Research has identified differences in partisan communication styles, cognitive processing, values, and cultures. This article assesses if there are also differences in how Democrats and Republicans conceive of electoral participation. We submitted 1,730 open-ended responses from a 2016 survey prompt soliciting thoughts and feelings about voting to computerized content analysis. Findings show that Republicans employed more confident and less negative language than Democrats in their responses. Additionally, a close read of the Republican statements reveals how they expressed that their electoral participation matters. Our conclusion addresses how the traditional ideals often associated with the Grand Old Party may make them a more duty-based constituency valuing voting more than their less conservative peers.
BaumerD. C.GoldH. J. (1995). Party images and the American electorate. American Politics Quarterly, 23, 33-61.
3.
BennettW. L.SegerbergA. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BenoitW. (1999). Acclaiming, attacking, and defending in presidential nominating acceptance addresses, 1960-1996. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 85, 247-267.
5.
BenoitW. (2004). Political party affiliation and presidential campaign discourse. Communication Quarterly, 52, 81-97.
6.
BoneH. A.RanneyA. (1971). Politics and voters (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
7.
CampbellA.ConverseP.MillerW.StokesD. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: Wiley.
8.
CarneyD. R.JostJ. T.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807-840.
9.
CreweI. (1981). Electoral participation. In ButlerD.PennimanH. R.RanneyA. (Eds.), Democracy at the polls: A comparative study of competitive national elections (pp. 216-263). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
10.
CriglerA.JustM. R.McCafferyE. J. (2004). Rethinking the vote. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
DaltonR. (2008). The good citizen: How a younger generation is reshaping American politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
12.
DudleyR.ShiraevE. (2008). Counting every vote: The most contentious elections in American history. Washington, DC: Potomac Books.
13.
FreemanJ. (1986). The political culture of the Democratic and Republican parties. Political Science Quarterly, 101, 327-356.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyC. M.DowlingS. E. (2012). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104, 111-133.
16.
GershtensonJ. (2007). Primaries, parties, and candidate positioning in US Senate elections. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 17, 165-179.
17.
GrabeM. E.MyrickJ. G. (2016). Informed citizenship in a media-centric way of life. Journal of Communication, 66, 215-235.
18.
GrossmanM.HopkinsD. A. (2015). Ideological Republicans and group interest Democrats: The asymmetry of American party politics. Perspectives on Politics, 13, 119-139.
19.
GrossmanM.HopkinsD. A. (2016). Asymmetric politics: Ideological Republicans and group interest Democrats. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
HartR. P. (2000). Campaign talk: Why elections are good for us. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
HersheyM. (1992). The constructed explanation: Interpreting election results in the 1984 presidential race. Journal of Politics, 54, 943-976.
22.
HuntingtonS. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
JarvisS. E. (2004). Partisan patterns in presidential campaign speeches, 1948-2000. Communication Quarterly, 52, 403-419.
24.
JarvisS. E. (2005). The talk of the party: Political labels, symbolic capital, and American life. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
25.
JarvisS. E.BarberenaL.DavisS. (2007). Civics, not government: Redirecting social studies in the nation’s schools (Report prepared for and funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation). Retrieved from http://www.cms-ca.org/civics_not_government.pdf
26.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
27.
JostJ. T.KivetzY.RubiniM.GuermandiG.MossoC. (2005). System-justifying functions of complementary regional and ethnic stereotypes: Cross-national evidence. Social Justice Research, 18, 305-333.
28.
JostJ. T.NapierJ. L.ThorisdottirH.GoslingS. D.PalfaiT. P.OstafinB. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity?Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989-1007.
29.
JostJ. T.NosekB. A.GoslingS. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126-136.
30.
KatzR. S. (1997). Democracy and elections. New York, NY: Oxford.
31.
KeyV. O. (1966). The responsible electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
LakoffG. (2016). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
MacedoS.Alex-AssensohY.BerryJ. M.BrintnallM.CampbellD. E.Luis Ricardo FragaL. R.. . . GalstonW. A. (2005). Democracy at risk: How political choices undermine citizen participation and what we can do about it. Washington, DC: Brookings.
34.
MannT. E.OrnsteinN. J. (2012). It’s even worse than it looks: How the American constitutional system collided with the new politics of extremism. New York, NY: Basic Books.
35.
MatthewsM.LevinS.SidaniusJ. (2009). A longitudinal test of the model of political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Political Psychology, 30, 921-936.
36.
McRaeR. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323-337.
37.
MondakJ. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
38.
MondakJ. J.HalperinK. D. (2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 335-362.
39.
MorrisM. W.CarranzaE.FoxC. R. (2008). Mistaken identity: Activating conservative political identities induces “conservative” financial decisions. Psychological Science, 19, 1154-1160.
40.
NapierJ. L.JostJ. T. (2008).Why are conservatives happier than liberals?Psychological Science, 19, 565-572.
41.
NorrisP. (2002). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42.
PennebakerJ. W.BoothR. J.BoydR. L.FrancisM. E. (2015). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2015. Austin, TX: Pennebaker Conglomerates.
43.
PennebakerJ. W.MehlM. R.NiederhofferK. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves.Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547-577.
44.
PomperG. M. (1968). Elections in America. New York, NY: Dodd, Mead.
45.
ShenkmanR. (2008). Just how stupid are we? Facing the truth about the American voter. New York, NY: Basic Books.
46.
SkitkaL. J.TetlockP. E. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1205-1223.
47.
SkocpolT.WilliamsonV. (2013). The Tea Party and the remaking of Republican conservatism. New York, NY: Oxford.
48.
SlachterR. B.ChungC. K.PennebakerJ. W.StoneL. D. (2007). Winning words: Individual differences among U.S. presidential and vice presidential candidates. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 63-75.
49.
TetlockP. E. (1983). Cognitive style and political ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 118-126.
50.
TetlockP. E.HannumK. A.MichelettiP. M. (1984). Stability and change in the complexity of senatorial debate: Testing the cognitive versus rhetorical style hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 979-990.
51.
van der ToornJ.NailP. R.LiviatanI.JostJ. T. (2014). My country, right or wrong: Does activating justification motivation eliminate the liberal-conservative gap in patriotism?Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 50-60.
WeaverR. M. (1953). The ethics of rhetoric. Chicago, IL: Regnery.
54.
WilsonD. C.BrewerP. (2013). The foundations of public opinion on voter ID laws: Political predispositions, racial resentment, and informational effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77, 962-984.
55.
ZukinC.KeeterS.AndolinaM.JenkinsK.Delli CarpiniM. (2005). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. New York, NY: Oxford.
