This article focuses on the politics of electoral system change and its effects on the process of democratic consolidation in Croatia. After the first decade of democratisation when electoral rules were strategically engaged in order to secure one-party domination, the consensual introduction of proportional representation in 1999 marked the start of the full-scale consolidation of democracy. However, after only a decade, when faced with strong pressure caused by a deep economic recession and omnipresent political corruption, democracy in Croatia started to deteriorate, followed by significantly lower levels of trust in representative institutions and widespread citizen disaffection with the functioning of democracy. The proportional representation system was identified as the main cause of the crisis of Croatian democracy, raising strong critical voices asking for its reform or even replacement. The Croatian case thus shows that the interplay between electoral institutions and democratic (de)consolidation is far from being straightforward.
BecherMMenéndez GonzálezIStegmuellerD (2021) Proportional Representation and Populism: Evidence from Electoral System Change in Europe. British Journal of Political Science.
2.
BenoitK (2004) Models of Electoral System Change. Electoral Studies23 (3): 363–389.
3.
BirchS (2003) Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-communist Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BirchS (2005) District Electoral Systems and Democratic Transition. Electoral Studies24 (2): 281–301.
5.
BirchSMillardFPopescuM, et al. (2002) Embodying Democracy: Electoral System Design in Post-communist Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BlaisADionS (1990) Electoral Systems and the Consolidation of New Democracies. In: EthierD (ed.) Democratic Transition and Consolidation in Southern Europe, Latin America and Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, pp.250–265.
7.
CarterEL (2002) Proportional Representation and the Fortunes of Extremist Parties. West European Politics25 (3): 125–146.
8.
CEPIS (2020) Arhiva podataka iz anketnih istraživanja u sklopu Hrvatskih izbornih studija. Available at: Javno mnijenje – CEPIS (accessed 28 November 2020).
9.
ČepoDNikić ČakarD (2019) Direct Democracy and the Rise of Political Entrepreneurs: An Analysis of Citizens’ Initiatives in Croatia. Anali Hrvatskog Politološkog Društva16 (1): 27–48.
10.
ColomerJM (2005) It’s Parties That Choose Electoral Systems (or, Duverger’s Laws Upside Down). Political Studies53: 1–21.
11.
Croatian Election Commission (2020) Izbori za zastupnike u Hrvatski sabor. Available at: Službene stranice Državnog izbornog povjerenstva Republike Hrvatske – Izbori za zastupnike u Hrvatski sabor (accessed 28 November 2020).
12.
ČularG (2000) Political Development in Croatia Fast Consolidation. Politička Misao37 (5): 30–46.
13.
ČularG (2013) Političko predstavništvo u Hrvatskoj: predstoji li korjenita promjena stranačkog sustava?Političke Analize4 (13): 3–11.
14.
ČularG (2018a) Metodološki izazovi ustavnog sudovanja: učinci podjele na izborne jedinice na rezultate izbora u Hrvatskoj 2000-2016. Anali Hrvatskog politološkog društva15 (1): 7–28.
15.
ČularG (2018b) Stability and Permissiveness: Party Regulation and Party Competition in Croatia. In: Casal BértoaFVan BiezenI (eds) The Regulation of Post-communist Party Politics. New York; London: Routledge, pp.257–289.
16.
ČularGNikić ČakarD (2019) Institutionalisation of a Charismatic Movement Party: The Case of Croatian Democratic Union. In: HarmelRSvåsandLG (eds) Institutionalisation of Political Parties. London; New York: ECPR Press/Rowman & Littlefield, pp.171–192.
17.
ČularGŠalajB (2019) Kritički građani ili nezadovoljni autokrati? Potpora demokraciji u Hrvatskoj 1999–2018. Anali Hrvatskog politološkog društva16 (1): 7–26.
18.
Di PalmaG (1990) To Craft Democracies: An Essay on Democratic Transitions. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
19.
DolenecD (2013) Democratic Institutions and Authoritarian Rule in Southeast Europe. Colchester: ECPR Press.
20.
ElklitJ (1999) Electoral Institutional Change and Democratization: You Can Lead a Horse to Water, But You Can’t Make It Drink. Democratization6 (4): 28–51.
21.
EnyediZCasal BértoaF (2018) Institutionalization and in Party Systems. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures32 (3): 422–450.
22.
FinnV (2019) Democracy in Croatia: From Stagnant 1990s to Rapid Change 2000–2011. International Political Science Review42: 197–212.
23.
FisherS (2006) Political Change in Post-communist Slovakia and Croatia: From Nationalist to Europeanist. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
HakhverdianAKoopC (2007) Consensus Democracy and Support for Populist Parties in Western Europe. Acta Politica42 (4): 401–420.
