Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objectives:

Several recent studies have reported a strong association between the cerebellar structural and functional abnormalities and psychiatric disorders. However, there are no studies to investigate possible changes in cerebellar functional connectivity in bipolar disorder. This study aimed to examine the whole-brain functional connectivity pattern of patients with remitted bipolar disorder II, in particular in the cerebellum.

Methods:

A total of 25 patients with remitted bipolar disorder II and 25 controls underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and neuropsychological tests. Voxel-wise whole-brain connectivity was analyzed using a graph theory approach: functional connectivity strength. A seed-based resting-state functional connectivity analysis was further performed to investigate abnormal functional connectivity pattern of those regions with changed functional connectivity strength.

Results:

Remitted bipolar disorder II patients had significantly decreased functional connectivity strength in the bilateral posterior lobes of cerebellum (mainly lobules VIIb/VIIIa). The seed-based functional connectivity analyses revealed decreased functional connectivity between the right posterior cerebellum and the default mode network (i.e. right posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus and right superior temporal gyrus), bilateral hippocampus, right putamen, left paracentral lobule and bilateral posterior cerebellum and decreased functional connectivity between the left posterior cerebellum and the right inferior parietal lobule and bilateral posterior cerebellum in patients with remitted bipolar disorder II.

Conclusion:

Our results suggest that cerebellar dysconnectivity, in particular distributed cerebellar–cerebral functional connectivity, might be associated with the pathogenesis of bipolar disorder.

Keywords

Bipolar disorder resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging remission functional connectivity strength cerebellum

Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) Global Burden of Disease study currently ranks mood disorders, including bipolar disorder (BD), among the leading cause of disease burden in the world. BD is a severe, chronic and recurrent mood disorder characterized by the fluctuation of mood between the two poles of depression and mania (bipolar I) or hypomania (bipolar II), passing through a period of affective remission, known as euthymia (Grande et al., 2016). Although a growing number of neuroimaging studies revealed structural and functional abnormalities in BD, the etiology and the pathogenesis underlying this disorder remain poorly understood.

Neuroimaging studies demonstrated that BD is associated with locally functional and structural deficits in the brain, such as the medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, superior temporal gyrus, cerebellum and so on (Hozer and Houenou, 2016; Phillips et al., 2015; Vargas et al., 2013). However, several recent studies suggested that BD is a disconnection syndrome, associated with alterations of connectivity between distributed brain areas rather than local deficits in specific brain regions. Studies using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) techniques reported widespread anatomical disconnectivity in BD patients, in particular white matter disruption within the frontolimbic network (Bellani et al., 2016). Several resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) studies observed altered functional connectivity in BD, including the default mode network (DMN), thalami-striatum connectivity, anterior cingulate-amygdalae connectivity and prefrontal-limbic connectivity, using independent component analysis (ICA) and seed-based correlation analysis (Vargas et al., 2013). However, most previous studies included acutely depressive and manic BD patients and did not provide further insight into their persistent abnormalities. A recent review of longitudinal neuroimaging study reported that there was a strong relationship between brain-volume outcomes and the current mood state (Dohm et al., 2017). In addition, recent rs-fMRI studies indicated abnormal cerebro-cerebellar functional connectivity in psychiatric disorders, including autism spectrum disorder (Khan et al., 2015), schizophrenia (Guo et al., 2015b) and major depressive disorder (MDD; Guo et al., 2013).

Whole-brain functional connectivity strength (FCS) mapping, a data-driven graph theory approach, measures the number of functional connections between a given voxel and others voxels (Buckner et al., 2009). It can reflect the complexity of the connectome as a whole, better than other functional connectivity study approaches, such as seed-based approaches or ICA. Furthermore, such a voxel-wise approach avoids parcellation-dependent effects on the topological organization of brain networks (Smith et al., 2011). Several studies have demonstrated that the FCS metric is closely associated with physiological measures such as regional cerebral blood flow, aerobic glycolysis and oxidative glucose metabolism (Wang et al., 2016). FCS alterations and correlation with pathophysiologic mechanisms have also been demonstrated in MDD (Guo et al., 2015a), bipolar depression (Wang et al., 2016) and schizophrenia (Wang et al., 2014).

Notably, there are two established subtypes of BD: type I and type II. The subtype BD II is distinguished from BD I mainly by the absence of full-blown manic episodes. Most neuroimaging studies have involved bipolar I samples, but comparatively few studies have focused on bipolar II disorder. However, a recent growing body of evidence suggests that there are neurobiological differences between BD I and BD II (Abe et al., 2016).

