Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2013-8
The influences of presentation modes and conducting gestures on the perceptions of expressive choral performance of high school musicians attending a summer choral camp
The purpose of this study was to examine the influences of presentation modes (audio and visual) on perceptions of expressive choral performance. The stimulus recording included four choral selections, each conducted by a different conductor in two ways: using expressive conducting gestures and using strict conducting gestures. Three groups of participants: (1) listened to the eight audio excerpts; or (2) listened and viewed the conductor from the rear; or (3) listened and viewed the conductor from the front. They then answered questions regarding expressivity, tone quality, and overall impression of the choral performance. Results indicate significant differences between presentation modes and conducting style. Participants rated performances conducted with an expressive gesture higher than performances conducted with a strict gesture in all three presentation modes.
CoferR. S. (1998). Effects of conducting-gesture instruction on seventh-grade band students’ performance response to conducting emblems. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 360–373.
2.
CristM. (1996). The listeners’ ability to identify an expressive performance. Contributions to Music Education, 23, 19–30.
3.
ErvinC. (1975). Systematic observation and evaluation of conductor effectiveness. Dissertation Abstracts International, 36, 7034A–7035A. (University Microfilms No. 76-1751)
4.
FredricksonW. E.JohnsonC. M.RobinsonC. R. (1998). The effect of pre-conducting and conducting behaviors on the evaluation of conductor competence. Journal of Band Research, 33, 1–13.
5.
GeringerJ. M.CassidyJ. W.ByoJ. L. (1996). The effects of music with video on responses of nonmusic majors: An exploratory study. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 240–251.
6.
GeringerJ. M.CassidyJ. W.ByoJ. L. (1997). Nonmusic majors’ cognitive and affective responses to performance and programmatic music videos. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 221–233.
7.
GrecheskyR. N. (1985). An analysis of nonverbal and verbal conducting behaviors and their relationship to expressive musical performance (aesthetic, gestural). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 2956A.
8.
HamannK. L. (2003). Identification of expressiveness in small ensemble performances by middle school students. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 155, 24–32.
9.
JohnsonC. M. (1991). Use of the continuous response digital interface in evaluation of auditory versus auditory and visual aspects of musical performance. Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 3, 97–108.
10.
JohnsonC. M. (1996a). Musicians’ and nonmusicians’ assessment of perceived rubato in musical performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 84–96.
11.
JohnsonC. M. (1996b). The performance of Mozart: Study of rhythmic timing by skilled musicians. Psychomusicology, 15, 87–109.
12.
JohnsonC. M. (1997). A comparison of the perceived musicianship of skilled musicians and their respective rhythmic timings in performances of Mozart. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 133, 45–51.
13.
JohnsonC. M. (2003). Effect of rubato magnitude on the perception of musicianship in musical performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 115–123.
14.
LaibJ. R. (1993). The effect of expressive conducting on band performance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 3258A.
15.
LucasK. V.HamannD. L.TeachoutD. J. (1996). Effect of perceptual mode on the identification of expressiveness in conducting. Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 8, 166–175.
16.
LucasK. V.TeachoutD. J. (1998). Identifying expressiveness in small ensemble performances. Contributions to Music Education, 25, 60–73.
17.
MadsenM. K. (1991). The effect of specific conducting gestures on vocal sound. (Unpublished master’s thesis). The Florida State University, USA.
18.
MadsenK. (2009). Effect of aural and visual presentation modes on Argentine and US musicians’ evaluations of conducting and choral performance. International Journal of Music Education, 27, 48–58.
19.
MayneR. G. (1992). An investigation of the use of facial expression in conjunction with musical conducting gestures and their interpretation by instrumental performers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 2729A.
20.
PriceH. E.WinterS. (1991). Effect of strict and expressive conducting on performances and opinions of eighth-grade band students. Journal of Band Research, 27, 30–43.
21.
PriceH. E. (2006). Relationships among conducting quality, ensemble performance quality, and state festival ratings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 203–214.
22.
PriceH. E.ChangE. C. (2001). Conductor expressivity and ensemble performance: An exploratory investigation. Contributions to Music Education, 28, 9–20.
23.
PriceH. E.ChangE. C. (2005). Conductor and ensemble performance expressivity and state festival ratings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 66–77.
24.
PriceH. E.MannA. (2009, February). The effect of conductors on ensemble evaluations. Paper presented at the International Symposium of Research in Music Behavior, St. Augustine, FL.
25.
RodriguezC. X. (1998). Children’s perception, production, and description of musical expression. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 48–61.
26.
SheldonD. A. (2004). Listeners’ identification of musical expression through figurative language and musical terminology. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 357–368.
27.
SidotiV. J. (1990). The effects of expressive and nonexpressive conducting on the performance accuracy of selected expression markings by individual high school instrumentalists. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 3270A.
28.
SilkebakkenD. L. (1988). The effect of conductor visual attributes on the observer’s evaluation of conducting performance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 3197A.
29.
SousaG. (1988). Musical conducting emblems: An investigation of the use of specific conducting gestures and their interpretation by instrumental performers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 2143A. (University Microfilms No. 8820356)
30.
VanWeeldenK. (2002). Relationships between perceptions of conducting effectiveness and ensemble performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 165–176.
31.
WapnickJ.DarrowA. A.KovacsJ.DalrympleL. (1997). Effects of attractiveness on evaluation of vocal performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 470–479.
32.
WoodyR. H. (2002). The relationship between musicians’ expectations and their perception of expressive features in an aural model. Research Studies in Music Education, 18, 53–61.
33.
WoodyR. H. (2006). The effect of various instructional conditions on expressive music performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 21–36.
34.
YarbroughC. (1975). Effects of magnitude of conductor behavior on students in selected mixed choruses. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 134–146.
35.
YarbroughC.HendelC. (1993). The effect of sequential patterns on rehearsal evaluations of high school and elementary students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 246–257.