26.
HarfstP (2013) Changing the Rules of the Game: Determinants of Successful Electoral System Change in Central and Eastern Europe. International Political Science Review34 (4): 427–443.
27.
HoffmanAL (2005) Political Parties, Electoral Systems and Democracy: A Analysis. European Journal of Political Research44 (2): 231–242.
28.
KasapovićM (1993) Izborni i stranački sustav Republike Hrvatske. Zagreb: Alinea.
29.
KasapovićM (2001) Demokratska konsolidacija i izborna politika u Hrvatskoj 1990–2000. In: KasapovićM (ed.) Hrvatska politika 1990–2000: Izbori, stranke i parlament u Hrvatskoj. Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti, pp.15–40.
30.
KasapovićM (2011) Zašto je hrvatski izborni sustav dobar? In: BarbićJ (ed.) Izbori zastupnika u Hrvatski sabor i referendum: okrugli stol održan 4. veljače 2011. u palači Akademije u Zagrebu. Zagreb: HAZU, pp.17–31.
31.
KasapovićM (2014) Kombinirani izborni sustavi u Europi 1945-2014. Zagreb: Plejada.
32.
KrastevI (2007) Is Europe Backsliding? The Strange Death of the Liberal Consensus. Journal of Democracy18 (4): 56–63.
33.
LeDucLNiemiRGNorrisP (eds) (1996) Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in a Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
34.
LewisPG (1997) Theories of Democratization and Patterns of Regime Change in Eastern Europe. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition13 (1): 4–26.
35.
LijphartA (2006) Constitutional Choices for New Democracies. In: DiamondLPlattnerMF (eds) Electoral Systems and Democracy. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp.73–85.
36.
LijphartA (2012) Patterns of Democracy. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.
37.
MerkelW (2011) Transformacija političkih sustava. Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti.
38.
Nikić ČakarD (2013) Prezidencijalizacija političkih stranaka. Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti.
39.
Nikić ČakarD (2019) The Presidentialisation of Political Parties in Croatia: Institutional Change Matters. In: PassarelliG (ed.) The Presidentialisation of Political Parties in the Western Balkans. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.23–47.
40.
Nikić ČakarD (2021) Croatia: Strong Prime Ministers and Weak Coalitions. In: TorbjörnBBäckHHellströmJ (eds) Coalition Governance in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.640–679.
41.
NikolenyiC (2011) When Electoral Reform Fails: The Stability of Proportional Representation in Democracies. West European Politics34 (3): 607–625.
42.
PassarelliG (2019) The Presidential Party: A Theoretical Framework for Comparative Analysis. Political Studies Review18 (1): 87–107.
43.
PodolnjakR (2012) Što treba mijenjati u hrvatskom izbornom sustavu?Informator – Male Stranice6053: 2–8.
44.
PoguntkeTScarrowSEWebbPD (2020) PPDB_Round1a_1b_consolidated_v1 (Harvard Dataverse, V1,). Available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NBWDFZ (accessed 28 January 2022).
45.
RaosV (2019) Ideology, Partisanship, and Change: Voter Profiles of Main Political Parties in Croatia. Politička Misao56 (3-4): 7–28.
46.
RenwickA (2010) The Politics of Electoral Reform: Changing the Rules of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
SekulićDŠporerŽ (2010) Gubimo li povjerenje u institucije? In: KregarJSekulićDŠporerŽ (eds) Korupcija i povjerenje. Zagreb: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu i Centar za demokraciju i pravo Miko Tripalo, pp.71–117.
48.
ShugartM (2001) Electoral Efficiency and the Move to Systems. Electoral Studies20 (2): 173–193.
49.
VárnagyRIlonszkiG (2017) The Conflict between Partisan Interests and Normative Expectations in Electoral System Change, Hungary in 2914. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy8 (1): 3–24.
50.
VejvodaI (2000) Democratic Despotism: Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Croatia. In: PridhamGGallagherT (eds) Experimenting with Democracy. Regime Change in the Balkans. London: Routledge, pp.219–236.
51.
VolkensABurstTKrauseW, et al. (2020) The Manifesto Data Collection: Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR) (Version 2020B). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin Für Sozialforschung (WZB). Available at: https://doi.org/10.25522/manifesto.mpds.2020b (accessed 14 December 2020).
52.
WebbPDKeithD (2017) Assessing the Strength of Party Organizational Resources: A Survey of the Evidence from the Political Party Database. In: ScarrowSEWebbPDPoguntkeT (eds) Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power. Oxford: ECPR and Oxford University Press, pp.31–61.
53.
ZakošekN (2002) Politički sustav Hrvatske. Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti.