In this study, we constructed voxel-wise whole-brain functional networks in patients with remitted bipolar II disorder and well-matched healthy control subjects using rs-fMRI data and performed FCS analyses. Based on previous findings from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we hypothesized that there would be altered cerebellar–cerebral circuits involved in cognition and emotion in BD and that these changes may be associated with clinical or behavioral variables.

Method

Participants

In total, 30 right-handed, out-patients with remitted BD II were recruited from the psychiatry department of First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. The patients were aged from 18 to 48 years. All patients had previously met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV) criteria for BD type II according to the diagnostic assessment by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Patient Edition (SCID-P). At the time of the measurements, all patients were in disease remission. Remitted state was defined by Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores less than 6 and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-24 (HAMD-24) scores less than 8, and the manic or depressive symptoms disappeared for at least or more than 6 months. These quite strict requirements were used in order to avoid the potentially confounding effects of subthreshold depressive and manic symptoms on cognitive function. Exclusion criteria included the presence of (1) any current psychiatric disorder (with the exception of BD and anxiety disorders); (2) a history of electroconvulsive therapy; (3) any history of moderate/severe head injury, head trauma, neurological disorder or mental retardation; (4) alcohol/substance abuse or dependence; (5) the presence of a concurrent significant physical illness; and (6) pregnancy or any contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning. Most patients (n = 20) were on treatment with mood stabilizers (lithium, sodium valproate) and/or antidepressants (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors) and/or antipsychotics (second generation).

A total of 28 right-handed age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects were recruited via local advertisements. They were carefully screened through a diagnostic interview, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Nonpatient Edition (SCID-NP), to rule out the presence of current or past psychiatric illness. Further exclusion criteria for healthy controls were any history of psychiatric illness in first-degree relatives, current or past significant medical or neurological illness.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, China. All subjects signed a written informed consent form after a full written and verbal explanation of the study. Two senior clinical psychiatrists confirmed that all subjects had the ability to consent to participate in the examination.

Neuropsychological assessment

All participants underwent comprehensive neuropsychological assessments (Lin et al., 2015), including: (1) attention by the Digit Span Forward of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised by China (WAIS-RC; Gong, 1982), (2) processing speed by the trail making test–part A (TMT-A; Lezak et al., 2004) and the Digit Symbol Coding subtest of the WAIS-RC (Gong, 1982), (3) set shifting by the Modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST-M; Nelson, 1976) and the trail making test–part B (TMT-B; Lu and Bigler, 2000), (4) verbal working memory by the Digit Span Backward subtest of the WAIS-RC (Gong, 1982), (5) verbal fluency by the animal naming test (Chen et al., 2000) and (6) visual spatial memory by the Immediate Visual Reproduction subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale–Revised by China (WMS-RC; Gong, 1987). The neuropsychological assessment was administered within 3 days of imaging.

Imaging acquisition

MRI data were acquired on a 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) system (Discovery MR 750 System; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) with an eight-channel phased-array head coil. Whole-brain resting-state functional images were acquired using gradient-echo echo-planar imaging sequence with the following parameters: repetition time (TR) = 2000 milliseconds, echo time (TE) = 25 milliseconds, flip angle = 90°, 35 axial sections per volume, thickness/gap = 3.0/1.0 mm, interleaved slice, data matrix = 64 × 64, field of view = 240 × 240 mm² and voxel size = 3.75 × 3.75 × 3 mm³. For each participant, 210 volumes were acquired, which resulted in an imaging time of 420 seconds. The anatomic images were then acquired using a three-dimensional brain-volume imaging sequence that covered the whole brain that was used for structural data acquisition (TR = 8.2 milliseconds, TE = 3.2 milliseconds, flip angle = 12°, data matrix = 256 × 256, field of view = 240 × 240 mm², section thickness = 1 mm, no intersection gap). The participants were instructed to relax with their eyes closed without falling asleep and to move as little as possible. In addition, two routine scans using axial T1-weighted fluid attenuation inversion recovery and fast spine echo T2-weighted MR sequences were also applied to obtain brain images to confirm the absence of any brain structural abnormalities.

Image preprocessing

Image preprocessing was performed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8; www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm) and Data Processing Assistant for Resting-State fMRI (DPARSF; Chao-Gan and Yu-Feng, 2010). For each participant, the first 10 volumes of the rs-fMRI dataset were discarded to allow for MR signal equilibrium, leaving 200 volumes for further analyses. The remaining volumes were corrected for the intra-volume acquisition time delay using slice timing and were realigned to the first volume using the six-parameter (rigid body) spatial transformation. All participants had no more than 1.5 mm of maximum displacement in x-, y- or z-axis and 1.5° of angular motion. The individual T1-weighted images were coregistered to functional images. The coregistered T1-weighted structural images were segmented (gray matter, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid) using the unified segmentation algorithm, and they were then transformed into standard Montreal Neurologic Institute space. The functional images were also spatially normalized to Montreal Neurologic Institute space by applying the parameters of structural image normalization and were resampled to 3 × 3 × 3 mm³ resolution. Furthermore, linear trend removal and temporal band-pass filtering (0.01–0.08 Hz) was performed. During nuisance signal regression, several regressors, including six head motion parameters, global mean signal, cerebrospinal fluid signal and white matter signal, were regressed out from the data.

