The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of differentiated performance attire and stage deportment on adjudicators’ ratings of high school solo vocal performances. High school choral students (n = 153) and undergraduate (n = 97) and graduate music majors (n = 32) served as adjudicators (N = 282). Adjudicators rated recorded solo vocal performances displayed in audio-only and four audiovisual presentation conditions with differentiated combinations of performance attire and stage deportment. Performance quality ratings were affected significantly by soloists’ performance attire and stage deportment and adjudicators’ academic level. Significant two-way interactions were identified: adjudicator gender by academic level for comparisons of performance ratings assigned in four of the five presentation conditions and adjudicator gender by academic level when differentiated attire was isolated from presentation conditions. Adjudicators assigned significantly higher ratings to performances presented in the audio-only condition.
AdamsB. L. (1994). The effect of visual/aural conditions on the emotional response to music(Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University, 1994). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 9434127)
2.
BakerJ. (1982). Full circle: An autobiographical journal. London, England: Julia MacRae.
3.
BanisterS. (1991). How do OMEA adjudicators award superior ratings at solo contests?Triad, 59, 27.
4.
BergeeM. J. (1993). A comparison of faculty, peer, and self-evaluation of applied brass jury performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 19–27. doi:10.2307/334547610.2307/3345476
5.
BergeeM. J. (1997). Relationships among faculty, peer, and self-evaluations of applied performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 601–612. doi:10.2307/334542510.2307/3345425
6.
BergeeM. J.Cecconi-RobertsL. (2002). Effects of small-group peer interaction on self-evaluation of music performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 256–268. doi:10.2307/334580210.2307/3345802
7.
BlomD.PooleK. (2004). Peer assessment of tertiary music performance: Opportunities for understanding performance assessment and performing through experience and self-reflection. British Journal of Music Education, 21(1), 111–125. doi:10.1017/S026505170300553910.1017/S0265051703005539
8.
BoswellJ. (1991). Comparisons of attitudinal assessments in middle and junior high school general music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 108, 49–57. Available from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40318437
9.
BrittinR. V. (1993). Discrimination of aural and visual tempo modulation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 116, 23–32. Available from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40318553
10.
ByoJ. (1990). Recognition of intensity contrasts in the gestures of beginning conductors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 157–163. doi:10.2307/334517910.2307/3345179
11.
ByoJ.AustinK. (1994). Comparison of expert and novice conductors: An approach to the analysis of nonverbal behaviors. Journal of Band Research, 30(1), 11–34.
12.
DavidsonJ. (1994). What type of information is conveyed in the body movements of solo musician performers?Journal of Human Movement, 6, 279–301.
13.
DavidsonJ. (1997). The social in musical performance. In HargreavesD.NorthA. A. (Eds.), The social psychology of music (pp. 209–228). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
14.
DavidsonJ.da Costa CoimbraD. C. (2001). Investigating performance evaluation by assessors of singers in a music college setting. Musicae Scientae, 5, 33–50.
15.
DaviesJ. B. (1978). The psychology of music. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
DeCarboN.FieseR.BoyleJ. D. (1990). A profile of all-state instrumentalists. Research Perspectives in Music Education: A Bulletin of the Florida Music Educators Association, 1(1), 32–40. Available from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED390718
17.
DuerksenG. L. (1972). Some effects of expectation on evaluation of recorded musical performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 20, 268–272. doi:10.2307/334409310.2307/3344093
18.
EkholmE. (1994). The effect of guided listening on evaluation of solo vocal performance. Unpublished master’s thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec.
19.
ElliottC. A. (1995a). All-state band practices and procedures: A nation-wide survey. Journal of Band Research, 30(2), 87–94.
20.
ElliottC. A. (1995b). Race and gender as factors in judgments of musical performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 127, 50–56. Available from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40318766
21.
FinnäsL. (1992). The effects of listening experience of different modes of presenting music. Pedagogiska, 1, 105–144.
22.
FiskeH. E.Jr. (1975). Judge-group differences in the rating of secondary school trumpet performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 186–196. doi:10.2307/334464310.2307/3344643
23.
FiskeH. E.Jr. (1977). Relationship of selected factors in trumpet performance adjudication reliability. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 256–263. doi:10.2307/334526610.2307/3345266
24.
ForsytheJ. L.KellyM. M. (1989). Effects of visual-spatial added cues on fourth-graders’ melodic discrimination. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 272–277. doi:10.2307/334466110.2307/3344661
25.
FredricksonW. E. (1994). Band musicians’ performance eye contact as influenced by loss of visual and/or aural stimulus. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 306–317. doi:10.2307/334573810.2307/3345738
26.
FredricksonW. E.JohnsonC. M.RobinsonC. R. (1998). The effect of pre-conducting and conducting behaviors on the evaluation of conductor competence. Journal of Band Research, 33, 1–13.
27.
GardnerH. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons in theory and practice. New York, NY: Basic Books.
28.
GastonE. T. (1968). Music in therapy. New York, NY: Macmillan.
29.
GillespieR. (1997). Ratings of violin and viola vibrato performance in audio-only and audiovisual presentations. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 212–220. doi:10.2307/334558110.2307/3345581
30.
GladwellM. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York, NY: Back Bay Books.
31.
GoldinC.RouseC. (2000). Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. The American Economic Review, 90, 715–741. doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.71510.1257/aer.90.4.715
32.
HandlerL.ButlerD. (1985). Visual and aural perception of emotional level in music performance. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southern Chapter of the College Music Society, Florida State University.
33.
HowardS. (2008). A survey of blind versus non-blind audition procedures for high school honor choir festivals in the United States. Unpublished manuscript, University of Missouri–Kansas City.
34.
