According to democratic theory, policy responsiveness is a key characteristic of democratic government: citizens’ preferences should affect policy outcomes. Empirically, however, the connection between public opinion and policy is not self-evident and is increasingly challenged. Using an originally constructed data set with information from 21 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries between 1980 and 2014, our research design allows for a comprehensive investigation of the linkages between ideological positions of citizens, parliaments and cabinets on one hand, and redistributive policies in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries on the other hand. We find that the role of the cabinet is more important than that of parliament. Although citizens’ left–right positions do not have an effect (directly or indirectly) on the level of social expenditure, there is a connection between mass preferences and the ideological position of parliament and government in high-turnout contexts.
AchenCHBartelsL (2016) Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AdamsJDowJMerrillS (2006) The Political Consequences of Alienation-based and Indifference-based Voter Abstention. Political Behavior28 (1): 65–86.
3.
BaronRKennyD (1986) The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51 (6): 1173–1182.
4.
BartelsLHecloHHeroR, et al. (2005) Inequality and American Governance. New York: Russell SAGE.
5.
BeckN (2008) Time-Series-Cross-Section Methods. In: Box-SteffensmeierJMBradyHECollierD (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.475–493.
6.
BeckNKatzJ (2011) Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series-Cross-Section Political Economy Data. Annual Review of Political Science14: 331–352.
7.
BlaisABodetM (2006) Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence between Citizens and Policy Makers?Comparative Political Studies39 (10): 1243–1262.
8.
BlaisANadeauR (1992) The Electoral Budget Cycle. Public Choice74 (4): 389–403.
9.
BlaisABlakeDDionS (1993) Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies. American Journal of Political Science37 (1): 40–62.
10.
BormannNGolderM (2013) Democratic Electoral Systems around the World, 1946–2011. Electoral Studies32 (2): 360–369.
11.
CampbellA (2012) Policy Makes Mass Politics. Annual Review of Political Science15: 333–351.
CostelloRThomsonR (2008) Election Pledges and their Enactment in Coalition Governments. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties18 (3): 239–256.
14.
DahlR (1989) Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
DahlR (1998) On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
DaltonR (2008) The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems. Comparative Political Studies41 (7): 899–920.
17.
De VriesCHakhverdianALanceeB (2013) The Dynamics of Voters’ Left/Right Identification. Political Science Research and Methods1 (2): 223–238.
18.
DöringHManowP (2016) Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov). Development Version. Available at: www.parlgov.org (accessed 29 March 2016).
19.
DreherASturmJUrsprungH (2008) The Impact of Globalization on the Composition of Government Expenditures. Public Choice134 (3–4): 263–292.
20.
EriksonR (2015) Income Inequality and Policy Responsiveness. Annual Review of Political Science18: 11–29.
21.
EriksonRMacKuenMStimsonJ (2002) The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
EzrowLde VriesCSteenbergenM, et al. (2011) Mean Voter Representation and Partisan Constituency Representation. Party Politics17 (3): 275–301.
23.
FerlandB (2016) Revisiting the Ideological Congruence Controversy. European Journal of Political Research55 (2): 358–373.
24.
FortunatoDRandolph StevensonTVonnahmeG (2016) Context and Political Knowledge: Explaining Cross-National Variation in Partisan Left-Right Knowledge. Journal of Politics78 (4): 1211–1228.
25.
FranzeseR (2002) Macroeconomic Policies of Developed Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
GolderMFerlandB (2017) Electoral Systems and Citizen-Elite Ideological Congruence. In: HerronEPekkanenRShugartM (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.213–246.
28.
HellwigT (2008) Explaining the Salience of Left–Right Ideology in Postindustrial Democracies. European Journal of Political Research47 (6): 687–709.
29.
HicksASwankD (1992) Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960–1982. American Political Science Review86 (3): 658–674.
30.
HicksRTingleyD (2011) Causal Mediation Analysis. Stata Journal11 (4): 605–619.
31.
HillKLeighleyJ (1992) The Policy Consequences of Class Bias in State Electorates. American Journal of Political Science36 (2): 351–365.
32.