Whole-brain functional connectivity analysis

Whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity analysis was performed using the Gretna (www.nitrc.org/projects/gretna/) packages (Fang et al., 2015). First, we computed Pearson correlation coefficient between the time series of all pairs of gray matter voxels and obtained a whole-brain functional connectivity matrix (55,857 × 55,857) for each individual. This computation was constrained within a gray matter mask that was generated by setting a threshold of 0.2 on the mean map of all gray matter maps involving all participants. Individual correlation matrices were transformed into a z score matrix using a Fisher r-to-z transformation to improve normality for group-level t-tests. Then, for a given voxel, FCS was computed as the sum of the connections (z values) between a given voxel and all other voxels. By considering the ambiguous interpretation of negative correlations with removal of the global signal, we conservatively restricted our analysis to positive correlations above a threshold of r = 0.25 (Buckner et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2015a). Such a threshold was chosen to eliminate the voxels with weak correlations that possibly arise from signal noise. To evaluate the effects of different correlation thresholds, we also analyzed FCS with different thresholds of r values of 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4, respectively (these results did not change our main conclusion; data not shown). Moreover, Buckner et al. (2009) indicated that different threshold selections did not qualitatively change their results for cortex. Notably, an FCS metric is similar to the so-called weighted degree centrality of networks in terms of graph theory (Buckner et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2015a). Finally, all individual FCS maps were further spatially smoothed with a 4-mm Gaussian kernel.

Seed-based functional connectivity analysis

To examine more detailed resting-state functional connectivity alterations, we performed a seed-based interregional correlation analysis using the DPARSF software package. The regions with abnormal FCS values in patients with BD were selected as regions of interest (ROIs). The mean time series of each spherical ROI with the centroid at its corresponding peak voxel (radius = 6 mm) was extracted, and functional connectivity analysis was performed using the data resulting from preprocessing. A correlation analysis was then performed voxel-wise between each seed ROI and the remaining voxels in the whole brain. The correlation coefficients were z-transformed using Fisher r-to-z transformation to improve Gaussianity of the distribution.

Statistical analysis

Independent-sample t-tests and χ² tests were used to compare the demographic variables between the BD and healthy control groups with software (SPSS 17.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL). The neuropsychological tests difference between the two groups was examined using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with age and educational level as covariates.

For comparisons of FCS maps, the one-sample t-test was performed to demonstrate the spatial distribution of FCS maps in BD and healthy controls. The two-sample t-test was performed to determine the significant differences in FCS maps between patients with BD and control participants. The statistical threshold was set at corrected p-value of less than 0.05 (combination of p < 0.005 for single voxel and a minimum cluster volume of >1080 mm³), which was determined by Monte Carlo simulations using the AlphaSim program. Age, sex and head motion parameters were included as nuisance covariates. Comparisons of the seed-based functional connectivity maps were as described above for the FCS maps. When statistically significant group differences were observed in any brain regions, we computed the partial correlation between neuroimaging results (FCS values and seed-based functional connectivity) and the neuropsychological measures, controlling for age, gender, years of education and duration of illness as confounding variables. In addition, we also computed the partial correlation between neuroimaging results and the clinical variables, controlling for age, gender and years of education as confounding variables. The clinical variables included the HAMD score, YMRS score, Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) score, number of episodes, onset age of illness and total duration of illness. The threshold for significance was adjusted for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni correction.

Results

Demographic information and neuropsychological performance

The demographic and neuropsychological data for all participants in this study are shown in Table 1. Five patients with BD and three control participants were excluded from further analyses because of excessive head motion or partial cerebellum coverage of their MRI scans. Finally, the participants were 25 patients with remitted BD II and 25 healthy control participants. There were no significant differences in gender distribution, age and educational level between the remitted BD II group and healthy control group (p > 0.05).

Table 1.

Demographic and neuropsychological data of the subjects.

