKF algorithm. It can be seen from Figures 13 and 14 that in the PMSM startup phase, the motor speed value estimated by ICKF algorithm is less fluctuated than that estimated by CKF, which is more close to the actual motor speed. After the motor operates smoothly, the rotational speed estimation is more accurate, with the estimated speed value slightly fluctuating around the actual value and with the error in gradual decrease. It can be seen from Figures 15 and 16 that ICKF algorithm can more accurately estimate motor rotor position than CKF algorithm, with smaller motor rotor position error and stronger resistance to sudden change in load, thus accurately reflecting motor rotor position. Through the bench experiment, it can be seen that the ICKF algorithm responds quickly to the change of the actual value. The delay of the estimated value and the actual value is controlled within 0.02 s. Compared with the CKF algorithm, the response is more timely and the execution efficiency is higher. The above experimental results verify the conclusions of simulation analysis and further demonstrate that the proposed ICKF-based PMSM rotor speed and position estimation algorithm has higher filtering accuracy and better anti-interference to load changes.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis of defects in traditional mechanical sensor-based PMSM control system and the existing sensorless control methods, this article proposes an ICKF-based PMSM sensorless control method. The discrete model of PMSM is established by Euler method. The ICKF-based PMSM sensorless vector control model is established according to the principle of ICKF algorithm, and the simulation analysis and bench experiment are done. Both analogue simulation and bench experiments have confirmed that, compared with CKF algorithm with good effect, ICKF algorithm can more accurately estimate PMSM rotation speed and rotor position, showing the advantages of small error, strong resistance to interference of sudden load change. It demonstrates that ICKF-based PMSM sensorless control has better control effect than CKF-based sensorless control as a good sensorless control method worthy of wider applications. For high temperature, high humidity, high vibration, and other harsh environments that are not suitable for sensor operation, if the PMSM is required to have high control precision, strong resistance to interference of sudden load change, and timely response, our research will be able to solve such problems better. In the future, based on the research of this article, we will make more research around further improving the PMSM sensorless control accuracy and simplifying the algorithm calculation process.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors thank the financial supports of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.51575001, No.51605003), Anhui University Scientific Research Platform Innovation Team Building Projects (2016–2018), and Young and Middle-Aged Top-Notch Talent Project of Anhui Polytechnic University (2016BJRC010).

ORCID iD

Shi Peicheng

Author biographies

Shi Peicheng received the Doctor of Engineering degree from HeFei University of Technology, Hefei, China, in 2010. His current research interests include motor control, new energy vehicle, vibration and control of Machinery and Automobile.

Wang Chen received the Master of Engineering degree from Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, China, in 2018. His current research interests include motor control and new energy vehicle.

Zhang Rongyun received the Doctor of Engineering degree from HeFei University of Technology, Hefei, China, in 2015. His current research interests include motor control and new energy vehicle.

Wang Suo received the Master of Engineering degree from Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, China, in 2018. His current research interests include motor control and new energy vehicle.

References

Tan

, et al. A review of sensorless control technology of permanent magnet synchronous motor. Trans China Electrotech Soc 2009; 24(11): 14–20.

Pan

Gao

Summarization of sensorless control technology for permanent magnet synchronous motor. Micromotors 2018; 3: 62–69.

Lee

Jin

, et al. Field-weakening strategy in condition of DC-link voltage variation using on electric vehicle of IPMSM. In: International conference on electrical machines and systems, Beijing, China, 20–23 August 2011, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.

Zhang

Yang

, et al. Review on sensorless control of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on high-frequency signal injection. Trans China Electrotech Soc 2018; 33(12): 2653–2664.

Dhamo

Spahiu

Nemec

, et al. Sliding-mode observer for IPMSM sensorless control by MTPA control strategy. IFAC Papers OnLine 2016; 49(29): 152–157.

Lan

Chen

Liao

, et al. Permanent magnet synchronous motor control strategies based on high-frequency pulsating voltage injection method. Small Spec Electr Mach 2017; 45(2): 65–6873.

Chen

Luo

PMSM sensorless control with separate control strategies and smooth switch from low speed to high speed. ISA Trans 2015; 58: 650–658.

Wang

Zhang

, et al. Quadrature PLL-based high-order sliding-mode observer for IPMSM sensorless control with online MTPA control strategy. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 2013; 28(1): 214–224.

Bolognani

Tubiana

Zigliotto

Extended Kalman filter tuning in sensorless PMSM drives. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2003; 39(6): 1741–1747.

10.

Gao

Xie

Zhu

Speed and rotor position estimation of sensorless PMSM based on EKF. Electr Sci Tech 2017; 30(12): 55–58.

11.

Yang

Long

, et al. Current sensorless predictive control based on extended Kalman filter for PMSM drives. In: IEEE transportation electrification conference and expo, Asia-Pacific, Harbin, China, 7–10 August 2017, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.

12.

Park

Wang

Sensorless direct torque control of surface-mounted permanent magnet synchronous motors with nonlinear Kalman filtering. Energies 2018; 11(4): 1–19.

13.

Liu

Yang

Wang

, et al. Sensorless technology of permanent magnet synchronous motor vector control based on unscented Kalman filter algorithm. Value Eng 2016; 35(4): 111–114.

14.

Hao

Reduced high-degree strong tracking cubature Kalman filter and its application in integrated navigation system. Contr Decis 2018; 10: 1–11.

15.

Liu

Zhang

Chu

Cubature Kalman filter with bounded constraints. Period Ocean Univ China 2018; 48(6): 109–113.

16.

She

Wei

Dong

, et al. Extended Kalman filters combined with feed-forward compensation for permanent magnet synchronous motor position estimation. Contr Theory Appl 2016; 33(10): 1312–1318.

17.

Wang

Iterated cubature Kalman particle filter algorithm. J Southeast Univ 2013; 43: 85–88.

18.

Cai

Iterated cubature Kalman filter and its application. Syst Eng Electr 2011; 33(7): 1454–1457.

19.

Yuan

Zhang

, et al. Novel neural network training algorithm based on iterated cubature Kalman Filter. Comp Sci 2016; 43: 256–261.

20.

Dong

Yang

Research on the control strategy of the sensorless permanent magnet synchronous motor. Ind Instrument Automat 2018; 2: 8–14.

21.

Zhang

Cheng

XF.

Sensorless control of permanent magnet synchronous motors and EKF parameter tuning research. Mathemat Prob Eng 2016; 8: 1–12.

22.

Yan

Zhang

Sensorless control of permanent magnet synchronous motors based on MRAS. J Mech Electr Eng 2015; 32(9): 1222–1228.

Research on sensorless control method of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on iterated cubature Kalman filter

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

PMSM discrete mathematical model

ICKF algorithm

ICKF-based PMSM vector control

Simulation analysis

Bench experiment

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

Author biographies

References