The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of post-performance conductor behaviors on college music students’ perceptions of ensemble performance quality and conductor competence. Participants (N = 202) were collegiate musicians who watched two videos of a male or female conductor, one with excellent and one with poor post-performance conductor behaviors. Although the visual aspects of each video were different, all videos had the same audio. After watching both videos, participants rated different aspects of the ensemble’s performance quality and the conductor’s competence. The post-performance conductor behaviors displayed in the videos had a significant effect on participants’ ratings of music performance quality (p < .001), and there was also a significant interaction between post-performance conductor behavior and order (p < .001). Additionally, post-performance conductor behaviors also affected participants’ ratings of conductor competence (p < .001). Conductors with excellent post-performance stage behaviors were rated as being significantly more competent than directors who exhibited poor post-performance behaviors. No significant differences in participants’ ratings of ensemble performance quality or conductor competence were found as a function of conductor gender.
BergeeM. J.McWhirterJ. L. (2005). Selected influences on solo and small-ensemble festival ratings: Replication and extension. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940505300207
2.
BergeeM. J.PlattM. C. (2003). Influence of selected variables on solo and small-ensemble festival ratings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(4), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345660
3.
BroughtonM.StevensC. (2009). Music, movement and marimba: An investigation of the role of movement and gesture in communicating musical expression to an audience. Psychology of Music, 37(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735608094511
4.
ByoJ. L.AustinK. R. (1994). A comparison of expert and novice conductors: An approach to the analysis of nonverbal behaviors. Journal of Band Research, 30(1), 11–34.
5.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
CumberledgeJ. P.SilveyB. A.SchererA. D.BoyerJ. R. (2021). Effects of pre-conducting and conducting behaviors on collegiate musicians’ evaluations of conductor competence. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 228, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.228.0025
7.
ElliottC. A. (1995). Race and gender as factors in judgments of musical performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 127, 50–56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40318766
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
10.
FeldmanE.ContziusA.LutchM.BugajK. (2020). Instrumental music education: Teaching with the musical and practical in harmony (3rd ed.). Routledge.
11.
FredricksonW. E.JohnsonC. M.RobinsonC. R. (1998). The effect of pre-conducting and conducting behaviors on the evaluation of conductor competence. Journal of Band Research, 33(2), 1–13.
12.
GreenE. A. H.GibsonM. (2004). The modern conductor (7th ed.). Pearson.
13.
HagbergK. A. (2003). Stage presence from head to toe: A manual for musicians. Scarecrow Press.
14.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
15.
HarringtonA. M. (2016). The effect of implied performer age, implied performer gender, and performance quality level on music majors’ evaluations of solo musical performances. (Publication No. 10306929) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
16.
HowardS. A. (2012). The effect of selected nonmusical factors on adjudicators’ ratings of high school solo vocal performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60(2), 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429412444610
17.
JohnsonC. M.GeringerJ. M. (2007). Predicting music majors’ overall ratings of wind band performances: Elements of music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 173, 25–38.
18.
Kleider-OffuttH. M.GrantA.TurnerJ. A. (2019). Common cortical areas involved in both auditory and visual imageries for novel stimuli. Experimental Brain Research, 237(5), 1279–1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05492-4
19.
KlenaP. L. (2020). Toward a more inclusive profession: A qualitative study of female wind band conductors (Publication No.28023559) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
20.
KruseA. J.GiebelhausenR.ShouldiceH. N.RamseyA. L. (2015). Male and female photographic representation in 50 years of Music Educators Journal. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(4), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429414555910
21.
KumarA. B.MorrisonS. J. (2016). The conductor as visual guide: Gesture and perception of musical content. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1049. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01049
22.
LabutaJ. A.MatthewsW. K. (2018). Basic conducting techniques (7th ed.). Routledge.
23.
MadsenC. H.MadsenC. K. (2020). Teaching discipline: A positive approach for educational development (5th ed.). Contemporary Publishing Company of Raleigh.
24.
MilesR. (Ed.). (2004). Teaching music through performance in band (Vol. 5). GIA Publications.
25.
NápolesJ. (2009). The effect of excerpt duration and music education emphasis on ratings of high quality children’s choral performances. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 179, 21–32.
26.
NápolesJ. (2013). The influences of presentation modes and conducting gestures on the perceptions of expressive choral performance of high school musicians attending a summer choral camp. International Journal of Music Education, 31(3), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761411434823
27.
ParkeC. S. (2013). Essential first steps to data analysis: Scenario-based examples using SPSS. Sage.
28.