	Bipolar II disorder	Control	p-value
Number of subjects	25	25
Age (years)	28.55 (9.76)	28.65 (9.66)	0.971
Gender (male/female)	9/16	8/17	0.675
Education (years)	13.43 (2.64)	14.52 (3.13)	0.220
Age at onset (years)	20.70 (6.16)	NA
Number of episodes	3.55 (0.83)	NA
Duration of illness (months)	40.20 (44.86)	NA
Duration of remissions (months)	13.52 (17.63)	NA
HAMD score (points)	2.44 (1.79)	NA
YMRS score (points)	0.39 (1.14)	NA
HAMA score (points)	2.17(1.95)	NA
Processing speed
Trail marking test–part A (seconds)	35.06(10.39)	34.30(10.08)	0.891
WAIS-RC Digit Symbol Coding (points)	64.00(11.17)	65.52(15.87)	0.441
Attention
Digit Span Forward of WAIS-RC (points)	8.41 (1.37)	9.08 (1.22)	0.043*
Set shifting
Modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
Categories completed (numbers)	4.68 (1.73)	5.12 (1.09)	0.116
Total errors (numbers)	13.14(10.04)	11.00(7.22)	0.191
Perseverative errors (numbers)	4.77 (2.37)	4.68 (3.22)	0.811
Trail marking test–part B (seconds)	54.57(17.94)	51.53(18.32)	0.292
Verbal fluency
Animal naming (numbers)	17.77(5.08)	22.44(4.92)	0.001*
Visual spatial memory
Immediate Visual Reproduction of WMS-RC (points)	10.54(2.67)	11.36(2.06)	0.117
Verbal working memory
Digit Span Backward of WAIS-RC (points)	5.73 (2.12)	6.40 (2.02)	0.131

HAMD: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; YMRS: Young Mania Rating Scale; HAMA: Hamilton Anxiety Scale; WAIS-RC: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised by China; WMS-RC: Wechsler Memory Scale–Revised by China; NA: not applicable.

Means (with standard deviations in parentheses) are reported unless otherwise noted.

p < 0.05 t-test.

The remitted BD II group performed significantly worse than the healthy control group in attention (p = 0.043) and verbal fluency (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in processing speed, set shifting, verbal working memory and visual spatial memory between the remitted BD II group and healthy control group (p > 0.05).

Whole-brain functional connectivity analysis

The FCS maps of healthy control and remitted BD II groups are presented in Figure 1. For the healthy control group, regions with high FCS values were mainly located in the DMN (including posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus, medial prefrontal and parietal cortices and lateral temporal and parietal cortical regions), lateral prefrontal, temporal–parietal junction and occipital cortices and cerebellum. Visual examination indicated that the spatial distributions of brain regions with high FCS in the remitted BD II group were similar to those of the healthy control group. However, statistical analysis revealed that compared with the healthy control group, the remitted BD II group showed significantly decreased FCS values in the bilateral posterior lobes of cerebellum (mainly lobules VIIb/VIIIa; Figure 1 and Table 2). No region showed increased FCS values in the remitted BD II patient group (p < 0.05; AlphaSim corrected).

Figure 1.

Results of the within/between-group analysis on functional connectivity strength (FCS): (a) mean FCS maps within the healthy control group, (b) mean FCS maps within the remitted BD II group and (c) between-group differences in the FCS. Shades of blue represent decreased FCS in the remitted BD group compared with healthy control group. Results are shown after correction for multiple comparisons using the AlphaSim correction at p-value of less than 0.05.

Table 2.

Regions showing FCS and seed-based functional connectivity differences between two groups.

Brain regions	Montreal Neurologic Institute coordinates			Peak t value	Cluster size (mm³)
Brain regions	X	Y	Z	Peak t value	Cluster size (mm³)
FCS differences, BD < control subjects
Right posterior cerebellum (lobule VIIIa)	36	−45	−54	−4.115	1728
Left posterior cerebellum (lobule VIIIa)	−30	−42	−45	−3.790	1215
Seed-based resting-state functional connectivity: right posterior cerebellum, BD < control subjects
Left posterior cerebellum (lobule IX/X)	−21	−30	−48	−5.115	2133
Left posterior cerebellum (lobule crus I)	−24	−78	−21	−4.895	3726
Right posterior cerebellum (lobule VI)	24	−54	−21	−5.114	3780
Right hippocampus	36	−18	−18	−5.156	1056
Right hippocampus	27	−27	−6	−6.007	1917
Left hippocampus	−24	−30	−6	−4.716	1512
Right posterior cingulate cortex	6	−57	6	−4.964	3024
Right superior temporal gyrus	66	−3	6	−4.699	1080
Right putamen	24	9	9	−4.467	1593
Left paracentral lobule	−3	−24	51	−4.413	3186
Seed-based resting-state functional connectivity: left posterior cerebellum, BD < control subjects
Right posterior cerebellum (lobule VIIIa)	33	−42	−48	−5.248	3861
Left posterior cerebellum (lobule IX)	−6	−48	−45	−5.003	1404
Left posterior cerebellum (lobule crus II)	−6	−78	−36	−4.127	1944
Left posterior cerebellum (lobule VI)	−33	−54	−30	−4.972	1944
Right inferior parietal lobule	57	−36	48	−4.584	1404

FCS: functional connectivity strength; BD: bipolar disorder.

p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons.

