Contemporary democratic theory is focused on empowering the voices of citizens in collective decision-making. The opposite of voice is silence. Increasingly, citizens are remaining silent rather than vocally participating in politics. Among democratic theorists, silent citizenship is equated to civic disengagement and disempowerment. I expand this view by theorizing the conditions under which silence is also a political expression. My analysis identifies four types of silence that can politically communicate. The resulting framework draws out the communicative dimension of silence, providing new tools to assess the unique interpretative challenges and dangers that silent citizenship presents for a democratic system.
AchesonK (2008) Silence as Gesture: Rethinking the Nature of Communicative Silences. Communication Theory18: 535–555.
2.
AllenD (2010) Anonymous: On Silence and the Public Sphere. In: SaratA (ed.) Speech and Silence in American Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.106–133.
3.
Aristotle (1998 [384-322BCE]) Politics (trans. BarkerE). New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
AustinJ (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5.
BarryB (1974) Review Article: “Exit, Voice, and Loyalty”British Journal of Political Science4 (1): 79–107.
6.
BenthamJ (1825) A Treatise on Judicial Evidence (trans. DumontM). London: Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy.
7.
BerinskyAJ (2004) Silent Voices: Public Opinion and Political Participation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
BickfordS (1996) The Dissonance of Democracy: Listening, Conflict, Citizenship. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
9.
BlaisARubensonD (2013) The Source of Turnout Decline: New Values or New Contexts?Comparative Political Studies46 (1): 95–117.
10.
BrandomRB (1994) Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
BroockmanDESkovronC (2018) Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elites. The American Political Science Review112 (3): 542–563.
12.
BrownW (2005) Freedom’s Silences. In: BrownW (ed.) Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp.83–96.
13.
DahlRA (1998) On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
DaltonRJ (2017) The Participation Gap: Social Status and Political Inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
DauenhauerBP (1980) Silence: The Phenomenon and Its Ontological Significance. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
DoviS (2020) What’s Missing? A Typology of Political Absence. The Journal of Politics82 (2): 559–571.
18.
Du BoisWEB (1956) I Won’t Vote. The Nation, 20October, pp.324–325.
19.
FergusonK (2003) Silence: A Politics. Contemporary Political Theory2 (1): 49–65.
20.
FrancisMM (2014) Civil Rights and the Making of the Modern American State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
FranklinM (2004) Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
FrickerM (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
GlennC (2004) Unspoken: A Rhetoric of Silence. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
24.
GoodinRE (2008) Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice after the Deliberative Turn. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
GraySWD (2015) Mapping Silent Citizenship: How Democratic Theory Hears Citizens’ Silence and Why It Matters. Citizenship Studies19 (5): 473–491.
26.
GraySWD (2019) Interpreting Silence: A Note of Caution. Contemporary Political Theory18 (3): 431–433.
27.
GraySWD (2021) Silence and Democratic Institutional Design. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy24: 330–345.
28.
GreenJE (2010) The Eyes of the People: Democracy in an Age of Spectatorship. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Hertel-FernandezAMildenbergerMStokesLC (2019) Legislative Staff and Representation in Congress. The American Political Science Review113 (1): 1–18.
30.
HibbingJRTheiss-MorseE (2002) Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
HightonBWolfingerRE (2001) The Political Implications of Higher Turnout. British Journal of Political Science31 (1): 179–192.
32.
HolmesS (1988) Gag Rules or the Politics of Omission. In: ElsterJSlagstadR (eds) Constitutionalism and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.19–58.
33.
JungkunzV (2012) The Promise of Democratic Silences. New Political Science34 (2): 127–150.
34.
KarpowitzCFMendelbergT (2014) The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
LandemoreHPageSE (2015) Deliberation and Disagreement: Problem Solving, Prediction, and Positive Dissensus. Politics, Philosophy & Economics14 (3): 229–254.
36.
LangtonR (1993) Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts. Philosophy and Public Affairs22 (4): 293–330.
37.
LangtonR (2007) Disenfranchised Silence. In: BrennanGGoodinREJacksonF, et al. (eds) Common Minds: Themes from the Philosophy of Philip Pettit. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 199–214.
38.
LeighleyJENaglerJ (2014) Who Votes Now? Demographics, Issues, Inequality, and Turnout in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
LomaskyLEBrennanG (2000) Is There a Duty to Vote?Social Philosophy and Policy17 (1): 62–86.
40.
Merleau-PontyM (1962) Phenomenology of Perception (trans. SmithC). New York: Routledge.
MutzDC (2006) Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
NorrisP (2011) Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
PettitP (2012) On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
ReganP (2010) Unsettling the Settler within: Indian Residential Schools, Truth Telling, and Reconciliation in Canada. Vancouver, BC, Canada: UBC Press.
47.
SablA (2015) The Two Cultures of Democratic Theory: Responsiveness, Democratic Quality, and the Empirical-Normative Divide. Perspectives on Politics13 (2): 345–365.
48.
SchlozmanKLPageBIVerbaS, et al. (2005) Inequalities of Political Voice. In: JacobsLRSkocpolT (eds) Inequality in American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp.19–87.
49.
SchlozmanKLVerbaSBradyHE (2012) The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
ShiffrinSV (2014) Speech Matters: On Lying, Morality, and the Law. New York: Princeton University Press.
51.
SimmonsAJ (1976) Tacit Consent and Political Obligation. Philosophy & Public Affairs5 (3): 274–291.
52.
SoltF (2008) Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement. The American Journal of Political Science52 (1): 48–60.
53.
SontagS (1969) The Aesthetics of Silence. In: SontagS (ed.) Styles of Radical Will. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, pp.3–34.
54.
Stillion SouthardBA (2008) Militancy, Power, and Identity: The Silent Sentinels as Women Fighting for Political Voice. Rhetoric and Public Affairs10 (3): 401–419.
55.
ThelenS (2017) Mobilizing a Majority: Nixon’s “Silent Majority” Speech and the Domestic Debate Over Vietnam. Journal of American Studies51 (3): 887–914.
56.
ThompsonDF (1970) The Democratic Citizen: Social Science and Democratic Theory in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
VieiraMB (2020) Representing Silence in Politics. The American Political Science Review114 (4): 976–988.
58.
WarrenME (2011) Voting with Your Feet: Exit-Based Empowerment in Democratic Theory. American Political Science Review105 (4): 683–701.
59.
WeberM (1978) Weber: Selections in Translation (ed. RuncimanWG; trans. MatthewsE). New York: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Wooley v. Maynard 430 U.S. 705 (1977).
61.
YoungIM (2000) Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
62.
ZerubavelE (2006) The Elephant in the Room: Silence and Denial in Everyday Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
