Late-life depression (LLD) is a common emotional and mental disability in the elderly population characterized by the presence of depressed mood, the loss of interest or pleasure in daily activities, and other depression symptoms. It has a serious effect on the quality of life of elderly individuals and increases their risk of developing physical and mental diseases. It is an important area of research, given the growing elderly population. Brain functional connectivity modifications represent one of the neurobiological biomarker for LLD even if to date remains poorly understood. In our study, we enrolled 10 elderly patients with depressive symptoms compared to 11 age-matched healthy controls. All participants were evaluated by means of neuropsychological tests and underwent the same functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) protocol to evaluate modifications of brain resting state functional connectivity. Between-group differences were observed for the Geriatric Depression Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, with higher scores for patients with LLD. Voxel-wise, 1-way analysis of variance revealed between-group differences in left frontoparietal network (lFPN) and sensory motor network (SMN): Increased intrinsic connectivity in the LLD group was observed in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and in the left superior parietal lobule of the lFPN and increased intrinsic connectivity in the LLD group was observed in the bilateral primary somatosensory cortex of the SMN. Our findings support the use of resting state fMRI as a potential biomarker for LLD; even if to confirm the relationship between brain changes and the pathophysiology of LLD, longitudinal neuroimaging studies are required.
KoenigAMBhallaRKButtersMA. Cognitive functioning and late-life depression. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014;20(5):461–467. doi:10.1017/S1355617714000198.
2.
KortenNCPenninxBWKokRM. Heterogeneity of late-life depression: relationship with cognitive functioning. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014;26(6):953–963. doi:10.1017/S1041610214000155.
3.
MirzaZKamalMABuzenadahAMAl-QahtaniMHKarimS. Establishing genomic/transcriptomic links between Alzheimer’s disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus by meta-analysis approach. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2014;13(3):501–516.
4.
AzizRSteffensDC. What are the causes of late-life depression?Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2013;36(4):497–516. doi:10.1016/j.psc.2013.08.001.
5.
TadayonnejadRAjiloreO. Brain network dysfunction in late-life depression: a literature review. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2014;27(1):5–12. doi:10.1177/0891988713516539.
6.
AllanCLZsoldosEEbmeierKP. Imaging and neurobiological changes in late-life depression. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2014;75(1):25–30. Review.
7.
KerestesRDaveyCGStephanoKWhittleSHarrisonBJ. Functional brain imaging studies of youth depression: a systematic review. Neuroimage Clin. 2013;4:209–231. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.11.009. Review.
8.
CabralJKringelbachMLDecoG. Exploring the network dynamics underlying brain activity during rest. Prog Neurobiol. 2014;114:102–131. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.12.005. Review.
9.
DamoiseauxJSRomboutsSABarkhofF. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(37):13848–53.
10.
DecoGJirsaVKMcIntoshAR. Resting brains never rest: computational insights into potential cognitive architectures. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36(5):268–274. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2013.03.001.
11.
AlexopoulosGSHoptmanMJKanellopoulosDMurphyCFLimKOGunningFM. Functional connectivity in the cognitive control network and the default mode network in late-life depression. Affect Disord. 2012;139(1):56–65. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.12.002.
12.
BroydSJDemanueleCDebenerSHelpsSKJamesCJSonuga-BarkeEJ. Default-mode brain dysfunction in mental disorders: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009;33(3):279–296. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.002. Review.
13.
ShelineYIBarchDMPriceJL. The default mode network and self-referential processes in depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(6):1942–1947. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812686106.
14.
Whitfield-GabrieliSFordJM. Default mode network activity and connectivity in psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8:49–76. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143049.
15.
BarkhofFHallerSRomboutsSA. Resting-state functional MR imaging: a new window to the brain. Radiology. 2014;272(1):29–49. doi:10.1148/radiol.14132388. Review.
16.
RaichleMESnyderAZ. A default mode of brain function: a brief history of an evolving idea. Neuroimage. 2007;37(4):1083–1090. Review.
17.
NejadABFossatiPLemogneC. Self-referential processing, rumination, and cortical midline structures in major depression. Front Hum Neurosci, 2013;7:666. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00666. Review.
18.
LaiCHWuYT. Decreased inter-hemispheric connectivity in anterior sub-network of default mode network and cerebellum: significant findings in major depressive disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;17(12):1935–1942. doi:10.1017/S1461145714000947.
19.
SundermannBOlde Lütke BeverborgMPfleidererB. Toward literature-based feature selection for diagnostic classification: a meta-analysis of resting-state fMRI in depression. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:692. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00692.