Seed ROI-based functional connectivity analysis

To examine more detailed functional connectivity alterations, we performed a seed ROI-based functional connectivity analysis. We selected the right and left posterior lobes of cerebellum as seed ROIs because of the significantly decreased FCS values in patients with remitted BD II. Compared with the healthy control group, the remitted BD II group showed significantly decreased functional connectivity between seed 1 (the right posterior cerebellum) and the bilateral posterior cerebellum (mainly lobules IX/X, VI and crus I), bilateral hippocampus, right posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus, right superior temporal gyrus, right putamen and left paracentral lobule. Also, the decreased functional connectivity was found between seed 2 (the left posterior cerebellum) and the bilateral posterior cerebellum (mainly lobules VIIIa, IX, VI and crus II) and right inferior parietal lobule (Figure 2 and Table 2). No region showed increased functional connectivity in the remitted BD II group (p < 0.05; AlphaSim corrected).

Figure 2.

Between-group differences in seed-based functional connectivity. The seeds (top row) were defined as the right and left posterior cerebellum. Shades of blue represent decreased functional connectivity in the remitted BD II group compared with healthy control group. Results are shown after correction for multiple comparisons using the AlphaSim correction at p-value of less than 0.05.

Correlational analysis

Bonferroni correction was used for the multiple comparisons when partial correlation analysis was performed. There were no significant correlations between altered neuroimaging results (FCS values and seed-based functional connectivity) and any neuropsychological measures or clinical variables in patients with remitted BD II.

Discussion

In a substantial sample of clinically homogeneous patient with BD II during remission, we examined the topological properties of voxel-wise whole-brain functional networks by estimating FCS, thus bypassing a priori selection of circuits of interest. The patients with remitted BD II showed decreased FCS in the bilateral posterior lobe of cerebellum during the resting state. Furthermore, the BD patients showed decreased functional connectivity between the cerebellum and the cerebral cortex, mainly including the DMN, hippocampus, basal ganglia and sensorimotor regions. This was the first study, to our knowledge, to explore resting-state cerebellar–cerebral functional connectivity in patients with BD. These findings suggest that cerebellar dysconnectivity might underlie the pathogenesis of BD.

Many recent studies have reported a strong association between the cerebellar structural and functional abnormalities and psychiatric disorders (Phillips et al., 2015; Shakiba, 2014). In this study, remitted BD patients showed decreased FCS values in the bilateral posterior lobes of cerebellum. Our group previously reported altered FCS in the cerebellum in depressive BD type II patients compared with controls (Wang et al., 2016). Taken together, these findings suggest that disturbed functional connectivity of the cerebellum may be trait dependent rather than associated with mood state in BD. A growing body of evidence indicates that in addition to its classical motor coordination function, the cerebellum is also involved in psychological alterations and in the modulation of affective cognitive and perceptual functions (Phillips et al., 2015; Schmahmann, 2004). The posterior lobules VI, VII, VIII and crus were found to be linked to cognition, the posterior vermis to be associated with emotion and lobules I–V related to sensorimotor function (Stoodley and Schmahmann, 2010). The cerebellum abnormalities have been reported in BD patients, including reduced cerebellar gray matter volume (Redlich et al., 2014), decreased activity (Phillips et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015b) and increased glucose metabolism (Altamura et al., 2013). For example, a structural MRI study found the reduction of cerebellar volume in BD was present from the beginning and remained stable during the course of the illness (Sani et al., 2016). In addition, a molecular study found altered expression of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors in the cerebellum in BD (Fatemi et al., 2013). GABA is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain and regulates multiple processes during the brain development. Therefore, our findings provide additional evidence for the involvement of cerebellar dysfunction in the pathophysiologic structure of BD.

In this study, we found reduced functional connectivity between the cerebellar seeds and the cerebral regions of the DMN in remitted BD, including the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus, superior temporal gyrus and inferior parietal lobule. The DMN has been suggested to play an important role in the sustenance of self-referential processing, conscious awareness, mind wandering, episodic memory retrieval and emotion modulation (Greicius and Menon, 2004). Connectivity within the DMN was compromised in a variety of psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia (Guo et al., 2015b; Meda et al., 2014), MDD (Guo et al., 2013) and BD (Vargas et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2016). For example, Meda et al. (2014) found reduced resting-state DMN connectivity in both BD and schizophrenia, and genes regulating specific neurodevelopment/transmission processes primarily mediated DMN disconnectivity. A seed-based functional connectivity study found decreased cerebellar functional connectivity with the DMN in MDD, including the superior, middle and inferior temporal gyrus, precuneus and inferior parietal lobule (Guo et al., 2013), which partially supports our findings of disturbed cerebellar-DMN functional connectivity in BD. In addition, a recent study reported altered cerebellar-DMN connectivity in unaffected siblings of schizophrenia patients, which may serve as candidate endophenotypes for schizophrenia (Guo et al., 2015b). Therefore, these studies combined with our results suggest that decreased cerebellar-DMN connectivity may be trait alterations for BD independent of mood state.