JohnsonC. M.StewartE. E. (2005). Effect of sex and race identification on instrument assignment by music educators. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 348–357. doi:10.1177/00224294050530040610.1177/002242940505300406
35.
JohnsonP. (1997). Performance as experience: The problem of assessment criteria. British Journal of Music Education, 14(3), 271–282. doi:10.1017/S026505170000124810.1017/S0265051700001248
36.
KimS. (2000). Group differences in piano performance evaluation by experienced and inexperienced judges. Contributions to Music Education, 27(2), 23–26.
37.
KurosawaK.DavidsonJ. (2005). Nonverbal behaviours in popular music performance: A case study ofThe Corrs. Musicae Scientiae, 29(1), 111–136. doi:10.1177/10298649050090010410.1177/102986490500900104
38.
LaibJ. R. (1993). The effect of expressive conducting on band performance (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 3258A.
39.
LeBlancA. (1980). Outline of a proposed model of sources of variation in musical taste. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 61, 29–34. Available from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40317580
40.
LehmannA. C.DavidsonJ. W. (2002). Taking an acquired skills perspective on music performance. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 542–562). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
41.
LinklaterF. (1997). Effects of audio- and videotape models on performance achievement of beginning clarinetists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 402–414. doi:10.2307/334553510.2307/3345535
42.
LucasK. V.HamannD. L.TeachoutD. J. (1996). Effect of perceptual mode on the identification of expressiveness in conducting. Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 8, 166–175.
43.
MassellP. M. (1978). The influence of voice quality and the visual element on vocal adjudication. Unpublished master’s thesis, The University of Western Ontario.
44.
MayneR. G. (1992). An investigation of the use of facial expression in conjunction with musical conducting gestures and their interpretation by instrumental performers(Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1992). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 9238229)
45.
McCraryJ. (1993). Effects of listeners’ and performers’ race on music preferences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 200–211. doi:10.2307/334532510.2307/3345325
46.
PitzerR. M.MorrisonS. J. (2009). The effects of audio-only and audio-visual presentations on jazz music on middle school students’ analytic and affective responses. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington.
47.
PriceH. E. (2006). Relationships among conducting quality, ensemble performance quality, and state festival ratings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 203–214. doi:10.1177/00224294060540030410.1177/002242940605400304
48.
PriceH. E.ChangE. C. (2001). Conductor expressivity and ensemble performance: An exploratory investigation. Contributions to Music Education, 28(2), 9–20.
49.
PriceH. E.ChangE. C. (2005). Conductor and ensemble performance expressivity and state festival ratings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 66–77. doi:10.1177/00224294050530010610.1177/002242940505300106
50.
RobertsB. (1975). Judge group differences in the rating of piano performances. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Western Ontario.
51.
RobinsonC. R. (2000, March). Choral students’ assessments of novice choral conductors. Poster session presented at the National Biennial In-Service Conference of MENC: The National Association for Music Education, Washington, DC.
52.
RyanC.Costa-GiomiE. (2004). Attractiveness bias in the evaluation of young pianists’ performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 141–154. doi:10.2307/334543610.2307/3345436
53.
RyanC.WapnickJ.LacailleN.DarrowA. A. (2006). The effects of various physical characteristics of high-level performers on adjudicators’ performance ratings. Psychology of Music, 34, 559–572. doi:10.1177/030573560606810610.1177/0305735606068106
54.
RyderJ. E. (1990). A survey of selected all-state chorus audition methods. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Missouri–Kansas City.
55.
Siddell-StrebelJ. (2007). The effects of non-musical components on the ratings of performance quality(Doctoral dissertation, McGill University, 2007). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT NR32324)
56.
SidotiV. J. (1990). The effects of expressive and nonexpressive conducting on the performance accuracy of selected expression markings by individual high school instrumentalists(Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1990). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 9105212)
57.
SullivanS. E. (1993). Do clothes really make the woman? The use of attire to enhance work performances. The Academy of Management Executive, 11, 90–91.
58.
VanWeeldenK. (2002). Relationships between perceptions of conducting effectiveness and ensemble performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 165–176. doi:10.2307/334582010.2307/3345820
59.
VasilT. (1973). The effects of systematically varying selected factors on music performing adjudication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
60.
WangC. C.SalzbergR. S. (1984). Discrimination of modulated music tempo by string students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 123–131. doi:10.2307/334497910.2307/3344979
61.
WapnickJ.DarrowA. A.KovacsJ.DalrympleL. (1997). Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluation of vocal performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 470–479. doi:10.2307/334554010.2307/3345540
62.
WapnickJ.MazzaJ. K.DarrowA. A. (1998). Effects of performer attractiveness, stage behavior, and dress on violin performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 510–521. doi:10.2307/334534710.2307/3345347
63.
WapnickJ.MazzaJ. K.DarrowA. A. (2000). Effects of performer attractiveness, stage behavior, and dress on the evaluation of children’s piano performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 323–335. doi:10.2307/334536710.2307/3345367
64.
WapnickJ.RyanC.LacailleN.DarrowA. A. (2004). Selected variables on musicians’ ratings of high-level piano performances. International Journal of Music Education, 22, 7–20. doi:10.1177/025576140404237110.1177/0255761404042371
65.
Wiest-ParthunK. J. (1998). The audition procedure of select community choral ensembles in the Greater Phoenix area(Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, 1998). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 9828226)
66.
WilliamonA. (1999). The value of performing from memory. Psychology of Music, 27, 87–95. doi:10.1177/030573569927100810.1177/0305735699271008
67.
WinterC. M. (1989). The effects of primacy/recency and excerpted versus full-length performance on large instrumental group adjudication(Doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama, 1989). Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 9022279)