20.
YesavageJABrinkTLRoseTL. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982;17(1):37–49.
21.
HamiltonM. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1967;6(4):278–296.
22.
FolsteinMFFolsteinSEMcHughPR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.
23.
McKeownMJSejnowskiTJ. Independent component analysis of fMRI data: examining the assumptions. Hum Brain Mapp. 1998;6(5-6):368–372.
24.
HyvärinenA. Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1999;10(3):626–634. doi:10.1109/72.761722.
25.
MantiniDPerrucciMGDel GrattaCRomaniGLCorbettaM. Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(32):13170–13175.
26.
LiaoWChenHFengY. Selective aberrant functional connectivity of resting state networks in social anxiety disorder. Neuroimage. 2010;52(4):1549–1558. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.010
27.
De MartinoFGentileFEspositoF. Classification of fMRI independent components using IC-fingerprints and support vector machine classifiers. Neuroimage. 2007;34(1):177–194.
28.
EspositoFScarabinoTHyvarinenA. Independent component analysis of fMRI group studies by self-organizing clustering. Neuroimage. 2005;25(1):193–205.
29.
FazekasFChawlukJBAlaviAHurtigHIZimmermanRA. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer’s dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149(2): 351–356. doi:10.2214/ajr.149.2.351
30.
Van den HeuvelMPHulshoff PolHE. Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;20(8):519–534. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.03.008.
31.
BohrIJKennyEBlamireA. Resting-state functional connectivity in late-life depression: higher global connectivity and more long distance connections. Front Psychiatry. 2013;3:116. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00116.
32.
MackinRSNelsonJCDelucchiKL. Association of age at depression onset with cognitive functioning in individuals with late-life depression and executive dysfunction. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;22(12):1633–1641. doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2014.02.006
33.
KennyERO’BrienJTCousinsDA. Functional connectivity in late-life depression using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;18(7):643–651. doi:10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181cabd0e.
34.
SextonCEAllanCLLe MasurierM. Magnetic resonance imaging in late-life depression: multimodal examination of network disruption. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(7):680–689. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1862.
35.
LiuCMaXWuX. Resting-state abnormal baseline brain activity in unipolar and bipolar depression. Neurosci. Lett. 2012;516(2):202–206.
36.
KorgaonkarMSCooperNJWilliamsLMGrieveSM. Mapping inter-regional connectivity of the entire cortex to characterize major depressive disorder: a whole-brain diffusion tensor imaging tractography study. Neuroreport. 2012;23(9):566–571.
37.
SchedlbauerAMCoparaMSWatrousAJEkstromAD. Multiple interacting brain areas underlie successful spatiotemporal memory retrieval in humans. Sci Rep. 2014;4:6431. doi:10.1038/srep06431.
38.
LeechRKamouriehSBeckmannCSharpD. Fractionating the default mode network: distinct contributions of the ventral and dorsal posterior cingulate cortex to cognitive control. J Neurosci. 2011;31(9):3217–3224.
39.
SchilbachLHoffstaedterFMüllerV. Transdiagnostic commonalities and differences in resting state functional connectivity of the default mode network in schizophrenia and major depression. Neuroimage Clin. 2015;10:326–335. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.11.021. eCollection 2016.
40.
PardoJVFoxPTRaichleME. Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Nature. 1991;349(6304):61–64.
41.
PosnerMIWalkerJAFriedrichFJRafalRD. Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. J Neurosci. 1984;4(7):1863–1874.
42.
WolpertDMMiallRCKawatoM. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn Sci. 1998;2(9):338–47.
43.
FelicianORomaiguèrePAntonJL. The role of human left superior parietal lobule in body part localization. Ann Neurol. 2004;55(5):749–751. doi:10.1002/ana.20109.
44.
SchoreAN. Attachment and the regulation of the right brain. Attach Hum Dev. 2000;2(1): 23–47. doi:10.1080/146167300361309.
45.
SchoreAN. Relational trauma and the developing right brain. An interface of psychoanalytic self psychology and neuroscience. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1159:189–203. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04474.x.
46.
KooBBSchettlerSPMurrayDE. Age-related effects on cortical thickness patterns of the Rhesus monkey brain. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(1):200.e23–e31. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.07.010.
47.
WebbSJMonkCSNelsonCA. Mechanisms of postnatal neurobiological development: implications for human development. Dev Neuropsychol. 2001;19(2):147–171.
48.