The hippocampus is a limbic structure located in the medial temporal lobe. Recent work has illustrated that the hippocampus and cerebellum are functionally connected in a bidirectional manner such that the cerebellum can influence hippocampal activity and vice versa (Yu and Krook-Magnuson, 2015). This functional connectivity has important implications for physiology, including spatial and temporal processing, as well as pathophysiology of neurological and psychiatric disorders (Phillips et al., 2015; Yu and Krook-Magnuson, 2015). In this study, we found that reduced functional connectivity between the right cerebellum posterior lobe and bilateral hippocampus in patients with remitted BD. Structural MRI studies found gray matter loss in the hippocampus and cerebellum in BD (Roda et al., 2015). A recent DTI study found decreased node strength in the hippocampus in both high risk of BD and BD groups (Roberts et al., 2016). Postmortem studies also found reduced pyramidal neuron cell bodies and interneuron number in the hippocampus of patients with BD (Konradi et al., 2011). An rs-fMRI study reported decreased hippocampal seeds functional connectivity with the cerebellum in psychotic BD I (Samudra et al., 2015). The other fMRI study found longitudinal changes of functional connectivity between the hippocampus and other regions in schizophrenia, including the cerebellum and DMN, indicating that sequential progression of the impairment of episodic memory in the clinical course of schizophrenia patients (Duan et al., 2015). Our findings, combined with these previous reports, suggest that disrupted cerebellar–hippocampal connectivity could be associated with cognitive function deficit in BD. Unfortunately, we failed to observe the correlation between cerebellar–hippocampal functional connectivity and neuropsychological measures. Further studies should, therefore, evaluate the relationship between cerebellar–hippocampal connectivity and the specific cognitive tasks (i.e. memory and navigation processing-related tasks) in BD to help clarify this issue.

We also found that the functional connectivity between the posterior cerebellum and putamen was reduced in remitted BD. Both the sensorimotor- and cognitive-related cerebellar subregions (lobules V, VII and VIII) were correlated with the basal ganglia in healthy controls (Sang et al., 2012), which is consistent with prior findings regarding the function of the basal ganglia in sensorimotor, cognitive and emotional processing (Groenewegen, 2003). Previous meta-analyses determined volumetric alterations of the basal ganglia in BD (Hallahan et al., 2011). Furthermore, a structural MRI study found shape changes of the right putamen associated with psychomotor performance in euthymic BD (Liberg et al., 2014). Although BD is classified as an affective disorder, psychomotor disturbances are classic clinical signs, present in different phases of the disease, and the focus of clinical, neuropsychological and neurobiological investigations. In addition, we also found that patients with BD showed reduced connectivity between the cerebellum and the paracentral lobule. Furthermore, several recent studies indicated that the DMN may be related to psychomotor behavior through its relationship with the sensorimotor network. Martino et al. (2016) found topographical abnormalities in frequency-specific resting-state variability in the balance between DMN and sensorimotor network with opposing patterns in depressed and manic patients. Taken together, these findings suggest that impairments of the cerebellar functional connectivity with the basal ganglia, sensorimotor and DMN regions could be related to psychomotor disturbances of BD.

Our investigation has several limitations. First, the sample size of this study was relatively small, and results will require replication in a larger study. Second, this study was a cross-sectional design, which is even more prone to bias, unable to substantiate the assumption of causation and can only be of value for forming hypotheses (Pfennig et al., 2017). Thus, further longitudinal studies with a long time window are needed. Third, all patients were naturalistically treated, and none of them was ‘medication naïve’ owing to the difficulty in finding BD patients in remission had never been medicated. In a review of structural and functional imaging studies in BD, Hafeman et al. (2012) reported a limited effect of medication on fMRI and DTI study. Additionally, an apparent independence of cerebellar volume from pharmacological treatments, such as lithium or antipsychotics, was found in a recent large international study (Laidi et al., 2015). Fourth, although many graph metrics could be used to identify the functional brain networks, we used FCS because it was difficult to calculate other graph metrics due to a highly computational load in a network of 60,000 nodes approximately.

