The purpose of this study was to determine how evaluations of four intact performances of a Chopin étude (Op. 25, No. 9, Butterfly), differing in quality, related to evaluations of each performance’s sections. We presented each performance as five excerpts: (a) opening phrase, (b) first half, (c) second half, (d) coda, and (e) intact. We then presented 10 of the 20 excerpts a second time to assess listener reliability. Results revealed an interaction between performer and ratings: Ratings of intact performances were significantly higher than were ratings of component sections for the two best performances. For the other two performances, however, ratings of intact excerpts were significantly lower than ratings of component sections. Nonsignificant factors were sections and listener background. Data indicate that ratings of longer sections (first and second halves) were more closely tied to intact performance ratings than were shorter sections (opening phrase and coda). Correlational data revealed that piano majors were marginally more reliable than nonpiano majors.
BergeeM. J. (1993). A comparison of faculty, peer, and self-evaluation of applied brass jury performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 19–27. doi:10.2307/3345476
2.
BergeeM. J. (1995). Primary and higher-order factors in a scale assessing concert band performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 126, 1–14.
3.
BergeeM. J. (1997). Relationships among faculty, peer, and self-evaluations of applied performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 601–612. doi:10.2307/3345425
4.
BergeeM. J. (2003). Faculty interjudge reliability of music performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 137–150. doi:10.2307/3345847
5.
BergeeM. J. (2007). Performer, rater, occasion, and sequence as sources of variability in music performance assessment. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 344–358. doi:10.1177/0022429408317515
6.
BrittinR. L. (2002). Instrumentalists’ assessment of solo performance with compact disc, piano, or no accompaniment. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 63–74. doi:10.2307/3345693
7.
ByoJ. L.CroneL. J. (1989). Adjudication by non-musicians: A comparison of professional and amateur performances. Missouri Journal of Research in Music Education, 26, 60–73.
8.
CiorbaC. R.SmithN. Y. (2009). Measurement of instrumental and vocal undergraduate performance juries using a multidimensional assessment rubric. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 5–15. doi:10.1177/0022429409333405
9.
EkholmE. (1994). The effect of guided listening on evaluation of solo vocal performance (Master’s thesis). McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
10.
FiskeH. E. (1975). Judge-group differences in the rating of secondary school trumpet performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 186–196. doi:10.2307/3344643
11.
FiskeH. E. (1977a). Relationship of selected factors in trumpet performance adjudication reliability. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 256–263. doi:10.2307/3345266
12.
FiskeH. E. (1977b). Who’s to judge? New insights into performance evaluation. Music Educators Journal, 64(4), 23–25. doi:10.2307/3395371
13.
FiskeH. E. (1979). Musical performance evaluation ability: toward a model of specificity. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 59, 27-31.
14.
GeringerJ. M.AllenM. L.MacLeodR. B.ScottL. (2009). Using a prescreening rubric for all-state violin selection: influences of performance and teaching experience. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 28, 41–46. doi:10.1177/8755123309344109
15.
GeringerJ. M.JohnsonC. M. (2007). Effects of excerpt duration, tempo, and performance level on musicians’ ratings of wind band performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 289–301. doi:10.1177/0022429408317366
16.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K. (1998). Musicians’ ratings of good versus bad vocal and string performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 522–534. doi:10.2307/3345348
17.
GillespieR. (1997). Ratings of violin and viola vibrato performance in audio-only and audiovisual presentations. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 212–220. doi:10.2307/3345581
18.
HeathC. E. (1976). The effect of instruction on the consistency of ratings given in the adjudication of trumpet solo excerpts (Doctoral dissertation), Indiana University, Bloomington.
19.
HewittM. P. (2002). Self-evaluation tendencies of junior high instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 215–226. doi:10.2307/3345799
20.
HewittM. P. (2005). Self-evaluation accuracy among high school and middle school instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 148–161. doi:10.1177/ 002242940505300205
21.
HewittM. P. (2007). Influence of primary performance instrument and education level on music performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 18–30. doi:10.1177/002242940705500103
22.
HewittM. P.SmithB. P. (2004). The influence of teaching-career level and primary performance instrument on the assessment of music performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 314–327. doi:10.1177/002242940405200404
23.
KinneyD. (2009). Internal consistency of performance evaluations as a function of music expertise and excerpt familiarity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 322–337. doi:10.1177/0022429408328934
24.
LatimerM. E.BergeeM. J.CohenM. L. (2010). Reliability and perceived utility of a weighted music performance assessment rubric. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58, 168–183. doi:10.1177/0022429410369836
25.
LeBlancA.ColmanJ.McCraryJ.SherrillC.MalinS. (1988). Tempo preferences of different age music listeners. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 156–168. doi:10.2307/3344637
26.
LeBlancA.SherrillC. (1986). Effect of vocal vibrato and performer’s sex on children’s music preference. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 222–237. doi:10.2307/3345258
27.
McCraryJ. (1993). Effects of listeners’ and performers’ race on music preferences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 200–211. doi:10.2307/3345325
28.
MorrisonS. J.MontemayerM.WiltshireE. S. (2004). The effect of a recorded model on band students’ performance self-evaluations, achievement, and attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 116–129. doi:10.2307/3345434
29.
RobertsB. A. (1975). Judge-group differences in the rating of piano performances (MusM thesis). University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
30.
SparksG. E. (1990). The effect of self-evaluation on musical achievement, attentiveness, and attitudes of elementary school instrumental students (Doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
31.
ThompsonS.WilliamonA.ValentineE. (2007). Time-dependent characteristics of performance evaluation. Music Perception, 25, 13–29.
32.
ThompsonW. F.DiamondC. P.BalkwillL. L. (1998). The adjudication of six performances of a Chopin étude: A study of expert knowledge. Psychology of Music, 26, 154–174. doi:10.1177/0305735698262004
33.
TowersR. (1980). Age-group differences in judge reliability of solo voice performances (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
34.
VasilT. (1973). The effects of systematically varying selected factors on music performance adjudication (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs.
35.
WagnerM. J. (1991). The effect of adjudicating three videotaped popular music performances on a “composite critique” rating and an “overall” rating. Missouri Journal of Research in Music Education, 28, 53–70.
36.
WapnickJ.DarrowA.-A.KovacsJ.DalrympleL. (1997). Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluation of vocal performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 470–479. doi:10.2307/3345540
37.
WapnickJ.EkholmE. (1997). Evaluation of vocal production in solo voice performance. Journal of Voice, 11, 429–436. doi:10.1016/S0892-1997(97)80039-2
38.
WapnickJ.FlowersP.AlegantM.JasinskasL. (1993). Consistency in piano performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 4, 282–292. doi:10.2307/3345504
39.
WapnickJ.Kovacs-MazzaJ.DarrowA.-A. (2000). Effects of performer attractiveness, stage behavior, and dress on evaluation of children’s piano performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 323–336. doi:10.2307/3345367
40.
WapnickJ.RyanC.CampbellL.DeekP.LemireR.DarrowA.-A. (2005). Effects of excerpt tempo and duration on musicians’ ratings of high-level piano performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 162–176. doi:10.1177/002242940505300206
41.
WapnickJ.RyanC.LacailleN.DarrowA.-A. (2004). Effects of selected variables on musicians’ ratings of high-level piano performances. International Journal of Music Education, 22, 7–20. doi:10.1177/0255761404042371
42.
ZdzinskiS. F.BarnesG. V. (2002). Development and validation of a string performance rating scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 245–255. doi:10.2307/3345801
