The debate concerning the secularism of the state always returns to the regulation of certain issues, such as same-sex marriage or embryonic stem cell research. In this study, we analysed the effects of political orientation, Catholic identity, and religious orientations (extrinsic, intrinsic, and quest) on the desire to have a secular state. Participants were 209 Italians who completed a questionnaire containing measures of the investigated constructs. The results showed that secularism of the state is negatively correlated with Catholic identity, extrinsic and intrinsic orientation, and right-wing political orientation, and is positively correlated with quest orientation. Moreover, the application of dominance analysis showed that intrinsic orientation dominates all other variables.
AbramsD.MarquesJ. M.BownN., & HensonM. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 906–912.
2.
AllportG. W. (1950). The individual and his religion: A psychological interpretation.New York: Macmillan.
3.
AllportG. W., & RossJ. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443.
4.
AltemeyerB. (2003). Why do religious fundamentalists tend to be prejudiced?International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 13(1), 17–28.
5.
AltemeyerB., & HunsbergerB. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133.
6.
AzenR., & BudescuD. V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 8(2), 129–148.
7.
BatsonD. C.DentonD. M., & VollmeckeJ. T. (2008). Quest religion, anti-fundamentalism, and limited versus universal compassion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47(1), 135–145.
8.
BatsonC. D.EidelmanS. H.HigleyS. L., & RussellS. A. (2001). “And who is my neighbor?” II: Quest religion as a source of universal compassion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(1), 39–50.
9.
BatsonC. D.FlinkC. H.SchoenradeP. A.FultzJ., & PychV. (1986). Religious orientation and overt versus covert racial prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 175–181.
10.
BatsonC. D.NaifehS. J., & PateS. (1978). Social desirability, religious orientation, and racial prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 17(1), 31–41.
11.
BatsonC. D.SchoenradeP., & VentisW. L. (1993). Religion and the individual.New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
BatsonC. D., & VentisW. L. (1982). The religious experience: A social-psychological perspective.New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.
14.
BentlerP. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual.Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
15.
BosettiG. L.VociA., & PagottoL. (2011). Religiosity, the sinner, and the sin: Different patterns of prejudice toward homosexuals and homosexuality. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 18(3), 157–170.
16.
BranscombeN. R.EllemersN.SpearsR., & DoosjeB. (1999). The context and content of social identity threats. In EllemersN.SpearsR., & DoosjeB. (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Oxford: Blackwell.
17.
BrownR., & CapozzaD. (Eds.) (2006). Social identities: Motivational, emotional, cultural influences.Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
18.
BudescuD. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 542–551.
19.
CSES (2011). Comparative Study of Electoral System. Retrieved from http://www.cses.org.
20.
DeFronzoJ. (1972). Religion and humanitarianism in Eysenck's T dimension and left-right political orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(3), 265–269.
Di NuovoS.HichyZ., & PirroneC. (2009). Comparing different strategies for data analysis. Applications to the search for personality correlates of life satisfaction. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 16, 193–207.
23.
DuckR. J., & HunsbergerB. (1999). Religious orientation and prejudice: The role of religious proscription, right-wing authoritarianism, and social desirability. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9(3), 157–179.
24.
EllemersM.SpearsR., & DoosjeB. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 161–186.
FeldmanN. (2005). Divided by God.New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
27.
GoldfriedJ., & MinerM. (2002). Quest religion and the problem of limited compassion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 685–695.
28.
HallD. L.MatzD. C., & WoodW. (2010). Why don't we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 126–139.
29.
HerekG. M. (1987). Religious orientation and prejudice: A comparison of racial and sexual attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13(1), 34–44.
30.
HichyZ.CoenS.Di MarcoG., & Halim Helmy GergesM. (2013). Outgroup evaluation, religious identity, and acculturation orientations of the Coptic minority in Egypt. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 491–495.
31.
HichyZ.MariS., & CapozzaD. (2008). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviants: A test of the subjective group dynamics model. Journal of Social Psychology, 148(5), 641–644.
32.
HichyZ.Rodriguez EspartalN.TrifilettiE., & Di BernardoG. A. (2012). The “secularism of state” scale. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 19(3), 151–163.
33.
HillsP.FrancisL. J., & RobbinsM. (2005). The development of the Revised Religious Life Inventory (RLI-R) by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(6), 1389–1399.
34.
HoggM. A. (1996). Intragroup processes, group structure and social identity. In RobinsonW. P. (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 65–93). Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann.
35.
HoggM. A., & AbramsD. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes.London: Routledge.
36.
HuL., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
37.
HunsbergerB. (1995). Religion and prejudice: The role of religious fundamentalism, quest, and right-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 51(2), 113–129.
38.
HunsbergerB., & JacksonL. M. (2005). Religion, meaning, and prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 61(4), 807–826.
JacksonL. M., & HunsbergerB. (1999). An intergroup perspective on religion and prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(4), 509–523.
41.
JöreskogK. G., & SörbomD. (2004). LISREL 8.7 for Windows [Computer Software].Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
42.
KlineR. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York: Guilford Press.
43.
KosminB. A. (2007). Contemporary secularity and secularism. In KosminB. A., & KeysarA. (Eds.), Secularism and secularity (pp. 1–13). Hartford, CT: ISSSC.
44.
McFarlandS. G., & WarrenJ. C. (1992). Religious orientations and selective exposure among fundamentalist Christians. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31(2), 163–174.
45.
NorrisP., & InglehartR. (2004). Sacred and secular.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
PostmesT., & JettenJ. (Eds.) (2006). Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity.London: SAGE.
47.
RaschkeV. (1973). Dogmatism and committed consensual religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 12, 399–344.
48.
TajfelH. (1978). Differentiation between social groups.London: Academic Press.
49.
TajfelH., & TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G., & WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
50.
TajfelH., & TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In WorchelS., & AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
51.
ThompsonA. D. (1974). Open-mindedness and indiscrimination antireligious orientation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 13, 471–477.
52.
TrifilettiE.DazziC.HichyZ., & CapozzaD. (2007). A validation of HCAS: The Host Community Acculturation Scale. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 14(3-4), 1–15.
53.
Van VugtM., & De CremerD. (1999). Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 587–599.
54.
World Values Survey Association (2009). World Values Survey 2005 Official Data File v.20090901.Aggregate File Producer: ASEP/JDS, Madrid. Retrieved from www.worldvaluessurvey.org.