Combining whole-brain FCS and seed-based functional connectivity analyses, this study demonstrated that cerebellar dysconnectivity in BD even during the remitted state. Moreover, BD patients showed disrupted functional connectivity between the posterior cerebellum and the cerebral cortex, mainly including the DMN, limbic system, basal ganglia and sensorimotor regions. These findings indicated that the cerebellum might be associated with the pathogenesis of BD. Whether the cerebellum has the potential to be an effective target for treatment of BD is worth future investigations.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Y.W., S.Z. and G.C. contributed equally to this work.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81671670, 81501456 and 81471650); Planned Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province, China (2014B020212022); and Planned Science and Technology Project of Guangzhou, China (1563000653, 201508020004, 20160402007 and 201604020184). The funding organizations play no further role in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation and paper writing.

References

Abe

Ekman

Sellgren

et al . (2016) Cortical thickness, volume and surface area in patients with bipolar disorder types I and II. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience 41: 240–250.

Altamura

Bertoldo

Marotta

et al . (2013) White matter metabolism differentiates schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A preliminary PET study. Psychiatry Research 214: 410–414.

Bellani

Boschello

Delvecchio

et al . (2016) DTI and myelin plasticity in bipolar disorder: Integrating neuroimaging and neuropathological findings. Frontiers in Psychiatry 7: 21.

Buckner

Sepulcre

Talukdar

et al . (2009) Cortical hubs revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity: Mapping, assessment of stability, and relation to Alzheimer’s disease. The Journal of Neuroscience 29: 1860–1873.

Chao-Gan

Yu-Feng

(2010) DPARSF: A MATLAB toolbox for ‘pipeline’ data analysis of resting-state fMRI. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 4: 13.

Chen

Lieh-Mak

(2000) Semantic verbal fluency deficit as a familial trait marker in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research 95: 133–148.

Dohm

Redlich

Zwitserlood

et al . (2017) Trajectories of major depression disorders: A systematic review of longitudinal neuroimaging findings. Australian and New Zealand journal of Psychiatry 51: 441–454.

Duan

Gan

Yang

et al . (2015) A longitudinal study on intrinsic connectivity of hippocampus associated with positive symptom in first-episode schizophrenia. Behavioural Brain Research 283: 78–86.

Fang

Rong

Hong

et al . (2015) Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation modulates default mode network in major depressive disorder. Biological Psychiatry 79: 266–273.

10.

Fatemi

Folsom

Rooney

et al . (2013) Expression of GABAA alpha2-, beta1- and epsilon-receptors are altered significantly in the lateral cerebellum of subjects with schizophrenia, major depression and bipolar disorder. Translational Psychiatry 3: e303.

11.

Gong

(1982) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised by China. Hunan Medical School Press: Hunan.

12.

Gong

(1987) Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised in China. Hunan Medical School Press: Hunan.

13.

Grande

Berk

Birmaher

et al . (2016) Bipolar disorder. Lancet 387: 1561–1572.

14.

Greicius

Menon

(2004) Default-mode activity during a passive sensory task: Uncoupled from deactivation but impacting activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 1484–1492.

15.

Groenewegen

(2003) The basal ganglia and motor control. Neural Plasticity 10: 107–120.

16.

Guo

Liu

Chen

et al . (2015a) Decreased long- and short-range functional connectivity at rest in drug-naive major depressive disorder. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 50: 763–769.

17.

Guo

Liu

Xue

et al . (2013) Abnormal resting-state cerebellar-cerebral functional connectivity in treatment-resistant depression and treatment sensitive depression. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 44: 51–57.

18.

Guo

Liu

Zhang

et al . (2015b) Increased cerebellar functional connectivity with the default-mode network in unaffected siblings of schizophrenia patients at rest. Schizophrenia Bulletin 41: 1317–1325.

19.

Hafeman

Chang

Garrett

et al . (2012) Effects of medication on neuroimaging findings in bipolar disorder: An updated review. Bipolar Disorder 14: 375–410.

20.

Hallahan

Newell

Soares

et al . (2011) Structural magnetic resonance imaging in bipolar disorder: An international collaborative mega-analysis of individual adult patient data. Biological Psychiatry 69: 326–335.

21.

Hozer

Houenou

(2016) Can neuroimaging disentangle bipolar disorder? Journal of Affective Disorders 195: 199–214.

22.

Khan

Nair

Keown

et al . (2015) Cerebro-cerebellar resting-state functional connectivity in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Biological Psychiatry 78: 625–634.

23.

Konradi

Zimmerman

Yang

et al . (2011) Hippocampal interneurons in bipolar disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry 68: 340–350.

24.

