This study empirically tests whether people invoke moral and prudential rationales when evaluating behavior in a novel context—the early months of the Covid-19 pandemic in the United States—and whether those rationales are associated with their support for a norm. We use data from two online vignette experiments that describe key health behaviors—staying home and masking—and find substantial support. Given the politicization of these behaviors in the U.S. context, we also explore the role of political orientation and find that liberal participants react more strongly to the behaviors.
CalvilloDustin P.RossBryan J.GarciaRyan J. B.SmelterThomas J.RutchickAbraham M.2020. “Political Ideology Predicts Perceptions of the Threats of COVID-19 (and Susceptibility to Fake News about It).”Social Psychological and Personality Science11(8):1119–28.
CialdiniRobert B.2007. “Descriptive Norms as Underappreciated Sources of Social Control.”Psychometrika72(2):263–68.
8.
ColemanJames S.1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
9.
CookKaren Schweers. 2005. “Networks, Norms, and Trust: The Social Psychology of Social Capital.”Social Psychology Quarterly68(1):4–14.
10.
CorrellShelley J.BenardStephenPaikIn. 2007. “Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?”American Journal of Sociology112(5):1297–338.
11.
CowanSarah K.2014. “Secrets and Misperceptions: The Creation of Self-Fulfilling Illusions.”Sociological Science1:466–92.
12.
CowanSarah K.BaldassarriDelia. 2018. “‘It Could Turn Ugly’: Selective Disclosure of Attitudes in Political Discussion Networks.”Social Networks52:1–17.
13.
DésiletsÉliseBrissonBenoitHétuSébastien. 2020. “Sensitivity to Social Norm Violation Is Related to Political Orientation.”PLOS ONE15(12):e0242996. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.024996.
FeinbergMatthewWillerRobbSchultzMichael. 2014. “Gossip and Ostracism Promote Cooperation in Groups.”Psychological Science25(3):656–64.
16.
FiskeSusan T.CuddyAmy J. C.GlickPeter. 2006. “Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence.”Trends in Cognitive Science11(2):77–83.
17.
GrahamJesseHaidtJonathanNosekBrian A.2009. “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.’’Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96(5):1029–46.
18.
GrayKurtScheinChelseaWardAdrian F.2014. “The Myth of Harmless Wrongs in Moral Cognition: Automatic Dyadic Completion from Sin to Suffering.”Journal of Experimental Psychology143(4):1600–15.
HeckathornDouglas D.1989. “Collective Action and the Second-Order Free-Rider Problem.”Rationality and Society1(1):78–100.
22.
HorneChristine. 2001a. “The Enforcement of Norms: Group Cohesion and Metanorms.”Social Psychology Quarterly64(3):253–66.
23.
HorneChristine. 2001b. Sociological Perspectives on the Emergence of Social Norms. Pp. 3–34 in Social Norms, edited by HechterM.OppK.-D.New York, NY: Russell Sage.
24.
HorneChristineDodooNaa DoduaDodooF. Nii-Amoo. 2018. “The Conditionality of Norms: The Case of Bridewealth.”Social Psychology Quarterly81(4):319–39.
25.
HorneChristineJohnsonMonica Kirkpatrick. 2021. “Testing an Integrated Theory: Distancing Norms in the Early Months of Covid-19.”Sociological Perspectives64(5):970–87.
26.
HorneChristineMollbornStefanie. 2020. “Norms: An Integrated Framework.”Annual Review of Sociology46:467–87.
27.
HorneChristinePrzepiorkaWojtek. 2021. “Technology Use and Norm Change in Online Privacy: Experimental Evidence from Vignette Studies.”Information, Communication, and Society24(9):1212–28. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2019.1684542.
MasonLilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
McAdamsRichard. 2015. The Expressive Power of Law. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
MerkleyEricSteculaDominic A.2021. “Party Cues in the News: Democratic Elites, Republican Backlash, and the Dynamics of Climate Skepticism.”British Journal of Political Science51(4):1439–56. doi:10.1017/S0007123420000113.
35.
MertonRobert K.1968. “Continuities to the Theory of Reference Groups and Social Structure.” Pp. 335–440 in Social Theory and Social Structure, edited by MertonR. K.New York, NY: Free Press.
36.
MollbornStefanie. 2017. Mixed Messages: Norms and Social Control around Teen Sex and Pregnancy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
MollbornStefanieSennottChristie. 2015. “Bundles of Norms about Teen Sex and Pregnancy.”Qualitative Health Research25(9):1283–99.
OppKarl-Dieter. 2004. “‘What Is IS Always Becoming What Ought to Be.’ How Political Action Generates a Participation Norm.”European Sociological Review20:13–29.
40.
PalanS.SchitterC.2018. “Prolific.ac – A Subject Pool for Online Experiments.”Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance17:22–27.
41.
PaluckElizabeth LevyShepherdHanaAronowPeter. 2016. “Changing Climates of Conflict: A Social Network Experiment in 56 Schools.”PNAS113(3):566–71.
PeerEyalBrandimarteLauraSamatSonamAcquistiAlessandro. 2017. “Beyond the Turk: Alternative Platforms for Crowdsourcing Behavioral Research.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology70:153–63.
44.
PhillipsAdamTaylorBarbara. 2010. On Kindness. London: Picador.
45.
SaxenaDhirendra Prakash. 1971. “The ‘Reference Group’ Concept.”Social Science46(3):155–64.
46.
SchellingThomas. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York, NY: WW Norton.
47.
ScheinChelseaGrayKurt. 2015. “The Unifying Moral Dyad: Liberals and Conservatives Share the Same Harm-Based Moral Template.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin41(8):1147–63.
48.
ScheinChelseaGrayKurt. 2018. “The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm.”Personality and Social Psychology Review22(1):32–70.
49.
ShankDaniel B.KashimaYoshihisaPetersKimLiYangRobinsGarryKirleyMichael. 2019. “Norm Talk and Human Cooperation: Can We Talk Ourselves into Cooperation?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology117(1):99–123.
50.
SorokinPitirim A.1968. Man and Society in Calamity. New York, NY: E.P. Dutton.
WojciskeB.KlusekB.1996. “Moral and Competence Related Traits in Political Perception.”Polish Psychological Bulletin27:319–24.
59.
WojciszkeB.1994. “Multiple Meanings of Behavior: Construing Actions in Terms of Competence or Morality.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67:222–32.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