RazNGunningFMHeadD. Selective aging of the human cerebral cortex observed in vivo: differential vulnerability of the prefrontal gray matter. Cereb Cortex. 1997;7(3):268–282.
49.
GoodCDJohnsrudeIAshburnerJHensonRNFristonKJFrackowiakRS. Cerebral asymmetry and the effects of sex and handedness on brain structure: a voxel-based morphometric analysis of 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage. 2001;14(3):685–700.
50.
RussMOMackWGramaCR. Enactment effect in memory: evidence concerning the function of the supramarginal gyrus. Exp Brain Res. 2003;149(4):497–504.
51.
LiangFJiaJWangSQinWLiuG. Decreased plasma levels of soluble low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 (sLRP) and the soluble form of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) in the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20(3):357–361. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2012.06.005.
52.
EspositoRMoscaAPieramicoVCieriFCeraNSensiSL. Characterization of resting state activity in MCI individuals. PeerJ. 2013;1:e135. doi:10.7717/peerj.135.
FjellAMMcEvoyLHollandD. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative. brain changes in older adults at very low risk for Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2013;33(19):8237–8242. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5506-12.2013.
55.
AlexanderGEBergfieldKLChenK. Gray matter network associated with risk for Alzheimer’s disease in young to middle-aged adults. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(12):2723–32. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.01.014.
56.
GulbinaiteRvan RijnHCohenMX. Fronto-parietal network oscillations reveal relationship between working memory capacity and cognitive control. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:761. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00761.
57.
WeiMQinJYanRLiHYaoZLuQ. Identifying major depressive disorder using Hurst exponent of resting-state brain networks. Psychiatry Res. 2013;214(3):306–12. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
58.
BeckAT. The evolution of the cognitive model of depression and its neurobiological correlates. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(8):969–77.
59.
BuchananAWangXGollanJK. Resting-state functional connectivity in women with major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2014;59:38–44. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.09.002.
60.
BaeJNMacFallJRKrishnanKRPayneMESteffensDCTaylorWD. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex white matter alterations in late-life depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;60(12):1356–1363.
61.
DavidsonRJPizzagalliDNitschkeJBPutnamK. Depression: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:545–574. Review.
62.
FrodlTScheuereckerJAlbrechtJ. Neuronal correlates of emotional processing in patients with major depression. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2009;10(3):202–208.
63.
KennedyDPCourchesneE. Functional abnormalities of the default network during self- and other-reflection in autism. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008;3(2):177–90. doi:10.1093/scan/nsn011.
64.
ZengLLShenHLiuL. Identifying major depression using whole-brain functional connectivity: a multivariate pattern analysis. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 5):1498–1507. doi:10.1093/brain/aws059.
65.
NaismithSLNorrieLMMowszowskiLHickieIB. The neurobiology of depression in later-life: clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging and pathophysiological features. Prog Neurobiol. 2012;98(1):99–143. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.05.009.
66.
AizensteinHJButtersMAWuM. Altered functioning of the executive control circuit in late-life depression: episodic and persistent phenomena. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;17(1):30–42. doi:10.1097/JGP.0b013e31817b60af.
67.
KoenigsMGrafmanJ. The functional neuroanatomy of depression: distinct roles for ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Behav Brain Res. 2009;201(2):239–43. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.03.004.
FoxMDLiuHPascual-LeoneA. Identification of reproducible individualized targets for treatment of depression with TMS based on intrinsic connectivity. Neuroimage. 2013;66:151–160. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.082.
70.
LemogneCMaybergHBergouignanL. Self-referential processing and the prefrontal cortex over the course of depression: a pilot study. J Affect Disord. 2010;124(1-2):196–201. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.003.
71.
WagnerGKochKSchachtzabelC. Self-referential processing influences functional activation during cognitive control: an fMRI study. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013;8(7):828–837. doi:10.1093/scan/nss074.
72.
CorbettaMShulmanGL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3(3):201–215.
73.
PessoaL. On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci2008;9(2):148–158. doi:10.1038/nrn2317.
74.
KastnerSUngerleiderLG. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:315–341. Review. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.315.
75.
FusterJMAlexanderGE. Neuron activity related to short-term memory. Science. 1971;173(3997):652–654.
76.
BushGLuuPPosnerMI. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000;4(6):215–222.
77.
BohrIJKennyEBlamireA. Resting-state functional connectivity in late-life depression: higher global connectivity and more long distance connections. Front Psychiatry. 2013;3:116. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00116.