PeddellL. T. (2008). Factors influencing listeners’ perception of expressiveness for a conducted performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 178, 47–61. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319338
29.
PinnerJ.-M.PinnerD. G. (2019). Manners for music making: Recital and concert stage decorum 101—String soloist and conductor protocols. American String Teacher, 69(3), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003131319855955
30.
PlatzF.KopiezR. (2012). When the eye listens: A meta-analysis of how audio-visual presentation enhances the appreciation of music performance. Music Perception, 30(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2012.30.1.71
31.
PopeD. A. (2012). The effect of performance quality, audio and video performances, tempo, and adjudicator experience on music majors’ evaluations of string orchestra performances (Publication No. 3539605) [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
32.
PriceH. E.WinterS. (1991). Effect of strict and expressive conducting on performances and opinions of eighth-grade band students. Journal of Band Research, 27(1), 30–43.
33.
RyanC.WapnickJ.LacailleN.DarrowA.-A. (2006). The effects of various physical characteristics of high-level performers on adjudicators’ performance ratings. Psychology of Music, 34(4), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735606068106
34.
SearsC. A. Q. (2010). Paving their own way: Experiences of female high school band directors (Publication No. 3424962) [Doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
35.
ShakerS. (2020). Paucity of female college band directors as faculty and conductors at national conferences in the United States, 2017–2018 (Publication No. 27959120) [Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
36.
ShouldiceH. N.EastridgeJ. L. (2020). A comparison of Virginia band performance assessments in relation to director gender. Journal of Research in Music Education, 68(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022429420922137
37.
SilveiraJ. M. (2014). The effect of body movement on listeners’ perceptions of musicality in trombone quartet performances. International Journal of Music Education, 32(3), 311–232. http://doi.org/10.1177/0255761413491210
38.
SilveyB. A. (2011). The effect of ensemble performance quality on the evaluation of conducting expressivity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(2), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429411406173
39.
SilveyB. A.SpringerD. G. (2020). The role of accompaniment quality in band directors’ evaluations of solo instrumental performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 67(4), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429419878148
40.
SpringerD. G.SchlegelA. L. (2016). Effects of applause magnitude and musical style on listeners’ evaluations of wind band performances. Psychology of Music, 44(4), 742–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735615591307
41.
SpringerD. G.SchlegelA. L.NápolesJ. (2018). Effects of applause magnitude and musical style on listeners’ evaluations of choral performances. International Journal of Music Education, 36(3), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761418771985
42.
SpringerD. G.SilveyB. A. (2018). The role of accompaniment quality in the evaluation of solo instrumental performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 66(1), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429418761044
43.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson.
44.
TsayC.-J. (2013). Sight over sound in the judgment of music performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(36), 14580–14585. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221454110
45.
Van den StockJ.PeretzI.GrèzesJ.de GelderB. (2009). Instrumental music influences recognition of emotional body language. Brain Topography, 21(3–4), 216–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-009-0099-0
46.
VanWeeldenK. (2002). Relationships between perceptions of conducting effectiveness and ensemble performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345820
47.
VanWeeldenK. (2003). Demographic study of choral programs and conductors in four-year institutions in the United States. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 156, 20–30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319171
48.
VanWeeldenK.McGeeI. R. (2007). The influence of music style and conductor race on perceptions of ensemble and conductor performance. International Journal of Music Education, 25(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761407074886
49.
WaddellG.WilliamonA. (2017). Eye of the beholder: Stage entrance behavior and facial expression affect continuous quality ratings in music performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 513. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00513
50.
WapnickJ.CampbellL.Siddell-StrebelJ.DarrowA.-A. (2009). Effects of non-musical attributes and excerpt duration on ratings of high-level piano performances. Musicae Scientiae, 13(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864909013001002
51.
WapnickJ.MazzaJ. K.DarrowA.-A. (1998). Effects of performer attractiveness, stage behavior, and dress on violin performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(4), 510–521. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345347
52.
WapnickJ.MazzaJ. K.DarrowA.-A. (2000). Effects of performer attractiveness, stage behavior, and dress on evaluation of children’s piano performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48(4), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345367
53.
WarnetV. (2021). Predictive relationships between concert band size and ratings at adjudicated music performance assessments. Journal of Band Research, 57(1), 27–40.
54.
WilliamsM. (2016). Effect of excerpt duration on adjudicator ratings of middle school band performances. Research Perspectives in Music Education, 18(1), 16–25.
55.
YarbroughC. (1975). Effect of magnitude of conductor behavior on students in selected mixed choruses. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345286
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
