Research by Graham and Haidt (2010) suggests that beliefs, rituals, and other social aspects of religion establish moral communities. As such, they suggest religion is most strongly associated with the group-focused “binding” moral foundations of ingroup/loyalty, authority/respect, and purity/sanctity. Two studies tested this hypothesis, investigating the role of political orientation in these relationships. These studies supported our hypothesis that general religiosity is positively associated with each of the group-focused moral foundations, even when controlling for the role of political orientation. Further, we find religious and political orientations interact such that low-religious political liberals are least likely to endorse group-focused moral intuitions. Results are discussed in a moral foundations framework and consider the role of religiosity's association with political orientation and group-focused moral foundations.
AtranS. (2006). The cognitive and evolutionary roots of religion. In McNamaraP. (Ed.), Where God and science meet: How brain and evolutionary studies alter our understanding of religion (Vols. 1-3, Vol. 1, pp. 194–220). Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
2.
BatsonC. D. (1983). Sociobiology and the role of religion in promoting prosocial behavior: An alternative view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(6), 1380–1385.
3.
BehrendT. S.SharekD. J.MeadeA. W., & WiebeE. N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 800–813. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0.
4.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT., & GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980.
5.
CohenA. B. (2011). Religion and culture. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 4(4), 8.
6.
CohenA. B.HallD. E.KoenigH. G., & MeadorK. G. (2005). Social versus individual motivation: Implications for normative definitions of religious orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 48–61.
7.
DavisD. E.DooleyM. T.HookJ. N.ChoeE., & McElroyS. E. (2017). The purity/sanctity subscale of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire does not work similarly for religious versus non-religious individuals. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9, 124–130.
8.
GalenL. W. (2012). Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 876.
9.
GrahamJ., & HaidtJ. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 140–150. doi: 10.1177/1088868309353415.
10.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ., & NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.
11.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS., & DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. doi: 10.1037/a0021847.
12.
HaidtJ. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002.
HaidtJ., & GrahamJ. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice, 20(1), 98–116.
15.
HallD. L.MatzD. C., & WoodW. (2010). Why don't we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 126–139. doi: 10.1177/1088868309352179.
16.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach.New York: Guilford.
17.
HillE. D.CohenA. B.TerrellH. K., & NagoshiC. T. (2010). The role of social cognition in the religious fundamentalism-prejudice relationship. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(4), 724–739. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01542.x.
18.
IyerR.KolevaS.GrahamJ.DittoP., & HaidtJ. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e42366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042366.
19.
IronsW. (2001). Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In NesseR. M. (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 290–309). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
JohnsonK. A.HookJ. N.DavisD. E.Van TongerenD. R.SandageS. J., & CrabtreeS. A. (2016). Moral foundation priorities reflect U.S. Christians’ individual differences in religiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 56–61.
21.
JohnsonM. K.LaBouffJ. P.RowattW. C.Patock-PeckhamJ. A., & CarlisleR. D. (2012). Facets of right-wing authoritarianism mediate the relationship between religious fundamentalism and attitudes toward Arabs and African Americans. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(1), 128–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01622.x.
22.
JohnsonM. K.RowattW. C.Barnard-BrakL. M.Patock-PeckhamJ. A.LaBouffJ. P., & CarlisleR. D. (2011). A mediational analysis of the role of right-wing authoritarianism and religious fundamentalism in the religiosity–prejudice link. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 851–856. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.010.
23.
JohnsonM. K.RowattW. C., & LaBouffJ. P. (2012). Religiosity and prejudice revisited: In-group favoritism, out-group derogation, or both?Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(2), 154–168. doi: 10.1037/a0025107.
24.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W., & SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.
25.
JostJ. T.HawkinsC. B.NosekB. A.HennesE. P.SternC.GoslingS. D., & GrahamJ. (2013). Belief in a just god (and a just society): A system justification perspective on religious ideology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34, 56–81. doi: 10.1037/a0033220.
26.
LaBouffJ. P.RowattW. C.JohnsonM. K., & FinkleC. (2012). Differences in attitudes toward outgroups in religious and nonreligious contexts in a multinational sample: A situational context priming study. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22(1), 1–9.
27.
MasonW., & SuriS. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 1–23. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6.
28.
MavorK. I.MacleodC. J.BoalM. J., & LouisW. R. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism, fundamentalism and prejudice revisited: Removing suppression and statistical artefact. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(5-6), 592–597.
PaolacciG., & ChandlerJ. (2014). Inside the turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 184–188. doi: 10.1177/0963721414531598.
31.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M., & MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763.
32.
PreacherK. J., & HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple Mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instrucments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.
33.
PreacherK. J., & HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
34.
Randolph-SengB., & NielsenM. E. (2007). Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17(4), 303–315.
35.
RappaportR. A. (1999). Ritual and religion in the making of humanity.New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
RowattW. C.LaBouffJ.JohnsonM.FroeseP., & TsangJ.-A. (2009). Associations among religiousness, social attitudes, and prejudice in a national random sample of American adults. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1(1), 14–24. doi: 10.1037/a0014989.
37.
RushB. (1806). Essays: Literary, Moral and Philosophical.Whitefish, Montana: Kessinger Publishing.
38.
SaroglouV. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320–1340.
39.
SaroglouV. (2013). Religion, spirituality, and altruism. APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion and Spirituality, 1, 439–457.
40.
SaroglouV., & CohenA. B. (2013). Cultural and cross-cultural psychology of religion. Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 2, 330–356.
41.
ShariffA. F. (2015). Does religion increase moral behavior?Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 108–113.
42.
ShariffA. F., & NorenzayanA. (2007). God is watching you. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803–809.
43.
ShariffA. F.PiazzaJ., & KramerS. R. (2014). Morality and the religious mind: Why theists and nontheists differ. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 439–441.
44.
TabachnickB. G., & FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics sixth edition.Boston, MA: Pearson.
45.
Van CappellenP.CorneilleO.ColsS., & SaroglouV. (2011). Beyond mere compliance to authoritative figures: Religious priming increases conformity to informational influence among submissive people. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21, 97–105.