Laidi

d’Albis

Wessa

et al . (2015) Cerebellar volume in schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder with and without psychotic features. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 131: 223–233.

25.

Lezak

Howieson

Loring

(2004) Neuropsychological Assessment, 4th Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

26.

Liberg

Ekman

Sellgren

et al . (2014) Vertex-based morphometry in euthymic bipolar disorder implicates striatal regions involved in psychomotor function. Psychiatry Research 221: 173–178.

27.

Lin

et al . (2015) Neuropsychological performance of patients with soft bipolar spectrum disorders. Bipolar Disorder 17: 194–204.

28.

Bigler

(2000) Performance on original and a Chinese version of trail making test part B: A normative bilingual sample. Applied Neuropsychology 7: 243–246.

29.

Martino

Magioncalda

Huang

et al . (2016) Contrasting variability patterns in the default mode and sensorimotor networks balance in bipolar depression and mania. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113: 4824–4829.

30.

Meda

Ruano

Windemuth

et al . (2014) Multivariate analysis reveals genetic associations of the resting default mode network in psychotic bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111: 2066–2075.

31.

Nelson

(1976) A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex 12: 313–324.

32.

Pfennig

Leopold

Ritter

et al . (2017) Longitudinal changes in the antecedent and early manifest course of bipolar disorder—A narrative review of prospective studies. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 51: 509–523.

33.

Phillips

Hewedi

Eissa

et al . (2015) The cerebellum and psychiatric disorders. Frontiers in Public Health 3: 66.

34.

Redlich

Almeida

Grotegerd

et al . (2014) Brain morphometric biomarkers distinguishing unipolar and bipolar depression. A voxel-based morphometry-pattern classification approach. JAMA Psychiatry 71: 1222–1230.

35.

Roberts

Perry

Lord

et al . (2016) Structural dysconnectivity of key cognitive and emotional hubs in young people at high genetic risk for bipolar disorder. Molecular Psychiatry. Epub ahead of print 20 December. DOI: 10.1038/mp.2016.216.

36.

Roda

Chendo

Kunz

(2015) Biomarkers and staging of bipolar disorder: A systematic review. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy 37: 3–11.

37.

Samudra

Ivleva

Hubbard

et al . (2015) Alterations in hippocampal connectivity across the psychosis dimension. Psychiatry Research 233: 148–157.

38.

Sang

Qin

Liu

et al . (2012) Resting-state functional connectivity of the vermal and hemispheric subregions of the cerebellum with both the cerebral cortical networks and subcortical structures. Neuroimage 61: 1213–1225.

39.

Sani

Chiapponi

Piras

et al . (2016) Gray and white matter trajectories in patients with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorder 18: 52–62.

40.

Schmahmann

(2004) Disorders of the cerebellum: Ataxia, dysmetria of thought, and the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 16: 367–378.

41.

Shakiba

(2014) The role of the cerebellum in neurobiology of psychiatric disorders. Neurologic Clinics 32: 1105–1115.

42.

Smith

Miller

Salimi-Khorshidi

et al . (2011) Network modelling methods for FMRI. Neuroimage 54: 875–891.

43.

Stoodley

Schmahmann

(2010) Evidence for topographic organization in the cerebellum of motor control versus cognitive and affective processing. Cortex 46: 831–844.

44.

Vargas

Lopez-Jaramillo

Vieta

(2013) A systematic literature review of resting state network–functional MRI in bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders 150: 727–735.

45.

Wang

Xia

et al . (2015a) The effects of antidepressant treatment on resting-state functional brain networks in patients with major depressive disorder. Human Brain Mapping 36: 768–778.

46.

Wang

Xia

Lai

et al . (2014) Disrupted resting-state functional connectivity in minimally treated chronic schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 156: 150–156.

47.

Wang

Zhong

Jia

et al . (2015b) Interhemispheric resting state functional connectivity abnormalities in unipolar depression and bipolar depression. Bipolar Disorder 17: 486–495.

48.

Wang

Zhong

Jia

et al . (2016) Disrupted resting-state functional connectivity in nonmedicated bipolar disorder. Radiology 280: 529–536.

49.

Krook-Magnuson

(2015) Cognitive collaborations: Bidirectional functional connectivity between the cerebellum and the hippocampus. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 9: 177.

Altered cerebellar functional connectivity in remitted bipolar disorder: A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Abstract

Objectives:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Introduction

Method

Participants

Neuropsychological assessment

Imaging acquisition

Image preprocessing

Whole-brain functional connectivity analysis

Seed-based functional connectivity analysis

Statistical analysis

Results

Demographic information and neuropsychological performance

Whole-brain functional connectivity analysis

Seed ROI-based functional connectivity analysis

Correlational analysis

Discussion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References