HillKJordanSHurleyP (2015) Representation in Congress: A Unified Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
HillKLeighleyJHinton-AnderssonA (1995) Lower-Class Mobilization and Policy Linkage in the U.S. States. American Journal of Political Science39 (1): 75–86.
34.
HoboltSKlemmensenR (2005) Responsive Government? Public Opinion and Government Policy Preferences in Britain and Denmark. Political Studies53 (2): 379–402.
35.
HoogheMOserJ (2016) Trade Union Density and Social Expenditure. A Longitudinal Analysis of Policy Feedback Effects in OECD Countries, 1980–2010. Journal of European Public Policy23 (10): 1520–1542.
36.
ImaiKJoBStuartE (2010) Using Potential Outcomes to Understand Causal Mediation Analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research46 (5): 861–873.
37.
ImbeauLPétryFLamariM (2001) Left-Right Party Ideology and Government Policies: A Meta-analysis. European Journal of Political Research40 (1): 1–29.
38.
KangSPowellGB (2010) Representation and Policy Responsiveness: The Median Voter, Election Rules, and Redistributive Welfare Spending. Journal of Politics72 (4): 1014–1028.
39.
KeyVO (1961) Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.
40.
KimHFordingR (1998) Voter Ideology in Western Democracies, 1946–1989. European Journal of Political Research33 (1): 73–97.
41.
KimHFordingR (2003) Voter Ideology in Western Democracies: An Update. European Journal of Political Research42 (1): 95–105.
42.
LarcineseV (2007) Voting over Redistribution and the Size of the Welfare State: The Role of Turnout. Political Studies55 (3): 568–585.
43.
LeighleyJOserJ (2018) Representation in an Era of Political and Economic Inequality: How and When Citizen Engagement Matters. Perspectives on Politics16 (2): 328–344.
44.
LesschaeveC (2017) The Predictive Power of the Left-Right Self-placement Scale for the Policy Positions of Voters and Parties. West European Politics40 (2): 357–377.
45.
LijphartA (1997) Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma. American Political Science Review91 (1): 1–14.
46.
LoweWBenoitKMikhaylovS, et al. (2011) Scaling Policy Preferences from Coded Political Texts. Legislative Studies Quarterly36 (1): 123–155.
47.
MahlerV (2008) Electoral Turnout and Income Redistribution by the State: A Cross-National Analysis of the Developed Democracies. European Journal of Political Research47 (2): 161–183.
48.
MahlerVJesuitDParadowskiP (2014) Electoral Turnout and State Redistribution: A Cross-National Study of Fourteen Developed Countries. Political Research Quarterly67 (2): 361–373.
49.
MillJS (1861) Considerations on Representative Government. London: Routledge.
50.
MillerWStokesD (1963) Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review57 (1): 45–56.
51.
MoeneKWallersteinM (2003) Earnings Inequality and Welfare Spending: A Disaggregated Analysis. World Politics55 (4): 485–516.
PageBShapiroR (1983) Effects of Public Opinion on Policy. American Political Science Review77 (1): 175–190.
54.
PowellGBJr (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy. Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55.
PowellGBJr (2009) The Ideological Congruence Controversy. The Impact of Alternative Measures, Data, and Time Periods on the Effects of Election Rules. Comparative Political Studies42 (12): 1475–1497.
56.
RigbyEWrightG (2013) Political Parties and Representation of the Poor in the American States. American Journal of Political Science57 (3): 552–565.
57.
RuedaD (2018) Food Comes First, Then Morals: Redistribution Preferences, Parochial Altruism, and Immigration in Western Europe. Journal of Politics80 (1): 225–239.
58.
SchmidtM (1996) When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy. European Journal of Political Research30 (2): 155–183.
59.
SorokaSWlezienC (2010) Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
StimsonJMackuenMEriksonR (1995) Dynamic Representation. American Political Science Review89 (3): 543–565.
61.
TsebelisG (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
WarwickPZakharovaM (2013) Measuring the Median: The Risks of Inferring Beliefs from Votes. British Journal of Political Science43 (1): 157–175.
63.
WlezienCSorokaS (2012) Political Institutions and the Opinion-Policy Link. West European Politics35 (6): 1407–1432.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
